mark bridger case

My own guess is they probably found some sort of forensic evidence tying the poor child to his van.Might explain why they're still doing sweeping searches if he's not forthcomming with info.

Some are assuming that he must be a Peado ???? He might just be a cold blooded murderer but to be like that at his age he must have killed before. Or he is mentally ill and for some reason took her and when she started to object he panicked. Or it was sexual . Maybe a more recent thing due to it being available on the net. Maybe just looking didn't do it any more.
But whatever the reason he should spend the rest of his days in a bare cell. But we will all know he will get a top notch food, and he will get a room not a cell with TV ,Xbox ETC.

just a thought perhaps he has confessed and told them that he put the body in river which is why the peverting justice charge relates to the preventing burial of body.and the body may never be found if it drifted to the irish sea

Innocent till proven guilty or is it the other way around these day, although i think he done it myself, but im not the judge or have i seen anything in hard evidence so they must have something on him hence the trial, but it wouldnt be the first time the police have pointed the finger to keep the public happy and got it wrong to cover up there failings in cases. The worlds fucked up with some weird people floating about. What goes though peoples retarded minds to think of doing stuff like this to child.
Peado moved in down my mums estate once he lasted 24hours petrol bombed out and i personally give him a good kicking infront of the street, makes my f*cking skin crawl

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE CHARGES??

"YES!!!!" SNIFFLE f*cking SNIFFLE!!!

His family and friends will LEGALLY have been allowed access to him, and his solicitor would have made a f*cking
huge point of getting them up there, on telly, crying "NO WAY WOULD OUR LOVELY MARK DO SUCH A THING!!"
Not a peep. His family cannot be found. Not one Sky News reporter seems to have found anyone to speak on his
behalf

MOREOVER.. his brief has not appeared on telly either to say "my client strongly refutes these allegations, he is
an innocent man, he WILL be pleading NOT GUILTY at the appropriate time"

Stinks to high heaven it does. He's killed her all right. The Police are not so much fighting for a confession, they
want to know where April is.

Electrocute the c**t.

If he won't tell them what he did with her, I would say release him think that would do the trick.

Innocent until proven guilty.

He is originally from Croydon according to the papers,but speculating maybe he left that area because of previous crimes?

I find it strange from what I have also read in the papers that he told everyone when he moved to the area that he had been in the army but has'nt the army denied this?

You never fully know anyone's background/history with people increasingly migrating to different areas of the country & Wales has become a dumping ground for the pond life from English cities.

If found guilty he should be tortured until he gives the exact location of the little girl.

I have a friend in the police and he's told me the talk amongst the police is that he's confessed and said he put her in a storm drain but he can't remember which one! Obviously could be Chinese whispers but that's what my mate has told me but he is not in the force investigating. Let the people of macynlleth deal with the cuunt

Pump him full of that old skool "truth serum" they used during the cold war! Get the truth out of him, and if he is responsible, then let's get the location of poor aprils body so at least her family can lay her to rest properly. There are drugs that can make him talk and give up the truth. Only the silly outdated European courts of human rights stop them being used. If he's got nothing to hide then he's got nothing to worry about, and in fact,he would jump at any chance to prove his innocence.

You would not accept the charges if you were innocent, by f**k if I was accused by such a heinous crime I would do everything in my power to clear my name, would co operate with the police fully in their investigations but maintain a clear head throughout, accepting the blame for killing a five year old girl is not the actions of an innocent man.

String the c**t up and kill him, torture him before and slowly kill him so he f*cking suffers but then again the nonce defending leftie student hippy types are finding any f*cking reason to come up with excuses for the man.

until i hear some actual evidence, i think he didnt do it. from what i can see, police put up on the news they are looking for a van or rover maybe left hand drive. ok so if he did it why was his rover packed up and walking along 2 miles from where it happed. surly he put it in a garage, keeping his head down or even left town? that seems abit strange to me. yes the cps can charge you with no actual evidence, i found car keys in town and handed them in, i was arrested because they keys had been stolen from a house. i was charged and on bail for 6 months til the case was droped for no evidence. and as for his guilt. whats the point of him saying he dont understand the charges in court. all that means is they will read them out again to him. thats not guilt thats the court asking him dose he understand what they are acusing him of. and my other resson i think he didnt do it at the momment is because in all high profile crimes that hit the news they always give the public atlest a small bone of evidence to show there ressons, this time they have given nothing, so to sum this up, the crime is comited, they aressed a guy owning a rover near by soon after and got nothing to show us why they think its him. until i see some evidence i think its a fit up because they needed to nick someone for it

oh and as for that over comment about your friend of a friend who is a copper and he said the body is in a storm drain, that must be bull. because storm drains lead to pipe works, and they are still sticking with the river idea

I have a friend in the police and he's told me the talk amongst the police is that he's confessed and said he put her in a storm drain but he can't remember which one! Obviously could be Chinese whispers but that's what my mate has told me but he is not in the force investigating. Let the people of macynlleth deal with the cuunt

so if that was true then why are they still looking at the river? as storm drains lead to pipe works

just a thought perhaps he has confessed and told them that he put the body in river which is why the peverting justice charge relates to the preventing burial of body.and the body may never be found if it drifted to the irish sea

if he had confessed then there wouldnt be a trial. it would have been a pla hearing in court and remanded for psr pappers to be done

just a thought perhaps he has confessed and told them that he put the body in river which is why the peverting justice charge relates to the preventing burial of body.and the body may never be found if it drifted to the irish sea

if you steel a car and wipe the prints away after you can also be charged with trying to prevent the corse of justice. so fact they havnt given the public any evidence. you might as well say. police have evidence it was his rover(say a street camra got his numberplate) didnt find any evidence but found a bill for valiting. something like that

I thought you live in aber JB why would you be in Machynlleth? Serious question not having a dig

He was being held in Aber mate and the place is full of police.

until i hear some actual evidence, i think he didnt do it. from what i can see, police put up on the news they are looking for a van or rover maybe left hand drive. ok so if he did it why was his rover packed up and walking along 2 miles from where it happed. surly he put it in a garage, keeping his head down or even left town? that seems abit strange to me. yes the cps can charge you with no actual evidence, i found car keys in town and handed them in, i was arrested because they keys had been stolen from a house. i was charged and on bail for 6 months til the case was droped for no evidence. and as for his guilt. whats the point of him saying he dont understand the charges in court. all that means is they will read them out again to him. thats not guilt thats the court asking him dose he understand what they are acusing him of. and my other resson i think he didnt do it at the momment is because in all high profile crimes that hit the news they always give the public atlest a small bone of evidence to show there ressons, this time they have given nothing, so to sum this up, the crime is comited, they aressed a guy owning a rover near by soon after and got nothing to show us why they think its him. until i see some evidence i think its a fit up because they needed to nick someone for it

His landrover was hidden in a garage

just a thought perhaps he has confessed and told them that he put the body in river which is why the peverting justice charge relates to the preventing burial of body.and the body may never be found if it drifted to the irish sea

if you steel a car and wipe the prints away after you can also be charged with trying to prevent the corse of justice. so fact they havnt given the public any evidence. you might as well say. police have evidence it was his rover(say a street camra got his numberplate) didnt find any evidence but found a bill for valiting. something like that

Your not Mark Bridgers lawyer are you?

just a thought perhaps he has confessed and told them that he put the body in river which is why the peverting justice charge relates to the preventing burial of body.and the body may never be found if it drifted to the irish sea

if you steel a car and wipe the prints away after you can also be charged with trying to prevent the corse of justice. so fact they havnt given the public any evidence. you might as well say. police have evidence it was his rover(say a street camra got his numberplate) didnt find any evidence but found a bill for valiting. something like that

Your not Mark Bridgers lawyer are you?

im not for one minute saying he didnt do it, nor am i saying he did as ive not seen the evidence.....Only because of the media portraying him as guilty everyone thinks he is. Remember the Joanna Yeates murder in Bristol. Everyone was so sure it was the landlord.

The media can destroy people.

The guy has been in court and charged. People need to be patient and wait until he is convicted.....that of course is if he is guilty.

From what I am reading the chances are he will go down for abduction and not murder. It is feared the body has been washed out to sea and as mentioned above it is highly unlikely a murder charge will be given.

If I was a betting man I would say he was guilty of murder but will get away with that crime because you can bet his solicitor will be playing the law game. It comes as no surprise to me that this guy has not told the police where he last saw the body. He has most likely been advised by his solicitor not to say in the hope they will drop the murder charge because they cannot find the body. The solicitor most likely knows he is as guilty as hell but will claim he is only doing his job. The law can be an arse and certain solicitors will use that.

You can still be convicted of murder, without actually finding the body of the murder victim. If that wasn't the case then he wouldn't have been charged with murder untill the body had been found. Plenty of people have been convicted of murder without the actual evidence of having the body. The evidence has just got to be strong enough...which obviously it is, hence why the CPS have looked at the evidence gathered and given the go ahead for the detectives to charge him with the murder of april. They must have some pretty strong damning evidence on him in order to do that. Maybe a confession from him.

thats all well and good, but it wouldnt be the first time the CPS or the police have got something wrong.


Everyone is out to convict the man already, and its not really surprising considering the case, but lets all just be a little patient here, if guilty he will get what he deserves, the truth will out in the end!

thats all well and good, but it wouldnt be the first time the CPS or the police have got something wrong.


Everyone is out to convict the man already, and its not really surprising considering the case, but lets all just be a little patient here, if guilty he will get what he deserves, the truth will out in the end!

The thing that does it for me is, how quick they actually charged him with the murder. They could have just charged him with abduction or another lesser charge if they wasn't 100percent sure he committed the murder, in order to hold him and give themselves time to gather more evidence. But seems to me the evidence is so strong against him that they didn't need anymore time. They must have him banged to rights in order to charge him with murder in such a short space of time without the actual body. Some sort of confession, cctv footage, blood and DnA evidence. What ever it is they have on him, it must be something 100percent damning. I know the CPS and police get things wrong, but everything is video taped with solicitors present these days, in such cases like these especially, everything is scrutinised in the smallest detail, not just by the police, but buy independent agency's working for the prosecution and the defence. A lot of changes have happened in the way cases are investigated these days because of so many high profile miscarriages of justice that have happened in the past. The evidence has got to be pretty much 100percent.These days before charges can be brought and taken to court.

The storm drains where I live I believe go down to the river Rhymney. They do have or supposed to have grills on them at the end before the river but I know of one whilst walking the dog the grill is missing.
But as someone said the storm drain rumour is just Chinese whispers.

thats all well and good, but it wouldnt be the first time the CPS or the police have got something wrong.


Everyone is out to convict the man already, and its not really surprising considering the case, but lets all just be a little patient here, if guilty he will get what he deserves, the truth will out in the end!

The thing that does it for me is, how quick they actually charged him with the murder. They could have just charged him with abduction or another lesser charge if they wasn't 100percent sure he committed the murder, in order to hold him and give themselves time to gather more evidence. But seems to me the evidence is so strong against him that they didn't need anymore time. They must have him banged to rights in order to charge him with murder in such a short space of time without the actual body. Some sort of confession, cctv footage, blood and DnA evidence. What ever it is they have on him, it must be something 100percent damning. I know the CPS and police get things wrong, but everything is video taped with solicitors present these days, in such cases like these especially, everything is scrutinised in the smallest detail, not just by the police, but buy independent agency's working for the prosecution and the defence. A lot of changes have happened in the way cases are investigated these days because of so many high profile miscarriages of justice that have happened in the past. The evidence has got to be pretty much 100percent.These days before charges can be brought and taken to court.

In law, you fight fire with fire. Never let a statement go unanswered, never let the 'other side'
get away with anything. Dont give an inch. Or a Jury, the Judge, the public will only hear one
side of the story and it will stick.

He has been charged with murder. But even before that, his solicitor WOULD have been on the
steps of the police station saying how his client is innocent, they got the wrong man, the police
have fucked up.

Everything that is happening now is cementing this fuckers guilt in the mindset of the British Public.

Yet his solicitor is saying f**k all, Not even to refute the Murder Charge, because he/she is probably
trying to get the odious c**t to tell them where the poor childs body is.

If there was a GLIMMER of innocence, f**k me lads, we're talking solicitor here, the chance to shine!!!...

His brief would have a more familiar face right now than the accused!!

Bridger is guilty as f**k!

thats all well and good, but it wouldnt be the first time the CPS or the police have got something wrong.


Everyone is out to convict the man already, and its not really surprising considering the case, but lets all just be a little patient here, if guilty he will get what he deserves, the truth will out in the end!

The thing that does it for me is, how quick they actually charged him with the murder. They could have just charged him with abduction or another lesser charge if they wasn't 100percent sure he committed the murder, in order to hold him and give themselves time to gather more evidence. But seems to me the evidence is so strong against him that they didn't need anymore time. They must have him banged to rights in order to charge him with murder in such a short space of time without the actual body. Some sort of confession, cctv footage, blood and DnA evidence. What ever it is they have on him, it must be something 100percent damning. I know the CPS and police get things wrong, but everything is video taped with solicitors present these days, in such cases like these especially, everything is scrutinised in the smallest detail, not just by the police, but buy independent agency's working for the prosecution and the defence. A lot of changes have happened in the way cases are investigated these days because of so many high profile miscarriages of justice that have happened in the past. The evidence has got to be pretty much 100percent.These days before charges can be brought and taken to court.

In law, you fight fire with fire. Never let a statement go unanswered, never let the 'other side'
get away with anything. Dont give an inch. Or a Jury, the Judge, the public will only hear one
side of the story and it will stick.

He has been charged with murder. But even before that, his solicitor WOULD have been on the
steps of the police station saying how his client is innocent, they got the wrong man, the police
have fucked up.

Everything that is happening now is cementing this fuckers guilt in the mindset of the British Public.

Yet his solicitor is saying f**k all, Not even to refute the Murder Charge, because he/she is probably
trying to get the odious c**t to tell them where the poor childs body is.

If there was a GLIMMER of innocence, f**k me lads, we're talking solicitor here, the chance to shine!!!...

His brief would have a more familiar face right now than the accused!!

Bridger is guilty as f**k!

Looks like.

But Taff are you allowing for the suggestion the guy could have just had his land rover valeted and the police have put 2 + 2 tofether and got 5?

Shouldnt laugh its no laughing matter but some of the nonsense on this thread if I dont laugh ill cry.

But Taff are you allowing for the suggestion the guy could have just had his land rover valeted and the police have put 2 + 2 tofether and got 5?

Shouldnt laugh its no laughing matter but some of the nonsense on this thread if I dont laugh ill cry.

I Despair of this country I really do.

A wicked evil c**t who kidnaps a child, and a piece of shit that made a joke about dead
children gets more support on here than the lad who called radical Muslims rag heads!!

People need to take a step back and think about who they are giving the benefit of the doubt to.

Every single person has a fundamental right to be innocent until proven guilty (regardless of what you think)

IF he is guilty they should hang him from the first tree outside the courtroom.

IF he is innocent he will recieve a rather larger cheque from the newspapers and the Mid Wales Police, probably given a new identity and a home at the tax payers expense.

Until the case is over, none of us have the right to judge him as none of us have heard any of the evidence whatsoever.