Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:49 pm
HANDBALL ! wrote:harold pinta wrote:HANDBALL ! wrote:harold pinta wrote:I find it hard to understand how anyone can like him, given the complete disdain he shows towards us.
On the pitch we are doing well at the moment, so there is a certain amount of good will towards him from those who feel that success is more important than identity. If and when things take a down turn, I predict many of these same fans will turn against him.
Have previous Chairmen worked on the same prognosis
I have no agenda , but been there worn the Tshirt
Just like managers, almost all football owners will eventually become unpopular, success cannot last forever. At the moment there are people expressing their love for tan, but it's not him they love, it's his money. As soon as things go tits up they will be calling for his head just the same as all the others.
As the OP said "it's easy to say why you don't like the man" - your not bloody kidding mate!
I loved Sam and his ideas. He deliberately gained media attention and it was a good time !
Tan wants Malaysian attention and although I understand I still struggle.
Was anyone else gonna pay the tax bill ?
Were HMRC gonna wind us up ?
I haven't been insulted once tonite , wow , I may return sooner
Maybe CCFC is an addiction they cant give up ?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:49 pm
harold pinta wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Cant just say rebrand can you chuckles ..got to add ghastly ..thats your oppinion not everyones
I have to say, ghastly is a very good way to describe the re brand. Other words I would use are despicable, abhorrent, crass, wretched and loathsome.
Tan does not give the tiniest bit of shit about our fans, he has made that quite clear. Love his money if you want, but why would anyone love the man. He certainly doesn't love you.
Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:51 pm
HANDBALL ! wrote:harold pinta wrote:HANDBALL ! wrote:harold pinta wrote:I find it hard to understand how anyone can like him, given the complete disdain he shows towards us.
On the pitch we are doing well at the moment, so there is a certain amount of good will towards him from those who feel that success is more important than identity. If and when things take a down turn, I predict many of these same fans will turn against him.
Have previous Chairmen worked on the same prognosis
I have no agenda , but been there worn the Tshirt
Just like managers, almost all football owners will eventually become unpopular, success cannot last forever. At the moment there are people expressing their love for tan, but it's not him they love, it's his money. As soon as things go tits up they will be calling for his head just the same as all the others.
As the OP said "it's easy to say why you don't like the man" - your not bloody kidding mate!
Maybe CCFC is an addiction they cant give up ?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:51 pm
Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:54 pm
darran1927 wrote:My personal feeling is I appreciate what he is doing for the club but I just cannot fathom why we had to change colour it really does bother me , he obviously wants us to succeed , however he is being naive in thinking that a football club is just like any other business and cannot seem to grasp why some supporters are against the rebrand, if he understood football a bit more before he invested then I don't believe he would of changed the colour.
I wish I could like him for being the person to give us a successful team but I can't as he has stripped us of blue
Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:55 pm
Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:58 pm
Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:01 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Dicey wrote:Try reading the the opening two lines from the Op on this thread . I think he maybe trying to gauge folks opinions on why some support Tan and NOT reasons why folk (YOU) disrespect him.
I'm not the only one who does not respect Tan..
I read the WHOLE of the opening post which asked for opinions on Tan. It asked that people TRY to be positive.
I tried & I couldn't. So I gave my honest opinions.
Even if you disagree, calling members insults rather than debating maturely says a lot.
Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:04 pm
El Tel wrote:My opinion of Tan is that he has saved our club and given me the most exciting times i can ever remember as a City fan. Long may it continue.
![]()
![]()
Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:08 pm
Dicey wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Dicey wrote:Try reading the the opening two lines from the Op on this thread . I think he maybe trying to gauge folks opinions on why some support Tan and NOT reasons why folk (YOU) disrespect him.
I'm not the only one who does not respect Tan..
I read the WHOLE of the opening post which asked for opinions on Tan. It asked that people TRY to be positive.
I tried & I couldn't. So I gave my honest opinions.
Even if you disagree, calling members insults rather than debating maturely says a lot.
Now now chuckles , I suggest you read the opening post again and pay attention to the DETAIL
Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:09 pm
bluelover wrote:darran1927 wrote:My personal feeling is I appreciate what he is doing for the club but I just cannot fathom why we had to change colour it really does bother me , he obviously wants us to succeed , however he is being naive in thinking that a football club is just like any other business and cannot seem to grasp why some supporters are against the rebrand, if he understood football a bit more before he invested then I don't believe he would of changed the colour.
I wish I could like him for being the person to give us a successful team but I can't as he has stripped us of blue
Tan is looking at the bigger picture, to make us succeed he believes that the only way to do this long term is to grow our market beyond just South Wales and believes that in doing so the market to aim for is the Asian market he knows so well and where he believes playing in a red shirt will assist the process.
Imagine it like this. Of the 20,000 fans at the stadium, if he was to lose 5,000 fans because of their love of blue i.e. the 25% he estimates, then he has retained 15,000 of local support. If as he believes a red shirt will appeal more in China than a blue shirt will and the fan base grows as a result then we could gain many thousands of new fans, making the loss of 5,000 local fans regrettable but acceptable. Tan is a very successful businessman and not in it for the love of football and personally I thank god he is because our history has shown again and again that for this club to survive let alone grow we need a man with vision.
Tan is not stupid and knows that for his vision to succeed, the club has to be be playing at the top end of the Premiership consistently to keep the interest overseas and I for one am very excited about what potentially awaits this club.
Of course should Tan end up failing which is perfectly possible in a business that relies so much on what happens on the pitch, then as he said he will walk away but leave us in a good position and the 25% can then come back and watch their team playing in blue.
I believe some fans want success but just can't get their head around the need for a colour change. I believe the majority do understand Tan's reasons for changing to red although most of them would ideally prefer to stay in blue. What I find hard to understand though is that there are some fans out there who I honestly beleive would prefer for us to go back to how we were before the Malaysians become involved, back to the days of fighting for the clubs very existence.........just as long as it meant the team played in blue
Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:12 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Dicey wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Dicey wrote:Try reading the the opening two lines from the Op on this thread . I think he maybe trying to gauge folks opinions on why some support Tan and NOT reasons why folk (YOU) disrespect him.
I'm not the only one who does not respect Tan..
I read the WHOLE of the opening post which asked for opinions on Tan. It asked that people TRY to be positive.
I tried & I couldn't. So I gave my honest opinions.
Even if you disagree, calling members insults rather than debating maturely says a lot.
Now now chuckles , I suggest you read the opening post again and pay attention to the DETAIL
I have. Asking for people to post opinions. So I have.
.. I'm sure there will more threads tomorrow you can derail .
Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:14 pm
Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:19 pm
Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:28 pm
All Black Everything. wrote:Who's to say Tan won't turn us back to blue once we are making profit? The reason we are red now is because he is trying to scrimp together every penny and make us appeal more. It might work, it might not but hes willing to try and get something going.
Sometimes to turn a business around you need to make sacrifices - lay off staff, rebrand, relocate, change manufacturers. With a footballing business only some of those are applicable because otherwise there would be uproar. Imagine if Tan tried to relocate us like other businesses do? It would cause murder.
I would not be surprised if Tan returns us back to blue once we are making profit. At that point he'll have what he came here for. He'll have a business known, a brand known, a profit making machine in the west and a continuous stream of income from TV deals and competition money. He can then also be regarded as a hero if he returned us to blue.
The key is it takes sacrifices to get there. When a club is losing as much money as us per month then I do think from a business point of view one has to understand that he will be trying whatever he can to scrape from the barrel. Of course this is wishful thinking but we genuinely don't know his motives and I have given up second guessing. What will happen, will happen now. People should just accept that and hope and pray for the best.
Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:10 pm
aj1927 wrote:IT'S EASY TO SAY WHY YOU DON'T LIKE THE MAN.
TRY SAYING WHY YOU DO LIKE/APREICATE//RESPECT THE MAN?
He has helped develope a very impressive squad with surrounding staff and improved facilities and is on the verge of realising my personal dream of seeing Cardiff in the top flight. A dream that for me was re-ignited when Sam joined the club.
So please don't abuse people's views and opinions on this thread just state your own personal view.
Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:07 am
Coco wrote:aj1927 wrote:IT'S EASY TO SAY WHY YOU DON'T LIKE THE MAN.
TRY SAYING WHY YOU DO LIKE/APREICATE//RESPECT THE MAN?
He has helped develope a very impressive squad with surrounding staff and improved facilities and is on the verge of realising my personal dream of seeing Cardiff in the top flight. A dream that for me was re-ignited when Sam joined the club.
So please don't abuse people's views and opinions on this thread just state your own personal view.
Are you suggesting it's more difficult to say why we do like/appreciate/respect Tan !? I agree - TAN OUT , sooner rather than later .Tin-pot dictator , Tosspot !
Thu Mar 21, 2013 1:07 am
Thu Mar 21, 2013 1:46 am
Thu Mar 21, 2013 2:01 am
aj1927 wrote:roystonblue wrote:
Strange your view on here John?
After reading this -http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=47042
It was Taffy apples positive spin on the Malaysians (pre rebrand)
Re: THOSE MALAYSIAN FELLERS, A POSITIVE VIEW!!!
by roystonblue » Fri May 27, 2011 10:18 pm
Well said Taffy, The malaysians will let us know in time whats happening. And i think it will be a positive outcome. By the way what mob were or are you in?
roystonblue
Granted it was two years back...
Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:49 am
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:I don't know why chuckles is getting so much stick. Is he not allowed to give his "personal opinion"?
What about this whole "freedom of speech".
Sorry OP but you're asking people to respect others views, which is fine, yet you contradict yourself b not respecting chuckles views.
Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:40 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Bridgend_bluebird wrote:I don't know why chuckles is getting so much stick. Is he not allowed to give his "personal opinion"?
What about this whole "freedom of speech".
Sorry OP but you're asking people to respect others views, which is fine, yet you contradict yourself b not respecting chuckles views.
It's because I can't respect Tan. I've given valid reasons for debate & they are incapable, so they throw insults instead. Debate won.
Barry Chuckle wrote:Bridgend_bluebird wrote:I don't know why chuckles is getting so much stick. Is he not allowed to give his "personal opinion"?
What about this whole "freedom of speech".
Sorry OP but you're asking people to respect others views, which is fine, yet you contradict yourself b not respecting chuckles views.
It's because I can't respect Tan. I've given valid reasons for debate & they are incapable, so they throw insults instead. Debate won.
Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:43 am
Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:44 am
Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:54 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Where did I say that you had thrown insults? In fairness, you haven't.. You don't seem to like the fact that I dislike dictator tan though.
Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:54 am
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Tan is a decent man who is listening to his fan base. He made some changes that were initially unpopular but the fans have backed him financially in their droves by renewing STs, to me that shows great business sense and accumen. The best way to see if fans like something is to see whether or not they come back and most of us have bar a few.
Roll on next season, maybe Tan will invest our ST money in changing the seats to red!?
Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:59 am
Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:03 am
aj1927 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Where did I say that you had thrown insults? In fairness, you haven't.. You don't seem to like the fact that I dislike dictator tan though.
Chuck, it's your decision and your mindset. Only a fool would argue in attempt to change that.
I'm just trying to understand how "Fans" can suggest that they have hated him from the off/ or since he has implemented the changes. When surely they must realise that owners come and go regularly In this "Buisness".
I have stated in the past that my biggest resentment towards Tan is the divide he has caused. Especially after the work Malky did to unite us all.
If I felt strongly enough that I couldn't accept what Tan was doing then I would just "Walk Away"
But I wouldn't walk into another club. But the fact for me remains, I feel stronger passion for CCFC than I do for Tan.
That's my choice, others can do as they please.
Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:19 am
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:I don't know why chuckles is getting so much stick. Is he not allowed to give his "personal opinion"?
What about this whole "freedom of speech".
Sorry OP but you're asking people to respect others views, which is fine, yet you contradict yourself b not respecting chuckles views.
Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:22 am