If we change to red and dont get promoted

Carpe in "I wasnt really there" shocker.

Attebdances of between 1900 and 3000 for much of the early 90s???

I dont think so.

Fool.

You know what it was probably late 80s early 90s but we were around the 3000 avg sometimes less But at times we may have been in the 4000's. Don't be ignorant as well as stupid. Probably asking too much though. Fool

Get your facts right if you are going to look down your nose at others.

Idiot

I do look down at you as you are a f*cking thick tw*t. Here some facts on avg attendances:
1986 3061
1987 2826
1988 4390
1989 4385
1990 3642
1991 2946

Towards the end of the 90s we were back in the 3000s. Oh and these are averages so at times we had some shocking figures like 1900. But then you wouldn't know. It gives me no pleasure proving simpletons like you wrong but it had to be done

As i said in another thread this could just be the calm before the storm. We had the old bill monitering the board last time. The bbc got john simpson on standby. It'll be worse than a bad day in syria on here tomorrow.

You said the much of the early 90s then proceeded to put up stats from 86 to 91.

90 to 94 please dickhead

How are you going to feel knowing you sold your soul and identity for f**k all?

I'm pretty sure my identity will remain firmly intact.

Thats a shame youve got a bit of a crap name

It's interesting how you imply my name is my identity.

When Cardiff are keeping their name and your moaning about identity loss.

Name is just one part if identity.

Michael Jackson kept his name but changed his colour and he was never looked upon the same.

Prince changed his name to The Symbol yet we still know and LOVE him as Prince.

*kicks up feet and lights cigar*

Cassius clay changed his name to Mohamed Ali...............and is now famously know as Mohamed Ali

So you can now take your feet back down and put that cigar out

You said the much of the early 90s then proceeded to put up stats from 86 to 91.

90 to 94 please dickhead

I already said it was late 80s after my first post.
Well small brain in case you didn't realise 90 and 91 were already given to you. Here goes:
92 6191
93 8560 (promotion year, great times and you probably saw a few games)
94 6072
95 4532 (relegation)
96 3420 (back in the dungeon, Polo goes into hiding)
97 3594
98 3610

Wow seems I'm still right and your still a fool. Least ive got your permission to look down my nose at you

How are you right for the early 90s we averaged around 6000+ not 1900-3000 as you stated?

Didnt even need me to prove you wrong you put the evidence up against yourself.

Dickhead.

How are you right for the early 90s we averaged around 6000+ not 1900-3000 as you stated?

Didnt even need me to prove you wrong you put the evidence up against yourself.

Dickhead.

I do find it bizarre aswell as to why he thinks he's right.

How are you right for the early 90s we averaged around 6000+ not 1900-3000 as you stated?

Didnt even need me to prove you wrong you put the evidence up against yourself.

Dickhead.

I do find it bizarre aswell as to why he thinks he's right.

Cos im thick and hes not by all accounts.

Maths obviously not a strong point for him.

How are you right for the early 90s we averaged around 6000+ not 1900-3000 as you stated?

Didnt even need me to prove you wrong you put the evidence up against yourself.

Dickhead.

I do find it bizarre aswell as to why he thinks he's right.

Cos im thick and hes not by all accounts.

Maths obviously not a strong point for him.

Because in my first post I wasn't saying the averages were 1900 to 3000 just that they were games where we had those figures. It's not hard to understand is it? The averages for the season were then in reference to just how many non plastics we supposedly had and proved that generally our position today is c20000 better off than back then. So for you to talk about plastics is nonsense. Ffs keep up and stop reading what you want to see.
Out of interest which figures going back to that time do you find impressive?

How are you right for the early 90s we averaged around 6000+ not 1900-3000 as you stated?

Didnt even need me to prove you wrong you put the evidence up against yourself.

Dickhead.

I do find it bizarre aswell as to why he thinks he's right.

Cos im thick and hes not by all accounts.

Maths obviously not a strong point for him.

Oh and you are thick

Genuine question to those in the Red Camp.

How are you going to deal with the games against Bristol City.

When we play them at home are you realy going to feel comfortable singing Red Army, or come on
you reds, knowing that is what our rivals sing and have done for years whilst we have sung Blue Army.

i will still be singing BLUE ARMY

If all else fails move the goal posts.

Looks like my quote of 8500 was nearer your 1900-3000 eh

For the record I was reffering to 92 onwards which I preffered those times to now.

How come I was attending games between 190 and 3000 then for much of thearly 90s.

I think the fact you put two figures and used the word "much" suggests you were implying our regular attendance was between 1900-3000.

On an average of 6000+ thats obviously bollicks but hey ho.

You are the self proclaimed academic here.

Here we go again, another stupid thread.

Adapting is not selling your soul and changing the KIT colour is NOT losing our f*cking identity.

Our identity is the stadia, the club name and heck us fans.

Have to agree with that BB,spot on.

If all else fails move the goal posts.

Looks like my quote of 8500 was nearer your 1900-3000 eh

For the record I was reffering to 92 onwards which I preffered those times to now.

f*cking hell I'd already said it was more late 80s early 90s.
Ok you conveniently choose the years where we had over 6000 and ignore 90 abd 91. Even then your glory days lasted for 3 years then we were back to 4500 then down to 3500 ish. We didnt surpass 8500 again until 2002 so your figure of 8500 non plastics is bollocks as we would never fall below this level. I know you made it up but I think generally you look back with clouded memories yet yearn for shit crowds in a shit division. Weird.

All I can say is I have contributed to each and every one of those attendance figures over the years bar 1963 when I was in Malaysia all year. Where the f**k were the rest of you during the hard times?

All I can say is I have contributed to each and every one of those attendance figures over the years bar 1963 when I was in Malaysia all year. Where the f**k were the rest of you during the hard times?

Dear oh dear oh dear

Will you stop reffering to before 90 and after 94.

You clearly said when trying to dispell my figure of 8000+ that you "remember the crowds were between 1900-3000 for MUCH of the EARLY 90s"

Now youve proved yourself wrong you are barking on about the late 80s and late 90s. Wtf ?!?!?

Just accept you made a tw*t of yourself whilst trying to be clever and we can put this to bed.

I agree with the last line, but it's something we have to take on the chin and adapt.

No, we don't. What does this tell you about the intentions about this man? I, for one, don't believe for a second that he has any good intentions!

I do. I think he wants us to get in the prem and become a regular Prem team (like Stoke have done), then perhaps sell us on.

That makes sense, I saw loads of Stoke tops in the far East when I was there last year, no Chelsea at all

How are you going to feel knowing you sold your soul and identity for f**k all?

I will feel great knowing all of them got lied to with TG open letter and still believed they was getting everything just like the last two seasons of close calls but squad was never good enough and no players to push on when we needed them but for some reason they think red will get us there, only theres a supposed carrot on the string this time so it must be true.

Dear oh dear oh dear

Will you stop reffering to before 90 and after 94.

You clearly said when trying to dispell my figure of 8000+ that you "remember the crowds were between 1900-3000 for MUCH of the EARLY 90s"

Now youve proved yourself wrong you are barking on about the late 80s and late 90s. Wtf ?!?!?

Just accept you made a tw*t of yourself whilst trying to be clever and we can put this to bed.

I'm not ignoring 90 or 91. You cling to 3 years 92-94
You can't understand the concept of an average can you? I admit I hadn't gone all stato before my post but then at most we are talking about maybe an average if 4000+ from the late 80s (yes I've already conceded that my timings were a few years out - whoopee - but you like to ignore this to try and boost your crap argument) and the early 90s even if we include your glory period and ignore what happened after. And yes we had crowds within this period of 3000s regularly (this goes from 3000 to 3999 in case you can't work it out) and I remember my a time low of 1900 or so)T.

Bottom line is even if we had 5000 or 6000 or 7000 dies it really make your wish for these glory days right? Ffs I feel like I'm teaching in nursery

I think I grasp averages far better than you and the proof is there for all to see.

You tried to be all smug and prove me wrong, it didnt work.

Goodnight

I think I grasp averages far better than you and the proof is there for all to see.

You tried to be all smug and prove me wrong, it didnt work.

Goodnight

Not smug just right and blew your plastic nonsense away. Not convinced you know figures at all and I can assure you you're not in my league. Until the next lesson. All the best

Oh and for the record average between 90-94 was 5482 more than double the 2450 average you were implying in your "gates of between 1900-3000 for MUCH of the EARLY 90s"

Thank f**k your not teaching nursery they wouldnt learn f**k all.

"Sorry kids what I said yesterday was a lie but we will try and change the questions to make the lies fit".

And still make a pigs year of it.

Oh and for the record average between 90-94 was 5482 more than double the 2450 average you were implying in your "gates of between 1900-3000 for MUCH of the EARLY 90s"

Thank f**k your not teaching nursery they wouldnt learn f**k all.

"Sorry kids what I said yesterday was a lie but we will try and change the questions to make the lies fit".

And still make a pigs year of it.

Oh and for the record average between 90-94 was 5482 more than double the 2450 average you were implying in your "gates of between 1900-3000 for MUCH of the EARLY 90s"

Thank f**k your not teaching nursery they wouldnt learn f**k all.

"Sorry kids what I said yesterday was a lie but we will try and change the questions to make the lies fit".

And still make a pigs year of it.

Ffs I'll try again. The 1900 was the low and not an average for a season. The 3000 was in 3000s so up to 3999. We had averages of in the 3000s or below in 90 and 91 and later in the mid/late 90s. You make an average out if 1900 and 3000 you fool as your just manipulating my posts to suit your nonsense.

In the late 80s we had 3000ish up to 4000ish. Wow was I a few out? Oh that makes you right then of course.
Well done for working out 5482. How is that closer to your 8500 non plastic figure than the 3000s (up to 3999 don't forget)? And even more to the point how is that so great compared to the crowds we get today?

Please think hard and don't be afraid to ask me for help. Back of the class for you

Changing the goalposts again

Have you no shame?

You fucked up and a 'thick tw*t' made you look silly on figures.

Get over it and go to bed you clown.

3000 meant up to 3999 yet you went as specific on the 1900

What a tw*t.

Changing the goalposts again

Have you no shame?

You fucked up and a 'thick tw*t' made you look silly on figures.

Get over it and go to bed you clown.

No answer then. And i think we all know who the clown is on this forum. You tried to make up some silly average figure so i had to point out your stupidity. I got my years out by a couple which I quickly admitted to. Wow wee you got me. My averages may have been a few hundred out, but the underlying premise stands. You yearn for days of shit crowds even I give you 1993 as the norm. You just post mindless crap and with no idea what you are bumping on about. Thick tw*t

You know what polo I take the thick tw*t back. Never meant to start name calling. Still stand by my points and think you're splitting hairs to still make zero sense, but i apologise for the abuse