Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:26 pm
welshman19 wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:welshman19 wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:We have a football club to support.
We also have a £160m and rising bill
That's owed to the person who owns our club an is going nowhere.
What would you rather 160m of debt or Newport County being your closest league side?
Doesn't matter who the money is owed to the club is still in massive debt
Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:39 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Jesus christ, its like f*cking groundhog day!
Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:43 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:welshman19 wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:welshman19 wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:We have a football club to support.
We also have a £160m and rising bill
That's owed to the person who owns our club an is going nowhere.
What would you rather 160m of debt or Newport County being your closest league side?
Doesn't matter who the money is owed to the club is still in massive debt
Debt he hasnt called in, unless some people get their way and force him out.
Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:49 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:49 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:52 pm
mjw6150 wrote:Pant-yr-awel bluebird wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Wayne S wrote:The only benefit plain and simple was that we didn't go under.
However we will NEVER know if that was possible and the benefit will not totally come to fruition until the debt is written off.
We would have gone under by now without Vincent Tan's money.
Yes.We could have gone into admin and be in the shit'like Swansea.Southampton.Crystal palace.And guess what.They kept their identity.Disaster.Where are they now.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
As stevedavies said, it would have been a miracle for us to come out of it like those teams did. Some of you protesting fans have no idea.
Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:55 pm
citygardens73 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:welshman19 wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:welshman19 wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:We have a football club to support.
We also have a £160m and rising bill
That's owed to the person who owns our club an is going nowhere.
What would you rather 160m of debt or Newport County being your closest league side?
Doesn't matter who the money is owed to the club is still in massive debt
Debt he hasnt called in, unless some people get their way and force him out.
& then we could be truly fecked !!
Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:59 pm
Forever Blue wrote:" Can anyone answer this please? "![]()
What were the benefits of the Rebrand for Cardiff City ?
All opinions welcome![]()
Wed Jul 02, 2014 2:53 pm
Jaffajack wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Pant-yr-awel bluebird wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Wayne S wrote:The only benefit plain and simple was that we didn't go under.
However we will NEVER know if that was possible and the benefit will not totally come to fruition until the debt is written off.
We would have gone under by now without Vincent Tan's money.
Yes.We could have gone into admin and be in the shit'like Swansea.Southampton.Crystal palace.And guess what.They kept their identity.Disaster.Where are they now.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
As stevedavies said, it would have been a miracle for us to come out of it like those teams did. Some of you protesting fans have no idea.
Honest question how many of you would be willing to take the hit of tan going to get your identity back , it's appears to be the only way this will happen . We were in the sh€t at a time when football was realistic in money terms so in some ways easier to get out of . With all the potential ie catchment area wag investment etc you go on about is it better he goes . What options do you have . I doubt you would of gone under without tans money as someone would of intervened as they always do . Could he just walk away ? , could he recall all his loans ?. The blue brigade are at least showing passion and good on them
Wed Jul 02, 2014 3:13 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:AlwaysBBlue wrote:smilies over substance as usual baz.
do you honestly think the protests are working?
as someone who has taken part in most of them i can honestly say they do squat. the biggest one wasn't even a quater of the match day attendence (not even close). and Tan so far has done nothing about it.
you all keep saying "Tan hasn't done xxx and he's not going to do it soon" (debt to eq, r2b etc) so why do you think his reactions to protests will be any different??
2 options and 2 options only: fan ownership, or find another sugar daddy (one who doesnt mind us playing in blue)
sad state of affairs but there you go
No, not enough protests are being done, but are they working? Well he certainly knows it now, doesn't he? How else do you suggest forcing this man to leave?
For someone who is called always be blue, I'm amazed at your negativity towards any sort of protest.
Wed Jul 02, 2014 5:06 pm
steve davies wrote:Jaffajack wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Pant-yr-awel bluebird wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Wayne S wrote:The only benefit plain and simple was that we didn't go under.
However we will NEVER know if that was possible and the benefit will not totally come to fruition until the debt is written off.
We would have gone under by now without Vincent Tan's money.
Yes.We could have gone into admin and be in the shit'like Swansea.Southampton.Crystal palace.And guess what.They kept their identity.Disaster.Where are they now.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
As stevedavies said, it would have been a miracle for us to come out of it like those teams did. Some of you protesting fans have no idea.
Honest question how many of you would be willing to take the hit of tan going to get your identity back , it's appears to be the only way this will happen . We were in the sh€t at a time when football was realistic in money terms so in some ways easier to get out of . With all the potential ie catchment area wag investment etc you go on about is it better he goes . What options do you have . I doubt you would of gone under without tans money as someone would of intervened as they always do . Could he just walk away ? , could he recall all his loans ?. The blue brigade are at least showing passion and good on them
what part of being in court facing a winding up order from the revenue do people not understand. there was no other party tan either put his 6 million in and we survived or he dident put the 6 million in and cardiff city as we knew it would have disappeared off the face of the earth.
even with the bankers draft for 6 million the revenue barrister was still trying to wind us up saying we were trading insolvent.
tan saved cardiff city there is no question of that its the price he has made people pay for it afterwards is sticking in peoples craw
Wed Jul 02, 2014 5:50 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2014 5:52 pm
Denzil wrote:Tan Ghee saved us from going under not vincent tan.
as far as benefits we would have had if we had not rebranded............the answer is nothing.
He put money in yes.............but we owe him that..........so whats new.........loads on here slate Sam Hamman for doing the very same thing..............we just owe him more
Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:06 pm
Denzil wrote:Tan Ghee saved us from going under not vincent tan.
as far as benefits we would have had if we had not rebranded............the answer is nothing.
He put money in yes.............but we owe him that..........so whats new.........loads on here slate Sam Hamman for doing the very same thing..............we just owe him more
Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:08 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:16 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Denzil wrote:Tan Ghee saved us from going under not vincent tan.
as far as benefits we would have had if we had not rebranded............the answer is nothing.
He put money in yes.............but we owe him that..........so whats new.........loads on here slate Sam Hamman for doing the very same thing..............we just owe him more
Denzil, TG, I have total Respect for, pity Tan never.
Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:26 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:34 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:43 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:49 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:54 pm
smakerzthebluebird wrote:We were dead and buried without tans money end of so those saying red or dead wasn't the truth are also full of shit
we were the time he originally stepped in, but we weren't at the time the rebrand was mooted. Tan himself said the club would just be restructured & the CEO at the time told fans in a meeting that it wasn't red or dead.
No one likes the red but it Is what it is
& the fans are entitled to show their displeasure about it.
We would have been liquidated now and Cardiff city wouldn't even exist
this is incorrect. tan "rescued" the club by paying off a tax bill originally, but the club wasn't on the brink of not existing at the time the rebrand was mooted.
We'd no longer be in the English pyramids of football either and that is ALSO a fact as the new club established were not granted permission into the English competitions
this isn't a fact.
So all of you ask yourselves a question
Why are u still watching the matches? Why aren't you watching the new club set up to start in the lower welsh leagues cos that's what would have happened had we been liquidated
strange question that. Are you suggesting that those against the rebrand/Tan shouldn't attend at all? That's something I disagree wholeheartedly with. You've often posted your dislike of Hammam. Does that mean you didn't go under his ownership?
The time for this was two years ago when proposed then tan had saved us and we may have got a buyer we won't bet a buyer unless we gain promotion again and whose to say the new buyer will ever change us back to blue?
hopefully protests will continue until the club are in it's rightful colour, whoever the owner is.
Knock me down all you want but the truth hurts as a fan base we done f**k all two years ago when it mattered so you have a choice you keep lining tans pocket with ticket money (which no matter how u dress it up is supporting him) or you boycott games and hope that enough others do to make tan think again personally I don't see either working, I personally don't go anymore and have attended only 1 game in three years and didn't attend a single premier league game, I still love the club and am grateful we still have a Cardiff city football club and I don't not go because of the red either I don't go cos I can't stand the bollocks surrounding the club far more important things in life than arguing at match days with good friends over a shirt colour
Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:31 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:We were dead and buried without tans money end of so those saying red or dead wasn't the truth are also full of shit
we were the time he originally stepped in, but we weren't at the time the rebrand was mooted. Tan himself said the club would just be restructured & the CEO at the time told fans in a meeting that it wasn't red or dead.
No one likes the red but it Is what it is
& the fans are entitled to show their displeasure about it.
We would have been liquidated now and Cardiff city wouldn't even exist
this is incorrect. tan "rescued" the club by paying off a tax bill originally, but the club wasn't on the brink of not existing at the time the rebrand was mooted.
We'd no longer be in the English pyramids of football either and that is ALSO a fact as the new club established were not granted permission into the English competitions
this isn't a fact.
So all of you ask yourselves a question
Why are u still watching the matches? Why aren't you watching the new club set up to start in the lower welsh leagues cos that's what would have happened had we been liquidated
strange question that. Are you suggesting that those against the rebrand/Tan shouldn't attend at all? That's something I disagree wholeheartedly with. You've often posted your dislike of Hammam. Does that mean you didn't go under his ownership?
The time for this was two years ago when proposed then tan had saved us and we may have got a buyer we won't bet a buyer unless we gain promotion again and whose to say the new buyer will ever change us back to blue?
hopefully protests will continue until the club are in it's rightful colour, whoever the owner is.
Knock me down all you want but the truth hurts as a fan base we done f**k all two years ago when it mattered so you have a choice you keep lining tans pocket with ticket money (which no matter how u dress it up is supporting him) or you boycott games and hope that enough others do to make tan think again personally I don't see either working, I personally don't go anymore and have attended only 1 game in three years and didn't attend a single premier league game, I still love the club and am grateful we still have a Cardiff city football club and I don't not go because of the red either I don't go cos I can't stand the bollocks surrounding the club far more important things in life than arguing at match days with good friends over a shirt colour
Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:41 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:We were dead and buried without tans money end of so those saying red or dead wasn't the truth are also full of shit
we were the time he originally stepped in, but we weren't at the time the rebrand was mooted. Tan himself said the club would just be restructured & the CEO at the time told fans in a meeting that it wasn't red or dead.
No one likes the red but it Is what it is
& the fans are entitled to show their displeasure about it.
We would have been liquidated now and Cardiff city wouldn't even exist
this is incorrect. tan "rescued" the club by paying off a tax bill originally, but the club wasn't on the brink of not existing at the time the rebrand was mooted.
We'd no longer be in the English pyramids of football either and that is ALSO a fact as the new club established were not granted permission into the English competitions
this isn't a fact.
So all of you ask yourselves a question
Why are u still watching the matches? Why aren't you watching the new club set up to start in the lower welsh leagues cos that's what would have happened had we been liquidated
strange question that. Are you suggesting that those against the rebrand/Tan shouldn't attend at all? That's something I disagree wholeheartedly with. You've often posted your dislike of Hammam. Does that mean you didn't go under his ownership?
The time for this was two years ago when proposed then tan had saved us and we may have got a buyer we won't bet a buyer unless we gain promotion again and whose to say the new buyer will ever change us back to blue?
hopefully protests will continue until the club are in it's rightful colour, whoever the owner is.
Knock me down all you want but the truth hurts as a fan base we done f**k all two years ago when it mattered so you have a choice you keep lining tans pocket with ticket money (which no matter how u dress it up is supporting him) or you boycott games and hope that enough others do to make tan think again personally I don't see either working, I personally don't go anymore and have attended only 1 game in three years and didn't attend a single premier league game, I still love the club and am grateful we still have a Cardiff city football club and I don't not go because of the red either I don't go cos I can't stand the bollocks surrounding the club far more important things in life than arguing at match days with good friends over a shirt colour
Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:53 pm
Bluebird86 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:We were dead and buried without tans money end of so those saying red or dead wasn't the truth are also full of shit
we were the time he originally stepped in, but we weren't at the time the rebrand was mooted. Tan himself said the club would just be restructured & the CEO at the time told fans in a meeting that it wasn't red or dead.
No one likes the red but it Is what it is
& the fans are entitled to show their displeasure about it.
We would have been liquidated now and Cardiff city wouldn't even exist
this is incorrect. tan "rescued" the club by paying off a tax bill originally, but the club wasn't on the brink of not existing at the time the rebrand was mooted.
We'd no longer be in the English pyramids of football either and that is ALSO a fact as the new club established were not granted permission into the English competitions
this isn't a fact.
So all of you ask yourselves a question
Why are u still watching the matches? Why aren't you watching the new club set up to start in the lower welsh leagues cos that's what would have happened had we been liquidated
strange question that. Are you suggesting that those against the rebrand/Tan shouldn't attend at all? That's something I disagree wholeheartedly with. You've often posted your dislike of Hammam. Does that mean you didn't go under his ownership?
The time for this was two years ago when proposed then tan had saved us and we may have got a buyer we won't bet a buyer unless we gain promotion again and whose to say the new buyer will ever change us back to blue?
hopefully protests will continue until the club are in it's rightful colour, whoever the owner is.
Knock me down all you want but the truth hurts as a fan base we done f**k all two years ago when it mattered so you have a choice you keep lining tans pocket with ticket money (which no matter how u dress it up is supporting him) or you boycott games and hope that enough others do to make tan think again personally I don't see either working, I personally don't go anymore and have attended only 1 game in three years and didn't attend a single premier league game, I still love the club and am grateful we still have a Cardiff city football club and I don't not go because of the red either I don't go cos I can't stand the bollocks surrounding the club far more important things in life than arguing at match days with good friends over a shirt colour
Why do you think the club wasn't on the brink of going out of business when the rebrand was mooted.
Because Tan was paying our bills.
If we didn't have the rebrand he wasn't going to keep throwing money in to pay for everything and we'd be back at square one.
An like before nobody else would of saved us. Look at Leeds a huge huge club compared to ours who's come running to help them nobody.
Wed Jul 02, 2014 8:19 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2014 8:26 pm
smakerzthebluebird wrote:Barry keep arguing on here to make yourself feel better if that's what your conscience needs to take the weight off knowing you didn't give two hoots about the rebrand at the time £100m was dangled in front of your hooter
excuse me? Sorry, but you must have the wrong person. From the very moment the rebrand was suggested, I was very much against it. NEVER have I "not given two hoots" about the rebrand. Post history on this will prove it. I'll always debate points that I think are incorrect and I saw several inaccuracies in yours.
Protesting now will achieve very little but make people feel better in their own mind
absolutely. I protested at the time too. One of the very few.
And it is a fact had we been liquidated that we would not be eligible for the English leagues as a new founded welsh club has been denied entry to the English football leagues
I didn't say that wasn't a fact, I pointed out other things were not factual.
So a liquated Cardiff city would have been starting out as a new name in the welsh leagues just as the new club founded by some that post on here is doing this season
And as I said I have not boycotted due to tan I welcomed his investment I no longer go as I've lost friends over the colour of a shirt when to me Cardiff city is what I believe in not a colour we have changed badges and shirts through our history many times and our history will never go away, it would have had we been liquidated!
it wouldn't have. I didn't ask about Tan. I asked about Hammam.
And spinning this on me cos I didn't like hammann is a totally different ball game completely
no it isn't. I'm against Tan and you are telling me I shouldn't go. By that notion, when you were against Hammam, did you stop going? Or are you just a hypocrite?
You criticise anyone supporting tan now and the counter argument is if you go to games you are supporting him totally, you know this currently whilst he is chairman and you accepted the rebrand whilst he was/ and is chairman you know everything he is doing yet still attend
never accepted the rebrand.
This is completely different to the hammann situation ergo the lies and spindle surrounding his reign only came out after he left the club so following at the time and attending games meant that I did not embrace what he was doing as I didn't know at the point he was in charge of the club had I known whilst he was in charge that he was racking up debt that could almost see us go to the wall would I still have gone to games maybe not
no it isn't.
As I said this is a totally different argument to what I am saying whilst you continue to line tans pockets game after game season after season he will continue to do what he does
no it isn't.
I will not lie in the fact that if my mates and I could go to games without friction and tension and agree that colour doesn't matter then I would go and fully support tans regime, I may not like a colour change but I accepted it two years ago for the future of this club that stance hasn't changed unlike most chameleons on here who's colours and agenda change week in week out
Wed Jul 02, 2014 9:13 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2014 9:20 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2014 9:26 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:Barry keep arguing on here to make yourself feel better if that's what your conscience needs to take the weight off knowing you didn't give two hoots about the rebrand at the time £100m was dangled in front of your hooter
excuse me? Sorry, but you must have the wrong person. From the very moment the rebrand was suggested, I was very much against it. NEVER have I "not given two hoots" about the rebrand. Post history on this will prove it. I'll always debate points that I think are incorrect and I saw several inaccuracies in yours.
Protesting now will achieve very little but make people feel better in their own mind
absolutely. I protested at the time too. One of the very few.
And it is a fact had we been liquidated that we would not be eligible for the English leagues as a new founded welsh club has been denied entry to the English football leagues
I didn't say that wasn't a fact, I pointed out other things were not factual.
So a liquated Cardiff city would have been starting out as a new name in the welsh leagues just as the new club founded by some that post on here is doing this season
And as I said I have not boycotted due to tan I welcomed his investment I no longer go as I've lost friends over the colour of a shirt when to me Cardiff city is what I believe in not a colour we have changed badges and shirts through our history many times and our history will never go away, it would have had we been liquidated!
it wouldn't have. I didn't ask about Tan. I asked about Hammam.
And spinning this on me cos I didn't like hammann is a totally different ball game completely
no it isn't. I'm against Tan and you are telling me I shouldn't go. By that notion, when you were against Hammam, did you stop going? Or are you just a hypocrite?
You criticise anyone supporting tan now and the counter argument is if you go to games you are supporting him totally, you know this currently whilst he is chairman and you accepted the rebrand whilst he was/ and is chairman you know everything he is doing yet still attend
never accepted the rebrand.
This is completely different to the hammann situation ergo the lies and spindle surrounding his reign only came out after he left the club so following at the time and attending games meant that I did not embrace what he was doing as I didn't know at the point he was in charge of the club had I known whilst he was in charge that he was racking up debt that could almost see us go to the wall would I still have gone to games maybe not
no it isn't.
As I said this is a totally different argument to what I am saying whilst you continue to line tans pockets game after game season after season he will continue to do what he does
no it isn't.
I will not lie in the fact that if my mates and I could go to games without friction and tension and agree that colour doesn't matter then I would go and fully support tans regime, I may not like a colour change but I accepted it two years ago for the future of this club that stance hasn't changed unlike most chameleons on here who's colours and agenda change week in week out
Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:29 pm
my point being I'd rather be back blue and have the threat of administrationwelshman19 wrote:blue lagoon wrote:We'd be a struggling champ side in blue with this badge
As opposed to being £160m in debt and rising