Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 4:42 pm

CityGent wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:101 posts on account number 500 in 16 hours. Wow. Just wow.

And yet Im the fanasist, weirdo, got issues, on here 24/7 :laughing5:

The irony meter just smashed to smithereens.


He has a'great life'away from this forum apparently. You can only imagine :laughing6:

He is catching a nap before his next 100 posts Lake :lol:

101 posts in 2/3 of a day. What a f*cking life. :laughing5:

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 4:46 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:
CityGent wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:101 posts on account number 500 in 16 hours. Wow. Just wow.

And yet Im the fanasist, weirdo, got issues, on here 24/7 :laughing5:

The irony meter just smashed to smithereens.


He has a'great life'away from this forum apparently. You can only imagine :laughing6:

He is catching a nap before his next 100 posts Lake :lol:

101 posts in 2/3 of a day. What a f*cking life. :laughing5:

Dragged me down to his level too. I'm not one to argue mate you know that. :lol:

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 4:48 pm

I wonder how many fake hotmail accounts he's had to make just to come on here and post his "facts"?

In the hundreds, I'd wager.

Time to ask yourself some serious questions, IYAM.

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 4:58 pm

Damned Yank wrote:I wonder how many fake hotmail accounts he's had to make just to come on here and post his "facts"?

In the hundreds, I'd wager.

Time to ask yourself some serious questions, IYAM.


Hotmail, Googlemail, Rocketmail, oddballmail, SerialWrongUnMail

He's got them all

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:00 pm

Damned Yank wrote:I wonder how many fake hotmail accounts he's had to make just to come on here and post his "facts"?

In the hundreds, I'd wager.

Time to ask yourself some serious questions, IYAM.

The FBI would have their work cut out with him. Serial predator.

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:05 pm

He's probably banging a new one out right now....

I'll_get_them_this_time@stalker.com

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:07 pm

It's threads like this that are ruining this forum.
4 pages of you lot talking shit 2 each other with hardly a mention

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:09 pm

Damned Yank wrote:He's probably banging a new one out right now....

I'll_get_them_this_time@stalker.com


If he hasn't done a 'Buffalo Bill' yet, then I fear for the next poor female that offers to help him lift a settee into the back of his van

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:15 pm

hotwings wrote:It's threads like this that are ruining this forum.
4 pages of you lot talking shit 2 each other with hardly a mention


Although the majority of your recent posting history is rugby-related...

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:20 pm

CityGent wrote:
hotwings wrote:It's threads like this that are ruining this forum.
4 pages of you lot talking shit 2 each other with hardly a mention


Although the majority of your recent posting history is rugby-related...


Threads about rugby talking about rugby.
Thread about Paul Ince - 4 pages of bollocks

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:20 pm

CityGent wrote:
hotwings wrote:It's threads like this that are ruining this forum.
4 pages of you lot talking shit 2 each other with hardly a mention


Although the majority of your recent posting history is rugby-related...

f**k sake spat my hot dog out :laughing5:

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:22 pm

hotwings wrote:
CityGent wrote:
hotwings wrote:It's threads like this that are ruining this forum.
4 pages of you lot talking shit 2 each other with hardly a mention


Although the majority of your recent posting history is rugby-related...


Threads about rugby talking about rugby.
Thread about Paul Ince - 4 pages of bollocks

Very apt as Paul big spuds Ince talks a lot of bollocks!!"

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:24 pm

hotwings wrote:
CityGent wrote:
hotwings wrote:It's threads like this that are ruining this forum.
4 pages of you lot talking shit 2 each other with hardly a mention


Although the majority of your recent posting history is rugby-related...


Threads about rugby talking about rugby.
Thread about Paul Ince - 4 pages of bollocks

Hey hot wings you send sexy. show us your tits!!

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:27 pm

hotwings wrote:
CityGent wrote:
hotwings wrote:It's threads like this that are ruining this forum.
4 pages of you lot talking shit 2 each other with hardly a mention


Although the majority of your recent posting history is rugby-related...


Threads about rugby talking about rugby.
Thread about Paul Ince - 4 pages of bollocks


Please forgive me as I've only just joined, so you can only blame me for half a page of bollock-talking

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:30 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:
hotwings wrote:
CityGent wrote:
hotwings wrote:It's threads like this that are ruining this forum.
4 pages of you lot talking shit 2 each other with hardly a mention


Although the majority of your recent posting history is rugby-related...


Threads about rugby talking about rugby.
Thread about Paul Ince - 4 pages of bollocks

Very apt as Paul big spuds Ince talks a lot of bollocks!!"


This was quite funny

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:31 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:
hotwings wrote:
CityGent wrote:
hotwings wrote:It's threads like this that are ruining this forum.
4 pages of you lot talking shit 2 each other with hardly a mention


Although the majority of your recent posting history is rugby-related...


Threads about rugby talking about rugby.
Thread about Paul Ince - 4 pages of bollocks

Hey hot wings you send sexy. show us your tits!!


This was not

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:32 pm

CityGent wrote:
hotwings wrote:
CityGent wrote:
hotwings wrote:It's threads like this that are ruining this forum.
4 pages of you lot talking shit 2 each other with hardly a mention


Although the majority of your recent posting history is rugby-related...


Threads about rugby talking about rugby.
Thread about Paul Ince - 4 pages of bollocks


Please forgive me as I've only just joined, so you can only blame me for half a page of bollock-talking

And me for 2 and a half,polo for 1. :mrgreen:

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:37 pm

Nanny McPhail wrote:
CityGent wrote:
hotwings wrote:
CityGent wrote:
hotwings wrote:It's threads like this that are ruining this forum.
4 pages of you lot talking shit 2 each other with hardly a mention


Although the majority of your recent posting history is rugby-related...


Threads about rugby talking about rugby.
Thread about Paul Ince - 4 pages of bollocks


Please forgive me as I've only just joined, so you can only blame me for half a page of bollock-talking

And me for 2 and a half,polo for 1. :mrgreen:


I didn't notice. Once I saw Weird Al Wankovic had hijacked his thousandth thread it's the literary equivalent of white noise for me then.

He's the poet laureate of Blah-Blah-Blahing

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:42 pm

CityGent wrote:
Nanny McPhail wrote:
CityGent wrote:
hotwings wrote:
CityGent wrote:
hotwings wrote:It's threads like this that are ruining this forum.
4 pages of you lot talking shit 2 each other with hardly a mention


Although the majority of your recent posting history is rugby-related...


Threads about rugby talking about rugby.
Thread about Paul Ince - 4 pages of bollocks


Please forgive me as I've only just joined, so you can only blame me for half a page of bollock-talking

And me for 2 and a half,polo for 1. :mrgreen:


I didn't notice. Once I saw Weird Al Wankovic had hijacked his thousandth thread it's the literary equivalent of white noise for me then.

He's the poet laureate of Blah-Blah-Blahing

I hope you banned him again. I promised him that you would. :laughing6:

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:47 pm

That account is banned,just like his hundreds of others but there'll be a new one along shortly. The legendary sad c**t

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:48 pm

CityGent wrote:That account is banned,just like his hundreds of others but there'll be a new one along shortly. The legendary sad c**t

Never fails to disappoint mate.

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 7:25 pm

Why ban him again then? To me,by doing that says you've lost the argument and by banning him gives you the 'get out of jail' card.

Man up you 3 amigos and take him on through debating.He's very good at it as you know and why you continue to ban him.

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 7:32 pm

6 bysedd wrote:Why ban him again then? To me,by doing that says you've lost the argument and by banning him gives you the 'get out of jail' card.

Man up you 3 amigos and take him on through debating.He's very good at it as you know and why you continue to ban him.

Thats the problem, he isn't any good at it is he just goes round in circles for the sole purpose of pissing people off and some are for whatever reason happy to keep on replying which only adds to the problem as you end up with these silly threads and its like groundhog day all over...if EVERYONE just ignored him he would either have to talk to himself or just f**k off..

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 7:43 pm

AbsolutelyFearless wrote:
6 bysedd wrote:Why ban him again then? To me,by doing that says you've lost the argument and by banning him gives you the 'get out of jail' card.

Man up you 3 amigos and take him on through debating.He's very good at it as you know and why you continue to ban him.

Thats the problem, he isn't any good at it is he just goes round in circles for the sole purpose of pissing people off and some are for whatever reason happy to keep on replying which only adds to the problem as you end up with these silly threads and its like groundhog day all over...if EVERYONE just ignored him he would either have to talk to himself or just f**k off..

Fair point.But banning him solves nothing as he just comes back under another guise and the same old problems repeat themselves.

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 7:44 pm

6 bysedd wrote:Why ban him again then? To me,by doing that says you've lost the argument and by banning him gives you the 'get out of jail' card.

Man up you 3 amigos and take him on through debating.He's very good at it as you know and why you continue to ban him.


Very good at debating :thumbup:

Fair play mush that's a cracker :D

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 7:51 pm

6 bysedd wrote:
AbsolutelyFearless wrote:
6 bysedd wrote:Why ban him again then? To me,by doing that says you've lost the argument and by banning him gives you the 'get out of jail' card.

Man up you 3 amigos and take him on through debating.He's very good at it as you know and why you continue to ban him.

Thats the problem, he isn't any good at it is he just goes round in circles for the sole purpose of pissing people off and some are for whatever reason happy to keep on replying which only adds to the problem as you end up with these silly threads and its like groundhog day all over...if EVERYONE just ignored him he would either have to talk to himself or just f**k off..

Fair point.But banning him solves nothing as he just comes back under another guise and the same old problems repeat themselves.


At least with the other jacks on here, there is a line you know you can cross before it gets unreasonable. This lonely troll doesn't care about opinions(apart from his own)and is obsessed with getting the last word and always believes he's correct. From the finances of CCFC, Leicester being the best club in the championship through to trying to tell us that Gomis wouldn't want to go to the favourites for relegation in Ligue 1 Monaco :laughing6: , as long as he's trying to wind us up with his many anonymous shitcunt usernames, he's happy. It's all quite tragic for the textbook loner

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 7:54 pm

CityGent wrote:
6 bysedd wrote:
AbsolutelyFearless wrote:
6 bysedd wrote:Why ban him again then? To me,by doing that says you've lost the argument and by banning him gives you the 'get out of jail' card.

Man up you 3 amigos and take him on through debating.He's very good at it as you know and why you continue to ban him.

Thats the problem, he isn't any good at it is he just goes round in circles for the sole purpose of pissing people off and some are for whatever reason happy to keep on replying which only adds to the problem as you end up with these silly threads and its like groundhog day all over...if EVERYONE just ignored him he would either have to talk to himself or just f**k off..

Fair point.But banning him solves nothing as he just comes back under another guise and the same old problems repeat themselves.


At least with the other jacks on here, there is a line you know you can cross before it gets unreasonable. This lonely troll doesn't care about opinions(apart from his own)and is obsessed with getting the last word and always believes he's correct. From the finances of CCFC, Leicester being the best club in the championship through to trying to tell us that Gomis wouldn't want to go to the favourites for relegation in Ligue 1 Monaco :laughing6: , as long as he's trying to wind us up with his many anonymous shitcunt usernames, he's happy. It's all quite tragic for the textbook loner

Cant the mods/admin just give him an account and put him on automatic ignore for everyone :laughing6:

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 7:56 pm

AbsolutelyFearless wrote:
CityGent wrote:
6 bysedd wrote:
AbsolutelyFearless wrote:
6 bysedd wrote:Why ban him again then? To me,by doing that says you've lost the argument and by banning him gives you the 'get out of jail' card.

Man up you 3 amigos and take him on through debating.He's very good at it as you know and why you continue to ban him.

Thats the problem, he isn't any good at it is he just goes round in circles for the sole purpose of pissing people off and some are for whatever reason happy to keep on replying which only adds to the problem as you end up with these silly threads and its like groundhog day all over...if EVERYONE just ignored him he would either have to talk to himself or just f**k off..

Fair point.But banning him solves nothing as he just comes back under another guise and the same old problems repeat themselves.


At least with the other jacks on here, there is a line you know you can cross before it gets unreasonable. This lonely troll doesn't care about opinions(apart from his own)and is obsessed with getting the last word and always believes he's correct. From the finances of CCFC, Leicester being the best club in the championship through to trying to tell us that Gomis wouldn't want to go to the favourites for relegation in Ligue 1 Monaco :laughing6: , as long as he's trying to wind us up with his many anonymous shitcunt usernames, he's happy. It's all quite tragic for the textbook loner

Cant the mods/admin just give him an account and put him on automatic ignore for everyone :laughing6:


That's a great idea

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 7:59 pm

CityGent wrote:
6 bysedd wrote:
AbsolutelyFearless wrote:
6 bysedd wrote:Why ban him again then? To me,by doing that says you've lost the argument and by banning him gives you the 'get out of jail' card.

Man up you 3 amigos and take him on through debating.He's very good at it as you know and why you continue to ban him.

Thats the problem, he isn't any good at it is he just goes round in circles for the sole purpose of pissing people off and some are for whatever reason happy to keep on replying which only adds to the problem as you end up with these silly threads and its like groundhog day all over...if EVERYONE just ignored him he would either have to talk to himself or just f**k off..

Fair point.But banning him solves nothing as he just comes back under another guise and the same old problems repeat themselves.


At least with the other jacks on here, there is a line you know you can cross before it gets unreasonable. This lonely troll doesn't care about opinions(apart from his own)and is obsessed with getting the last word and always believes he's correct. From the finances of CCFC, Leicester being the best club in the championship through to trying to tell us that Gomis wouldn't want to go to the favourites for relegation in Ligue 1 Monaco :laughing6: , as long as he's trying to wind us up with his many anonymous shitcunt usernames, he's happy. It's all quite tragic for the textbook loner

Like I said previously Lake,he's the worst case of egomania ever seen on this forum.

Re: Paul Ince

Sun Jul 21, 2013 8:06 pm

CityGent wrote:
AbsolutelyFearless wrote:
CityGent wrote:
6 bysedd wrote:
AbsolutelyFearless wrote:
6 bysedd wrote:Why ban him again then? To me,by doing that says you've lost the argument and by banning him gives you the 'get out of jail' card.

Man up you 3 amigos and take him on through debating.He's very good at it as you know and why you continue to ban him.

Thats the problem, he isn't any good at it is he just goes round in circles for the sole purpose of pissing people off and some are for whatever reason happy to keep on replying which only adds to the problem as you end up with these silly threads and its like groundhog day all over...if EVERYONE just ignored him he would either have to talk to himself or just f**k off..

Fair point.But banning him solves nothing as he just comes back under another guise and the same old problems repeat themselves.


At least with the other jacks on here, there is a line you know you can cross before it gets unreasonable. This lonely troll doesn't care about opinions(apart from his own)and is obsessed with getting the last word and always believes he's correct. From the finances of CCFC, Leicester being the best club in the championship through to trying to tell us that Gomis wouldn't want to go to the favourites for relegation in Ligue 1 Monaco :laughing6: , as long as he's trying to wind us up with his many anonymous shitcunt usernames, he's happy. It's all quite tragic for the textbook loner

Cant the mods/admin just give him an account and put him on automatic ignore for everyone :laughing6:


That's a great idea

:notworthy: :occasion5: :wave: