MAX WATTERS: " CARDIFF CITY TEAM TONIGHT "

I've literally just posted the proof half way up but people seem to be ignoring it just to have a pop at Barclay instead.

Ben Turner is lying then?
Or Ole is the one who lied to Turner himself?

https://www.viewfromtheninian.com/2020/ ... pprentice/

its more realistic that, 8 years ago, they wanted a new signing to play yeah. when i say more realistic, i mean, it makes more sense than someone in the board demanding eli king plays

id still be interested to know if it was "suggested" he played cala or he was outright told to...

I've literally just posted the proof half way up but people seem to be ignoring it just to have a pop at Barclay instead.

Ben Turner is lying then?
Or Ole is the one who lied to Turner himself?

https://www.viewfromtheninian.com/2020/ ... pprentice/

I’ve also posted ‘evidence’. It’s all hearsay.

Is it beyond the realm that Ole is using that as he’s weak as pish?

It’s not conclusive.

Morison rotates the squad to rest players after a game they looked knackered in, and Tan is suddenly picking the team

I've literally just posted the proof half way up but people seem to be ignoring it just to have a pop at Barclay instead.

Ben Turner is lying then?
Or Ole is the one who lied to Turner himself?

https://www.viewfromtheninian.com/2020/ ... pprentice/

I’ve also posted ‘evidence’. It’s all hearsay.

Is it beyond the realm that Ole is using that as he’s weak as pish?

It’s not conclusive.

So If both are hearsay, is one more credit or than the other? There is an argument for one, and the other. I choose one you choose the other.

I've literally just posted the proof half way up but people seem to be ignoring it just to have a pop at Barclay instead.

Ben Turner is lying then?
Or Ole is the one who lied to Turner himself?

https://www.viewfromtheninian.com/2020/ ... pprentice/

its more realistic that, 8 years ago, they wanted a new signing to play yeah. when i say more realistic, i mean, it makes more sense than someone in the board demanding eli king plays

id still be interested to know if it was "suggested" he played cala or he was outright told to...

Why is it more realistic for board interference 8 years ago??

I'm not sure I have been as specific as saying the board demands Eli King plays. If you'd care to look I've said the 'team' is full of kids and committee signings. Kids who Morison questions are good enough, and committee signings like Watters who he hauled off after 48 mins.

Morison rotates the squad to rest players after a game they looked knackered in, and Tan is suddenly picking the team

Why so funny?? At the very least as Maccy confirms there is, at the very least hearsay, and possible proof that he has done this many times before.

If you had watched Morisons interview pre match you would have seen the awkwardness and difficulty with which he swatted away the question on his 'changes'.

I've literally just posted the proof half way up but people seem to be ignoring it just to have a pop at Barclay instead.

Ben Turner is lying then?
Or Ole is the one who lied to Turner himself?

https://www.viewfromtheninian.com/2020/ ... pprentice/

its more realistic that, 8 years ago, they wanted a new signing to play yeah. when i say more realistic, i mean, it makes more sense than someone in the board demanding eli king plays

id still be interested to know if it was "suggested" he played cala or he was outright told to...

Why is it more realistic for board interference 8 years ago??

I'm not sure I have been as specific as saying the board demands Eli King plays. If you'd care to look I've said the 'team' is full of kids and committee signings. Kids who Morison questions are good enough, and committee signings like Watters who he hauled off after 48 mins.

This committee signing/picking the team thing really gets me.

So are we saying that the committee signed Moore, Wilson, Osei-Tutu, Doughty, Giles, Hugill, Drameh, Uche, Collins and Watters ?

Or is it that the committee only signs the players that turn out not to be good enough ?

Because based on recent signings as detailed above if it is the committee then then have a pretty good success rate.

I don't believe for a minute that the manager has no influence, just as I don't believe the committee picks the team. That said, if they are doing both they are doing a pretty good job recently so maybe we should get rid of Morison as he's not needed

Morison rotates the squad to rest players after a game they looked knackered in, and Tan is suddenly picking the team

Why so funny?? At the very least as Maccy confirms there is, at the very least hearsay, and possible proof that he has done this many times before.

If you had watched Morisons interview pre match you would have seen the awkwardness and difficulty with which he swatted away the question on his 'changes'.

Because its a ridiculous statement. A few days ago morison said it was a game too far for some the team, shock horror he makes changes for the next game. I'd imagine if he put the same 11 out for another leggy performance you'd criticise him for not making changes. Anything to have a moan.

Funny how recently you said morison won't take any crap and now he's letting the board dictate his team selection. Make your mind up.

Regarding the Turner and ole situation, from what I recall, the board wanted to play a particular way and that suited certain players. I dont agree with going over the manager but most cubs adopt a certain playing philosophy and stick to it - That's something I hope we do moving forward. But that case was almost 10 years and 5 managers ago. Why would the board interfere now when morison finally has us pulling away from the relegation zone? They wouldn't.

I've literally just posted the proof half way up but people seem to be ignoring it just to have a pop at Barclay instead.

Ben Turner is lying then?
Or Ole is the one who lied to Turner himself?

https://www.viewfromtheninian.com/2020/ ... pprentice/

its more realistic that, 8 years ago, they wanted a new signing to play yeah. when i say more realistic, i mean, it makes more sense than someone in the board demanding eli king plays

id still be interested to know if it was "suggested" he played cala or he was outright told to...

Why is it more realistic for board interference 8 years ago??

I'm not sure I have been as specific as saying the board demands Eli King plays. If you'd care to look I've said the 'team' is full of kids and committee signings. Kids who Morison questions are good enough, and committee signings like Watters who he hauled off after 48 mins.

This committee signing/picking the team thing really gets me.

So are we saying that the committee signed Moore, Wilson, Osei-Tutu, Doughty, Giles, Hugill, Drameh, Uche, Collins and Watters ?

Or is it that the committee only signs the players that turn out not to be good enough ?

Because based on recent signings as detailed above if it is the committee then then have a pretty good success rate.

I don't believe for a minute that the manager has no influence, just as I don't believe the committee picks the team. That said, if they are doing both they are doing a pretty good job recently so maybe we should get rid of Morison as he's not needed

Anything good that happens to the club is in despite of the committee. Anything bad is because of them. That's the way a few people think on here.

Morison rotates the squad to rest players after a game they looked knackered in, and Tan is suddenly picking the team

Why so funny?? At the very least as Maccy confirms there is, at the very least hearsay, and possible proof that he has done this many times before.

If you had watched Morisons interview pre match you would have seen the awkwardness and difficulty with which he swatted away the question on his 'changes'.

Because its a ridiculous statement. A few days ago morison said it was a game too far for some the team, shock horror he makes changes for the next game. I'd imagine if he put the same 11 out for another leggy performance you'd criticise him for not making changes. Anything to have a moan.

Funny how recently you said morison won't take any crap and now he's letting the board dictate his team selection. Make your mind up.

Regarding the Turner and ole situation, from what I recall, the board wanted to play a particular way and that suited certain players. I dont agree with going over the manager but most cubs adopt a certain playing philosophy and stick to it - That's something I hope we do moving forward. But that case was almost 10 years and 5 managers ago. Why would the board interfere now when morison finally has us pulling away from the relegation zone? They wouldn't.

It is. When I said hearsay I of course meant bollocks.

I see Mike Riley is still at it

Even with VAR he can’t get it right