Would you like us to go back to blue?

Proove what?You must have a massive cock in your dreams pal.Oh and I'm not laughing at you honestly-wouldn't want to upset you.

You said that I was speaking for myself when I mentioned embarrassment and dignity. I told you to open your eyes and realise that the whole football world is laughing at us. Then you start insulting me. Hilarious.

The greater football world doesn't give one about us.And as for laughing at us-Its a weakness to show their getting at you=like I said Grow a pair.

They're not "getting at me", I'm just proving you wrong as I'm not "speaking for myself".

Well your certainly not speaking for the majority,anyway no harm done

No.

Vincent Tan has been the best thing ever for this club.

1. Premier League
2. Going to settle the debt and float the club to look for investment
3. He backs the manager and his ability
4. New training facilities
5. Better engagement with the community especially the young and disabled
6. The reputation of the club has got better during the Tan era
7. Stadium expansion planning is underway
8. Better quality of players coming to the club

...and all you have to is accept red. It's not hard. I think we've got the better end of the deal.

Feck me, mate. Wait for the onslaught from the 'Negativos'

How dare you come on here and post something that is pretty straghtforward, i.e. that 'all the above' in exchange for a change of shirt colour is not really a bad deal under the circumstances we found ourselves under before VT arrived

Great 'post' as far as I am concerned and exactly 'why' the majority of fans are 'realists' when it comes to reluctantly accepting the colour change

Most will agree IMHO but the loudest ones (with the negative agendas they can't really justify) won't

1. OK
2. Not done yet.
3. To be expected.
4. Not done yet.
5. This was already the case.
6. Our reputation was improving long before tan arrived.
7. OK
8. OK

3 out of 8 isn't bad. All of this and more could have been achieved with out re branding the club.

No.

Vincent Tan has been the best thing ever for this club.

1. Premier League
2. Going to settle the debt and float the club to look for investment
3. He backs the manager and his ability
4. New training facilities
5. Better engagement with the community especially the young and disabled
6. The reputation of the club has got better during the Tan era
7. Stadium expansion planning is underway
8. Better quality of players coming to the club

...and all you have to is accept red. It's not hard. I think we've got the better end of the deal.

Feck me, mate. Wait for the onslaught from the 'Negativos'

How dare you come on here and post something that is pretty straghtforward, i.e. that 'all the above' in exchange for a change of shirt colour is not really a bad deal under the circumstances we found ourselves under before VT arrived

Great 'post' as far as I am concerned and exactly 'why' the majority of fans are 'realists' when it comes to reluctantly accepting the colour change

Most will agree IMHO but the loudest ones (with the negative agendas they can't really justify) won't

1. OK
2. Not done yet.
3. To be expected.
4. Not done yet.
5. This was already the case.
6. Our reputation was improving long before tan arrived.
7. OK
8. OK

3 out of 8 isn't bad. All of this and more could have been achieved with out re branding the club.

All this could have been achieved without the rebrand.

No.

Vincent Tan has been the best thing ever for this club.

1. Premier League
2. Going to settle the debt and float the club to look for investment
3. He backs the manager and his ability
4. New training facilities
5. Better engagement with the community especially the young and disabled
6. The reputation of the club has got better during the Tan era
7. Stadium expansion planning is underway
8. Better quality of players coming to the club

...and all you have to is accept red. It's not hard. I think we've got the better end of the deal.

Feck me, mate. Wait for the onslaught from the 'Negativos'

How dare you come on here and post something that is pretty straghtforward, i.e. that 'all the above' in exchange for a change of shirt colour is not really a bad deal under the circumstances we found ourselves under before VT arrived

Great 'post' as far as I am concerned and exactly 'why' the majority of fans are 'realists' when it comes to reluctantly accepting the colour change

Most will agree IMHO but the loudest ones (with the negative agendas they can't really justify) won't

1. OK
2. Not done yet.
3. To be expected.
4. Not done yet.
5. This was already the case.
6. Our reputation was improving long before tan arrived.
7. OK
8. OK

3 out of 8 isn't bad. All of this and more could have been achieved with out re branding the club.

All this could have been achieved without the rebrand.

No it couldnt. The rebrand was part of the deal. No rebrand, none of the above.

I was told last week there was no deal.

Well it is a matter of opinion if VT would have invest or not if we had rejected the rebrand.

I was told last week there was no deal.

Well it is a matter of opinion if VT would have invest or not if we had rejected the rebrand.

Personally I don't believe for a second that tan would have walked away. I simply do not buy this load of cobblers about changing to red to get access to far eastern income streams. I believe he did it for one reason only , because he could.

I was told last week there was no deal.

Well it is a matter of opinion if VT would have invest or not if we had rejected the rebrand.

Personally I don't believe for a second that tan would have walked away. I simply do not buy this load of cobblers about changing to red to get access to far eastern income streams. I believe he did it for one reason only , because he could.

He did it because he could, of course he did, but he still would have walked if he couldn't do what he wanted. He would have then looked elsewhere for a club he could impose his vision on. The simple fact is, the majority of fans accepted the rebrand in the summer last year. You had the choice there and then, identity of £100m investment. The majority chose the £100m investment. Just because we're in the Premier League now you cant suddenly change your mind. That wasn't part of the offer. Its done and dusted and im not going to continue moaning about it. We're red, the dragon is our emblem and Tan is our owner. We're a Premier League team and im going to enjoy myself.

I was told last week there was no deal.

Well it is a matter of opinion if VT would have invest or not if we had rejected the rebrand.

Personally I don't believe for a second that tan would have walked away. I simply do not buy this load of cobblers about changing to red to get access to far eastern income streams. I believe he did it for one reason only , because he could.

Were you willing to take that risk because i wasnt

I believe that pretty much 100% of us would love to see us back in blue, but our fans have to stop buying and wearing red. Tan is desperate for us to start wearing red, he proved this fact by spending thousands of pounds on scarves and trying to get us to wear them by giving prizes for doing so. Despite this, other than the Brighton game there have been less and less scarves on display. There are of course those fans that will always buy the home shirt no matter what, but if you have to buy a shirt next season, it would speak volumes and really help the cause for a return to our traditional home colours if you buy the blue away kit.

Tan can make the players wear red, he can change the website to red, he can change the stadium to red, but he cannot make us fans wear red.

It is the most simple effective way of getting our point across.

BLUE ARMY!!

agree 100 % hate the red kit and badge and it was very disrespectful of Tan to do what he did.

Was it very disrespectful of Tan to save our club

I was told last week there was no deal.

Well it is a matter of opinion if VT would have invest or not if we had rejected the rebrand.

Personally I don't believe for a second that tan would have walked away. I simply do not buy this load of cobblers about changing to red to get access to far eastern income streams. I believe he did it for one reason only , because he could.

He did it because he could, of course he did, but he still would have walked if he couldn't do what he wanted. He would have then looked elsewhere for a club he could impose his vision on. The simple fact is, the majority of fans accepted the rebrand in the summer last year. You had the choice there and then, identity of £100m investment. The majority chose the £100m investment. Just because we're in the Premier League now you cant suddenly change your mind. That wasn't part of the offer. Its done and dusted and im not going to continue moaning about it. We're red, the dragon is our emblem and Tan is our owner. We're a Premier League team and im going to enjoy myself.

Yeah sure he would have walk after investing £40 million.

I was told last week there was no deal.

Well it is a matter of opinion if VT would have invest or not if we had rejected the rebrand.

Personally I don't believe for a second that tan would have walked away. I simply do not buy this load of cobblers about changing to red to get access to far eastern income streams. I believe he did it for one reason only , because he could.

Were you willing to take that risk because i wasnt

Yes Craig I was because I do not for one moment think he would have walked away from his £40 million investment.

Yeah sure he would have walk after investing £40 million.

Easily offset by the millions he made in profit from his shares in Facebook. You win some, you lose some. Sometimes you have to walk away from the poker table and come back and play another day. People forget Tan is a billionaire and his wealth is increasing every day thanks to his investments.

£40m is a large sum but nothing he couldn't recuperate easily in another venture.

Yeah sure he would have walk after investing £40 million.

Easily offset by the millions he made in profit from his shares in Facebook. You win some, you lose some. Sometimes you have to walk away from the poker table and come back and play another day. People forget Tan is a billionaire and his wealth is increasing every day thanks to his investments.

£40m is a large sum but nothing he couldn't recuperate easily in another venture.

A billionaire does not walk away from a £40 million investment when you are knocking on the door of a £100 million treasure.

That would be a great loss of face to him. Also everyone is quite aware he is a billionaire and I think you are a troll.

Bye bye.

A billionaire does not walk away from a £40 million investment when you are knocking on the door of a £100 million treasure.

That would be a great loss of face to him. Also everyone is quite aware he is a billionaire and I think you are a troll.

Bye bye.

No I was encouraging in debate. Had you talked to the forum owner and your moderation team you would have known my intentions.

If you cant handle debate and are going to cry like a petulant child and throw your toys out of the pram then thats your issue. I was actually going to reply to you and say fair enough, lets agree to disagree, but there you go.

Whatever floats your boat.

A billionaire does not walk away from a £40 million investment when you are knocking on the door of a £100 million treasure.

That would be a great loss of face to him. Also everyone is quite aware he is a billionaire and I think you are a troll.

Bye bye.

No I was encouraging in debate. Had you talked to the forum owner and your moderation team you would have known my intentions.

If you cant handle debate and are going to cry like a petulant child and throw your toys out of the pram then thats your issue. I was actually going to reply to you and say fair enough, lets agree to disagree, but there you go.

Whatever floats your boat.

Debate bollocks. Your doing a Roathie on us.

Debate bollocks. Your doing a Roathie on us.

Absolute lies. How am I doing a Roathie on you? Ask your moderation team and the forum owner. I messaged both of them.

If I wanted to do a Roathie on this forum you'd f*cking know it. I would use multiple VPN's and I would DdOS the crap out of this forum. The forum would be rendered useless and you wouldn't be able to load it. Then I could hack it using an SQL injection if I was so inclined. If you want me to troll I will. Im a computer scientist so if I wanted to troll a website I think I know how to do it properly.

I created good threads and good debate. Thats why one of my threads got STICKIED.

At no point did I abuse or troll. You just couldn't handle debate.

My username was below to see on my new account in the signature.

If I wanted to do a Roathie on this forum you'd f*cking know it. I would use multiple VPN's and I would DdOS the crap out of this forum. The forum would be rendered useless and you wouldn't be able to load it. Then I could hack it using an SQL injection if I was so inclined. If you want me to troll I will. Im a computer scientist so if I wanted to troll a website I think I know how to do it properly.

Come to think of it because its you Barnett I'm quite proud of myself banning the account.

If we had a moderator of the year award I would win it hands down.

SOMEONE BRING MY BLUE DUMMY BACK PLS.

Come to think of it because its you Barnett I'm quite proud of myself banning the account.

If we had a moderator of the year award I would win it hands down.

I will be unbanned. I'll speak to Annis later dont worry. I have not broken any rules of the forum. You banned me for debating with you. As you were.

SOMEONE BRING MY BLUE DUMMY BACK PLS.

Touché

If I wanted to do a Roathie on this forum you'd f*cking know it. I would use multiple VPN's and I would DdOS the crap out of this forum. The forum would be rendered useless and you wouldn't be able to load it. Then I could hack it using an SQL injection if I was so inclined. If you want me to troll I will. Im a computer scientist so if I wanted to troll a website I think I know how to do it properly.

Didnt you get all upset when Polo and Barnett were doing this to each other?

Yeah you go running to headteacher Barnett.

Didnt you get all upset when Polo and Barnett were doing this to each other?

Ignore Chuckles. You'll only end up getting in a debate with him and ending up getting banned. This forum doesn't like debate.

Erm.. No? All I said was that taking the piss out of someone for a disability or a gambling issue is a bit over the top... This was just a funny picture with a forum member I chat to quite regularly & I hoped he would take it in the manner which it was intended.

Yeah you go running to headteacher Barnett.

Im not running. I'll walk casually, LIKE A BOSS.

Erm.. No? All I said was that taking the piss out of someone for a disability or a gambling issue is a bit over the top... This was just a funny picture with a forum member I chat to quite regularly & I hoped he would take it in the manner which it was intended.

Agreed. Thats harmless banter. That is still allowed unlike debate. I wonder when they'll stop you having fun on this forum as well. It wont be long before only the mods are allowed to post and we're all just readers.

FIGHT THE OPPRESSION AND THE STRUGGLE.

I must admit, whilst I disagree with your views, you shouldn't be banned for airing them.

I must admit, whilst I disagree with your views, you shouldn't be banned for airing them.

Baked just needs to chill out. I have no intention of trolling. All he had to do if he was not interested in debating with me was say 'enough is enough shut up'. I'll get unbanned later anyway as Annis is reasonable like that. I have nothing against Baked so i'll leave it at that. Roathie is a whopper and deserves everything he gets but I was just engaging in debate. My stance on the rebrand is clear now on my new account, im just going along with it. Nice, easy and done with and I can move forward and hopefully enjoy next season.

I must admit, whilst I disagree with your views, you shouldn't be banned for airing them.

Thing is Alex as far as I was concerned this was a new user getting right into it. A very much Roathie thing. When he came out with the statement "I don't think people realise Tan is a billionaire" I thought this troll is taking the piss as everyone knows Tan is that rich. So new user plus stupid statement equals troll in my world so he was out of hear.

Now I know its Barnett I can't stop laughing. Have you ever seen him cry so much?