Tue Aug 25, 2020 2:12 pm
Tue Aug 25, 2020 2:14 pm
piledriver64 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:darran1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:In England Radio 5 reporting this morning that stadium capacity in September will be a maximum of 30%, with 1 meter spacing. You will though be able to sit as a family of up to 4 people.
Every other row occupied with 1 meter spacing all around you.
I don't see how this will work though, say you are in a row with other fans socially distancing,then one needs to go to the toilet during the game, they will have to walk straight past you much closer than 1 meter
I didn't know social distancing had changed in Wales thought its still 2mtrs? Passing someone is ok it happens all the time on pavement... shops ... in fact everywhere... so why should it be different at football?
Correct. Really don't know why schools, shops, etc., are being charged with developing one way systems when the guidance if that any exposure within 2 metres would have to be for at least 15 mins before it significantly increased the risk.
It's easy to socially distance in the arena and toilets on that basis with reduced capacity. The only thing they may have to do is stop people hanging about in the concourses, bars, food outlets and approach to the stadium.
Why is it suddenly more risky to walk past somebody at a football ground than working past somebody in Primark![]()
Tue Aug 25, 2020 2:19 pm
Igovernor wrote:piledriver64 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:darran1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:In England Radio 5 reporting this morning that stadium capacity in September will be a maximum of 30%, with 1 meter spacing. You will though be able to sit as a family of up to 4 people.
Every other row occupied with 1 meter spacing all around you.
I don't see how this will work though, say you are in a row with other fans socially distancing,then one needs to go to the toilet during the game, they will have to walk straight past you much closer than 1 meter
I didn't know social distancing had changed in Wales thought its still 2mtrs? Passing someone is ok it happens all the time on pavement... shops ... in fact everywhere... so why should it be different at football?
Correct. Really don't know why schools, shops, etc., are being charged with developing one way systems when the guidance if that any exposure within 2 metres would have to be for at least 15 mins before it significantly increased the risk.
It's easy to socially distance in the arena and toilets on that basis with reduced capacity. The only thing they may have to do is stop people hanging about in the concourses, bars, food outlets and approach to the stadium.
Why is it suddenly more risky to walk past somebody at a football ground than working past somebody in Primark![]()
In the stadium if they are going to have a seat every 3 places and a one way system, please tell me bow the hell are you going to socially distance? Because when I am passing someone in a row, I am inches away from that person, there is no other way to pass, and even if it's one way you still have to pass people on the way back. the only way that would work is if you only had two people in a row at each end of the row, you would be lucky to get 500 people in there on that basis,it is just not going to work. I suppose not many people have thought about it.
Tue Aug 25, 2020 2:31 pm
Igovernor wrote:piledriver64 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:darran1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:In England Radio 5 reporting this morning that stadium capacity in September will be a maximum of 30%, with 1 meter spacing. You will though be able to sit as a family of up to 4 people.
Every other row occupied with 1 meter spacing all around you.
I don't see how this will work though, say you are in a row with other fans socially distancing,then one needs to go to the toilet during the game, they will have to walk straight past you much closer than 1 meter
I didn't know social distancing had changed in Wales thought its still 2mtrs? Passing someone is ok it happens all the time on pavement... shops ... in fact everywhere... so why should it be different at football?
Correct. Really don't know why schools, shops, etc., are being charged with developing one way systems when the guidance if that any exposure within 2 metres would have to be for at least 15 mins before it significantly increased the risk.
It's easy to socially distance in the arena and toilets on that basis with reduced capacity. The only thing they may have to do is stop people hanging about in the concourses, bars, food outlets and approach to the stadium.
Why is it suddenly more risky to walk past somebody at a football ground than working past somebody in Primark![]()
In the stadium if they are going to have a seat every 3 places and a one way system, please tell me bow the hell are you going to socially distance? Because when I am passing someone in a row, I am inches away from that person, there is no other way to pass, and even if it's one way you still have to pass people on the way back. the only way that would work is if you only had two people in a row at each end of the row, you would be lucky to get 500 people in there on that basis,it is just not going to work. I suppose not many people have thought about it.
Tue Aug 25, 2020 2:32 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Igovernor wrote:piledriver64 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:darran1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:In England Radio 5 reporting this morning that stadium capacity in September will be a maximum of 30%, with 1 meter spacing. You will though be able to sit as a family of up to 4 people.
Every other row occupied with 1 meter spacing all around you.
I don't see how this will work though, say you are in a row with other fans socially distancing,then one needs to go to the toilet during the game, they will have to walk straight past you much closer than 1 meter
I didn't know social distancing had changed in Wales thought its still 2mtrs? Passing someone is ok it happens all the time on pavement... shops ... in fact everywhere... so why should it be different at football?
Correct. Really don't know why schools, shops, etc., are being charged with developing one way systems when the guidance if that any exposure within 2 metres would have to be for at least 15 mins before it significantly increased the risk.
It's easy to socially distance in the arena and toilets on that basis with reduced capacity. The only thing they may have to do is stop people hanging about in the concourses, bars, food outlets and approach to the stadium.
Why is it suddenly more risky to walk past somebody at a football ground than working past somebody in Primark![]()
In the stadium if they are going to have a seat every 3 places and a one way system, please tell me bow the hell are you going to socially distance? Because when I am passing someone in a row, I am inches away from that person, there is no other way to pass, and even if it's one way you still have to pass people on the way back. the only way that would work is if you only had two people in a row at each end of the row, you would be lucky to get 500 people in there on that basis,it is just not going to work. I suppose not many people have thought about it.
People cannot or do not pass 2mtrs away in shops on streets try doing it in st davidssame in shops on busses list is endless so why can't you pass by people in stadium that's the question we are asking?
Tue Aug 25, 2020 3:22 pm
Igovernor wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Igovernor wrote:piledriver64 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:darran1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:In England Radio 5 reporting this morning that stadium capacity in September will be a maximum of 30%, with 1 meter spacing. You will though be able to sit as a family of up to 4 people.
Every other row occupied with 1 meter spacing all around you.
I don't see how this will work though, say you are in a row with other fans socially distancing,then one needs to go to the toilet during the game, they will have to walk straight past you much closer than 1 meter
I didn't know social distancing had changed in Wales thought its still 2mtrs? Passing someone is ok it happens all the time on pavement... shops ... in fact everywhere... so why should it be different at football?
Correct. Really don't know why schools, shops, etc., are being charged with developing one way systems when the guidance if that any exposure within 2 metres would have to be for at least 15 mins before it significantly increased the risk.
It's easy to socially distance in the arena and toilets on that basis with reduced capacity. The only thing they may have to do is stop people hanging about in the concourses, bars, food outlets and approach to the stadium.
Why is it suddenly more risky to walk past somebody at a football ground than working past somebody in Primark![]()
In the stadium if they are going to have a seat every 3 places and a one way system, please tell me bow the hell are you going to socially distance? Because when I am passing someone in a row, I am inches away from that person, there is no other way to pass, and even if it's one way you still have to pass people on the way back. the only way that would work is if you only had two people in a row at each end of the row, you would be lucky to get 500 people in there on that basis,it is just not going to work. I suppose not many people have thought about it.
People cannot or do not pass 2mtrs away in shops on streets try doing it in st davidssame in shops on busses list is endless so why can't you pass by people in stadium that's the question we are asking?
Allan i am not sure where you shop, as I am out shopping all the time and it really is easy to avoid people if you want to! Never had a problem doing that even with the idiots out there!
Ps I don't travel on buses, or trains and in the stadium we are talking of inches
Tue Aug 25, 2020 6:10 pm
Tue Aug 25, 2020 6:43 pm
Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:15 am
Isawgarystevensscoreagoal wrote:But they haven't back tracked on the conditions they imposed.
Wed Aug 26, 2020 3:28 pm
WestCoastBlue wrote:Isawgarystevensscoreagoal wrote:But they haven't back tracked on the conditions they imposed.
Which is why my group of 5 as well as I’m sure thousands of others haven’t renewed. I think it was an awful stance from the club, games were still gonna be played at the CCS whether there were fans or not meaning there is zero additional cost to the club for closed door games. How they can justify charging fans for those games is baffling. I personally don’t think a streaming code counts as compensation either.