Ched Evans

In answer to the question, No I wouldn't have Ched at this club purely because he is shite!!!

In relation to his trial I feel it was a bit farcical

If he is guilty because the young lady couldn't consent as she was to intoxicated why wasn't the other guy prosecuted as well? If she's to drunk to consent to Ched then she's to drunk to consent to the other guy. The court found one innocent and the other guilty how does that add up?

She consented to go back to the hotel with other guy. Obviously not for a coffee.

yeah, ched snuck in through the back door, doesnt mean she didnt consent of course, but there is a difference between the two cases

Why is there a difference? She admitted she did not drink anymore after getting to the hotel and had sex with both males. So why is she able to consent to one male but not the other?

Because she says she remembers agreeing going back to the hotel with the one player in the knowledge they were going to have sex.

What she doesnt remember agreeeing to was some weirdo hiding in a cupboard hell bent on joining in.

Just cos you dont drink anymore doesnt make you less pissed especially when the fresh air hits you.

I think there is cctv showing her picking up a pizza and walking fine that was not shown at the trial ,they are arguing that if she was that drunk she couldn't of done that

Come on Wez you used to run a pub ffs. You should be used to seeing people with the lights on and nobody home so to speak.

You dont have to be legless and unable to walk to still be pissed out of your tree. Ive woke up plenty of times and got no recollection after certain points of the night and how I got home.

Last edited by polo on Wed Mar 23, 2016 4:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Well there we go the prosecutor has just said on SSN that even if they overturn his appeal they will be seeking a retrial speaks volumes in itself GUILTY as fook

of course the prosecutor is going to say that though


Doesnt mean he's more or less guilty than he was before

Where did I say he was more guilty than before?please explain fella

First of all i didnt say that you said that


however, You think because the prosecutor said that it "speaks volumes" as to his guilt, when infact it doesnt alter his actual guilt or innocence

Why would the prosecutor state they would be seeking a retrial then?surely he knows a bit more about the law than me or you

Well there we go the prosecutor has just said on SSN that even if they overturn his appeal they will be seeking a retrial speaks volumes in itself GUILTY as fook

of course the prosecutor is going to say that though


Doesnt mean he's more or less guilty than he was before

Where did I say he was more guilty than before?please explain fella

First of all i didnt say that you said that


however, You think because the prosecutor said that it "speaks volumes" as to his guilt, when infact it doesnt alter his actual guilt or innocence

Why would the prosecutor state they would be seeking a retrial then?surely he knows a bit more about the law than me or you

Because that's what his press office told him to say. Belive me if he gets it overturned they will drop it like it's hot, they won't go for a retrial. They wouldn't want more compensation pay out than they need to.

Well there we go the prosecutor has just said on SSN that even if they overturn his appeal they will be seeking a retrial speaks volumes in itself GUILTY as fook

of course the prosecutor is going to say that though


Doesnt mean he's more or less guilty than he was before

Where did I say he was more guilty than before?please explain fella

First of all i didnt say that you said that


however, You think because the prosecutor said that it "speaks volumes" as to his guilt, when infact it doesnt alter his actual guilt or innocence

Why would the prosecutor state they would be seeking a retrial then?surely he knows a bit more about the law than me or you

Because that's what his press office told him to say. Belive me if he gets it overturned they will drop it like it's hot, they won't go for a retrial. They wouldn't want more compensation pay out than they need to.

IF he gets it overturned

Well there we go the prosecutor has just said on SSN that even if they overturn his appeal they will be seeking a retrial speaks volumes in itself GUILTY as fook

of course the prosecutor is going to say that though


Doesnt mean he's more or less guilty than he was before

Where did I say he was more guilty than before?please explain fella

First of all i didnt say that you said that


however, You think because the prosecutor said that it "speaks volumes" as to his guilt, when infact it doesnt alter his actual guilt or innocence

Why would the prosecutor state they would be seeking a retrial then?surely he knows a bit more about the law than me or you

Because that's what his press office told him to say. Belive me if he gets it overturned they will drop it like it's hot, they won't go for a retrial. They wouldn't want more compensation pay out than they need to.

IF he gets it overturned

Well of course but that's what you were talking about. If it gets over turned they go for retrial. You asked why the prosecutor said that. They won't take it for a retrial. You confused me a bit now by going off you original point.

Doesn't take much I know lol.

I was answering a few diff points that was all

FICKIN HELL lads calm down I was only trying to get a cheeky little free transfer in the door that would steer us to he promise land

FICKIN HELL lads calm down I was only trying to get a cheeky little free transfer in the door that would steer us to he promise land

In answer to the question, No I wouldn't have Ched at this club purely because he is shite!!!

In relation to his trial I feel it was a bit farcical

If he is guilty because the young lady couldn't consent as she was to intoxicated why wasn't the other guy prosecuted as well? If she's to drunk to consent to Ched then she's to drunk to consent to the other guy. The court found one innocent and the other guilty how does that add up?

She consented to go back to the hotel with other guy. Obviously not for a coffee.

yeah, ched snuck in through the back door, doesnt mean she didnt consent of course, but there is a difference between the two cases

Why is there a difference? She admitted she did not drink anymore after getting to the hotel and had sex with both males. So why is she able to consent to one male but not the other?

Because she says she remembers agreeing going back to the hotel with the one player in the knowledge they were going to have sex.

What she doesnt remember agreeeing to was some weirdo hiding in a cupboard hell bent on joining in.

Just cos you dont drink anymore doesnt make you less pissed especially when the fresh air hits you.

I think there is cctv showing her picking up a pizza and walking fine that was not shown at the trial ,they are arguing that if she was that drunk she couldn't of done that

Come on Wez you used to run a pub ffs. You should be used to seeing people with the lights on and nobody home so to speak.

You dont have to be legless and unable to walk to still be pissed out of your tree. Ive woke up plenty of times and got no recollection after certain points of the night and how I got home.

So how can the one get off with it but ched didn't ?either they are both guilty or both not

Ive already answered that Wez. She had been getting intimate with the other one in a club in town and she went back to the hotel room willingly with him.

What she doesnt remember is some pervert with eyes too close together to be trusted hiding in the wardbrobe when they got back to the hotel and joining in.