Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:04 pm

RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
:withstupid:
Things never make sense to you when you when you don't like what you read. Funny that. To support you they would have to care. They don't support you because thy don't care what you have to say. There's a link you see. I'll try and write in one syllables if it helps.


Still makes no sense, the fact you think you have to support something to care is bizarre.

If I killed your family, you wouldnt support my actions.... Would that mean you wouldn't care?

The pro reds don't support the actions of the KCB.... Do they care? They sure do.

Case dismissed.

Cheers


Oh dear you really are stupid. I didn't say you have to support something to care, its the other way around. Read it again retard


Nope that still doesn't make sense. People are replying, asking questions meaning they are interested.... You claimed they didn't care because they didn't support what I was doing. Read what you type.

Cheers


No I said they don't support you as they don't care. It won't make sense if you read the words you want to see. Is this very difficult for you to follow? Oops Mr High & Mighty had made himself look silly :lol:

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:04 pm

taffyapple wrote:
:lol: :lol: Property Developer!!

Imagine a REAL Property 'Developer' who would feel the need to explain what
he does for a living, and use that term. Not only that, but then give the addresses
of some of his properties?

You great big f*cking whopper :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Don't get that post at all. Property developers don't describe themselves as property developers :lol: oooookay.

Why wouldn't I give out what properties I own? Who will rent them if nobody knows they are for rent?

There goes my 8% yearly yield :lol:

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:05 pm

Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
:withstupid:
Things never make sense to you when you when you don't like what you read. Funny that. To support you they would have to care. They don't support you because thy don't care what you have to say. There's a link you see. I'll try and write in one syllables if it helps.


Still makes no sense, the fact you think you have to support something to care is bizarre.

If I killed your family, you wouldnt support my actions.... Would that mean you wouldn't care?

The pro reds don't support the actions of the KCB.... Do they care? They sure do.

Case dismissed.

Cheers


Oh dear you really are stupid. I didn't say you have to support something to care, its the other way around. Read it again retard


Nope that still doesn't make sense. People are replying, asking questions meaning they are interested.... You claimed they didn't care because they didn't support what I was doing. Read what you type.

Cheers


No I said they don't support you as they don't care. It won't make sense if you read the words you want to see. Is this very difficult for you to follow? Oops Mr High & Mighty had made himself look silly :lol:


No you didn't, read it again. Or shall I quote you and put it in bold red writing :lol:

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:06 pm

The Lone Gunman. wrote:The majority of you possess terrible attitude problems and should seek to address them immediately.

Roath Magic posts what you don't believe, and he is villainised for it. The German people acted like that during WWII towards the small minority who spoke of the death camps.


lol

another big time charlie who got fucked off by Tan (but isnt bitter, honest) :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:06 pm

The Lone Gunman. wrote:
Overthemoon wrote:
The Lone Gunman. wrote:The majority of you possess terrible attitude problems and should seek to address them immediately.

Roath Magic posts what you don't believe, and he is villainised for it. The German people acted like that during WWII towards the small minority who spoke of the death camps.

Feck me, we've reportedly lost one big ego on here and an even bigger one appears! :roll:

I am neither known for my ego nor for threatening oaps, children, women, and Annis's with violence. Can't possibly compare, my friend.

You can't be Dave Sugarman then, as he's definitely known for his fecking big ego!

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:07 pm

RoathMagic wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
:lol: :lol: Property Developer!!

Imagine a REAL Property 'Developer' who would feel the need to explain what
he does for a living, and use that term. Not only that, but then give the addresses
of some of his properties?

You great big f*cking whopper :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Don't get that post at all. Property developers don't describe themselves as property developers :lol: oooookay.

Why wouldn't I give out what properties I own? Who will rent them if nobody knows they are for rent?

There goes my 8% yearly yield :lol:


So the 7% paid on our debts is a good rate then?

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:07 pm

RoathMagic wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
:lol: :lol: Property Developer!!

Imagine a REAL Property 'Developer' who would feel the need to explain what
he does for a living, and use that term. Not only that, but then give the addresses
of some of his properties?

You great big f*cking whopper :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Don't get that post at all. Property developers don't describe themselves as property developers :lol: oooookay.

Why wouldn't I give out what properties I own? Who will rent them if nobody knows they are for rent?

There goes my 8% yearly yield :lol:


Annual yield

If you insist on spouting bollocks. at least get it right

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:07 pm

Overthemoon wrote:
The Lone Gunman. wrote:
Overthemoon wrote:
The Lone Gunman. wrote:The majority of you possess terrible attitude problems and should seek to address them immediately.

Roath Magic posts what you don't believe, and he is villainised for it. The German people acted like that during WWII towards the small minority who spoke of the death camps.

Feck me, we've reportedly lost one big ego on here and an even bigger one appears! :roll:

I am neither known for my ego nor for threatening oaps, children, women, and Annis's with violence. Can't possibly compare, my friend.

You can't be Dave Sugarman then, as he's definitely known for his fecking big ego!

I'm not, as I have stated about 675 times since last night (please do keep up!)

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:08 pm

curiosity question for you RM why do you spend so much time looking up facts, figures, quotes, ect ect? you go to one hell of a way just to try prove a point? why?????????????

is it that important to you that you have to be seen to be right all the time when clearly you are not! (some times maybe) but not all the time! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: cheers

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:09 pm

Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
:lol: :lol: Property Developer!!

Imagine a REAL Property 'Developer' who would feel the need to explain what
he does for a living, and use that term. Not only that, but then give the addresses
of some of his properties?

You great big f*cking whopper :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Don't get that post at all. Property developers don't describe themselves as property developers :lol: oooookay.

Why wouldn't I give out what properties I own? Who will rent them if nobody knows they are for rent?

There goes my 8% yearly yield :lol:




So the 7% paid on our debts is a good rate then?


For tan, very good yes.

In property at least, yearly rental yields are usually around 4-6%

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:09 pm

RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
:withstupid:
Things never make sense to you when you when you don't like what you read. Funny that. To support you they would have to care. They don't support you because thy don't care what you have to say. There's a link you see. I'll try and write in one syllables if it helps.


Still makes no sense, the fact you think you have to support something to care is bizarre.

If I killed your family, you wouldnt support my actions.... Would that mean you wouldn't care?

The pro reds don't support the actions of the KCB.... Do they care? They sure do.

Case dismissed.

Cheers


Oh dear you really are stupid. I didn't say you have to support something to care, its the other way around. Read it again retard


Nope that still doesn't make sense. People are replying, asking questions meaning they are interested.... You claimed they didn't care because they didn't support what I was doing. Read what you type.

Cheers


No I said they don't support you as they don't care. It won't make sense if you read the words you want to see. Is this very difficult for you to follow? Oops Mr High & Mighty had made himself look silly :lol:


No you didn't, read it again. Or shall I quote you and put it in bold red writing :lol:


Yep

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:09 pm

pembroke allan wrote:curiosity question for you RM why do you spend so much time looking up facts, figures, quotes, ect ect? you go to one hell of a way just to try prove a point? why?????????????

is it that important to you that you have to be seen to be right all the time when clearly you are not! (some times maybe) but not all the time! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: cheers

Or perhaps he likes to qualify his viewpoints, unlike somone like you?!

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:10 pm

RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
:lol: :lol: Property Developer!!

Imagine a REAL Property 'Developer' who would feel the need to explain what
he does for a living, and use that term. Not only that, but then give the addresses
of some of his properties?

You great big f*cking whopper :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Don't get that post at all. Property developers don't describe themselves as property developers :lol: oooookay.

Why wouldn't I give out what properties I own? Who will rent them if nobody knows they are for rent?

There goes my 8% yearly yield :lol:


Not really since he can make 8% on renting out properties



So the 7% paid on our debts is a good rate then?


For tan, very good yes.

In property at least, yearly rental yields are usually around 4-6%

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:13 pm

The Lone Gunman. wrote:
Overthemoon wrote:
The Lone Gunman. wrote:
Overthemoon wrote:
The Lone Gunman. wrote:The majority of you possess terrible attitude problems and should seek to address them immediately.

Roath Magic posts what you don't believe, and he is villainised for it. The German people acted like that during WWII towards the small minority who spoke of the death camps.

Feck me, we've reportedly lost one big ego on here and an even bigger one appears! :roll:

I am neither known for my ego nor for threatening oaps, children, women, and Annis's with violence. Can't possibly compare, my friend.

You can't be Dave Sugarman then, as he's definitely known for his fecking big ego!

I'm not, as I have stated about 675 times since last night (please do keep up!)

I saw one of your posts stating this last night and if I'm honest, I thought you were high on crack or something similar, so I took it with a pinch of salt!

If you genuinely aren't Sugarman, then I find it even sadder that you should copy his photo and his username, even if your version has a fecking dot in it and his doesn't or vice versa!

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:13 pm

Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
:lol: :lol: Property Developer!!

Imagine a REAL Property 'Developer' who would feel the need to explain what
he does for a living, and use that term. Not only that, but then give the addresses
of some of his properties?

You great big f*cking whopper :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Don't get that post at all. Property developers don't describe themselves as property developers :lol: oooookay.

Why wouldn't I give out what properties I own? Who will rent them if nobody knows they are for rent?

There goes my 8% yearly yield :lol:


Not really since he can make 8% on renting out properties



So the 7% paid on our debts is a good rate then?


For tan, very good yes.

In property at least, yearly rental yields are usually around 4-6%


Ha ha you edited your post as you knew you had been sussed. Originally saying 7% was good for VT but a quick change to 4 to 6%. Yet you get 8%?
You talk complete nonsense :lol:

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:14 pm

Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:With comments and threads made by gwyn most notably as well as others regarding waiting until he pumps his money in and then planning to protest.

I've taken a leaf out of ihatealiens' book.

I'll inform you of the reply.


Nobody cares what you do


This thread tells different.

Cheers


Errr, which bit dreamer? Cheers


The post every 60 seconds added to the hundreds of views in a short period of time, plus the question asked by others. Simple really.

Cheers


None if which support you so like I said nobody cares what you do. Like me just seeing what your latest wum moment is and pitying you.
Cheers
Cheers


Read it all.

You said nobody cares.

I said yes they do.

You said why I think that.

I said because people are asking we question, the page views and post count.

You said but none of them support me so they don't care.

So either way you are wrong.

Cheers.

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:14 pm

Overthemoon wrote:
The Lone Gunman. wrote:
Overthemoon wrote:
The Lone Gunman. wrote:
Overthemoon wrote:
The Lone Gunman. wrote:The majority of you possess terrible attitude problems and should seek to address them immediately.

Roath Magic posts what you don't believe, and he is villainised for it. The German people acted like that during WWII towards the small minority who spoke of the death camps.

Feck me, we've reportedly lost one big ego on here and an even bigger one appears! :roll:

I am neither known for my ego nor for threatening oaps, children, women, and Annis's with violence. Can't possibly compare, my friend.

You can't be Dave Sugarman then, as he's definitely known for his fecking big ego!

I'm not, as I have stated about 675 times since last night (please do keep up!)

I saw one of your posts stating this last night and if I'm honest, I thought you were high on crack or something similar, so I took it with a pinch of salt!

If you genuinely aren't Sugarman, then I find it even sadder that you should copy his photo and his username, even if your version has a fecking dot in it and his doesn't or vice versa!

Login names are at a premium now, friend. It's not ideal but I shall have to make do for now.

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:16 pm

The Lone Gunman. wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:curiosity question for you RM why do you spend so much time looking up facts, figures, quotes, ect ect? you go to one hell of a way just to try prove a point? why?????????????

is it that important to you that you have to be seen to be right all the time when clearly you are not! (some times maybe) but not all the time! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: cheers

Or perhaps he likes to qualify his viewpoints, unlike somone like you?!



alll the time?? isnt that a bit extreme? after all its a fans forum not a i must be right all the time forum?
how do you know i put viewpoints on here? you look up my threads like RM do you?? just curious?? :D

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:16 pm

Carpe Diem wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
:lol: :lol: Property Developer!!

Imagine a REAL Property 'Developer' who would feel the need to explain what
he does for a living, and use that term. Not only that, but then give the addresses
of some of his properties?

You great big f*cking whopper :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Don't get that post at all. Property developers don't describe themselves as property developers :lol: oooookay.

Why wouldn't I give out what properties I own? Who will rent them if nobody knows they are for rent?

There goes my 8% yearly yield :lol:


Not really since he can make 8% on renting out properties



So the 7% paid on our debts is a good rate then?


For tan, very good yes.

In property at least, yearly rental yields are usually around 4-6%


Ha ha you edited your post as you knew you had been sussed. Originally saying 7% was good for VT but a quick change to 4 to 6%. Yet you get 8%?
You talk complete nonsense :lol:


What the hell are you talking about?

Tan gets 7% on his loan notes.

Normal yearly yields on property is around 4-6%

My yearly yeilds are 8%

What are you accusing me of editing? :?

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:19 pm

Me and my missus have got 5 propertys now. Hoping to get another one this
year. We rent them out we do. It'll be our pension, and our legacy to our kids.

The very idea of using the word 'Property Developer'..... It makes me itch'

How pretentious can you get?

I almost spat my latte out. That would have been embarrassing in the Ritz tea rooms

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:22 pm

RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:With comments and threads made by gwyn most notably as well as others regarding waiting until he pumps his money in and then planning to protest.

I've taken a leaf out of ihatealiens' book.

I'll inform you of the reply.


Nobody cares what you do


This thread tells different.

Cheers


Errr, which bit dreamer? Cheers


The post every 60 seconds added to the hundreds of views in a short period of time, plus the question asked by others. Simple really.

Cheers


None if which support you so like I said nobody cares what you do. Like me just seeing what your latest wum moment is and pitying you.
Cheers
Cheers


Read it all.

You said nobody cares.

I said yes they do.

You said why I think that.

I said because people are asking we question, the page views and post count.

You said but none of them support me so they don't care.

So either way you are wrong.

Cheers.[/quote]

Loving this. The quote is:
None of which support you so like I said nobody cares

So they don't support you as they don't care. Understand? Your use of "so" in "none of them support me so they don't care" changes the whole context and not what I wrote.

Case dismissed

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:24 pm

taffyapple wrote:Me and my missus have got 5 propertys now. Hoping to get another one this
year. We rent them out we do. It'll be our pension, and our legacy to our kids.

The very idea of using the word 'Property Developer'..... It makes me itch'

How pretentious can you get?

I almost spat my latte out. That would have been embarrassing in the Ritz tea rooms


I develop property and depending on yearly rental leads I wil sell or rent.

Why you have an aversion to this job title is baffling, as it would be to my circle of friends who combined probably have over 100 properties in england and Wales.

Pretentious means pretending. Which part of developing property and selling it is pretentious when lending to the term property developer?

Cheers

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:27 pm

Carpe Diem wrote:
Loving this. The quote is:
None of which support you so like I said nobody cares

So they don't support you as they don't care. Understand? Your use of "so" in "none of them support me so they don't care" changes the whole context and not what I wrote.

Case dismissed


So which one is it?

They don't care... Which is dismissed by the fact people are clearly interested due to page views, posts and questions asked.

Or they don't support me... Which is a completely different issue.

Cheers

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:35 pm

RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
Loving this. The quote is:
None of which support you so like I said nobody cares

So they don't support you as they don't care. Understand? Your use of "so" in "none of them support me so they don't care" changes the whole context and not what I wrote.

Case dismissed


So which one is it?

They don't care... Which is dismissed by the fact people are clearly interested due to page views, posts and questions asked.

Or they don't support me... Which is a completely different issue.

Cheers


And with his tail between his legs :oops: RM starts from the beginning. I'll break it down, here goes:
Nobody (sane) supports you.
Why?
Because nobody cares what you think.

So not caring is the driver for not supporting you. Not vice versa or any other way to try and twist it to squirm out of being shown up. Enjoyed it though :lol:

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:36 pm

SOMEONE BAN THIS JACK c**t IT'S BEYOND A JOKE NOW

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:38 pm

Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
Loving this. The quote is:
None of which support you so like I said nobody cares

So they don't support you as they don't care. Understand? Your use of "so" in "none of them support me so they don't care" changes the whole context and not what I wrote.

Case dismissed


So which one is it?

They don't care... Which is dismissed by the fact people are clearly interested due to page views, posts and questions asked.

Or they don't support me... Which is a completely different issue.

Cheers


And with his tail between his legs :oops: RM starts from the beginning. I'll break it down, here goes:
Nobody (sane) supports you.
Why?
Because nobody cares what you think.

So not caring is the driver for not supporting you. Not vice versa or any other way to try and twist it to squirm out of being shown up. Enjoyed it though :lol:


He says start from the beginning yet says a statement that was never said :lol:

If you had said that from the start it would have been a lot less time wasted, although you have clearly changed it.

I couldn't care less if anyone supports me, I don't need support to send an email.

As for nobody caring, we dismissed that on page one.

Cheers.

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:44 pm

RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
:lol: :lol: Property Developer!!

Imagine a REAL Property 'Developer' who would feel the need to explain what
he does for a living, and use that term. Not only that, but then give the addresses
of some of his properties?

You great big f*cking whopper :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Don't get that post at all. Property developers don't describe themselves as property developers :lol: oooookay.

Why wouldn't I give out what properties I own? Who will rent them if nobody knows they are for rent?

There goes my 8% yearly yield :lol:


Not really since he can make 8% on renting out properties



So the 7% paid on our debts is a good rate then?


For tan, very good yes.

In property at least, yearly rental yields are usually around 4-6%


Ha ha you edited your post as you knew you had been sussed. Originally saying 7% was good for VT but a quick change to 4 to 6%. Yet you get 8%?
You talk complete nonsense :lol:


What the hell are you talking about?

Tan gets 7% on his loan notes.

Normal yearly yields on property is around 4-6%

My yearly yeilds are 8%

What are you accusing me of editing? :?[/quote]

You know :lol: . So you can get 8% but VT should be happy with 7%? Get over yourself. The loan note rate is very competitive is this market.
Oh and playing monopoly against yourself on your computer doesn't make you a property developer

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:46 pm

RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
Loving this. The quote is:
None of which support you so like I said nobody cares

So they don't support you as they don't care. Understand? Your use of "so" in "none of them support me so they don't care" changes the whole context and not what I wrote.

Case dismissed


So which one is it?

They don't care... Which is dismissed by the fact people are clearly interested due to page views, posts and questions asked.

Or they don't support me... Which is a completely different issue.

Cheers


And with his tail between his legs :oops: RM starts from the beginning. I'll break it down, here goes:
Nobody (sane) supports you.
Why?
Because nobody cares what you think.

So not caring is the driver for not supporting you. Not vice versa or any other way to try and twist it to squirm out of being shown up. Enjoyed it though :lol:


He says start from the beginning yet says a statement that was never said :lol:

If you had said that from the start it would have been a lot less time wasted, although you have clearly changed it.

I couldn't care less if anyone supports me, I don't need support to send an email.

As for nobody caring, we dismissed that on page one.

Cheers.


I'm afraid that breaks down to what I said. You're the one you changed it, slipping in a cheeky "so" to try and deflect from looking like an arse. News is fella, you failed :lol:

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:47 pm

Again I have no idea what you are talking about.

Are you suggesting all businesses have the same rate of profit?

You are sounding a little silly now. :?

Re: I've just emailed tan and tg

Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:48 pm

Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
RoathMagic wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
Loving this. The quote is:
None of which support you so like I said nobody cares

So they don't support you as they don't care. Understand? Your use of "so" in "none of them support me so they don't care" changes the whole context and not what I wrote.

Case dismissed


So which one is it?

They don't care... Which is dismissed by the fact people are clearly interested due to page views, posts and questions asked.

Or they don't support me... Which is a completely different issue.

Cheers


And with his tail between his legs :oops: RM starts from the beginning. I'll break it down, here goes:
Nobody (sane) supports you.
Why?
Because nobody cares what you think.

So not caring is the driver for not supporting you. Not vice versa or any other way to try and twist it to squirm out of being shown up. Enjoyed it though :lol:


He says start from the beginning yet says a statement that was never said :lol:

If you had said that from the start it would have been a lot less time wasted, although you have clearly changed it.

I couldn't care less if anyone supports me, I don't need support to send an email.

As for nobody caring, we dismissed that on page one.

Cheers.


I'm afraid that breaks down to what I said. You're the one you changed it, slipping in a cheeky "so" to try and deflect from looking like an arse. News is fella, you failed :lol:


I see so when you initially said nobody cared, you mean nobody supported me :lol:

Both are either wrong or inconsequential..... Awesome :lol: