Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:02 pm
Steve Zodiak wrote:Overthemoon wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:As I said one game dosen't make Slade the messiah. Then the same voices saying Boro ain't played for ten days and they had time in the sun, whilst our players got soaking wet thrashing Brighton.
Now these are highly paid professional players that should not make jack shit.
Last night to many individual mistakes cost us dearly awful defending and giving the ball away.
Well it certainly appears that the boys worked hard to try and get the win after their exertions last Saturday, but if you ask any sports scientist whether a 10 day break from football, coupled with a warm weather training and bonding exercise is more advantageous to a team playing against another team, who ran their bollocks off in a pissing down gale only 3 days earlier, I think you know what the answer will be!
I accept your point about the individual errors, but none of us know for certain whether the difference between the break from football was a factor or not and I've no idea why you've mentioned about them being highly paid!
I think the main reason we were beaten is that Middlesbrough are a better side than us, and have better players in key positions. I don't think the outcome would have been any different if our players had spent 6 weeks sunning themselves in Barbados before the game, After the amount of matches now played, the table does not lie, and the fact of the matter is that unless we can improve and become more consistent, we are destined to remain a mid table side.
Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:37 pm
paulh_85 wrote:Steve Zodiak wrote:Overthemoon wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:As I said one game dosen't make Slade the messiah. Then the same voices saying Boro ain't played for ten days and they had time in the sun, whilst our players got soaking wet thrashing Brighton.
Now these are highly paid professional players that should not make jack shit.
Last night to many individual mistakes cost us dearly awful defending and giving the ball away.
Well it certainly appears that the boys worked hard to try and get the win after their exertions last Saturday, but if you ask any sports scientist whether a 10 day break from football, coupled with a warm weather training and bonding exercise is more advantageous to a team playing against another team, who ran their bollocks off in a pissing down gale only 3 days earlier, I think you know what the answer will be!
I accept your point about the individual errors, but none of us know for certain whether the difference between the break from football was a factor or not and I've no idea why you've mentioned about them being highly paid!
I think the main reason we were beaten is that Middlesbrough are a better side than us, and have better players in key positions. I don't think the outcome would have been any different if our players had spent 6 weeks sunning themselves in Barbados before the game, After the amount of matches now played, the table does not lie, and the fact of the matter is that unless we can improve and become more consistent, we are destined to remain a mid table side.
why do people keep saying this, we havent been mid table all season
Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:43 pm
Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:49 pm
polo wrote:Mid table is 9th to 16th.
If you know your 8 times table its not difficult to divide 24 by 3 - top, middle and bottom.
Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:07 pm
paulh_85 wrote:polo wrote:Mid table is 9th to 16th.
If you know your 8 times table its not difficult to divide 24 by 3 - top, middle and bottom.
what term would you use to describe a team in 8th place
Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:13 pm
Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:27 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:At the start of the season I said we'd be marooned in mid table for much of the season without a chance of getting to the play offs, I am happy to say Slade has exceeded my expectations as we have been sitting within striking distance of sixth place for the entire season.
However I won't apologise for saying Slade isn't good enough to take us up because we are not going up this season. Slade has never made me believe he's a manager capable of promotion.
Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:36 pm
Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:44 pm
polo wrote:Mid table is 9th to 16th.
If you know your 8 times table its not difficult to divide 24 by 3 - top, middle and bottom.
Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:08 pm
Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:14 pm
Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:34 pm
T1JMO wrote:polo wrote:Mid table is 9th to 16th.
If you know your 8 times table its not difficult to divide 24 by 3 - top, middle and bottom.
by this logic the team in 8th is top the table
Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:37 pm
paulh_85 wrote:i guess you can think of it a few different ways. Me personally i'd split the table up into more than three sections, with the middle being something like 10-15th
Wed Feb 24, 2016 5:54 pm
polo wrote:paulh_85 wrote:i guess you can think of it a few different ways. Me personally i'd split the table up into more than three sections, with the middle being something like 10-15th
Explain your logic Paul.
Thu Feb 25, 2016 8:18 pm
Sat Feb 27, 2016 10:28 pm
Sat Feb 27, 2016 10:32 pm
Sat Feb 27, 2016 11:02 pm
Sun Feb 28, 2016 2:18 pm
Sun Feb 28, 2016 4:13 pm