Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:29 pm

HANDBALL ! wrote:I wouldn't know Carl (or Annis) if I saw them in the stadium. I'm not defending them either but I do feel sorry for them when anyone can post a "We're signing so-and-so for 5 million" thread and yet they get attacked for Carl's posts of the same nature.
Why single Carl out ?
Factual responses please Baz !


Anyone can post that they would like to sign ABC or would like to sign XYZ, but when someone on this forum & there are a few, claim to be ITK & post "UPDATES" and thrive on the attention they receive (along with follow up posts to try and prove their accuracy) then they will get shot down...

It is my belief that NOBODY is fully ITK here anymore. The way it should be. :thumbup:

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:33 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
HANDBALL ! wrote:I wouldn't know Carl (or Annis) if I saw them in the stadium. I'm not defending them either but I do feel sorry for them when anyone can post a "We're signing so-and-so for 5 million" thread and yet they get attacked for Carl's posts of the same nature.
Why single Carl out ?
Factual responses please Baz !


Anyone can post that they would like to sign ABC or would like to sign XYZ, but when someone on this forum & there are a few, claim to be ITK & post "UPDATES" and thrive on the attention they receive (along with follow up posts to try and prove their accuracy) then they will get shot down...

It is my belief that NOBODY is fully ITK here anymore. The way it should be. :thumbup:


Yeah , I suppose Carl does overdo it a bit

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:33 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
HANDBALL ! wrote:I wouldn't know Carl (or Annis) if I saw them in the stadium. I'm not defending them either but I do feel sorry for them when anyone can post a "We're signing so-and-so for 5 million" thread and yet they get attacked for Carl's posts of the same nature.
Why single Carl out ?
Factual responses please Baz !


Anyone can post that they would like to sign ABC or would like to sign XYZ, but when someone on this forum & there are a few, claim to be ITK & post "UPDATES" and thrive on the attention they receive (along with follow up posts to try and prove their accuracy) then they will get shot down...

It is my belief that NOBODY is fully ITK here anymore. The way it should be. :thumbup:


Cardiff to sign Rooney for £5mil plus all the red scarves he wants. I know someone from within the club. :thumbup:

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:37 pm

I've no doubt that those who claim to be ITK, were ITK at one stage (under Jones), but those links, quite rightly, have closed since Malky has joined the club. I'm all for that too. :thumbup:

This forum used to be renown for it's updates from ITK, it's what stood it apart from the others.. But now, it's a struggle to write such updates, as the information has obviously dried up. This is why we have had a series of incorrect updates and embarrassing posts, such as those aimed at Paul Guy recently..

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:48 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:I've no doubt that those who claim to be ITK, were ITK at one stage (under Jones), but those links, quite rightly, have closed since Malky has joined the club. I'm all for that too. :thumbup:

This forum used to be renown for it's updates from ITK, it's what stood it apart from the others.. But now, it's a struggle to write such updates, as the information has obviously dried up. This is why we have had a series of incorrect updates and embarrassing posts, such as those aimed at Paul Guy recently..

Your like a broken down record chuckles, said the same sort of thing about 50 times in this thread alone, i think most know whats going on :lol: :ayatollah:

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:48 pm

This should remain a sticky. Not sure who makes more stuff up your owner or your super fan. :lol: what a shower.

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:53 pm

Bluebird1977 wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:I've no doubt that those who claim to be ITK, were ITK at one stage (under Jones), but those links, quite rightly, have closed since Malky has joined the club. I'm all for that too. :thumbup:

This forum used to be renown for it's updates from ITK, it's what stood it apart from the others.. But now, it's a struggle to write such updates, as the information has obviously dried up. This is why we have had a series of incorrect updates and embarrassing posts, such as those aimed at Paul Guy recently..

Your like a broken down record chuckles, said the same sort of thing about 50 times in this thread alone, i think most know whats going on :lol: :ayatollah:


Someone asked my opinion. :thumbup:

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:10 pm

Leave it there Chuckles you couldnt wait to bump this thread way before you were asked the question :lol:

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:11 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:Leave it there Chuckles you couldnt wait to bump this thread way before you were asked the question :lol:


Chuckles loves it. :D

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:12 pm

Delete the thread ffs :lol:

Talk about putting your foot in your mouth :lol:

Ankles and mouth disease :lol:

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:13 pm

Fact. :happy1:

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:21 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:Delete the thread ffs :lol:

Talk about putting your foot in your mouth :lol:

Ankles and mouth disease :lol:

Yes please delete the thread as my dad is embarrassed for him and feels bad enough about replacing him with gwyn as minister for misinformation

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:22 pm

sams lovechild wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:Delete the thread ffs :lol:

Talk about putting your foot in your mouth :lol:

Ankles and mouth disease :lol:

Yes please delete the thread as my dad is embarrassed for him and feels bad enough about replacing him with gwyn as minister for misinformation

I was going to lol@ your post then realised yet another troll has been let on here :laughing5:

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:31 pm

Bluebird1977 wrote:
sams lovechild wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:Delete the thread ffs :lol:

Talk about putting your foot in your mouth :lol:

Ankles and mouth disease :lol:

Yes please delete the thread as my dad is embarrassed for him and feels bad enough about replacing him with gwyn as minister for misinformation

I was going to lol@ your post then realised yet another troll has been let on here :laughing5:

Sorry for any offence ian may I invite you to supper one night where we will dine on sheeps eyes and curtis's bollocks for the embarrassment he has caused my dad

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:35 pm

wonder if we'll see carl do another post now..........doubt it

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:36 pm

bluebird04 wrote:wonder if we'll see carl do another post now..........doubt it


I was wondering where he is aswell.

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 8:19 pm

carlccfc wrote:"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?


Well the City statement this evening states you are wrong.

Re: DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Sat Jul 20, 2013 8:19 pm

carlccfc wrote:"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?


Well the City statement this evening states you are wrong.