Putting rumours to bed permanently

What a silly post. Bring on the new season where we can talk football (hopefully).

Honestly , trying to have a sensible debate on this board is increasingly becoming as frustrating as trying to knit fog.

Then stay away Keith.

I see you have stirred a hornets nest on Mikes board now with their complimentaries for Carl.Well done.

And stay away is what I will do from now on as to try and get some people to read things and understand them is a waste of time on here. An example in this very thread is Damned Yank who made a claim that I said something in another thread , posted a link to that thread which clearly shows that I had said no such thing , yet still refers to it as me being "found out". He either didn`t read his own post attachment , didn`t understand it , or did and is just mischief making.
And the "usual suspects" then just blindly follow without even bothering to read and understand what was actually said for themselves.

I haven`t been on Mike`s board for a while and certainly haven`t posted anything about Carl on there, but will visit it soon as I am interested to see what they are giving Carl for free with the "complimentaries" you are referring to

Bye

Honestly , trying to have a sensible debate on this board is increasingly becoming as frustrating as trying to knit fog.

Then stay away Keith.

I see you have stirred a hornets nest on Mikes board now with their complimentaries for Carl.Well done.

And stay away is what I will do from now on as to try and get some people to read things and understand them is a waste of time on here. An example in this very thread is Damned Yank who made a claim that I said something in another thread , posted a link to that thread which clearly shows that I had said no such thing , yet still refers to it as me being "found out". He either didn`t read his own post attachment , didn`t understand it , or did and is just mischief making.
And the "usual suspects" then just blindly follow without even bothering to read and understand what was actually said for themselves.

I haven`t been on Mike`s board for a while and certainly haven`t posted anything about Carl on there, but will visit it soon as I am interested to see what they are giving Carl for free with the "complimentaries" you are referring to

The actual thread on Mikes board has been removed.....not for the first time.

Keith, your efforts to back peddle and blame it on "people not being able to read and understand" are as insulting as your opening post.

Honestly , trying to have a sensible debate on this board is increasingly becoming as frustrating as trying to knit fog.

Then stay away Keith.

I see you have stirred a hornets nest on Mikes board now with their complimentaries for Carl.Well done.

And stay away is what I will do from now on as to try and get some people to read things and understand them is a waste of time on here. An example in this very thread is Damned Yank who made a claim that I said something in another thread , posted a link to that thread which clearly shows that I had said no such thing , yet still refers to it as me being "found out". He either didn`t read his own post attachment , didn`t understand it , or did and is just mischief making.
And the "usual suspects" then just blindly follow without even bothering to read and understand what was actually said for themselves.

I haven`t been on Mike`s board for a while and certainly haven`t posted anything about Carl on there, but will visit it soon as I am interested to see what they are giving Carl for free with the "complimentaries" you are referring to

Welcome to my world.

Frustrating isn't it.

Keith, your efforts to back peddle and blame it on "people not being able to read and understand" are as insulting as your opening post.

Chris, we don't agree on everything, but your spot on here.
Keith has been found out, so he now throws his toys out of his pram and says I won't be posting on here anymore.

To be fair I can see and understand Keith's intentions and what he is saying regards people jumping on a bandwagon on here. Shame if you go Keith, enjoy your posts, all very well informed

Ps I think the key to Keith's intentions are in the title of discussion.

Keith, your efforts to back peddle and blame it on "people not being able to read and understand" are as insulting as your opening post.

Chris, we don't agree on everything, but your spot on here.
Keith has been found out, so he now throws his toys out of his pram and says I won't be posting on here anymore.

Would get more credit if he held his hands up.

Carl held his hands up couple of weeks ago wen he said something out of turn
well Keith should have done the same.

Instead he is digging a bigger hole.

Keith, your efforts to back peddle and blame it on "people not being able to read and understand" are as insulting as your opening post.

Chris, we don't agree on everything, but your spot on here.
Keith has been found out, so he now throws his toys out of his pram and says I won't be posting on here anymore.

Would get more credit if he held his hands up.

Carl held his hands up couple of weeks ago wen he said something out of turn
well Keith should have done the same.

Instead he is digging a bigger hole.

To be fair I can see and understand Keith's intentions and what he is saying regards people jumping on a bandwagon on here. Shame if you go Keith, enjoy your posts, all very well informed

Well, well, well what a surprise. Natman in saying opposite to Annis shocker.

To be fair I can see and understand Keith's intentions and what he is saying regards people jumping on a bandwagon on here. Shame if you go Keith, enjoy your posts, all very well informed

Well, well, well what a surprise. Natman in saying opposite to Annis shocker.

Chris, I would collapse if Natman ever agreed with me

To be fair I can see and understand Keith's intentions and what he is saying regards people jumping on a bandwagon on here. Shame if you go Keith, enjoy your posts, all very well informed

Well, well, well what a surprise. Natman in saying opposite to Annis shocker.

Chris, I would collapse if Natman ever agreed with me

I think he loves you really mate.

Hes just finding it hard to show his true feelings.

To be fair I can see and understand Keith's intentions and what he is saying regards people jumping on a bandwagon on here. Shame if you go Keith, enjoy your posts, all very well informed

Well, well, well what a surprise. Natman in saying opposite to Annis shocker.

Chris, I would collapse if Natman ever agreed with me

I think he loves you really mate.

Hes just finding it hard to show his true feelings.

Pmsl

To be fair I can see and understand Keith's intentions and what he is saying regards people jumping on a bandwagon on here. Shame if you go Keith, enjoy your posts, all very well informed

Well, well, well what a surprise. Natman in saying opposite to Annis shocker.

Didn't realise I want allowed my own opinion and had to follow like a sheep Mario. And it's sad that just by having a different opinion you become labeled a sniper. I guess throwing insults and aspersions so as to try and discredit a person is far easier than providing a reasoned counter argument, especially when you know you're on to a listing argument and want to save face or gain favour

To be fair I can see and understand Keith's intentions and what he is saying regards people jumping on a bandwagon on here. Shame if you go Keith, enjoy your posts, all very well informed

Well, well, well what a surprise. Natman in saying opposite to Annis shocker.

Didn't realise I want allowed my own opinion and had to follow like a sheep Mario. And it's sad that just by having a different opinion you become labeled a sniper. I guess throwing insults and aspersions so as to try and discredit a person is far easier than providing a reasoned counter argument, especially when you know you're on to a listing argument and want to save face or gain favour

Me? A sheep? A wolf in sheeps clothing maybe.
I fly solo on here, speak as I find, no need to curry favour with anyone.
Ive disagreed with Annis and Carl many times, other things we agree on.

You on the other hand constantly look to pick holes in Annis posts. Look at your posting history 75% of your posts are replies to Annis.

To be fair I can see and understand Keith's intentions and what he is saying regards people jumping on a bandwagon on here. Shame if you go Keith, enjoy your posts, all very well informed

Well, well, well what a surprise. Natman in saying opposite to Annis shocker.

Didn't realise I want allowed my own opinion and had to follow like a sheep Mario. And it's sad that just by having a different opinion you become labeled a sniper. I guess throwing insults and aspersions so as to try and discredit a person is far easier than providing a reasoned counter argument, especially when you know you're on to a listing argument and want to save face or gain favour

Me? A sheep? A wolf in sheeps clothing maybe.
I fly solo on here, speak as I find, no need to curry favour with anyone.
Ive disagreed with Annis and Carl many times, other things we agree on.

You on the other hand constantly look to pick holes in Annis posts. Look at your posting history 75% of your posts are replies to Annis.

Funny. I can quite remember a few posts on here The last few days where I've not done anything of the kind

To be fair I can see and understand Keith's intentions and what he is saying regards people jumping on a bandwagon on here. Shame if you go Keith, enjoy your posts, all very well informed

Well, well, well what a surprise. Natman in saying opposite to Annis shocker.

Didn't realise I want allowed my own opinion and had to follow like a sheep Mario. And it's sad that just by having a different opinion you become labeled a sniper. I guess throwing insults and aspersions so as to try and discredit a person is far easier than providing a reasoned counter argument, especially when you know you're on to a listing argument and want to save face or gain favour

Me? A sheep? A wolf in sheeps clothing maybe.
I fly solo on here, speak as I find, no need to curry favour with anyone.
Ive disagreed with Annis and Carl many times, other things we agree on.

You on the other hand constantly look to pick holes in Annis posts. Look at your posting history 75% of your posts are replies to Annis.

Polo, you've disagreed more with me than anyone else, I was shocked and pleased to see you finally agree with me, keep it up

To be fair I can see and understand Keith's intentions and what he is saying regards people jumping on a bandwagon on here. Shame if you go Keith, enjoy your posts, all very well informed

Well, well, well what a surprise. Natman in saying opposite to Annis shocker.

Didn't realise I want allowed my own opinion and had to follow like a sheep Mario. And it's sad that just by having a different opinion you become labeled a sniper. I guess throwing insults and aspersions so as to try and discredit a person is far easier than providing a reasoned counter argument, especially when you know you're on to a listing argument and want to save face or gain favour

Me? A sheep? A wolf in sheeps clothing maybe.
I fly solo on here, speak as I find, no need to curry favour with anyone.
Ive disagreed with Annis and Carl many times, other things we agree on.

You on the other hand constantly look to pick holes in Annis posts. Look at your posting history 75% of your posts are replies to Annis.

But still, if you have to stick to bringing character into disrepute rather than use an intelligent argument. Shame!

And I've recently been receiving comments from other posters which are quite to the contrary

Honestly , trying to have a sensible debate on this board is increasingly becoming as frustrating as trying to knit fog.

Then stay away Keith.

I see you have stirred a hornets nest on Mikes board now with their complimentaries for Carl.Well done.

And stay away is what I will do from now on as to try and get some people to read things and understand them is a waste of time on here. An example in this very thread is Damned Yank who made a claim that I said something in another thread , posted a link to that thread which clearly shows that I had said no such thing , yet still refers to it as me being "found out". He either didn`t read his own post attachment , didn`t understand it , or did and is just mischief making.
And the "usual suspects" then just blindly follow without even bothering to read and understand what was actually said for themselves.

I haven`t been on Mike`s board for a while and certainly haven`t posted anything about Carl on there, but will visit it soon as I am interested to see what they are giving Carl for free with the "complimentaries" you are referring to

Mischief making.. You're the mischief maker. In that thread I linked to Barnett made several good points, yet the only one you jumped all over was the one abour Carl working in the media.

I may not have explained it very well, but the point remains the same.