Fri Oct 28, 2016 9:28 pm
Fri Oct 28, 2016 10:40 pm
ccfcsince62 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:The reason why the club went down the route of putting the Grange Enders as far from visiting fans was they were trying to distance themselves from the reputation that Ninian Park had. To make it a more plesent experience for the away fan and a new image for the club.
But after our first game at the CCS with Bristol City a mate of mine who is BCFC said to me he hated it there, his words were no atmosphere and he felt SAFE !! He said he missed feeling shit scared like he did at Ninian Park and wished we stayed there.
But the fans love a rousing atmosphere and so does the players and Managers, the away fans love banter as much as we do, so why can't we change it back ? More Police costs they say !! But the CCTV is so good they can zoom in on you reading a match programme and read the friggin text so if anyone Miss behaves then they deserve it. And with the threat of banning orders I can't see a problem. Just I feel the club is being very stubborn on this issue IMO and for once the should listen to the paying public.
West Ham ain't doing us no favours at the moment but they are having trouble every game now and that includes. Them fighting each other as well.
You haven't done the argument for switching ends at the ground any favours at all. Indeed you have shown why the club should oppose it strongly. In case it hasn't registered why, your argument is that the atmosphere should change so that away fans can "enjoy" being shit scared.
It's what makes some grounds better to visit. I know I enjoy away's that are a tad "spicy"
Exactly do you as an away fan want to go to a soulless bowl, and with the singers so far away you would need binoculars ? No you want atmosphere and banter with the home fans. I ain't talking about scrapping with each other I'm on about banter and getting an atmosphere.
I asked earlier in this thread how it is that clubs that are renowned for a tremendous atmosphere can do this without putting the more vociferous home fans next to the away fans. No one has even attempted to answer the question.
Sat Oct 29, 2016 7:56 am
Nuclearblue wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:The reason why the club went down the route of putting the Grange Enders as far from visiting fans was they were trying to distance themselves from the reputation that Ninian Park had. To make it a more plesent experience for the away fan and a new image for the club.
But after our first game at the CCS with Bristol City a mate of mine who is BCFC said to me he hated it there, his words were no atmosphere and he felt SAFE !! He said he missed feeling shit scared like he did at Ninian Park and wished we stayed there.
But the fans love a rousing atmosphere and so does the players and Managers, the away fans love banter as much as we do, so why can't we change it back ? More Police costs they say !! But the CCTV is so good they can zoom in on you reading a match programme and read the friggin text so if anyone Miss behaves then they deserve it. And with the threat of banning orders I can't see a problem. Just I feel the club is being very stubborn on this issue IMO and for once the should listen to the paying public.
West Ham ain't doing us no favours at the moment but they are having trouble every game now and that includes. Them fighting each other as well.
You haven't done the argument for switching ends at the ground any favours at all. Indeed you have shown why the club should oppose it strongly. In case it hasn't registered why, your argument is that the atmosphere should change so that away fans can "enjoy" being shit scared.
It's what makes some grounds better to visit. I know I enjoy away's that are a tad "spicy"
Exactly do you as an away fan want to go to a soulless bowl, and with the singers so far away you would need binoculars ? No you want atmosphere and banter with the home fans. I ain't talking about scrapping with each other I'm on about banter and getting an atmosphere.
I asked earlier in this thread how it is that clubs that are renowned for a tremendous atmosphere can do this without putting the more vociferous home fans next to the away fans. No one has even attempted to answer the question.
What clubs ? But in our stadium the vocals don't travel very well. So the canton can't hear the away fans and vice versa. Most stadiums the sound carries but unless ours is full to the brim the accustics are awful. Anyhow best for the kids if they can't hear what is being sung if they are moved to the Canton. Hope this explains my reasons Chief.
Sat Oct 29, 2016 9:42 am
ccfcsince62 wrote:nubbsy wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:The reason why the club went down the route of putting the Grange Enders as far from visiting fans was they were trying to distance themselves from the reputation that Ninian Park had. To make it a more plesent experience for the away fan and a new image for the club.
But after our first game at the CCS with Bristol City a mate of mine who is BCFC said to me he hated it there, his words were no atmosphere and he felt SAFE !! He said he missed feeling shit scared like he did at Ninian Park and wished we stayed there.
But the fans love a rousing atmosphere and so does the players and Managers, the away fans love banter as much as we do, so why can't we change it back ? More Police costs they say !! But the CCTV is so good they can zoom in on you reading a match programme and read the friggin text so if anyone Miss behaves then they deserve it. And with the threat of banning orders I can't see a problem. Just I feel the club is being very stubborn on this issue IMO and for once the should listen to the paying public.
West Ham ain't doing us no favours at the moment but they are having trouble every game now and that includes. Them fighting each other as well.
You haven't done the argument for switching ends at the ground any favours at all. Indeed you have shown why the club should oppose it strongly. In case it hasn't registered why, your argument is that the atmosphere should change so that away fans can "enjoy" being shit scared.
It's what makes some grounds better to visit. I know I enjoy away's that are a tad "spicy"
Exactly do you as an away fan want to go to a soulless bowl, and with the singers so far away you would need binoculars ? No you want atmosphere and banter with the home fans. I ain't talking about scrapping with each other I'm on about banter and getting an atmosphere.
I asked earlier in this thread how it is that clubs that are renowned for a tremendous atmosphere can do this without putting the more vociferous home fans next to the away fans. No one has even attempted to answer the question.
What clubs are these? European clubs? Different culture, different breed of fans - ultras. we haven't got an organised group of ultras. Ccfc fans habe always thrived on the competition and banter with away fans. It's nothing to do with other clubs..
No, not just European clubs. How many clubs in the Premier or Football Leagues have away fans sections next to the most vociferous home fans?
Sat Oct 29, 2016 11:00 am
nubbsy wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:nubbsy wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:The reason why the club went down the route of putting the Grange Enders as far from visiting fans was they were trying to distance themselves from the reputation that Ninian Park had. To make it a more plesent experience for the away fan and a new image for the club.
But after our first game at the CCS with Bristol City a mate of mine who is BCFC said to me he hated it there, his words were no atmosphere and he felt SAFE !! He said he missed feeling shit scared like he did at Ninian Park and wished we stayed there.
But the fans love a rousing atmosphere and so does the players and Managers, the away fans love banter as much as we do, so why can't we change it back ? More Police costs they say !! But the CCTV is so good they can zoom in on you reading a match programme and read the friggin text so if anyone Miss behaves then they deserve it. And with the threat of banning orders I can't see a problem. Just I feel the club is being very stubborn on this issue IMO and for once the should listen to the paying public.
West Ham ain't doing us no favours at the moment but they are having trouble every game now and that includes. Them fighting each other as well.
You haven't done the argument for switching ends at the ground any favours at all. Indeed you have shown why the club should oppose it strongly. In case it hasn't registered why, your argument is that the atmosphere should change so that away fans can "enjoy" being shit scared.
It's what makes some grounds better to visit. I know I enjoy away's that are a tad "spicy"
Exactly do you as an away fan want to go to a soulless bowl, and with the singers so far away you would need binoculars ? No you want atmosphere and banter with the home fans. I ain't talking about scrapping with each other I'm on about banter and getting an atmosphere.
I asked earlier in this thread how it is that clubs that are renowned for a tremendous atmosphere can do this without putting the more vociferous home fans next to the away fans. No one has even attempted to answer the question.
What clubs are these? European clubs? Different culture, different breed of fans - ultras. we haven't got an organised group of ultras. Ccfc fans habe always thrived on the competition and banter with away fans. It's nothing to do with other clubs..
No, not just European clubs. How many clubs in the Premier or Football Leagues have away fans sections next to the most vociferous home fans?
I'm not sure, but as far as I'm concerned atmosphere in many premier league stadiums are shit too.
But we're not premier league are we? We're not stoke or whoever else. We're Cardiff city and like I said we've always loved having a bit of back and forth with the away fans. I couldn't give a f**k about any other club.
Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:02 pm
ccfcsince62 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:The reason why the club went down the route of putting the Grange Enders as far from visiting fans was they were trying to distance themselves from the reputation that Ninian Park had. To make it a more plesent experience for the away fan and a new image for the club.
But after our first game at the CCS with Bristol City a mate of mine who is BCFC said to me he hated it there, his words were no atmosphere and he felt SAFE !! He said he missed feeling shit scared like he did at Ninian Park and wished we stayed there.
But the fans love a rousing atmosphere and so does the players and Managers, the away fans love banter as much as we do, so why can't we change it back ? More Police costs they say !! But the CCTV is so good they can zoom in on you reading a match programme and read the friggin text so if anyone Miss behaves then they deserve it. And with the threat of banning orders I can't see a problem. Just I feel the club is being very stubborn on this issue IMO and for once the should listen to the paying public.
West Ham ain't doing us no favours at the moment but they are having trouble every game now and that includes. Them fighting each other as well.
You haven't done the argument for switching ends at the ground any favours at all. Indeed you have shown why the club should oppose it strongly. In case it hasn't registered why, your argument is that the atmosphere should change so that away fans can "enjoy" being shit scared.
It's what makes some grounds better to visit. I know I enjoy away's that are a tad "spicy"
Exactly do you as an away fan want to go to a soulless bowl, and with the singers so far away you would need binoculars ? No you want atmosphere and banter with the home fans. I ain't talking about scrapping with each other I'm on about banter and getting an atmosphere.
I asked earlier in this thread how it is that clubs that are renowned for a tremendous atmosphere can do this without putting the more vociferous home fans next to the away fans. No one has even attempted to answer the question.
What clubs ? But in our stadium the vocals don't travel very well. So the canton can't hear the away fans and vice versa. Most stadiums the sound carries but unless ours is full to the brim the accustics are awful. Anyhow best for the kids if they can't hear what is being sung if they are moved to the Canton. Hope this explains my reasons Chief.
I gave a few examples of clubs earlier in this thread. For lots of others,if you look on the internet at the Football Grounds Guide website you can see each club's ground layout. Then you can see many clubs where away fans are a long way from the home " singing section" and it doesn't adversely impact on their atmosphere.
The kids will always be able to hear bad language wherever they sit in the ground.
Tue Nov 01, 2016 9:50 am
Tue Nov 01, 2016 2:41 pm
ccfcsince62 wrote:nubbsy wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:nubbsy wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:The reason why the club went down the route of putting the Grange Enders as far from visiting fans was they were trying to distance themselves from the reputation that Ninian Park had. To make it a more plesent experience for the away fan and a new image for the club.
But after our first game at the CCS with Bristol City a mate of mine who is BCFC said to me he hated it there, his words were no atmosphere and he felt SAFE !! He said he missed feeling shit scared like he did at Ninian Park and wished we stayed there.
But the fans love a rousing atmosphere and so does the players and Managers, the away fans love banter as much as we do, so why can't we change it back ? More Police costs they say !! But the CCTV is so good they can zoom in on you reading a match programme and read the friggin text so if anyone Miss behaves then they deserve it. And with the threat of banning orders I can't see a problem. Just I feel the club is being very stubborn on this issue IMO and for once the should listen to the paying public.
West Ham ain't doing us no favours at the moment but they are having trouble every game now and that includes. Them fighting each other as well.
You haven't done the argument for switching ends at the ground any favours at all. Indeed you have shown why the club should oppose it strongly. In case it hasn't registered why, your argument is that the atmosphere should change so that away fans can "enjoy" being shit scared.
It's what makes some grounds better to visit. I know I enjoy away's that are a tad "spicy"
Exactly do you as an away fan want to go to a soulless bowl, and with the singers so far away you would need binoculars ? No you want atmosphere and banter with the home fans. I ain't talking about scrapping with each other I'm on about banter and getting an atmosphere.
I asked earlier in this thread how it is that clubs that are renowned for a tremendous atmosphere can do this without putting the more vociferous home fans next to the away fans. No one has even attempted to answer the question.
What clubs are these? European clubs? Different culture, different breed of fans - ultras. we haven't got an organised group of ultras. Ccfc fans habe always thrived on the competition and banter with away fans. It's nothing to do with other clubs..
No, not just European clubs. How many clubs in the Premier or Football Leagues have away fans sections next to the most vociferous home fans?
I'm not sure, but as far as I'm concerned atmosphere in many premier league stadiums are shit too.
But we're not premier league are we? We're not stoke or whoever else. We're Cardiff city and like I said we've always loved having a bit of back and forth with the away fans. I couldn't give a f**k about any other club.
No we are not Premier League. Look at the reference in this thread to other ground layouts in the Championship. They also don't feel the need for this " back and forth" with other fans or feel the need to relocate large numbers of fans and rearrange security arrangements which work so well as they are just to pander to the wishes of a few.
Tue Nov 01, 2016 2:56 pm
nubbsy wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:nubbsy wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:nubbsy wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:The reason why the club went down the route of putting the Grange Enders as far from visiting fans was they were trying to distance themselves from the reputation that Ninian Park had. To make it a more plesent experience for the away fan and a new image for the club.
But after our first game at the CCS with Bristol City a mate of mine who is BCFC said to me he hated it there, his words were no atmosphere and he felt SAFE !! He said he missed feeling shit scared like he did at Ninian Park and wished we stayed there.
But the fans love a rousing atmosphere and so does the players and Managers, the away fans love banter as much as we do, so why can't we change it back ? More Police costs they say !! But the CCTV is so good they can zoom in on you reading a match programme and read the friggin text so if anyone Miss behaves then they deserve it. And with the threat of banning orders I can't see a problem. Just I feel the club is being very stubborn on this issue IMO and for once the should listen to the paying public.
West Ham ain't doing us no favours at the moment but they are having trouble every game now and that includes. Them fighting each other as well.
You haven't done the argument for switching ends at the ground any favours at all. Indeed you have shown why the club should oppose it strongly. In case it hasn't registered why, your argument is that the atmosphere should change so that away fans can "enjoy" being shit scared.
It's what makes some grounds better to visit. I know I enjoy away's that are a tad "spicy"
Exactly do you as an away fan want to go to a soulless bowl, and with the singers so far away you would need binoculars ? No you want atmosphere and banter with the home fans. I ain't talking about scrapping with each other I'm on about banter and getting an atmosphere.
I asked earlier in this thread how it is that clubs that are renowned for a tremendous atmosphere can do this without putting the more vociferous home fans next to the away fans. No one has even attempted to answer the question.
What clubs are these? European clubs? Different culture, different breed of fans - ultras. we haven't got an organised group of ultras. Ccfc fans habe always thrived on the competition and banter with away fans. It's nothing to do with other clubs..
No, not just European clubs. How many clubs in the Premier or Football Leagues have away fans sections next to the most vociferous home fans?
I'm not sure, but as far as I'm concerned atmosphere in many premier league stadiums are shit too.
But we're not premier league are we? We're not stoke or whoever else. We're Cardiff city and like I said we've always loved having a bit of back and forth with the away fans. I couldn't give a f**k about any other club.
No we are not Premier League. Look at the reference in this thread to other ground layouts in the Championship. They also don't feel the need for this " back and forth" with other fans or feel the need to relocate large numbers of fans and rearrange security arrangements which work so well as they are just to pander to the wishes of a few.
How the hell do you know what the fans from these clubs think? Didn't Chelsea recently relocate their singing section to revive their atmosphere? I'm sure there's lots of clubs thay feel the same. It's general knowledge that atmospheres are waning.
But don't worry if it happens you can still enjoy your bovril in exactly the same seat or one with an equal view (yes the stadium is round with lots of spare seats).
But we're never going to agree as your a self proclaimed prawn sandwich club member so we could argue all day. You actually like the ground quieter... I despair...