EMILIANO SALA FLIGHT MESSAGES WITH AGENT'S SON REVEALED

“Until a proper digital forensic examination of McKay’s phone is done then it’s speculation, in a court case it’s classed as inadmissable evidence and after all the trouble with the phone hacking scandal recently too it’s weird how they have ‘got a copy’ because it wouldn’t have come from Emiliano,s phone unless his WhatsApp account was hacked.”

That’s it then.. And this is probably the best build up sentence I’ve read in my entire life!
“proper digital forensic examination” Hope you don’t mind me adopting that into my daily vocabulary.

As this will be going down the lines of a criminal investigation at some point then the mobile phone will be seized and a digital forensic examination will take place where a full digital image will be taken which will be worked on and translated within the confines of UK laws, until then this conversation is speculation, it is possible that the entire conversation could have been changed when translated and passed on.

It’s what we do mate! Speculate. How many soldiers do we need to seize a mobile phone and how quickly can it be done? We need to do proper digital forensic examination ASAP! I’m sorry mate, I’m going to use this every time I don’t understand a meme or a text. Just loved it

Did I say ASAP?

How many soldiers do we need? Ummm 0 how about 1 police officer with a court order.....

How do you think images and conversations are found in cases of company espionage or paedophile cases?

There are a set rules and guidelines to be followed before such evidence can be used, i certainly didn’t go through 5 years of uni and obtain a masters in computer forensics to be treated like an idiot in a football forum over questioning the validity of a conversation that could have been changed at translation before being handed over to the media...

And my observation also remains, you sir are an arse

So if you suspect a pedophile grooming, you don’t speculate, make judgement and take action upon it? You wait for proper digital forensic examination? I would go into zeige mentality and tackle that fucker ASAP!

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/emiliano-salas-text-messages-reveal-15735670

Does anyone else find this statement concerning and desperate to try and wash their hands of any responsibility?

McKay said: "In regards to the booking of the flight, we contacted David Henderson (who did not eventually fly the plane) who has flown us and many of our players all over Europe on countless occasions.


"We had no involvement in selecting a plane or a pilot and wish to make clear we do not own the plane that Emiliano flew on.

There is no evdience for this and only an assumption...

From this statement, they've booked this flight with either an other agency/company or an individual (my guess David Henderson).

Look at this statement:

"In regards to the booking of the flight, we contacted David Henderson (who did not eventually fly the plane) who has flown us and many of our players all over Europe on countless occasions."

So they contact thier usual pilot who flys their jockeys/other footballers around, he said he can't do it, so they've now either asked him to find an alternative or they've approached a separate company.

Surely as the representative of the player it's their duty to ensure the new arrangement in place is: firstly safe, and secondly adequate for an 18 million premier League footballer.

It's always easier to say in hindsight but their responsibility in this instance would be due diligence on...

Who the Pilot was,
What plane they we're using & is that plane safe to fly in the current climate.

If their is any doubt about this then surely it is their responsibility as agents of the player to relay this info to Sala and then it would be his choice if he wants to proceed.

Does anyone actually believe Sala new there was an added risk of flying over water at night in this particular plane?

This statement really doesn't sit right with me and now it's clear where sky got it from... the Mckays themselves.

Again what’s the source? Were they obtained legally? Were they altered at translation?

Until a proper digital forensic examination of McKay’s phone is done then it’s speculation, in a court case it’s classed as inadmissable evidence and after all the trouble with the phone hacking scandal recently too it’s weird how they have ‘got a copy’ because it wouldn’t have come from Emiliano,s phone unless his WhatsApp account was hacked.

The source is on the top of the page! The paper have used direct quotes! Yes i know the media can bend the truth but Wales on line, BBC & Sky are all using the same quotes. Therefore this has been directly said from a statement from the Mckays. This hasn't been released by the police investigation etc. They released the texts to the press to clear their name and have made a statement with it.

The rest is just me reading the statement and giving an opinion. I've clearly said that there is no evidence in my opinion on the matter!! Could be tottaly wrong but Im sure a lot of other people are wondering the same!!

Made the arrangements but did not choose plane or pilot! Who did then as wasn't it same plane that took him to nante? The planning of the trip was a shambles and looks to have been made by bunch of back street taxi firm!!

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/emiliano-salas-text-messages-reveal-15735670

Does anyone else find this statement concerning and desperate to try and wash their hands of any responsibility?

McKay said: "In regards to the booking of the flight, we contacted David Henderson (who did not eventually fly the plane) who has flown us and many of our players all over Europe on countless occasions.


"We had no involvement in selecting a plane or a pilot and wish to make clear we do not own the plane that Emiliano flew on.

There is no evdience for this and only an assumption...

From this statement, they've booked this flight with either an other agency/company or an individual (my guess David Henderson).

Look at this statement:

"In regards to the booking of the flight, we contacted David Henderson (who did not eventually fly the plane) who has flown us and many of our players all over Europe on countless occasions."

So they contact thier usual pilot who flys their jockeys/other footballers around, he said he can't do it, so they've now either asked him to find an alternative or they've approached a separate company.

Surely as the representative of the player it's their duty to ensure the new arrangement in place is: firstly safe, and secondly adequate for an 18 million premier League footballer.

It's always easier to say in hindsight but their responsibility in this instance would be due diligence on...

Who the Pilot was,
What plane they we're using & is that plane safe to fly in the current climate.

If their is any doubt about this then surely it is their responsibility as agents of the player to relay this info to Sala and then it would be his choice if he wants to proceed.

Does anyone actually believe Sala new there was an added risk of flying over water at night in this particular plane?

This statement really doesn't sit right with me and now it's clear where sky got it from... the Mckays themselves.

Again what’s the source? Were they obtained legally? Were they altered at translation?

Until a proper digital forensic examination of McKay’s phone is done then it’s speculation, in a court case it’s classed as inadmissable evidence and after all the trouble with the phone hacking scandal recently too it’s weird how they have ‘got a copy’ because it wouldn’t have come from Emiliano,s phone unless his WhatsApp account was hacked.

The source is on the top of the page! The paper have used direct quotes! Yes i know the media can bend the truth but Wales on line, BBC & Sky are all using the same quotes. Therefore this has been directly said from a statement from the Mckays. This hasn't been released by the police investigation etc. They released the texts to the press to clear their name and have made a statement with it.

The rest is just me reading the statement and giving an opinion. I've clearly said that there is no evidence in my opinion on the matter!! Could be tottaly wrong but Im sure a lot of other people are wondering the same!!

And I’m questioning the legitimacy of the source, they have been translated which could have been done and changed before handing over to the media. If they’ve come from a company that specialises in digital forensic examinations then I’ll accept them as true, until then I believe they’ve been changed at source

Made the arrangements but did not choose plane or pilot! Who did then as wasn't it same plane that took him to nante? The planning of the trip was a shambles and looks to have been made by bunch of back street taxi firm!!

I agree it does appear shambolic and I can't help thinking releasing these messages is nothing more than a back covering exercise. To mention the experienced pilot by name who it appears was logged as the pilot of record, but was not on the flight or anywhere near Nantes, , raises serious questions about the legality of this flight.

The agent has moved very quickly to distance himself from Mr Henderson and that for me stinks of covering his backside.

Oh god, why does supporting Cardiff have to be such a drama

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/emiliano-salas-text-messages-reveal-15735670

Does anyone else find this statement concerning and desperate to try and wash their hands of any responsibility?

McKay said: "In regards to the booking of the flight, we contacted David Henderson (who did not eventually fly the plane) who has flown us and many of our players all over Europe on countless occasions.


"We had no involvement in selecting a plane or a pilot and wish to make clear we do not own the plane that Emiliano flew on.

There is no evdience for this and only an assumption...

From this statement, they've booked this flight with either an other agency/company or an individual (my guess David Henderson).

Look at this statement:

"In regards to the booking of the flight, we contacted David Henderson (who did not eventually fly the plane) who has flown us and many of our players all over Europe on countless occasions."

So they contact thier usual pilot who flys their jockeys/other footballers around, he said he can't do it, so they've now either asked him to find an alternative or they've approached a separate company.

Surely as the representative of the player it's their duty to ensure the new arrangement in place is: firstly safe, and secondly adequate for an 18 million premier League footballer.

It's always easier to say in hindsight but their responsibility in this instance would be due diligence on...

Who the Pilot was,
What plane they we're using & is that plane safe to fly in the current climate.

If their is any doubt about this then surely it is their responsibility as agents of the player to relay this info to Sala and then it would be his choice if he wants to proceed.

Does anyone actually believe Sala new there was an added risk of flying over water at night in this particular plane?

This statement really doesn't sit right with me and now it's clear where sky got it from... the Mckays themselves.

Again what’s the source? Were they obtained legally? Were they altered at translation?

Until a proper digital forensic examination of McKay’s phone is done then it’s speculation, in a court case it’s classed as inadmissable evidence and after all the trouble with the phone hacking scandal recently too it’s weird how they have ‘got a copy’ because it wouldn’t have come from Emiliano,s phone unless his WhatsApp account was hacked.

The source is on the top of the page! The paper have used direct quotes! Yes i know the media can bend the truth but Wales on line, BBC & Sky are all using the same quotes. Therefore this has been directly said from a statement from the Mckays. This hasn't been released by the police investigation etc. They released the texts to the press to clear their name and have made a statement with it.

The rest is just me reading the statement and giving an opinion. I've clearly said that there is no evidence in my opinion on the matter!! Could be tottaly wrong but Im sure a lot of other people are wondering the same!!

And I’m questioning the legitimacy of the source, they have been translated which could have been done and changed before handing over to the media. If they’ve come from a company that specialises in digital forensic examinations then I’ll accept them as true, until then I believe they’ve been changed at source

I'm referring to this statement which is not a translation:


McKay said: "In regards to the booking of the flight, we contacted David Henderson (who did not eventually fly the plane) who has flown us and many of our players all over Europe on countless occasions.

"We had no involvement in selecting a plane or a pilot and wish to make clear we do not own the plane that Emiliano flew on.

Every media outlet are saying the same.

This is a statement they made on releasing the text messages. I don't understand what forensic anything has got to do with this particular statement by people trying to distance themselves of the responsibility.

I tottaly agree with you, that you should never just believe what you read, I'm just making a judgment on the current information avialble. This situation is changing daily so I could be miles off the final outcome... who knows!!

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/emiliano-salas-text-messages-reveal-15735670

Does anyone else find this statement concerning and desperate to try and wash their hands of any responsibility?

McKay said: "In regards to the booking of the flight, we contacted David Henderson (who did not eventually fly the plane) who has flown us and many of our players all over Europe on countless occasions.


"We had no involvement in selecting a plane or a pilot and wish to make clear we do not own the plane that Emiliano flew on.

There is no evdience for this and only an assumption...

From this statement, they've booked this flight with either an other agency/company or an individual (my guess David Henderson).

Look at this statement:

"In regards to the booking of the flight, we contacted David Henderson (who did not eventually fly the plane) who has flown us and many of our players all over Europe on countless occasions."

So they contact thier usual pilot who flys their jockeys/other footballers around, he said he can't do it, so they've now either asked him to find an alternative or they've approached a separate company.

Surely as the representative of the player it's their duty to ensure the new arrangement in place is: firstly safe, and secondly adequate for an 18 million premier League footballer.

It's always easier to say in hindsight but their responsibility in this instance would be due diligence on...

Who the Pilot was,
What plane they we're using & is that plane safe to fly in the current climate.

If their is any doubt about this then surely it is their responsibility as agents of the player to relay this info to Sala and then it would be his choice if he wants to proceed.

Does anyone actually believe Sala new there was an added risk of flying over water at night in this particular plane?

This statement really doesn't sit right with me and now it's clear where sky got it from... the Mckays themselves.

Again what’s the source? Were they obtained legally? Were they altered at translation?

Until a proper digital forensic examination of McKay’s phone is done then it’s speculation, in a court case it’s classed as inadmissable evidence and after all the trouble with the phone hacking scandal recently too it’s weird how they have ‘got a copy’ because it wouldn’t have come from Emiliano,s phone unless his WhatsApp account was hacked.

The source is on the top of the page! The paper have used direct quotes! Yes i know the media can bend the truth but Wales on line, BBC & Sky are all using the same quotes. Therefore this has been directly said from a statement from the Mckays. This hasn't been released by the police investigation etc. They released the texts to the press to clear their name and have made a statement with it.

The rest is just me reading the statement and giving an opinion. I've clearly said that there is no evidence in my opinion on the matter!! Could be tottaly wrong but Im sure a lot of other people are wondering the same!!

And I’m questioning the legitimacy of the source, they have been translated which could have been done and changed before handing over to the media. If they’ve come from a company that specialises in digital forensic examinations then I’ll accept them as true, until then I believe they’ve been changed at source

I'm referring to this statement which is not a translation:


McKay said: "In regards to the booking of the flight, we contacted David Henderson (who did not eventually fly the plane) who has flown us and many of our players all over Europe on countless occasions.

"We had no involvement in selecting a plane or a pilot and wish to make clear we do not own the plane that Emiliano flew on.

Every media outlet are saying the same.

This is a statement they made on releasing the text messages. I don't understand what forensic anything has got to do with this particular statement by people trying to distance themselves of the responsibility.

I tottaly agree with you, that you should never just believe what you read, I'm just making a judgment on the current information avialble. This situation is changing daily so I could be miles off the final outcome... who knows!!

What I’m saying is is that they could have changed the conversation when they translated it to the media, the only way we will ever know the proper conversation is if the investigating authorities seize McKays phone and have a forensic examination of the phone done as part of the investigation which will give them the full conversation which they will then officially and legally translate as evidence.

Any evidence that comes from phones or computers falls under Digital Forensics and need to be correctly and legally imaged and searched, the back log with SWP alone is 6-8 months, imaging 1 hard drive/phone depending on the size can take a minimum of a day from start to finish then once that image has been taken the investigator will then look for evidence via specific search parameters on the image, the only time the device is touched is to take the digital image. This search can be a lengthy process in itself, so the true conversation may not come out until the end of the year

Your knowledge on this matter is brilliant but your missing my point. I'm not talking about what's on the phone I'm taking about the statement that the Mckays have made following releasing the text messages on the phone.

This is a direct statement in English to the English media. They have then quoted this in the report.

My initial post was on how the agents are trying to distance themselves from any responsibility not on the legitimacy of the initial text messages.

Your knowledge on this matter is brilliant but your missing my point. I'm not talking about what's on the phone I'm taking about the statement that the Mckays have made following releasing the text messages on the phone.

This is a direct statement in English to the English media. They have then quoted this in the report.

My initial post was on how the agents are trying to distance themselves from any responsibility not on the legitimacy of the initial text messages.

I got your point

I was referring to the messages that were attached to the bottom of the report

Made the arrangements but did not choose plane or pilot! Who did then as wasn't it same plane that took him to nante? The planning of the trip was a shambles and looks to have been made by bunch of back street taxi firm!!

I agree it does appear shambolic and I can't help thinking releasing these messages is nothing more than a back covering exercise. To mention the experienced pilot by name who it appears was logged as the pilot of record, but was not on the flight or anywhere near Nantes, , raises serious questions about the legality of this flight.

The agent has moved very quickly to distance himself from Mr Henderson and that for me stinks of covering his backside.

No where have there been any reference to who's company the plane belonged too or who selected the pilot? Mackay arranged flight but doesn't give the other info I've just mentioned why not as he must know?

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/emiliano-salas-text-messages-reveal-15735670

Does anyone else find this statement concerning and desperate to try and wash their hands of any responsibility?

McKay said: "In regards to the booking of the flight, we contacted David Henderson (who did not eventually fly the plane) who has flown us and many of our players all over Europe on countless occasions.


"We had no involvement in selecting a plane or a pilot and wish to make clear we do not own the plane that Emiliano flew on.

There is no evdience for this and only an assumption...

From this statement, they've booked this flight with either an other agency/company or an individual (my guess David Henderson).

Look at this statement:

"In regards to the booking of the flight, we contacted David Henderson (who did not eventually fly the plane) who has flown us and many of our players all over Europe on countless occasions."

So they contact thier usual pilot who flys their jockeys/other footballers around, he said he can't do it, so they've now either asked him to find an alternative or they've approached a separate company.

Surely as the representative of the player it's their duty to ensure the new arrangement in place is: firstly safe, and secondly adequate for an 18 million premier League footballer.

It's always easier to say in hindsight but their responsibility in this instance would be due diligence on...

Who the Pilot was,
What plane they we're using & is that plane safe to fly in the current climate.

If their is any doubt about this then surely it is their responsibility as agents of the player to relay this info to Sala and then it would be his choice if he wants to proceed.

Does anyone actually believe Sala new there was an added risk of flying over water at night in this particular plane?

This statement really doesn't sit right with me and now it's clear where sky got it from... the Mckays themselves.

Again what’s the source? Were they obtained legally? Were they altered at translation?

Until a proper digital forensic examination of McKay’s phone is done then it’s speculation, in a court case it’s classed as inadmissable evidence and after all the trouble with the phone hacking scandal recently too it’s weird how they have ‘got a copy’ because it wouldn’t have come from Emiliano,s phone unless his WhatsApp account was hacked.

The source is on the top of the page! The paper have used direct quotes! Yes i know the media can bend the truth but Wales on line, BBC & Sky are all using the same quotes. Therefore this has been directly said from a statement from the Mckays. This hasn't been released by the police investigation etc. They released the texts to the press to clear their name and have made a statement with it.

The rest is just me reading the statement and giving an opinion. I've clearly said that there is no evidence in my opinion on the matter!! Could be tottaly wrong but Im sure a lot of other people are wondering the same!!

And I’m questioning the legitimacy of the source, they have been translated which could have been done and changed before handing over to the media. If they’ve come from a company that specialises in digital forensic examinations then I’ll accept them as true, until then I believe they’ve been changed at source

I'm referring to this statement which is not a translation:


McKay said: "In regards to the booking of the flight, we contacted David Henderson (who did not eventually fly the plane) who has flown us and many of our players all over Europe on countless occasions.

"We had no involvement in selecting a plane or a pilot and wish to make clear we do not own the plane that Emiliano flew on.

Every media outlet are saying the same.

This is a statement they made on releasing the text messages. I don't understand what forensic anything has got to do with this particular statement by people trying to distance themselves of the responsibility.

I tottaly agree with you, that you should never just believe what you read, I'm just making a judgment on the current information avialble. This situation is changing daily so I could be miles off the final outcome... who knows!!

What I’m saying is is that they could have changed the conversation when they translated it to the media, the only way we will ever know the proper conversation is if the investigating authorities seize McKays phone and have a forensic examination of the phone done as part of the investigation which will give them the full conversation which they will then officially and legally translate as evidence.

Any evidence that comes from phones or computers falls under Digital Forensics and need to be correctly and legally imaged and searched, the back log with SWP alone is 6-8 months, imaging 1 hard drive/phone depending on the size can take a minimum of a day from start to finish then once that image has been taken the investigator will then look for evidence via specific search parameters on the image, the only time the device is touched is to take the digital image. This search can be a lengthy process in itself, so the true conversation may not come out until the end of the year

You have the biggest god complex I have ever seen.

What if the papers translated it themselves?

You are repeating yourself trying to shut down a discussion because you think you know best!!!

Absolute dick.

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/emiliano-salas-text-messages-reveal-15735670

Does anyone else find this statement concerning and desperate to try and wash their hands of any responsibility?

McKay said: "In regards to the booking of the flight, we contacted David Henderson (who did not eventually fly the plane) who has flown us and many of our players all over Europe on countless occasions.


"We had no involvement in selecting a plane or a pilot and wish to make clear we do not own the plane that Emiliano flew on.

There is no evdience for this and only an assumption...

From this statement, they've booked this flight with either an other agency/company or an individual (my guess David Henderson).

Look at this statement:

"In regards to the booking of the flight, we contacted David Henderson (who did not eventually fly the plane) who has flown us and many of our players all over Europe on countless occasions."

So they contact thier usual pilot who flys their jockeys/other footballers around, he said he can't do it, so they've now either asked him to find an alternative or they've approached a separate company.

Surely as the representative of the player it's their duty to ensure the new arrangement in place is: firstly safe, and secondly adequate for an 18 million premier League footballer.

It's always easier to say in hindsight but their responsibility in this instance would be due diligence on...

Who the Pilot was,
What plane they we're using & is that plane safe to fly in the current climate.

If their is any doubt about this then surely it is their responsibility as agents of the player to relay this info to Sala and then it would be his choice if he wants to proceed.

Does anyone actually believe Sala new there was an added risk of flying over water at night in this particular plane?

This statement really doesn't sit right with me and now it's clear where sky got it from... the Mckays themselves.

Again what’s the source? Were they obtained legally? Were they altered at translation?

Until a proper digital forensic examination of McKay’s phone is done then it’s speculation, in a court case it’s classed as inadmissable evidence and after all the trouble with the phone hacking scandal recently too it’s weird how they have ‘got a copy’ because it wouldn’t have come from Emiliano,s phone unless his WhatsApp account was hacked.

The source is on the top of the page! The paper have used direct quotes! Yes i know the media can bend the truth but Wales on line, BBC & Sky are all using the same quotes. Therefore this has been directly said from a statement from the Mckays. This hasn't been released by the police investigation etc. They released the texts to the press to clear their name and have made a statement with it.

The rest is just me reading the statement and giving an opinion. I've clearly said that there is no evidence in my opinion on the matter!! Could be tottaly wrong but Im sure a lot of other people are wondering the same!!

And I’m questioning the legitimacy of the source, they have been translated which could have been done and changed before handing over to the media. If they’ve come from a company that specialises in digital forensic examinations then I’ll accept them as true, until then I believe they’ve been changed at source

I'm referring to this statement which is not a translation:


McKay said: "In regards to the booking of the flight, we contacted David Henderson (who did not eventually fly the plane) who has flown us and many of our players all over Europe on countless occasions.

"We had no involvement in selecting a plane or a pilot and wish to make clear we do not own the plane that Emiliano flew on.

Every media outlet are saying the same.

This is a statement they made on releasing the text messages. I don't understand what forensic anything has got to do with this particular statement by people trying to distance themselves of the responsibility.

I tottaly agree with you, that you should never just believe what you read, I'm just making a judgment on the current information avialble. This situation is changing daily so I could be miles off the final outcome... who knows!!

What I’m saying is is that they could have changed the conversation when they translated it to the media, the only way we will ever know the proper conversation is if the investigating authorities seize McKays phone and have a forensic examination of the phone done as part of the investigation which will give them the full conversation which they will then officially and legally translate as evidence.

Any evidence that comes from phones or computers falls under Digital Forensics and need to be correctly and legally imaged and searched, the back log with SWP alone is 6-8 months, imaging 1 hard drive/phone depending on the size can take a minimum of a day from start to finish then once that image has been taken the investigator will then look for evidence via specific search parameters on the image, the only time the device is touched is to take the digital image. This search can be a lengthy process in itself, so the true conversation may not come out until the end of the year

You have the biggest god complex I have ever seen.

What if the papers translated it themselves?

You are repeating yourself trying to shut down a discussion because you think you know best!!!

Absolute dick.

God complex

I’ve stated the legal way of extracting the information and pointed out that the messages could have easily been changed when translated. When it comes to digital forensics I know what I’m talking about, honestly believe the Masters I’ve earned vouches for that one, just the same as on another post a person who studied law understands he contract law....

Sorry for putting my view across and questioning the validity of a conversation that’s been posted in the media because we all know the media never tell lies do they

As for your last remark, you’re entitled to your opinion, you don’t know me and base your assumption on a post, so in reply to that you sir are also an absolute dick

Maybe the reason he turned the club's offer of transportation down is because he'd already said yes to McKay's offer? If the club offered first I reckon he'd have accepted

But your just making stuff up now. Great!

Maybe the reason he turned the club's offer of transportation down is because he'd already said yes to McKay's offer? If the club offered first I reckon he'd have accepted

if you read the texts, and take them at face value.
its pretty clear that Emiliano was attempting to extend his stay in France not curtail it.

And further. People was saying Salas ex was reacting somewhat over emotional when saying “the football mafia killed him” Maybe she knew more about it than first thought.

I notice on Sala's Wikipedia page it says,

In 2009, while living in Granada, Spain, he was recommended to Portuguese District side FC Crato by a fellow Argentinian footballer who played there and joined the Portuguese team. Sala played one official match for Crato, scoring twice, but suddenly decided to leave the club and return to Argentina claiming that his girlfriend was "in trouble" in his homeland.

I wondered if that was the same ex as the one making football maffia claims,

Either way, when someone dies at such a young age and it's no from illness etc it's hard to take especially for those close to him so they can be forgiven for looking for someone to blame.

There seems to be new bits of info coming out every day so i don't want to blame anyone until we know everything.

Seems to me that McKay has tried cutting costs, why the f**k has a plane come from Lincoln in the first place, I’ve read elsewhere that a twin engines plane could have been booked from Cardiff, Bristol or Haverfordwest.

Seems to me that McKay has tried cutting costs, why the f**k has a plane come from Lincoln in the first place, I’ve read elsewhere that a twin engines plane could have been booked from Cardiff, Bristol or Haverfordwest.

We don't know that (cost cutting) and he may well have been trying to 'do his best' for his client; no matter how ill-judged that looks right now

No one should hang anyone out to dry until the facts are known and remember there are others who appear to have a lot of questions to answer, too; Dave Henderson being one