Tue Nov 23, 2021 12:28 pm
maccydee wrote:What was the condition of Ninian Park?
Our club shop. When did it even ever open?
Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:15 pm
Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:21 pm
Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:21 pm
Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:48 pm
Tue Nov 23, 2021 2:03 pm
Tue Nov 23, 2021 2:34 pm
maccydee wrote:We see things very similarly Mr Driver.
The way I see it there are distinct sides in this debate.
There are some who will never, ever agree anything that Tan has done is any good. I’ve said it before if he cured cancer they would say bet he has been sat on that for ages.
Some are blind and pretty stupid and actually make no sense (Ninian 27, Barclay) and aren’t really worth debating with. At least with Annis you can debate him because he absolutely knows his stuff albeit he is very anti Tan. He has never said differently. He also is very loyal to Sam and that’s commendable. Sam is his good friend and that’s probably the best thing about Annis as anyone who has spent time with him or spoke to him on the phone will agree with.
Me and you and others are far more balanced. I cannot say that Tan hasn’t made mistakes, as I cannot say Sam didn’t. Both trusted the wrong people.
Tan trusted Dalman to look after his club while he dealt with matters close to home. As a significant person in Malaysia of course he is going to be expected to do that.
Sam trusted PMG and Ridsdale and they turned out to be after their own interests rather than Sam’s or indeed Cardiff City’s. It’s no coincidence that the council stopped dealing with Sam but would deal with PMG and they are the ones who made the money out of the stadium and retail outlet. Plans envisaged by Sam. Yes Sam made threats after he was ousted, but let’s be honest, who wouldn’t in his position? It was a slight on him and absolutely he was right to get what was his.
When Dalman’s expenses are discussed it’s ignored that Sam’s management company also did this. It was also loans that financed our climb up the table into the championship on that ride we all loved. However, no one else was prepared to do that and there had to be equity for Sam to do that so without him there wouldn’t have been the ride we enjoyed. For that I will always think fondly of him. But when he left, while we were far better off on the pitch off it we weren’t. It’s no point going over that again.
Tan has stabilised us and as the debt is his responsibility then we are far better off than we ever have been. That is simply a fact. We are now having a tough time as we aim to live within our means. This is something we have wanted apparently. But still Tan gets stick. He’s damned if he does, damned it he doesn’t.
My biggest three regrets over the last 20 years are;
1) when we were on our charge we didn’t get into the premier league. With Sam in charge, one season at Ninian it would have been class. Might have kept our best players and developed into something. Council would have had to deal with Sam and companies would have been fighting over the retail space.
2) when Tan decided to go for it he didn’t replace Malky with a manager who would have got us more suited for the premier league. The money Malky got to spend and to do it so badly was a massive f**k up. A better manager would have built a championship winning squad ready for the premier league and with 50 million extra a mid table prem side.
3) that Sam and Tan didn’t stay on the same page and become a dream team partnership. Imagine Sam doing Dalman’s role? Would have been class and a match made in whatever heaven you believe in.
I have spoken.
Tue Nov 23, 2021 2:46 pm
maccydee wrote:We see things very similarly Mr Driver.
The way I see it there are distinct sides in this debate.
There are some who will never, ever agree anything that Tan has done is any good. I’ve said it before if he cured cancer they would say bet he has been sat on that for ages.
Some are blind and pretty stupid and actually make no sense (Ninian 27, Barclay) and aren’t really worth debating with. At least with Annis you can debate him because he absolutely knows his stuff albeit he is very anti Tan. He has never said differently. He also is very loyal to Sam and that’s commendable. Sam is his good friend and that’s probably the best thing about Annis as anyone who has spent time with him or spoke to him on the phone will agree with.
Me and you and others are far more balanced. I cannot say that Tan hasn’t made mistakes, as I cannot say Sam didn’t. Both trusted the wrong people.
Tan trusted Dalman to look after his club while he dealt with matters close to home. As a significant person in Malaysia of course he is going to be expected to do that.
Sam trusted PMG and Ridsdale and they turned out to be after their own interests rather than Sam’s or indeed Cardiff City’s. It’s no coincidence that the council stopped dealing with Sam but would deal with PMG and they are the ones who made the money out of the stadium and retail outlet. Plans envisaged by Sam. Yes Sam made threats after he was ousted, but let’s be honest, who wouldn’t in his position? It was a slight on him and absolutely he was right to get what was his.
When Dalman’s expenses are discussed it’s ignored that Sam’s management company also did this. It was also loans that financed our climb up the table into the championship on that ride we all loved. However, no one else was prepared to do that and there had to be equity for Sam to do that so without him there wouldn’t have been the ride we enjoyed. For that I will always think fondly of him. But when he left, while we were far better off on the pitch off it we weren’t. It’s no point going over that again.
Tan has stabilised us and as the debt is his responsibility then we are far better off than we ever have been. That is simply a fact. We are now having a tough time as we aim to live within our means. This is something we have wanted apparently. But still Tan gets stick. He’s damned if he does, damned it he doesn’t.
My biggest three regrets over the last 20 years are;
1) when we were on our charge we didn’t get into the premier league. With Sam in charge, one season at Ninian it would have been class. Might have kept our best players and developed into something. Council would have had to deal with Sam and companies would have been fighting over the retail space.
2) when Tan decided to go for it he didn’t replace Malky with a manager who would have got us more suited for the premier league. The money Malky got to spend and to do it so badly was a massive f**k up. A better manager would have built a championship winning squad ready for the premier league and with 50 million extra a mid table prem side.
3) that Sam and Tan didn’t stay on the same page and become a dream team partnership. Imagine Sam doing Dalman’s role? Would have been class and a match made in whatever heaven you believe in.
I have spoken.
Tue Nov 23, 2021 2:49 pm
piledriver64 wrote:maccydee wrote:We see things very similarly Mr Driver.
The way I see it there are distinct sides in this debate.
There are some who will never, ever agree anything that Tan has done is any good. I’ve said it before if he cured cancer they would say bet he has been sat on that for ages.
Some are blind and pretty stupid and actually make no sense (Ninian 27, Barclay) and aren’t really worth debating with. At least with Annis you can debate him because he absolutely knows his stuff albeit he is very anti Tan. He has never said differently. He also is very loyal to Sam and that’s commendable. Sam is his good friend and that’s probably the best thing about Annis as anyone who has spent time with him or spoke to him on the phone will agree with.
Me and you and others are far more balanced. I cannot say that Tan hasn’t made mistakes, as I cannot say Sam didn’t. Both trusted the wrong people.
Tan trusted Dalman to look after his club while he dealt with matters close to home. As a significant person in Malaysia of course he is going to be expected to do that.
Sam trusted PMG and Ridsdale and they turned out to be after their own interests rather than Sam’s or indeed Cardiff City’s. It’s no coincidence that the council stopped dealing with Sam but would deal with PMG and they are the ones who made the money out of the stadium and retail outlet. Plans envisaged by Sam. Yes Sam made threats after he was ousted, but let’s be honest, who wouldn’t in his position? It was a slight on him and absolutely he was right to get what was his.
When Dalman’s expenses are discussed it’s ignored that Sam’s management company also did this. It was also loans that financed our climb up the table into the championship on that ride we all loved. However, no one else was prepared to do that and there had to be equity for Sam to do that so without him there wouldn’t have been the ride we enjoyed. For that I will always think fondly of him. But when he left, while we were far better off on the pitch off it we weren’t. It’s no point going over that again.
Tan has stabilised us and as the debt is his responsibility then we are far better off than we ever have been. That is simply a fact. We are now having a tough time as we aim to live within our means. This is something we have wanted apparently. But still Tan gets stick. He’s damned if he does, damned it he doesn’t.
My biggest three regrets over the last 20 years are;
1) when we were on our charge we didn’t get into the premier league. With Sam in charge, one season at Ninian it would have been class. Might have kept our best players and developed into something. Council would have had to deal with Sam and companies would have been fighting over the retail space.
2) when Tan decided to go for it he didn’t replace Malky with a manager who would have got us more suited for the premier league. The money Malky got to spend and to do it so badly was a massive f**k up. A better manager would have built a championship winning squad ready for the premier league and with 50 million extra a mid table prem side.
3) that Sam and Tan didn’t stay on the same page and become a dream team partnership. Imagine Sam doing Dalman’s role? Would have been class and a match made in whatever heaven you believe in.
I have spoken.
![]()
We just want to balance the argument because neither side is squeaky clean on this.
I just find it slightly disappointing that even at a point where things on the pitch are possibly more positive than for years we're still discussing the merits of a previous owner against a present day one.
The owner isn't changing anytime soon (despite some people being desperate for that) and therefore I'd much rather discuss how Morison and his troops are doing because, ultimately, that's what really matters to most of us.
Tue Nov 23, 2021 2:52 pm
Tue Nov 23, 2021 3:00 pm
Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:maccydee wrote:We see things very similarly Mr Driver.
The way I see it there are distinct sides in this debate.
There are some who will never, ever agree anything that Tan has done is any good. I’ve said it before if he cured cancer they would say bet he has been sat on that for ages.
Some are blind and pretty stupid and actually make no sense (Ninian 27, Barclay) and aren’t really worth debating with. At least with Annis you can debate him because he absolutely knows his stuff albeit he is very anti Tan. He has never said differently. He also is very loyal to Sam and that’s commendable. Sam is his good friend and that’s probably the best thing about Annis as anyone who has spent time with him or spoke to him on the phone will agree with.
Me and you and others are far more balanced. I cannot say that Tan hasn’t made mistakes, as I cannot say Sam didn’t. Both trusted the wrong people.
Tan trusted Dalman to look after his club while he dealt with matters close to home. As a significant person in Malaysia of course he is going to be expected to do that.
Sam trusted PMG and Ridsdale and they turned out to be after their own interests rather than Sam’s or indeed Cardiff City’s. It’s no coincidence that the council stopped dealing with Sam but would deal with PMG and they are the ones who made the money out of the stadium and retail outlet. Plans envisaged by Sam. Yes Sam made threats after he was ousted, but let’s be honest, who wouldn’t in his position? It was a slight on him and absolutely he was right to get what was his.
When Dalman’s expenses are discussed it’s ignored that Sam’s management company also did this. It was also loans that financed our climb up the table into the championship on that ride we all loved. However, no one else was prepared to do that and there had to be equity for Sam to do that so without him there wouldn’t have been the ride we enjoyed. For that I will always think fondly of him. But when he left, while we were far better off on the pitch off it we weren’t. It’s no point going over that again.
Tan has stabilised us and as the debt is his responsibility then we are far better off than we ever have been. That is simply a fact. We are now having a tough time as we aim to live within our means. This is something we have wanted apparently. But still Tan gets stick. He’s damned if he does, damned it he doesn’t.
My biggest three regrets over the last 20 years are;
1) when we were on our charge we didn’t get into the premier league. With Sam in charge, one season at Ninian it would have been class. Might have kept our best players and developed into something. Council would have had to deal with Sam and companies would have been fighting over the retail space.
2) when Tan decided to go for it he didn’t replace Malky with a manager who would have got us more suited for the premier league. The money Malky got to spend and to do it so badly was a massive f**k up. A better manager would have built a championship winning squad ready for the premier league and with 50 million extra a mid table prem side.
3) that Sam and Tan didn’t stay on the same page and become a dream team partnership. Imagine Sam doing Dalman’s role? Would have been class and a match made in whatever heaven you believe in.
I have spoken.
![]()
We just want to balance the argument because neither side is squeaky clean on this.
I just find it slightly disappointing that even at a point where things on the pitch are possibly more positive than for years we're still discussing the merits of a previous owner against a present day one.
The owner isn't changing anytime soon (despite some people being desperate for that) and therefore I'd much rather discuss how Morison and his troops are doing because, ultimately, that's what really matters to most of us.
The Topic was about now and what the future plans could be![]()
And yes plans should be in place for the good hope your even if it went wrong .
Tue Nov 23, 2021 3:24 pm
piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:maccydee wrote:We see things very similarly Mr Driver.
The way I see it there are distinct sides in this debate.
There are some who will never, ever agree anything that Tan has done is any good. I’ve said it before if he cured cancer they would say bet he has been sat on that for ages.
Some are blind and pretty stupid and actually make no sense (Ninian 27, Barclay) and aren’t really worth debating with. At least with Annis you can debate him because he absolutely knows his stuff albeit he is very anti Tan. He has never said differently. He also is very loyal to Sam and that’s commendable. Sam is his good friend and that’s probably the best thing about Annis as anyone who has spent time with him or spoke to him on the phone will agree with.
Me and you and others are far more balanced. I cannot say that Tan hasn’t made mistakes, as I cannot say Sam didn’t. Both trusted the wrong people.
Tan trusted Dalman to look after his club while he dealt with matters close to home. As a significant person in Malaysia of course he is going to be expected to do that.
Sam trusted PMG and Ridsdale and they turned out to be after their own interests rather than Sam’s or indeed Cardiff City’s. It’s no coincidence that the council stopped dealing with Sam but would deal with PMG and they are the ones who made the money out of the stadium and retail outlet. Plans envisaged by Sam. Yes Sam made threats after he was ousted, but let’s be honest, who wouldn’t in his position? It was a slight on him and absolutely he was right to get what was his.
When Dalman’s expenses are discussed it’s ignored that Sam’s management company also did this. It was also loans that financed our climb up the table into the championship on that ride we all loved. However, no one else was prepared to do that and there had to be equity for Sam to do that so without him there wouldn’t have been the ride we enjoyed. For that I will always think fondly of him. But when he left, while we were far better off on the pitch off it we weren’t. It’s no point going over that again.
Tan has stabilised us and as the debt is his responsibility then we are far better off than we ever have been. That is simply a fact. We are now having a tough time as we aim to live within our means. This is something we have wanted apparently. But still Tan gets stick. He’s damned if he does, damned it he doesn’t.
My biggest three regrets over the last 20 years are;
1) when we were on our charge we didn’t get into the premier league. With Sam in charge, one season at Ninian it would have been class. Might have kept our best players and developed into something. Council would have had to deal with Sam and companies would have been fighting over the retail space.
2) when Tan decided to go for it he didn’t replace Malky with a manager who would have got us more suited for the premier league. The money Malky got to spend and to do it so badly was a massive f**k up. A better manager would have built a championship winning squad ready for the premier league and with 50 million extra a mid table prem side.
3) that Sam and Tan didn’t stay on the same page and become a dream team partnership. Imagine Sam doing Dalman’s role? Would have been class and a match made in whatever heaven you believe in.
I have spoken.
![]()
We just want to balance the argument because neither side is squeaky clean on this.
I just find it slightly disappointing that even at a point where things on the pitch are possibly more positive than for years we're still discussing the merits of a previous owner against a present day one.
The owner isn't changing anytime soon (despite some people being desperate for that) and therefore I'd much rather discuss how Morison and his troops are doing because, ultimately, that's what really matters to most of us.
The Topic was about now and what the future plans could be![]()
And yes plans should be in place for the good hope your even if it went wrong .
Yep I hope I would be too !!
But if it goes wrong it doesn't mean that appointing Morison was wrong as most would agree, right now, it was a good appointment.
Truth be told, none of us really know about the finances other than stuff that is publicly declared; we can just use our own minds to come to a, hopefully, accurate position on the position.
Let's hope it all turns out positively.
Tue Nov 23, 2021 3:34 pm
Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:maccydee wrote:We see things very similarly Mr Driver.
The way I see it there are distinct sides in this debate.
There are some who will never, ever agree anything that Tan has done is any good. I’ve said it before if he cured cancer they would say bet he has been sat on that for ages.
Some are blind and pretty stupid and actually make no sense (Ninian 27, Barclay) and aren’t really worth debating with. At least with Annis you can debate him because he absolutely knows his stuff albeit he is very anti Tan. He has never said differently. He also is very loyal to Sam and that’s commendable. Sam is his good friend and that’s probably the best thing about Annis as anyone who has spent time with him or spoke to him on the phone will agree with.
Me and you and others are far more balanced. I cannot say that Tan hasn’t made mistakes, as I cannot say Sam didn’t. Both trusted the wrong people.
Tan trusted Dalman to look after his club while he dealt with matters close to home. As a significant person in Malaysia of course he is going to be expected to do that.
Sam trusted PMG and Ridsdale and they turned out to be after their own interests rather than Sam’s or indeed Cardiff City’s. It’s no coincidence that the council stopped dealing with Sam but would deal with PMG and they are the ones who made the money out of the stadium and retail outlet. Plans envisaged by Sam. Yes Sam made threats after he was ousted, but let’s be honest, who wouldn’t in his position? It was a slight on him and absolutely he was right to get what was his.
When Dalman’s expenses are discussed it’s ignored that Sam’s management company also did this. It was also loans that financed our climb up the table into the championship on that ride we all loved. However, no one else was prepared to do that and there had to be equity for Sam to do that so without him there wouldn’t have been the ride we enjoyed. For that I will always think fondly of him. But when he left, while we were far better off on the pitch off it we weren’t. It’s no point going over that again.
Tan has stabilised us and as the debt is his responsibility then we are far better off than we ever have been. That is simply a fact. We are now having a tough time as we aim to live within our means. This is something we have wanted apparently. But still Tan gets stick. He’s damned if he does, damned it he doesn’t.
My biggest three regrets over the last 20 years are;
1) when we were on our charge we didn’t get into the premier league. With Sam in charge, one season at Ninian it would have been class. Might have kept our best players and developed into something. Council would have had to deal with Sam and companies would have been fighting over the retail space.
2) when Tan decided to go for it he didn’t replace Malky with a manager who would have got us more suited for the premier league. The money Malky got to spend and to do it so badly was a massive f**k up. A better manager would have built a championship winning squad ready for the premier league and with 50 million extra a mid table prem side.
3) that Sam and Tan didn’t stay on the same page and become a dream team partnership. Imagine Sam doing Dalman’s role? Would have been class and a match made in whatever heaven you believe in.
I have spoken.
![]()
We just want to balance the argument because neither side is squeaky clean on this.
I just find it slightly disappointing that even at a point where things on the pitch are possibly more positive than for years we're still discussing the merits of a previous owner against a present day one.
The owner isn't changing anytime soon (despite some people being desperate for that) and therefore I'd much rather discuss how Morison and his troops are doing because, ultimately, that's what really matters to most of us.
The Topic was about now and what the future plans could be![]()
And yes plans should be in place for the good hope your even if it went wrong .
Yep I hope I would be too !!
But if it goes wrong it doesn't mean that appointing Morison was wrong as most would agree, right now, it was a good appointment.
Truth be told, none of us really know about the finances other than stuff that is publicly declared; we can just use our own minds to come to a, hopefully, accurate position on the position.
Let's hope it all turns out positively.
For me it was the best appointment as we have NO money and Morison knows the youth and first team better than anyone and I would love him to be here for years![]()
![]()
![]()
Tue Nov 23, 2021 3:38 pm
piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:maccydee wrote:We see things very similarly Mr Driver.
The way I see it there are distinct sides in this debate.
There are some who will never, ever agree anything that Tan has done is any good. I’ve said it before if he cured cancer they would say bet he has been sat on that for ages.
Some are blind and pretty stupid and actually make no sense (Ninian 27, Barclay) and aren’t really worth debating with. At least with Annis you can debate him because he absolutely knows his stuff albeit he is very anti Tan. He has never said differently. He also is very loyal to Sam and that’s commendable. Sam is his good friend and that’s probably the best thing about Annis as anyone who has spent time with him or spoke to him on the phone will agree with.
Me and you and others are far more balanced. I cannot say that Tan hasn’t made mistakes, as I cannot say Sam didn’t. Both trusted the wrong people.
Tan trusted Dalman to look after his club while he dealt with matters close to home. As a significant person in Malaysia of course he is going to be expected to do that.
Sam trusted PMG and Ridsdale and they turned out to be after their own interests rather than Sam’s or indeed Cardiff City’s. It’s no coincidence that the council stopped dealing with Sam but would deal with PMG and they are the ones who made the money out of the stadium and retail outlet. Plans envisaged by Sam. Yes Sam made threats after he was ousted, but let’s be honest, who wouldn’t in his position? It was a slight on him and absolutely he was right to get what was his.
When Dalman’s expenses are discussed it’s ignored that Sam’s management company also did this. It was also loans that financed our climb up the table into the championship on that ride we all loved. However, no one else was prepared to do that and there had to be equity for Sam to do that so without him there wouldn’t have been the ride we enjoyed. For that I will always think fondly of him. But when he left, while we were far better off on the pitch off it we weren’t. It’s no point going over that again.
Tan has stabilised us and as the debt is his responsibility then we are far better off than we ever have been. That is simply a fact. We are now having a tough time as we aim to live within our means. This is something we have wanted apparently. But still Tan gets stick. He’s damned if he does, damned it he doesn’t.
My biggest three regrets over the last 20 years are;
1) when we were on our charge we didn’t get into the premier league. With Sam in charge, one season at Ninian it would have been class. Might have kept our best players and developed into something. Council would have had to deal with Sam and companies would have been fighting over the retail space.
2) when Tan decided to go for it he didn’t replace Malky with a manager who would have got us more suited for the premier league. The money Malky got to spend and to do it so badly was a massive f**k up. A better manager would have built a championship winning squad ready for the premier league and with 50 million extra a mid table prem side.
3) that Sam and Tan didn’t stay on the same page and become a dream team partnership. Imagine Sam doing Dalman’s role? Would have been class and a match made in whatever heaven you believe in.
I have spoken.
![]()
We just want to balance the argument because neither side is squeaky clean on this.
I just find it slightly disappointing that even at a point where things on the pitch are possibly more positive than for years we're still discussing the merits of a previous owner against a present day one.
The owner isn't changing anytime soon (despite some people being desperate for that) and therefore I'd much rather discuss how Morison and his troops are doing because, ultimately, that's what really matters to most of us.
The Topic was about now and what the future plans could be![]()
And yes plans should be in place for the good hope your even if it went wrong .
Yep I hope I would be too !!
But if it goes wrong it doesn't mean that appointing Morison was wrong as most would agree, right now, it was a good appointment.
Truth be told, none of us really know about the finances other than stuff that is publicly declared; we can just use our own minds to come to a, hopefully, accurate position on the position.
Let's hope it all turns out positively.
For me it was the best appointment as we have NO money and Morison knows the youth and first team better than anyone and I would love him to be here for years![]()
![]()
![]()
I wholeheartedly agree with you on thatOnwards and upwards ........................ hopefully
![]()
Tue Nov 23, 2021 6:48 pm
Forever Blue wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Barclay1 wrote: I'd honestly say, the Tan years were not as good as the Sam years.
If you're right in the head I don't wanna be.
In My eyes and many others their have been NO real good years under Tan the minute he stripped us of our identity and divided our fam base.
Plus Our debt is way way higher than when he arrived , less crowds , lower league position and a Committee not even knowing what’s happening at our football club still.
Strange you were all over the malky promotion as being great
And ive been told from a good source that tans debt is down.to £62 million so he must have reduced our debt to him considerably by cutting costs and the parachute payments ??? Hmmm
I was for Malky and still am, never changed.
Steve , I just told you on the phone the debt![]()
Also I just found a video of you singing for Malky against Tan on one of Carlos away trips![]()
![]()
Tue Nov 23, 2021 7:27 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Barclay1 wrote: I'd honestly say, the Tan years were not as good as the Sam years.
If you're right in the head I don't wanna be.
In My eyes and many others their have been NO real good years under Tan the minute he stripped us of our identity and divided our fam base.
Plus Our debt is way way higher than when he arrived , less crowds , lower league position and a Committee not even knowing what’s happening at our football club still.
Strange you were all over the malky promotion as being great
And ive been told from a good source that tans debt is down.to £62 million so he must have reduced our debt to him considerably by cutting costs and the parachute payments ??? Hmmm
I was for Malky and still am, never changed.
Steve , I just told you on the phone the debt![]()
Also I just found a video of you singing for Malky against Tan on one of Carlos away trips![]()
![]()
I was a brilliant mime artist in the years gone by
Wed Nov 24, 2021 7:37 am
maccydee wrote:We see things very similarly Mr Driver.
The way I see it there are distinct sides in this debate.
There are some who will never, ever agree anything that Tan has done is any good. I’ve said it before if he cured cancer they would say bet he has been sat on that for ages.
Some are blind and pretty stupid and actually make no sense (Ninian 27, Barclay) and aren’t really worth debating with. At least with Annis you can debate him because he absolutely knows his stuff albeit he is very anti Tan. He has never said differently. He also is very loyal to Sam and that’s commendable. Sam is his good friend and that’s probably the best thing about Annis as anyone who has spent time with him or spoke to him on the phone will agree with.
Me and you and others are far more balanced. I cannot say that Tan hasn’t made mistakes, as I cannot say Sam didn’t. Both trusted the wrong people.
Tan trusted Dalman to look after his club while he dealt with matters close to home. As a significant person in Malaysia of course he is going to be expected to do that.
Sam trusted PMG and Ridsdale and they turned out to be after their own interests rather than Sam’s or indeed Cardiff City’s. It’s no coincidence that the council stopped dealing with Sam but would deal with PMG and they are the ones who made the money out of the stadium and retail outlet. Plans envisaged by Sam. Yes Sam made threats after he was ousted, but let’s be honest, who wouldn’t in his position? It was a slight on him and absolutely he was right to get what was his.
When Dalman’s expenses are discussed it’s ignored that Sam’s management company also did this. It was also loans that financed our climb up the table into the championship on that ride we all loved. However, no one else was prepared to do that and there had to be equity for Sam to do that so without him there wouldn’t have been the ride we enjoyed. For that I will always think fondly of him. But when he left, while we were far better off on the pitch off it we weren’t. It’s no point going over that again.
Tan has stabilised us and as the debt is his responsibility then we are far better off than we ever have been. That is simply a fact. We are now having a tough time as we aim to live within our means. This is something we have wanted apparently. But still Tan gets stick. He’s damned if he does, damned it he doesn’t.
My biggest three regrets over the last 20 years are;
1) when we were on our charge we didn’t get into the premier league. With Sam in charge, one season at Ninian it would have been class. Might have kept our best players and developed into something. Council would have had to deal with Sam and companies would have been fighting over the retail space.
2) when Tan decided to go for it he didn’t replace Malky with a manager who would have got us more suited for the premier league. The money Malky got to spend and to do it so badly was a massive f**k up. A better manager would have built a championship winning squad ready for the premier league and with 50 million extra a mid table prem side.
3) that Sam and Tan didn’t stay on the same page and become a dream team partnership. Imagine Sam doing Dalman’s role? Would have been class and a match made in whatever heaven you believe in.
I have spoken.
Wed Nov 24, 2021 10:40 am
Barclay1 wrote:maccydee wrote:We see things very similarly Mr Driver.
The way I see it there are distinct sides in this debate.
There are some who will never, ever agree anything that Tan has done is any good. I’ve said it before if he cured cancer they would say bet he has been sat on that for ages.
Some are blind and pretty stupid and actually make no sense (Ninian 27, Barclay) and aren’t really worth debating with. At least with Annis you can debate him because he absolutely knows his stuff albeit he is very anti Tan. He has never said differently. He also is very loyal to Sam and that’s commendable. Sam is his good friend and that’s probably the best thing about Annis as anyone who has spent time with him or spoke to him on the phone will agree with.
Me and you and others are far more balanced. I cannot say that Tan hasn’t made mistakes, as I cannot say Sam didn’t. Both trusted the wrong people.
Tan trusted Dalman to look after his club while he dealt with matters close to home. As a significant person in Malaysia of course he is going to be expected to do that.
Sam trusted PMG and Ridsdale and they turned out to be after their own interests rather than Sam’s or indeed Cardiff City’s. It’s no coincidence that the council stopped dealing with Sam but would deal with PMG and they are the ones who made the money out of the stadium and retail outlet. Plans envisaged by Sam. Yes Sam made threats after he was ousted, but let’s be honest, who wouldn’t in his position? It was a slight on him and absolutely he was right to get what was his.
When Dalman’s expenses are discussed it’s ignored that Sam’s management company also did this. It was also loans that financed our climb up the table into the championship on that ride we all loved. However, no one else was prepared to do that and there had to be equity for Sam to do that so without him there wouldn’t have been the ride we enjoyed. For that I will always think fondly of him. But when he left, while we were far better off on the pitch off it we weren’t. It’s no point going over that again.
Tan has stabilised us and as the debt is his responsibility then we are far better off than we ever have been. That is simply a fact. We are now having a tough time as we aim to live within our means. This is something we have wanted apparently. But still Tan gets stick. He’s damned if he does, damned it he doesn’t.
My biggest three regrets over the last 20 years are;
1) when we were on our charge we didn’t get into the premier league. With Sam in charge, one season at Ninian it would have been class. Might have kept our best players and developed into something. Council would have had to deal with Sam and companies would have been fighting over the retail space.
2) when Tan decided to go for it he didn’t replace Malky with a manager who would have got us more suited for the premier league. The money Malky got to spend and to do it so badly was a massive f**k up. A better manager would have built a championship winning squad ready for the premier league and with 50 million extra a mid table prem side.
3) that Sam and Tan didn’t stay on the same page and become a dream team partnership. Imagine Sam doing Dalman’s role? Would have been class and a match made in whatever heaven you believe in.
I have spoken.
Fair enough then.....
Wed Nov 24, 2021 7:02 pm
maccydee wrote:We see things very similarly Mr Driver.
The way I see it there are distinct sides in this debate.
There are some who will never, ever agree anything that Tan has done is any good. I’ve said it before if he cured cancer they would say bet he has been sat on that for ages.
Some are blind and pretty stupid and actually make no sense (Ninian 27, Barclay) and aren’t really worth debating with. At least with Annis you can debate him because he absolutely knows his stuff albeit he is very anti Tan. He has never said differently. He also is very loyal to Sam and that’s commendable. Sam is his good friend and that’s probably the best thing about Annis as anyone who has spent time with him or spoke to him on the phone will agree with.
Me and you and others are far more balanced. I cannot say that Tan hasn’t made mistakes, as I cannot say Sam didn’t. Both trusted the wrong people.
Tan trusted Dalman to look after his club while he dealt with matters close to home. As a significant person in Malaysia of course he is going to be expected to do that.
Sam trusted PMG and Ridsdale and they turned out to be after their own interests rather than Sam’s or indeed Cardiff City’s. It’s no coincidence that the council stopped dealing with Sam but would deal with PMG and they are the ones who made the money out of the stadium and retail outlet. Plans envisaged by Sam. Yes Sam made threats after he was ousted, but let’s be honest, who wouldn’t in his position? It was a slight on him and absolutely he was right to get what was his.
When Dalman’s expenses are discussed it’s ignored that Sam’s management company also did this. It was also loans that financed our climb up the table into the championship on that ride we all loved. However, no one else was prepared to do that and there had to be equity for Sam to do that so without him there wouldn’t have been the ride we enjoyed. For that I will always think fondly of him. But when he left, while we were far better off on the pitch off it we weren’t. It’s no point going over that again.
Tan has stabilised us and as the debt is his responsibility then we are far better off than we ever have been. That is simply a fact. We are now having a tough time as we aim to live within our means. This is something we have wanted apparently. But still Tan gets stick. He’s damned if he does, damned it he doesn’t.
My biggest three regrets over the last 20 years are;
1) when we were on our charge we didn’t get into the premier league. With Sam in charge, one season at Ninian it would have been class. Might have kept our best players and developed into something. Council would have had to deal with Sam and companies would have been fighting over the retail space.
2) when Tan decided to go for it he didn’t replace Malky with a manager who would have got us more suited for the premier league. The money Malky got to spend and to do it so badly was a massive f**k up. A better manager would have built a championship winning squad ready for the premier league and with 50 million extra a mid table prem side.
3) that Sam and Tan didn’t stay on the same page and become a dream team partnership. Imagine Sam doing Dalman’s role? Would have been class and a match made in whatever heaven you believe in.
I have spoken.