Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:43 pm
CP76 wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:CP76 wrote:Not if its slow. Stab him in the face and slice him all over with a razor. Throw boiling hot water over him. Every day until he is on the brink and then burn him alive.
That would give me more satisfaction.
To be fair some inmates will punish him
Fair? FAIR?
Sorry mate some inmate giving them a slap or cutting their throat doesnt even up killing your child.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:43 pm
Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:Bluemonkey wrote:OhhhGa wrote:I would not want he/she killed no, it's painless, pointless and does nothing to remedy the situation. I would like to speak to the offender however, to make he/she aware of what they have actually done and the effect it has had on the family.
I wouldn't feel any better knowing that they've had an easy escape, suffering a quick and totally painless death, but each to their own.
SPEAK TO THE OFFENDER........................OhhhGa your a cock in all the makings,i really dont understand some people in life,you being one of them
I am truly devastated by your comment.
left wing rubbish!!! No wonder this country is in such a f*cking mess!!!!
Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:43 pm
CP76 wrote:OhhhGa wrote:Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:Adam Brown chucking his two pence in the pot, shock horror.
The 'there, there' attitude in this country has made some communities a no-go zones at certain times of the night.
Didn't I read an article somewhere about your brain-wave of, quite literally, banning the youth from going outside after 9:00? That made me laugh fair play.
Good idea
Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:44 pm
OhhhGa wrote:CP76 wrote:OhhhGa wrote:Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:Adam Brown chucking his two pence in the pot, shock horror.
The 'there, there' attitude in this country has made some communities a no-go zones at certain times of the night.
Didn't I read an article somewhere about your brain-wave of, quite literally, banning the youth from going outside after 9:00? That made me laugh fair play.
Good idea
If you're a member of the Gestapo maybe. Why can't they go out after 9:00? Authoritarian tripe.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:45 pm
CP76 wrote:OhhhGa wrote:Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:Adam Brown chucking his two pence in the pot, shock horror.
The 'there, there' attitude in this country has made some communities a no-go zones at certain times of the night.
Didn't I read an article somewhere about your brain-wave of, quite literally, banning the youth from going outside after 9:00? That made me laugh fair play.
Good idea
Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:47 pm
OhhhGa wrote:So in conclusion you should all run the country and allow torture whilst simultaneously banning the very concept of human rights to feed your animalistic thirst for mob rule and blood.
Some things never change.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:47 pm
Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:48 pm
Bluemonkey wrote:OhhhGa wrote:So in conclusion you should all run the country and allow torture whilst simultaneously banning the very concept of human rights to feed your animalistic thirst for mob rule and blood.
Some things never change.
And you are one of them f*cking DO GOODERS in life
Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:50 pm
OhhhGa wrote:So you're punishing all young people because of some? Hardly seems just.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:51 pm
Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:So you're punishing all young people because of some? Hardly seems just.
Once again you are reading the headlines and not reading the story. What I said is that if children can prove that they are doing something constructive e.g going to a youth club or something similar then they would be exempt from the ruling.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:52 pm
Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:So you're punishing all young people because of some? Hardly seems just.
Once again you are reading the headlines and not reading the story. What I said is that if children can prove that they are doing something constructive e.g going to a youth club or something similar then they would be exempt from the ruling.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:55 pm
OhhhGa wrote:Bluemonkey wrote:OhhhGa wrote:So in conclusion you should all run the country and allow torture whilst simultaneously banning the very concept of human rights to feed your animalistic thirst for mob rule and blood.
Some things never change.
And you are one of them f*cking DO GOODERS in life
Is this a bad thing? I had no idea, should I be a "DO BADDER"?
Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:56 pm
Bluemonkey wrote:OhhhGa wrote:Bluemonkey wrote:OhhhGa wrote:So in conclusion you should all run the country and allow torture whilst simultaneously banning the very concept of human rights to feed your animalistic thirst for mob rule and blood.
Some things never change.
And you are one of them f*cking DO GOODERS in life
Is this a bad thing? I had no idea, should I be a "DO BADDER"?
SHOOT THE b*stard WHOSE RESPONSIBLE,all you lot with gently gently approach make this country a worse place to live in
Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:57 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:So you're punishing all young people because of some? Hardly seems just.
Once again you are reading the headlines and not reading the story. What I said is that if children can prove that they are doing something constructive e.g going to a youth club or something similar then they would be exempt from the ruling.
But it is based on your view of whats constructive. Why should boys who are out for a kick about or larking around not harming others should answer to you?
Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:58 pm
Angry Man wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:So you're punishing all young people because of some? Hardly seems just.
Once again you are reading the headlines and not reading the story. What I said is that if children can prove that they are doing something constructive e.g going to a youth club or something similar then they would be exempt from the ruling.
But it is based on your view of whats constructive. Why should boys who are out for a kick about or larking around not harming others should answer to you?
well maybe when you become a councilor and you see just how many lives on a council estate a group of youngters can damage then I'm sure people would support that idea. The only way it didn't get took on board was because the police didn't want to do the work however the evidence from Redruth proved that the public started to police the problem areas themselves.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:59 pm
OhhhGa wrote:Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:So you're punishing all young people because of some? Hardly seems just.
Once again you are reading the headlines and not reading the story. What I said is that if children can prove that they are doing something constructive e.g going to a youth club or something similar then they would be exempt from the ruling.
I read the article.
What about normal young people who don't go to "youth clubs"?
Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:59 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:CP76 wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:CP76 wrote:Not if its slow. Stab him in the face and slice him all over with a razor. Throw boiling hot water over him. Every day until he is on the brink and then burn him alive.
That would give me more satisfaction.
To be fair some inmates will punish him
Fair? FAIR?
Sorry mate some inmate giving them a slap or cutting their throat doesnt even up killing your child.
OK fair is a poor way of saying it but he will get more punishment than others in prison. However like you i agree he should suffer. If you commit crimes such as these you forfit your rights of being treated like a fair human being
Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:00 pm
Angry Man wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:So you're punishing all young people because of some? Hardly seems just.
Once again you are reading the headlines and not reading the story. What I said is that if children can prove that they are doing something constructive e.g going to a youth club or something similar then they would be exempt from the ruling.
But it is based on your view of whats constructive. Why should boys who are out for a kick about or larking around not harming others should answer to you?
well maybe when you become a councilor and you see just how many lives on a council estate a group of youngters can damage then I'm sure people would support that idea. The only way it didn't get took on board was because the police didn't want to do the work however the evidence from Redruth proved that the public started to police the problem areas themselves.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:00 pm
OhhhGa wrote:Angry Man wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:So you're punishing all young people because of some? Hardly seems just.
Once again you are reading the headlines and not reading the story. What I said is that if children can prove that they are doing something constructive e.g going to a youth club or something similar then they would be exempt from the ruling.
But it is based on your view of whats constructive. Why should boys who are out for a kick about or larking around not harming others should answer to you?
well maybe when you become a councilor and you see just how many lives on a council estate a group of youngters can damage then I'm sure people would support that idea. The only way it didn't get took on board was because the police didn't want to do the work however the evidence from Redruth proved that the public started to police the problem areas themselves.
AKA mob rule.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:01 pm
Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:So you're punishing all young people because of some? Hardly seems just.
Once again you are reading the headlines and not reading the story. What I said is that if children can prove that they are doing something constructive e.g going to a youth club or something similar then they would be exempt from the ruling.
I read the article.
What about normal young people who don't go to "youth clubs"?
Is 9pm such a bad thing then for teenagers..?
Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:01 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:Angry Man wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:So you're punishing all young people because of some? Hardly seems just.
Once again you are reading the headlines and not reading the story. What I said is that if children can prove that they are doing something constructive e.g going to a youth club or something similar then they would be exempt from the ruling.
But it is based on your view of whats constructive. Why should boys who are out for a kick about or larking around not harming others should answer to you?
well maybe when you become a councilor and you see just how many lives on a council estate a group of youngters can damage then I'm sure people would support that idea. The only way it didn't get took on board was because the police didn't want to do the work however the evidence from Redruth proved that the public started to police the problem areas themselves.
But what about adults? There are enough drunk antisocial adults that cause just as much problem for the community. If anybody child or adult then it is the matter of police to sort. If it comes to it put a larger number of police out on rounds to deal with it
Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:02 pm
Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:03 pm
OhhhGa wrote:Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:So you're punishing all young people because of some? Hardly seems just.
Once again you are reading the headlines and not reading the story. What I said is that if children can prove that they are doing something constructive e.g going to a youth club or something similar then they would be exempt from the ruling.
I read the article.
What about normal young people who don't go to "youth clubs"?
Is 9pm such a bad thing then for teenagers..?
Well I often left friends houses later than that and I know many people who were out and about after that as well. I would sympathise more if it was 12:00am, but 9:00? No chance.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:04 pm
Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:04 pm
OhhhGa wrote:Bluemonkey wrote:OhhhGa wrote:Bluemonkey wrote:OhhhGa wrote:So in conclusion you should all run the country and allow torture whilst simultaneously banning the very concept of human rights to feed your animalistic thirst for mob rule and blood.
Some things never change.
And you are one of them f*cking DO GOODERS in life
Is this a bad thing? I had no idea, should I be a "DO BADDER"?
SHOOT THE b*stard WHOSE RESPONSIBLE,all you lot with gently gently approach make this country a worse place to live in
Well f**k off to Syria then, there's lots of mob rule and shootings which will suit your tastes.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:04 pm
OhhhGa wrote:Wasted 6 months there then.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:04 pm
CP76 wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:CP76 wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:CP76 wrote:Not if its slow. Stab him in the face and slice him all over with a razor. Throw boiling hot water over him. Every day until he is on the brink and then burn him alive.
That would give me more satisfaction.
To be fair some inmates will punish him
Fair? FAIR?
Sorry mate some inmate giving them a slap or cutting their throat doesnt even up killing your child.
OK fair is a poor way of saying it but he will get more punishment than others in prison. However like you i agree he should suffer. If you commit crimes such as these you forfit your rights of being treated like a fair human being
The nonces and child killers are segregated and do not have more punishment.
I spent a short stont in there (on a normal wing) and it was boredom that got to me more than anything.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:06 pm
OhhhGa wrote:Caldicot, Bulwark and so on all had murders/stabbings.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:08 pm
Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:25 pm
cardiff yid wrote:Ohhh ga I would love you to be locked up with these animals. To be honest you come across as a well educated young man with little common sense and not much grasp of how it really is. Child killers should be executed. As a father of a girl I was sickened when I heard the news.