Tue May 29, 2018 9:57 am
Sneggyblubird wrote:As disgusting as it seems those people should get a fair trial.There must be no outside influence of any kind which might sway a jury one way or another.A defense can move for a miss-trial if they think the jury has been misled from any outside influence hence the restrictions on reporting.Witch hunts and trials by mobs were outlawed a long time ago.
And righteous indignation wins no arguments about this outside of this forum.
Tue May 29, 2018 10:07 am
dogfound wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:As disgusting as it seems those people should get a fair trial.There must be no outside influence of any kind which might sway a jury one way or another.A defense can move for a miss-trial if they think the jury has been misled from any outside influence hence the restrictions on reporting.Witch hunts and trials by mobs were outlawed a long time ago.
And righteous indignation wins no arguments about this outside of this forum.
seriously..?
did peter sutclife get a fair trial..of course he did...were the world and his brother aware of the trial..yes they were..
were there angry mobs..erm yes...
more shocked at people like yourself living in denial than the very sinister actions of the authorities.
if this media blackout nonsense held any water it would happen far more often..
whats happened here is wrong..but not liking tommy seems to trump that for some people
Tue May 29, 2018 10:27 am
dogfound wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:As disgusting as it seems those people should get a fair trial.There must be no outside influence of any kind which might sway a jury one way or another.A defense can move for a miss-trial if they think the jury has been misled from any outside influence hence the restrictions on reporting.Witch hunts and trials by mobs were outlawed a long time ago.
And righteous indignation wins no arguments about this outside of this forum.
seriously..?
did peter sutclife get a fair trial..of course he did...were the world and his brother aware of the trial..yes they were..
were there angry mobs..erm yes...
more shocked at people like yourself living in denial than the very sinister actions of the authorities.
if this media blackout nonsense held any water it would happen far more often..
whats happened here is wrong..but not liking tommy seems to trump that for some people
Tue May 29, 2018 2:25 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:dogfound wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:As disgusting as it seems those people should get a fair trial.There must be no outside influence of any kind which might sway a jury one way or another.A defense can move for a miss-trial if they think the jury has been misled from any outside influence hence the restrictions on reporting.Witch hunts and trials by mobs were outlawed a long time ago.
And righteous indignation wins no arguments about this outside of this forum.
seriously..?
did peter sutclife get a fair trial..of course he did...were the world and his brother aware of the trial..yes they were..
were there angry mobs..erm yes...
more shocked at people like yourself living in denial than the very sinister actions of the authorities.
if this media blackout nonsense held any water it would happen far more often..
whats happened here is wrong..but not liking tommy seems to trump that for some people
seriously,google images for angry mobs at the Sutcliffe trialwere there any reporting restrictions?
I'm glad these laws exist because otherwise defense lawyers would have a field day demonstrating that not only the jury could be influenced but also trial judges too thus letting these evil bastards off.I'm not fussed on Robinson either way and would take the same line if it was mother Teresa,its not about personalities just ignorance of the law.
Tue May 29, 2018 2:37 pm
Tue May 29, 2018 2:46 pm
CityBlue93 wrote:If they were there for sentencing the justice system had worked, these sick bastards had been found guilty, so robinson going there to report the news and, as many are putting it, 'make people aware of these people who the british legal system are trying to protect' is redundant as they are all off to prison anyway and no longer a threat to society.. their names would also have been all over the news once the sentencing and trial was complete.
Robinson had a chance to really report on a open case when one of his friends and fellow edl leaders was being found out as a paedophile for abusing a 10 year old.. this guy was still likely walking a free man and robinson could have outed him thereby protecting the public, but he chose to stay silent, and still the edl do not mention the fact that one of their leaders is a paedophile.
Robinson = harborer of paedos
Tue May 29, 2018 2:53 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:As disgusting as it seems those people should get a fair trial.There must be no outside influence of any kind which might sway a jury one way or another.A defense can move for a miss-trial if they think the jury has been misled from any outside influence hence the restrictions on reporting.Witch hunts and trials by mobs were outlawed a long time ago.
And righteous indignation wins no arguments about this outside of this forum.
Martin, They were already found Guilty when Tommy Robinson turned up, they were there for sentencing by the Judge.
Why should those Vile human beings have nothing reported? ? ?
Tue May 29, 2018 2:55 pm
wez1927 wrote:Seems to be a lot of paedo lovers on here ,attacking Robinson but not the groomers ,very strange
Tue May 29, 2018 2:57 pm
Tue May 29, 2018 3:11 pm
Jimmykingz wrote:He broke the law. This is how law works.
Tue May 29, 2018 3:13 pm
CityBlue93 wrote:If they were there for sentencing the justice system had worked, these sick bastards had been found guilty, so robinson going there to report the news and, as many are putting it, 'make people aware of these people who the british legal system are trying to protect' is redundant as they are all off to prison anyway and no longer a threat to society.. their names would also have been all over the news once the sentencing and trial was complete.
Robinson had a chance to really report on a open case when one of his friends and fellow edl leaders was being found out as a paedophile for abusing a 10 year old.. this guy was still likely walking a free man and robinson could have outed him thereby protecting the public, but he chose to stay silent, and still the edl do not mention the fact that one of their leaders is a paedophile.
Robinson = harborer of paedos
Tue May 29, 2018 3:19 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:As disgusting as it seems those people should get a fair trial.There must be no outside influence of any kind which might sway a jury one way or another.A defense can move for a miss-trial if they think the jury has been misled from any outside influence hence the restrictions on reporting.Witch hunts and trials by mobs were outlawed a long time ago.
And righteous indignation wins no arguments about this outside of this forum.
Martin, They were already found Guilty when Tommy Robinson turned up, they were there for sentencing by the Judge.
Why should those Vile human beings have nothing reported? ? ?
I understand where your'e coming from but the restrictions were in place for the whole of the trial which includes the sentencing.The time for reporting is when the whole thing is done and dusted but then our friend Tommy would have missed his chance for glory.The thing is you gotta strip this back and take the emotion out of it.Robinson broke the law,twice and has paid.It would have been the same if it was my old granny and not Robinson.
Tue May 29, 2018 3:21 pm
BluebirdWhitchurch wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:As disgusting as it seems those people should get a fair trial.There must be no outside influence of any kind which might sway a jury one way or another.A defense can move for a miss-trial if they think the jury has been misled from any outside influence hence the restrictions on reporting.Witch hunts and trials by mobs were outlawed a long time ago.
And righteous indignation wins no arguments about this outside of this forum.
Martin, They were already found Guilty when Tommy Robinson turned up, they were there for sentencing by the Judge.
Why should those Vile human beings have nothing reported? ? ?
They hadn’t been found guilty when Dickhead and his merry men turned up, they were due to be sentenced until their prescience meant they couldn’t.
Tue May 29, 2018 3:33 pm
Tue May 29, 2018 3:38 pm
MOZZER1 wrote:just reading through and it seems he was ok to film outside the court but not to publish onto social media which he did so they say
can' believe the main stream media have now released robinsons address for all to see . don't think that's wise in the circumstances
Tue May 29, 2018 3:42 pm
Forever Blue wrote:BluebirdWhitchurch wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:As disgusting as it seems those people should get a fair trial.There must be no outside influence of any kind which might sway a jury one way or another.A defense can move for a miss-trial if they think the jury has been misled from any outside influence hence the restrictions on reporting.Witch hunts and trials by mobs were outlawed a long time ago.
And righteous indignation wins no arguments about this outside of this forum.
Martin, They were already found Guilty when Tommy Robinson turned up, they were there for sentencing by the Judge.
Why should those Vile human beings have nothing reported? ? ?
They hadn’t been found guilty when Dickhead and his merry men turned up, they were due to be sentenced until their prescience meant they couldn’t.
Due to be sentenced means they were already found guilty and thats why they were being sentenced on Friday.
Tue May 29, 2018 3:46 pm
Forever Blue wrote:MOZZER1 wrote:just reading through and it seems he was ok to film outside the court but not to publish onto social media which he did so they say
can' believe the main stream media have now released robinsons address for all to see . don't think that's wise in the circumstances
Mozzer, unbelievable so they've released Robinsons family address on a breach of the peace charge and know his families life could be targeted, yet protect the vile scum![]()
![]()
Tue May 29, 2018 3:56 pm
Tue May 29, 2018 3:56 pm
Jock wrote:Forever Blue wrote:MOZZER1 wrote:just reading through and it seems he was ok to film outside the court but not to publish onto social media which he did so they say
can' believe the main stream media have now released robinsons address for all to see . don't think that's wise in the circumstances
Mozzer, unbelievable so they've released Robinsons family address on a breach of the peace charge and know his families life could be targeted, yet protect the vile scum![]()
![]()
I’d no idea they’d done this, what kind of a country have we become.
Tue May 29, 2018 3:59 pm
BluebirdWhitchurch wrote:Forever Blue wrote:BluebirdWhitchurch wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:As disgusting as it seems those people should get a fair trial.There must be no outside influence of any kind which might sway a jury one way or another.A defense can move for a miss-trial if they think the jury has been misled from any outside influence hence the restrictions on reporting.Witch hunts and trials by mobs were outlawed a long time ago.
And righteous indignation wins no arguments about this outside of this forum.
Martin, They were already found Guilty when Tommy Robinson turned up, they were there for sentencing by the Judge.
Why should those Vile human beings have nothing reported? ? ?
They hadn’t been found guilty when Dickhead and his merry men turned up, they were due to be sentenced until their prescience meant they couldn’t.
Due to be sentenced means they were already found guilty and thats why they were being sentenced on Friday.
Sorry meant to say that the verdict was due to be delivered. Judge who sentenced Robinson did so stating that the grooming case may have to go through a retrial due to his actions
Tue May 29, 2018 4:14 pm
BluebirdWhitchurch wrote:Forever Blue wrote:BluebirdWhitchurch wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:As disgusting as it seems those people should get a fair trial.There must be no outside influence of any kind which might sway a jury one way or another.A defense can move for a miss-trial if they think the jury has been misled from any outside influence hence the restrictions on reporting.Witch hunts and trials by mobs were outlawed a long time ago.
And righteous indignation wins no arguments about this outside of this forum.
Martin, They were already found Guilty when Tommy Robinson turned up, they were there for sentencing by the Judge.
Why should those Vile human beings have nothing reported? ? ?
They hadn’t been found guilty when Dickhead and his merry men turned up, they were due to be sentenced until their prescience meant they couldn’t.
Due to be sentenced means they were already found guilty and thats why they were being sentenced on Friday.
Sorry meant to say that the verdict was due to be delivered. Judge who sentenced Robinson did so stating that the grooming case may have to go through a retrial due to his actions
Tue May 29, 2018 4:25 pm
Jock wrote:BluebirdWhitchurch wrote:Forever Blue wrote:BluebirdWhitchurch wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:As disgusting as it seems those people should get a fair trial.There must be no outside influence of any kind which might sway a jury one way or another.A defense can move for a miss-trial if they think the jury has been misled from any outside influence hence the restrictions on reporting.Witch hunts and trials by mobs were outlawed a long time ago.
And righteous indignation wins no arguments about this outside of this forum.
Martin, They were already found Guilty when Tommy Robinson turned up, they were there for sentencing by the Judge.
Why should those Vile human beings have nothing reported? ? ?
They hadn’t been found guilty when Dickhead and his merry men turned up, they were due to be sentenced until their prescience meant they couldn’t.
Due to be sentenced means they were already found guilty and thats why they were being sentenced on Friday.
Sorry meant to say that the verdict was due to be delivered. Judge who sentenced Robinson did so stating that the grooming case may have to go through a retrial due to his actions
Why would there be a retrial, they had been found guilty and were in court to be sentenced. How could TR influence a verdict that had already been decided, does he have a Facist time machine ya crank.
Tue May 29, 2018 4:50 pm
CityBlue93 wrote:If they were there for sentencing the justice system had worked, these sick bastards had been found guilty, so robinson going there to report the news and, as many are putting it, 'make people aware of these people who the british legal system are trying to protect' is redundant as they are all off to prison anyway and no longer a threat to society.. their names would also have been all over the news once the sentencing and trial was complete.
Robinson had a chance to really report on a open case when one of his friends and fellow edl leaders was being found out as a paedophile for abusing a 10 year old.. this guy was still likely walking a free man and robinson could have outed him thereby protecting the public, but he chose to stay silent, and still the edl do not mention the fact that one of their leaders is a paedophile.
Robinson = harborer of paedos
Tue May 29, 2018 4:56 pm
Tue May 29, 2018 5:21 pm
GrangeEndStar wrote:Tommy Robinson has just been jailed for 13 months.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-44287640
Like Jock said earlier - what has this country become? It jails our own and let these religeous-cult scum rape our children.
Tue May 29, 2018 5:26 pm
BluebirdWhitchurch wrote:wez1927 wrote:Seems to be a lot of paedo lovers on here ,attacking Robinson but not the groomers ,very strange
So what ur saying wez is that if I accuse you of being a paedo everyone should have the right to name and shame you and threaten you and your families? and if people jump to your defence saying you haven’t yet been found guilty they’re paedo lovers?
or because you’re not muslim im guessing it doesn’t work like that
Tue May 29, 2018 5:29 pm
maccydee wrote:BluebirdWhitchurch wrote:wez1927 wrote:Seems to be a lot of paedo lovers on here ,attacking Robinson but not the groomers ,very strange
So what ur saying wez is that if I accuse you of being a paedo everyone should have the right to name and shame you and threaten you and your families? and if people jump to your defence saying you haven’t yet been found guilty they’re paedo lovers?
or because you’re not muslim im guessing it doesn’t work like that
That makes no sense as that is actually what would happen in most cases but hasn’t in this case.
Look at Dave Jones as one example among many.
Tue May 29, 2018 5:36 pm
WelshPatriot wrote:Jimmykingz wrote:He broke the law. This is how law works.
What law exactly did he break.
Tue May 29, 2018 5:38 pm
dogfound wrote:GrangeEndStar wrote:Tommy Robinson has just been jailed for 13 months.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-44287640
Like Jock said earlier - what has this country become? It jails our own and let these religeous-cult scum rape our children.
its not just happened..there has been a media blackout {now lifted } on reporting it..
Tue May 29, 2018 5:55 pm
wez1927 wrote:maccydee wrote:BluebirdWhitchurch wrote:wez1927 wrote:Seems to be a lot of paedo lovers on here ,attacking Robinson but not the groomers ,very strange
So what ur saying wez is that if I accuse you of being a paedo everyone should have the right to name and shame you and threaten you and your families? and if people jump to your defence saying you haven’t yet been found guilty they’re paedo lovers?
or because you’re not muslim im guessing it doesn’t work like that
That makes no sense as that is actually what would happen in most cases but hasn’t in this case.
Look at Dave Jones as one example among many.
The fact is they were found guilty and people on here are still defending the groomers which make them peado lovers ,there's gangs are bang to rights