Thu Aug 07, 2014 8:59 pm
Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:04 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Will briefly outline what I was told allegedly![]()
Malky and Moody was sending each other emails which was abusive about Tan and Tan seen them. Also on the Clubs mobiles on texts. West Ham were tipped off which saw his move scuppered. And his interview with Norwich went very badly.
Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:06 pm
wez1927 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Will briefly outline what I was told allegedly![]()
Malky and Moody was sending each other emails which was abusive about Tan and Tan seen them. Also on the Clubs mobiles on texts. West Ham were tipped off which saw his move scuppered. And his interview with Norwich went very badly.
Clubs put off by private messages lol
Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:18 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Will briefly outline what I was told allegedly![]()
Malky and Moody was sending each other emails which was abusive about Tan and Tan seen them. Also on the Clubs mobiles on texts. West Ham were tipped off which saw his move scuppered. And his interview with Norwich went very badly.
Clubs put off by private messages lol
When a lot of them was racist yes. People's careers have ended for a lot less Chief.
Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:19 pm
Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:45 pm
jackmadandbad wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Will briefly outline what I was told allegedly![]()
Malky and Moody was sending each other emails which was abusive about Tan and Tan seen them. Also on the Clubs mobiles on texts. West Ham were tipped off which saw his move scuppered. And his interview with Norwich went very badly.
Clubs put off by private messages lol
When a lot of them was racist yes. People's careers have ended for a lot less Chief.
so in a nutshell Malky is a racist?
i dunno Nukes, had Tan come out and said im sacking MM for racist emails and texts..there would be no case for wrongful dismissal...no PFA lawyers would have entertained representing him..and the fans? would you really sing dont sack mackay live on sky knowing him to be racist?....the media..they queued up to back him would they have been so keen to back him had there been the race thing?
dont add up
Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:55 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:jackmadandbad wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Will briefly outline what I was told allegedly![]()
Malky and Moody was sending each other emails which was abusive about Tan and Tan seen them. Also on the Clubs mobiles on texts. West Ham were tipped off which saw his move scuppered. And his interview with Norwich went very badly.
Clubs put off by private messages lol
When a lot of them was racist yes. People's careers have ended for a lot less Chief.
so in a nutshell Malky is a racist?
i dunno Nukes, had Tan come out and said im sacking MM for racist emails and texts..there would be no case for wrongful dismissal...no PFA lawyers would have entertained representing him..and the fans? would you really sing dont sack mackay live on sky knowing him to be racist?....the media..they queued up to back him would they have been so keen to back him had there been the race thing?
dont add up
Why do you think Tan had said when asked why he was sacked !! He replied ask Malky. Malky knew he was on a loser so apologised. But hey what I was told might not be true. But it makes sense doesn't it.
Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:17 am
Fri Aug 08, 2014 7:50 am
Green Arrow wrote:pembroke allan wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:This article sums it up in a nutshell for me. Those who continue to slag Malky off with unsubstantiated conjecture are doing so to try to justify why they themselves have disgracefully accepted every bad thing that their beloved Mr Tan has done to our club.
Facts are: Malky turned a threadbare squad into a team of winners.
Malky , despite constant sniping by Tan in the press, had steered us into a course that would have seen us comfortably avoid relegation in the premier.
Every manager buys a dud or two, but the facts remain as above.
On the other hand, what VT has done to the fabric of our clubs identity is a disgrace, but no more of a disgrace than the way some have accepted it and indeed, have tried to justify it by piling the blame onto Malky McKay
Your having a laugh! how much did he have to turn team into premier class? Winners? Just above relegation zone slowly slipping into it with second worst defence! facts are in public domain about wasting money and buying numurous
players who he never played! Malky brought things on himself end of story!
People like this are not worth arguing with. They probably still vote Labour through blind hatred of Thatcher because their parents told them she was evil and South Wales should remain a red stronghold. These people refuse to see the truth for what it is and make up their own truths to suit their arguments
this is an opinion based on the op of this thread you plum. I don't know you and I'm pretty sure you don't know me well enough to make a sweeping analysis such as this . Oh aye, never voted labour in my life
tw*t
Fri Aug 08, 2014 9:16 am
Fri Aug 08, 2014 9:42 am
DrDre wrote:Question 1: If this was only 'mud', why did Malky make a humiliating public apology ?
Question 2: If this was only 'mud', why did Malky never received or pursued his full compensation ?
Question 3: If this was only 'mud', why was Malky totally overlooked for jobs he was a shoe-in for like Norwich and Celtic?
answers on a postcard please....
Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:42 pm
Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:32 pm
DrDre wrote:Question 1: If this was only 'mud', why did Malky make a humiliating public apology ?
Question 2: If this was only 'mud', why did Malky never received or pursued his full compensation ?
Question 3: If this was only 'mud', why was Malky totally overlooked for jobs he was a shoe-in for like Norwich and Celtic?
answers on a postcard please....
Sat Aug 09, 2014 10:03 pm
wez1927 wrote:DrDre wrote:Question 1: If this was only 'mud', why did Malky make a humiliating public apology ?
Question 2: If this was only 'mud', why did Malky never received or pursued his full compensation ?
Question 3: If this was only 'mud', why was Malky totally overlooked for jobs he was a shoe-in for like Norwich and Celtic?
answers on a postcard please....
Malky for the anti rebrand people was a cause against tan but malky was for the rebrand which I done understand
Sat Aug 09, 2014 10:58 pm
BracklaBlue72 wrote:Green Arrow wrote:pembroke allan wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:This article sums it up in a nutshell for me. Those who continue to slag Malky off with unsubstantiated conjecture are doing so to try to justify why they themselves have disgracefully accepted every bad thing that their beloved Mr Tan has done to our club.
Facts are: Malky turned a threadbare squad into a team of winners.
Malky , despite constant sniping by Tan in the press, had steered us into a course that would have seen us comfortably avoid relegation in the premier.
Every manager buys a dud or two, but the facts remain as above.
On the other hand, what VT has done to the fabric of our clubs identity is a disgrace, but no more of a disgrace than the way some have accepted it and indeed, have tried to justify it by piling the blame onto Malky McKay
Your having a laugh! how much did he have to turn team into premier class? Winners? Just above relegation zone slowly slipping into it with second worst defence! facts are in public domain about wasting money and buying numurous
players who he never played! Malky brought things on himself end of story!
People like this are not worth arguing with. They probably still vote Labour through blind hatred of Thatcher because their parents told them she was evil and South Wales should remain a red stronghold. These people refuse to see the truth for what it is and make up their own truths to suit their arguments
this is an opinion based on the op of this thread you plum. I don't know you and I'm pretty sure
tw*t[/quThu Aug 21, 2014 4:44 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Excellent article.
Thu Aug 21, 2014 6:53 pm
DrDre wrote:Question 1: If this was only 'mud', why did Malky make a humiliating public apology ?
Question 2: If this was only 'mud', why did Malky never received or pursued his full compensation ?
Question 3: If this was only 'mud', why was Malky totally overlooked for jobs he was a shoe-in for like Norwich and Celtic?
answers on a postcard please....