Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:18 pm
CitySteve wrote:No, the value of the Club is uncountable, now PL Football is with us. If Promotion wasn't gained, it would be a whole lot more complex than it will be now.
Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:21 pm
kingdong wrote:I've only ever called you a brown noser nice try though mate.
Also one currently plays in the prem no thanks to Sam. You'll have to remind me where Wimbledon football club currently play.
Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:23 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:kingdong wrote:I've only ever called you a brown noser nice try though mate.
Also one currently plays in the prem no thanks to Sam. You'll have to remind me where Wimbledon football club currently play.
Again you are playing with facts. I just pointed out that you can put a spin on anything, so even if Wimbledon are no longer with us they did play in the PL under Sam but went tits up under Norwegian owners.
Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:25 pm
Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:28 pm
beaky wrote:Sams famous inner circle...thought they would of given up by now!!!
Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:30 pm
kingdong wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:kingdong wrote:I've only ever called you a brown noser nice try though mate.
Also one currently plays in the prem no thanks to Sam. You'll have to remind me where Wimbledon football club currently play.
Again you are playing with facts. I just pointed out that you can put a spin on anything, so even if Wimbledon are no longer with us they did play in the PL under Sam but went tits up under Norwegian owners.
Maybe because they didn't have there own ground why was that?
Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:38 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:kingdong wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:kingdong wrote:I've only ever called you a brown noser nice try though mate.
Also one currently plays in the prem no thanks to Sam. You'll have to remind me where Wimbledon football club currently play.
Again you are playing with facts. I just pointed out that you can put a spin on anything, so even if Wimbledon are no longer with us they did play in the PL under Sam but went tits up under Norwegian owners.
Maybe because they didn't have there own ground why was that?
TBH I really couldn't careless why Wimbledon went tits up.
Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:38 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:kingdong wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:kingdong wrote:I've only ever called you a brown noser nice try though mate.
Also one currently plays in the prem no thanks to Sam. You'll have to remind me where Wimbledon football club currently play.
Again you are playing with facts. I just pointed out that you can put a spin on anything, so even if Wimbledon are no longer with us they did play in the PL under Sam but went tits up under Norwegian owners.
Maybe because they didn't have there own ground why was that?
TBH I really couldn't careless why Wimbledon went tits up.
Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:39 pm
Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:45 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:kingdong wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:kingdong wrote:I've only ever called you a brown noser nice try though mate.
Also one currently plays in the prem no thanks to Sam. You'll have to remind me where Wimbledon football club currently play.
Again you are playing with facts. I just pointed out that you can put a spin on anything, so even if Wimbledon are no longer with us they did play in the PL under Sam but went tits up under Norwegian owners.
Maybe because they didn't have there own ground why was that?
TBH I really couldn't careless why Wimbledon went tits up.
AC Milan/Inter Milan and Swansea don't have or own their grounds.
Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:53 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:CitySteve wrote:No, the value of the Club is uncountable, now PL Football is with us. If Promotion wasn't gained, it would be a whole lot more complex than it will be now.
So what is the 5% or £19m? You mentioned intellectual property and the rebrand in the same sentence, so is Sam getting 5% of VT's rebrand which is valued at £380m?
Just trying to follow your logic as I'm sure the deal to settle with Sam isn't going to be as straight forward as a cheque for £15-19m
Thu Jul 18, 2013 9:46 pm
kingdong wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:kingdong wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:kingdong wrote:I've only ever called you a brown noser nice try though mate.
Also one currently plays in the prem no thanks to Sam. You'll have to remind me where Wimbledon football club currently play.
Again you are playing with facts. I just pointed out that you can put a spin on anything, so even if Wimbledon are no longer with us they did play in the PL under Sam but went tits up under Norwegian owners.
Maybe because they didn't have there own ground why was that?
TBH I really couldn't careless why Wimbledon went tits up.
AC Milan/Inter Milan and Swansea don't have or own their grounds.
Really you just compared ac Milan and inter Milan to Wimbledon.
The jacks don't ground share with another football club and have to pay rent.
Ask Coventry how fun a football club is when you don't own a ground.
Thu Jul 18, 2013 9:56 pm
Thu Jul 18, 2013 9:58 pm
kingdong wrote:I was just saying how your examples weren't very good ones.
Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:03 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:kingdong wrote:I was just saying how your examples weren't very good ones.
Well I was just politely trying to say your statement was crap.
Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:05 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:kingdong wrote:I was just saying how your examples weren't very good ones.
Well I was just politely trying to say your statement was crap.
Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:05 pm
Gowerjack wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:kingdong wrote:I was just saying how your examples weren't very good ones.
Well I was just politely trying to say your statement was crap.
You can add Man City to that list as well, the Etihad Stadium is owned by Manchester City Council, it doesn't seem to have hampered them