Sat May 31, 2014 3:01 pm
simon.wiesenthal wrote:
it isnt an assumption Barry.........he said at the time he would walk if we wanted him too.......having been assured by many fans leaders that all was ok..he stayed.....us the individuals could have there and then asked for refunds and made it crystal clear we would rather him move on.............DIDNT...........i didnt ,you didnt.hardly anyone did........to claim the 15,000 blue scarves 2 years on is a better protest than not paying for STs well...........
Sat May 31, 2014 3:26 pm
Sat May 31, 2014 5:14 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:
it isnt an assumption Barry.........he said at the time he would walk if we wanted him too.......having been assured by many fans leaders that all was ok..he stayed.....us the individuals could have there and then asked for refunds and made it crystal clear we would rather him move on.............DIDNT...........i didnt ,you didnt.hardly anyone did........to claim the 15,000 blue scarves 2 years on is a better protest than not paying for STs well...........
It is an assumption, I am afraid. He also said at the time that he would also transfer debt to equity & he hasn't done that either.
He also said that the club would reverse the plan originally, knowing full well that the club couldn't, as the colours had already been confirmed by the FA and the date had passed.
I never wanted a refund. Just because it is YOUR opinion that we should have done that, doesn't mean I have to agree with it.![]()
I tried to debate with you, but you cannot do it. Shame.
Sat May 31, 2014 5:31 pm
simon.wiesenthal wrote:debt to equity.......waw....he did say he would convert debts to equity yes..........not the current debt tho..........
Sat May 31, 2014 5:39 pm
Pat Turd wrote:My stance is this, blue and whatever, I don't want or need the money that's my point. I admire yours because you are sticking to your principles as I would mine if the club slid down the divisions again no matter how far. I will never simply boycott as a protest, that's just cutting off your nose to spite your face but if it gets to the point where I don 't feel I want to be part of it then I will go and others will just take my seat and nobody will care, I get that. We all have different tolerance levels but whole I still believe there is hope and like minded people I won't let go. Good luck with your stance But I hope it doesn't become the majority one. The tragedy is that we are here having this debate and that can only be blamed on one man ?!
Sat May 31, 2014 6:02 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:debt to equity.......waw....he did say he would convert debts to equity yes..........not the current debt tho..........
Yes, debt to equity. The one reason many were looking to put up with his horrific rebrand.
He also said a year later that the club would be debt free. Well, if he does as he says, the club will be in 100 million of debt after his conversion.
That's frighteningly high for a championship club. He is STILL putting money in every month, which means the debt it only going to grow.
I cannot fathom how anyone can trust this man, never mind suggest that he is making our long term future look bright. In my opinion, it's looking almost as horrific as his red shirts.
Sat May 31, 2014 6:09 pm
Sat May 31, 2014 6:38 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:He rebrand was a bitter pill to swallow made a little sweater by his promise of a debt free and stable club... You go on about fans keeping to their side of the "deal" and how you're a better man for doing so (??) yet you defend Tan every chance you can, when he doesn't do what you are telling everyone else to do (stick to their side of the "deal").
What irony.