Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:14 am
Paxman wrote:Lost me on that one I'm afraid. I think you lost your right to decide what is acceptable language when discussing football with adults when you used the word "CRINGE" all in caps may I add
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:16 am
Cardiff Daft! wrote:Paxman wrote:Lost me on that one I'm afraid. I think you lost your right to decide what is acceptable language when discussing football with adults when you used the word "CRINGE" all in caps may I add
Louie Spence aka Waddles B*tch!!
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:18 am
Paxman wrote:Cardiff Daft! wrote:Paxman wrote:Lost me on that one I'm afraid. I think you lost your right to decide what is acceptable language when discussing football with adults when you used the word "CRINGE" all in caps may I add
Louie Spence aka Waddles B*tch!!
Are you speaking in code?
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:18 am
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:28 am
mjw6150 wrote:waddle wrote:AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
it might not "guarantee" promotion...but it WILL get us promotion, i think thats the point that was being made, f**k the mathematical shit as they will all drop points and make our final target smaller..
shouldnt you be planning an assault on the top 4?
f**k the mathematical shit !!!!!! what a classic comment![]()
![]()
![]()
why would I be planning an assault on the top 4 ? do you think I am micheal laudrup or sir huw jenkins
Are you concerned that you might finish bottom of the Premier League?
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:35 am
mjw6150 wrote:waddle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
it might not "guarantee" promotion...but it WILL get us promotion, i think thats the point that was being made, f**k the mathematical shit as they will all drop points and make our final target smaller..
shouldnt you be planning an assault on the top 4?
Waddle has taken this out of context, he never said it would mathematically guarantee, he was simply epousing an opinion that it would surely be enough, an opinion you contradicted. Things can go both ways but it looks as if the 85 point prediction is going to be bang on so have a little humility and accept it was a good prediction...
You remind me of myself Waddle, back in my school days I used to log on forums and cause havoc. I did it because it helped me get away from the teenage angst many teenagers suffer in school. My advice is to enjoy the things you love and stay away from the things you hate, i.e. get on a Swansea board! Foster some positivity in your life because things these days, and always with youngsters, always seem to be negative.
I took nothing out of context , this was what the debate was all about in the original post I suggest you go back and read this properly then comment or we could always add you to the list of cretins
Hmm okay...
Ad hominem! This shows you have no real argument, thank you very much.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:35 am
mjw6150 wrote:Paxman you contradict yourself by agreeing with Waddle with your words here from another thread -
"8 points clear of 3rd with 2nd and 3rd playing each other tomorrow.
That means if we pick up 1 point a game in our remaining games..... And assuming hull pick up the required 12 points to overtake us...
that means either Watford will have to get 16 points from a possible 21 and even then will have to rely on goal difference just to overtake us or Palace will have to get 19 points out of 21.
We are promoted enjoy it."
We have 7 games left are on 78 points so a point a game leaves us with 85 and you say it's enough to get promoted.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:47 am
mathematical does not factor in reality, i.e teams arses falling out, we have a cushion and mathematically or not 85 will be enough, more than enough to get us promotion as i do not see watford or hull coming too close to that number of points.waddle wrote:AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
it might not "guarantee" promotion...but it WILL get us promotion, i think thats the point that was being made, f**k the mathematical shit as they will all drop points and make our final target smaller..
shouldnt you be planning an assault on the top 4?
f**k the mathematical shit !!!!!! what a classic comment![]()
![]()
![]()
why would I be planning an assault on the top 4 ? do you think I am micheal laudrup or sir huw jenkins
Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:03 pm
AbsolutelyFearless wrote:mathematical does not factor in reality, i.e teams arses falling out, we have a cushion and mathematically or not 85 will be enough, more than enough to get us promotion as i do not see watford or hull coming too close to that number of points.waddle wrote:AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
it might not "guarantee" promotion...but it WILL get us promotion, i think thats the point that was being made, f**k the mathematical shit as they will all drop points and make our final target smaller..
shouldnt you be planning an assault on the top 4?
f**k the mathematical shit !!!!!! what a classic comment![]()
![]()
![]()
why would I be planning an assault on the top 4 ? do you think I am micheal laudrup or sir huw jenkins
Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:09 pm
mathematically we can be caught, in reality we wont as nerves will kick in, teams fighting for points down the bottom will cause a few upsets and city will stride to the league title..waddle wrote:AbsolutelyFearless wrote:mathematical does not factor in reality, i.e teams arses falling out, we have a cushion and mathematically or not 85 will be enough, more than enough to get us promotion as i do not see watford or hull coming too close to that number of points.waddle wrote:AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
it might not "guarantee" promotion...but it WILL get us promotion, i think thats the point that was being made, f**k the mathematical shit as they will all drop points and make our final target smaller..
shouldnt you be planning an assault on the top 4?
f**k the mathematical shit !!!!!! what a classic comment![]()
![]()
![]()
why would I be planning an assault on the top 4 ? do you think I am micheal laudrup or sir huw jenkins
dear god another idiot , mathematical does not factor in reality![]()
Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:12 pm
waddle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:waddle wrote:AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
it might not "guarantee" promotion...but it WILL get us promotion, i think thats the point that was being made, f**k the mathematical shit as they will all drop points and make our final target smaller..
shouldnt you be planning an assault on the top 4?
f**k the mathematical shit !!!!!! what a classic comment![]()
![]()
![]()
why would I be planning an assault on the top 4 ? do you think I am micheal laudrup or sir huw jenkins
Are you concerned that you might finish bottom of the Premier League?
No
Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:12 pm
Paxman wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:Paxman wrote:waddle wrote:Paxman wrote:Have I taught this board nothing?
Cardiff had the upper hand on this thread as soon as it was posted and it has now descended into so much nonsense it's swung very much back in Swansea's favour.
We will not be as big as man utd in Malaysia in 5 years, not in 50 years either or 500. We will probably be as big as QPR over there, in fact probably less as they have on of the most famous Asian footballers on their books... And QPR aren't very popular over there either may I add.
Waddle is correct. One of my pet hates is someone clearly making a point declaring a specific point in time and someone taking it to the future and applying it to a time frame in which the comment was not intended. Bakedalaskar fell foul of this when on a thread marked "as it stands" I posted how the table stood after Watford scored, yet because the other team equalised 15 minutes later my initial comment was deemed to be a mistake on my part. Needless to say I put him in his place and he deleted the thread
I
Waddle is correct.
TBF mate it's only 3 of them out of the whole board that are to thick to see it , the fact they keep going is quite amusing though
I'm literally staggered each day by the stupidity of some people on this board, and they wonder why people keep returning
Carpe die, is my latest amusement, you won't believe the amount of unbelievably stupid stuff that guy comes out with, apparently Liverpool only changed to red in the 60's, arsenal are a better team without carzola and Chelsea are a better team without hazard - not to mention the championship being as strong as ever even though all the prem teams are in turmoil, none of the big names are firing, we haven't played well all year and are clear of 3rd by 8points and the top 4 consists of Cardiff, Watford, hull and crystal palace
These creatures are fascinating.
And don't forget the biggest whopper of them all. Paxman pretending to be a Cardiff City supporter.
Anyone who uses the word whopper should be shunned to the same place as the "CRINGE!" And "O..M..G" brigade.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:13 pm
waddle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:waddle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
it might not "guarantee" promotion...but it WILL get us promotion, i think thats the point that was being made, f**k the mathematical shit as they will all drop points and make our final target smaller..
shouldnt you be planning an assault on the top 4?
Waddle has taken this out of context, he never said it would mathematically guarantee, he was simply epousing an opinion that it would surely be enough, an opinion you contradicted. Things can go both ways but it looks as if the 85 point prediction is going to be bang on so have a little humility and accept it was a good prediction...
You remind me of myself Waddle, back in my school days I used to log on forums and cause havoc. I did it because it helped me get away from the teenage angst many teenagers suffer in school. My advice is to enjoy the things you love and stay away from the things you hate, i.e. get on a Swansea board! Foster some positivity in your life because things these days, and always with youngsters, always seem to be negative.
I took nothing out of context , this was what the debate was all about in the original post I suggest you go back and read this properly then comment or we could always add you to the list of cretins
Hmm okay...
Ad hominem! This shows you have no real argument, thank you very much.
you still haven't read the original topic have you![]()
vos es a campana finis
Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:14 pm
Paxman wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Paxman you contradict yourself by agreeing with Waddle with your words here from another thread -
"8 points clear of 3rd with 2nd and 3rd playing each other tomorrow.
That means if we pick up 1 point a game in our remaining games..... And assuming hull pick up the required 12 points to overtake us...
that means either Watford will have to get 16 points from a possible 21 and even then will have to rely on goal difference just to overtake us or Palace will have to get 19 points out of 21.
We are promoted enjoy it."
We have 7 games left are on 78 points so a point a game leaves us with 85 and you say it's enough to get promoted.
I've clearly worded that as an opinion backed with assumption, assuming the above comes to fruition the second oartnifnthe sentence comes into play.
That really is a terrible example and nothing like whats being discussed here. Nice try though.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:18 pm
mjw6150 wrote:Paxman wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Paxman you contradict yourself by agreeing with Waddle with your words here from another thread -
"8 points clear of 3rd with 2nd and 3rd playing each other tomorrow.
That means if we pick up 1 point a game in our remaining games..... And assuming hull pick up the required 12 points to overtake us...
that means either Watford will have to get 16 points from a possible 21 and even then will have to rely on goal difference just to overtake us or Palace will have to get 19 points out of 21.
We are promoted enjoy it."
We have 7 games left are on 78 points so a point a game leaves us with 85 and you say it's enough to get promoted.
I've clearly worded that as an opinion backed with assumption, assuming the above comes to fruition the second oartnifnthe sentence comes into play.
That really is a terrible example and nothing like whats being discussed here. Nice try though.
Rubbish. You say 'We are promoted enjoy it'. You say 7 points from 7 games will be enough, what's different to someone else saying 85 points will be enough?
Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:20 pm
Nanny McPhail wrote:Paxman wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:Paxman wrote:waddle wrote:Paxman wrote:Have I taught this board nothing?
Cardiff had the upper hand on this thread as soon as it was posted and it has now descended into so much nonsense it's swung very much back in Swansea's favour.
We will not be as big as man utd in Malaysia in 5 years, not in 50 years either or 500. We will probably be as big as QPR over there, in fact probably less as they have on of the most famous Asian footballers on their books... And QPR aren't very popular over there either may I add.
Waddle is correct. One of my pet hates is someone clearly making a point declaring a specific point in time and someone taking it to the future and applying it to a time frame in which the comment was not intended. Bakedalaskar fell foul of this when on a thread marked "as it stands" I posted how the table stood after Watford scored, yet because the other team equalised 15 minutes later my initial comment was deemed to be a mistake on my part. Needless to say I put him in his place and he deleted the thread
I
Waddle is correct.
TBF mate it's only 3 of them out of the whole board that are to thick to see it , the fact they keep going is quite amusing though
I'm literally staggered each day by the stupidity of some people on this board, and they wonder why people keep returning
Carpe die, is my latest amusement, you won't believe the amount of unbelievably stupid stuff that guy comes out with, apparently Liverpool only changed to red in the 60's, arsenal are a better team without carzola and Chelsea are a better team without hazard - not to mention the championship being as strong as ever even though all the prem teams are in turmoil, none of the big names are firing, we haven't played well all year and are clear of 3rd by 8points and the top 4 consists of Cardiff, Watford, hull and crystal palace
These creatures are fascinating.
And don't forget the biggest whopper of them all. Paxman pretending to be a Cardiff City supporter.
Anyone who uses the word whopper should be shunned to the same place as the "CRINGE!" And "O..M..G" brigade.
Paxman trying to give someone an English language lesson shocker. f**k me you're one boring c**t. Stick that in your dictionary if you want.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:22 pm
Paxman wrote:No not English language lesson, just a lesson in how to not sound like a 14 year old girl.
There's a difference.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:23 pm
Cardiff Daft! wrote:Paxman wrote:No not English language lesson, just a lesson in how to not sound like a 14 year old girl.
There's a difference.
only how to sound like a 14 year old, JB's rent boy eh Louie!!
Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:34 pm
[/quote]
[/quote]Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:27 pm
Swansea City ATW wrote:Cardiff City are a joke of a club, need money to be succesfull and have some owner who doesnt give a shit about the club, only his bank account. I have nothing against the fans, it's the way the club is run that makes me laugh!
Are you ready to get relegated next season and go into administration? I AM![]()
I will watch while your club fails at every level.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:44 pm
mjw6150 wrote:waddle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:waddle wrote:AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
it might not "guarantee" promotion...but it WILL get us promotion, i think thats the point that was being made, f**k the mathematical shit as they will all drop points and make our final target smaller..
shouldnt you be planning an assault on the top 4?
f**k the mathematical shit !!!!!! what a classic comment![]()
![]()
![]()
why would I be planning an assault on the top 4 ? do you think I am micheal laudrup or sir huw jenkins
Are you concerned that you might finish bottom of the Premier League?
No
But mathematically you still could finish bottom. With one hand you criticise those who say 85 points will mean we're up and then on the other you feel sure Reading & QPR won't go on runs you obviously believe Hull & Watford could go on.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 5:35 pm
Wed Apr 03, 2013 5:37 pm
PtB wrote:Swansea City ATW wrote:Cardiff City are a joke of a club, need money to be succesfull and have some owner who doesnt give a shit about the club, only his bank account. I have nothing against the fans, it's the way the club is run that makes me laugh!
Are you ready to get relegated next season and go into administration? I AM![]()
I will watch while your club fails at every level.
April Fools Day was yesterday chief.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:10 pm
nobby wrote:Waddle, you are a first class prick, your assumptions are based on Watford and Hull winning all 6 games, that wont happen 100%, 85 points will take us up, i said it a month ago and i say it now, and when it happens will have pleasure in reminding you once again, that you know f**k all, FACT.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:27 pm
waddle wrote:nobby wrote:Waddle, you are a first class prick, your assumptions are based on Watford and Hull winning all 6 games, that wont happen 100%, 85 points will take us up, i said it a month ago and i say it now, and when it happens will have pleasure in reminding you once again, that you know f**k all, FACT.
You can't say it won't happen 100% until it is mathematically impossible , honestly Annis I know you've trained this chimp to use a keyboard , but making him a moderator is ridiculous
Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:32 pm
AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:nobby wrote:Waddle, you are a first class prick, your assumptions are based on Watford and Hull winning all 6 games, that wont happen 100%, 85 points will take us up, i said it a month ago and i say it now, and when it happens will have pleasure in reminding you once again, that you know f**k all, FACT.
You can't say it won't happen 100% until it is mathematically impossible , honestly Annis I know you've trained this chimp to use a keyboard , but making him a moderator is ridiculous
He's as confident 85 points will be enough as you ate (be honest) that you are safe on 40 points..
Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:42 pm
nobby wrote:AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:nobby wrote:Waddle, you are a first class prick, your assumptions are based on Watford and Hull winning all 6 games, that wont happen 100%, 85 points will take us up, i said it a month ago and i say it now, and when it happens will have pleasure in reminding you once again, that you know f**k all, FACT.
You can't say it won't happen 100% until it is mathematically impossible , honestly Annis I know you've trained this chimp to use a keyboard , but making him a moderator is ridiculous
He's as confident 85 points will be enough as you ate (be honest) that you are safe on 40 points..
Exactly, and he still hasnt answered the question i have asked a month ago and today, can you guarantee 3 teams will get to 85 points?
Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:47 pm
PtB wrote:Swansea City ATW wrote:Cardiff City are a joke of a club, need money to be succesfull and have some owner who doesnt give a shit about the club, only his bank account. I have nothing against the fans, it's the way the club is run that makes me laugh!
Are you ready to get relegated next season and go into administration? I AM![]()
I will watch while your club fails at every level.
April Fools Day was yesterday chief.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:53 pm
nobby wrote:AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:nobby wrote:Waddle, you are a first class prick, your assumptions are based on Watford and Hull winning all 6 games, that wont happen 100%, 85 points will take us up, i said it a month ago and i say it now, and when it happens will have pleasure in reminding you once again, that you know f**k all, FACT.
You can't say it won't happen 100% until it is mathematically impossible , honestly Annis I know you've trained this chimp to use a keyboard , but making him a moderator is ridiculous
He's as confident 85 points will be enough as you ate (be honest) that you are safe on 40 points..
Exactly, and he still hasnt answered the question i have asked a month ago and today, can you guarantee 3 teams will get to 85 points?
Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:04 pm