worcester_ccfc wrote:tangledupinblue wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:tangledupinblue wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:tangledupinblue wrote:FOOTSOLDIER wrote:I and many others are not going back to watch city until Tan and his cronies have fucked off.
I know so many like you. And now possibly more if Bulut stays.
Terrible owner
Terrible manager

Top half finish.
Terrible football, terrible stats, one tactic (defensive yet shipped 70 goals) that he never changes, I’ve spoke to fans of other clubs , they are puzzled by this stubbornness and zero adaptability. Sticking to this rigid formula even when there are teams there for the taking or worse when we are behind. You simply can’t have that in the modern game, which yes, equals a terrible manager. He stays, we go backwards , dividing our fans rather than uniting them, you may want this dirge in our anniversary year, so many of us do not. Even out managed by Wayne Rooney, humiliated by Rotherham and the worst derby performance at Jackland. Clearly, points (no matter how we earn them ) are more important to you than quality, entertainment and style of play. Your personal preference, fair play, I have mine. We both want the revolving door to stop, but even your fellow Bulut supporters are regularly criticizing the one tactic and the style of play and also are now saying they have changed their mind on him . And not just because of Rotherham.
Like I said, criticise his tactics if you want. I disagree but can respect that opinion.
However, calling him a terrible manager is just wrong because we finished in the top half.
So you disagree, so you like his style of football then…..Not looking for an argument or whose right or whose wrong, but your saying tactic(s) there is no plural! Its tactic! And its defensive yet look at the goals against and the amount of defeats! And it’s boring predictability is worryingly disillusioning our fans and dividing them. I’m sorry but when most of the fans in the stadium are calling to the manager to change the tactic during the game when it’s obvious that needs to happen, and he doesn’t , that is terrible management , stubbornness, along with calling out young players publicly, Blaming the ref yesterday!! He doesn’t change the tactic, because he hasn’t got another , it seems he doesn’t have experience managing an attacking tactic. One dimensional , so yeah terrible.
Saying I like the tactics wouldn’t be true, I would expect to see a more attacking style next season if he stays.
I am of the opinion that we don’t have the players to play an attacking style at the moment.
We don’t have full backs/wing backs with pace, our midfielders are capable of running from one box to the other and are slow to release the ball, we still don’t have a decent goalscorer and these players just don’t have the athleticism to play that way.
The style needs to change of course but for that to happen, we need the funds to bring in the right players.
I'm with you on this, Ned...
As for Dave Jones, I was an admitted '
fan' of his time here, if not his occasional brusque character...
He was at point of leaving, our most successful manager (position-wise) and played the most atteactive style I can remember...
That (first) Malky and then Warnock came in and achieved more with less attractive (but in Warnock's words) '
winning' football is testament to '
style' not guaranteeing '
success'
