Sun May 11, 2014 10:12 pm
Gavin wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Blue and red is just as alien to Cardiff City as red and black. Cardiff City should be wearing blue jerseys at home.
Tan has today shown himself to be backing out of his promise to change debt to equity - wasn't that the reason the majority "reluctantly accepted" the rebrand in the first place? Pure and simple, he lied.
Tan has progressed this club and moved it along? How exactly? Next season, we will be playing in exactly the same league as when he joined, yet we will be saddled with FAR more debt & playing in a totally alien colour with a feuding fan base that are split on the club's identity.
I can't see how that's progression.
![]()
![]()
Why would he convert debt to equity, that would mean he is involved for the long term in a place he is made to feel completely unwelcome.
Sun May 11, 2014 10:32 pm
Sun May 11, 2014 11:28 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Debt to equity was one of the conditions for accepting the rebrand... Which is why many were so "reluctantly accepting" the rebrand.
As time has gone on & his promise has looked less likely, the fans have started to question it (fairly in my mind). Now that it is not going to happen, I think the fans are quite right to feel angry that he has reneged on his part of the deal & will therefore no longer reluctantly accept the rebrand.
Sun May 11, 2014 11:31 pm
maccydee wrote:But we aren't accepting the rebrand we are fighting it with marches and songs making him look a tw*t to his peers. Fair enough we have that right but we cannot then demand he follows through when we haven't.
I will point out I would prefer blue back I just am pointing out the obvious.
Sun May 11, 2014 11:34 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Sven wrote:Gavin, an excellent, well considered, concilliatory and (no doubt to some) controversial post...
Spot on in the main and time for ALL PARTIES (Tan, Board, Paying Fans) to work together for the GOOD of Cardiff CITY FC rather than short-termisms
Given that it is now increasingly apparent that Tan (a) is likely more right than wrong on the Malky/Moodie issue, and (b) appears ready to 'consider' the fans, then (as I've stated before) it's time to move forward and consign the mistakes of the past to the bins of history for the FUTURE benefit of our now wounded club
Ultimately, Tan holds the majority of the cards, but neither side can truly move forward without the other...FACT!
Forget who is to blame (neither side has been whiter than white) and embrace the opportunity for dialogue
How is plunging this club into more debt than ever & reneging on a promise to wipe it, in any way good for the long term for Cardiff City FC?
Surely going along with Tan's regime is short sighted...
Sun May 11, 2014 11:40 pm
Gavin wrote:I know that I am in the minority on this messageboard, but I feel that out of the 28000 fans who have watched City most home games this season, I think my opinion would be fairly common.
I want blue back, but I want Tan to remain as our majority shareholder/owner, I am willing to compromise with Tan, if he is willing to put a fan on the board and have regular contact between the senior board members and the supports trust, I would be happy to support Tan's leadership into next season and the long term future.
Its clear that the rebrand has been a terrible failure, Tan knows that, we know that, today he has given his first indication that he is willing to take a backwards step from the 'all red' kit and make some compromises to give the fans blue on the home kit, which we all want, but he isn't going to give that for nothing in return, he wants us to give a little too, allow him the owner and majority shareholder, to also be represented on the kit. We as fans can not just take take take
I guarantee if Tan just rolled over tomorrow and give the Blue back, the next day fans would want the old badge back, then they would want a full debt to equity conversion, then they would want a massive transfer budget, then they would want immediate promotion, then they would want even bigger transfer funds for the Prem (all funded by Tan though, heaven forbid the club should pay) then they would want a big challenge in the prem, then reduced ticket prices and then they would want Tan out anyway because he should have never fucked with the fans in the first place. Dare I say it sometimes I feel the club is dealing with a section of the fan base acting like a spoiled child.
I have stood in the Ninian Stand all season with a blue and white scarf, I've always sung 'always be blue' but I will never join in all the 'Tan is a wanker' and 'Tan Out' chants, he doesn't deserve such ridicule, he has helped move our club forward in many many ways, this will always be a regrettable season due to 'off field' crap and I honestly cant see how Tan can win over the fan base as whatever he does, they will never accept him.
But look at the good things he has done for us, I am not going to list them all, we all know the position the club was in when he turned up, we went from that to buying Caulker, Medel and Cornelius, big transfer fees that the die hard fans that attended that legendary 'rainy Tuesday night fixture in Rochdale' could only dream about. They didnt all work out but is that Tan's fault? of course not!
Whether you like it or not, Tan has moved the club along, further than anyone else in the clubs history, and while we all want blue back, you've got to accept that you cant have it all our own way under this owner, he wants compromise, and im sure we will get it, clearly we arent going to start wearing red as a compromise, but perhaps not mocking him and heckling him when he is in attendance at the CCS would be a start.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Mon May 12, 2014 12:29 am
Mon May 12, 2014 1:14 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:maccydee wrote:But we aren't accepting the rebrand we are fighting it with marches and songs making him look a tw*t to his peers. Fair enough we have that right but we cannot then demand he follows through when we haven't.
I will point out I would prefer blue back I just am pointing out the obvious.
Which I've already said is because many fans have become very distrusting on his promise of debt to equity, which they seem to have been right to not trust.
The grow in numbers who are against the rebrand have come as a direct result of his constant deleting tactics - personally feel the the never intended to do it in the first place.
Of course, many like myself, have been against the rebrand from the moment it was mentioned & have never accepted it.
Mon May 12, 2014 6:18 am
Mon May 12, 2014 7:22 am
Mon May 12, 2014 7:53 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:he doesn't want to be here... His family don't want him here... Best for all concerned.
Barry Chuckle wrote:We hopefully realise that we can't spend the ridiculous money that we do and aim to be a self sufficient club... Now that would be progression.
Mon May 12, 2014 7:59 am
Cardiffcitymad wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:he doesn't want to be here... His family don't want him here... Best for all concerned.
So you have evidence to prove this?Barry Chuckle wrote:We hopefully realise that we can't spend the ridiculous money that we do and aim to be a self sufficient club... Now that would be progression.
You dream!!!
Mon May 12, 2014 8:00 am
carlccfc wrote:Gavin wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Blue and red is just as alien to Cardiff City as red and black. Cardiff City should be wearing blue jerseys at home.
Tan has today shown himself to be backing out of his promise to change debt to equity - wasn't that the reason the majority "reluctantly accepted" the rebrand in the first place? Pure and simple, he lied.
Tan has progressed this club and moved it along? How exactly? Next season, we will be playing in exactly the same league as when he joined, yet we will be saddled with FAR more debt & playing in a totally alien colour with a feuding fan base that are split on the club's identity.
I can't see how that's progression.
![]()
![]()
Why would he convert debt to equity, that would mean he is involved for the long term in a place he is made to feel completely unwelcome.
Gavin, how about he honours his pledge to convert the debt to equity before any talk of compromise.
Secondly once he has converted ALL the debt to equity, I got a suggestion for compromise - turn us back to blue immediately and if we get back to the Premier League then and only then he can canvass all season ticket holders about allowing his values to become part of our heritage.
Gain our trust and then consult the fans on what we consider to be fair.
Mon May 12, 2014 8:17 am
steve davies wrote:carlccfc wrote:Gavin wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Blue and red is just as alien to Cardiff City as red and black. Cardiff City should be wearing blue jerseys at home.
Tan has today shown himself to be backing out of his promise to change debt to equity - wasn't that the reason the majority "reluctantly accepted" the rebrand in the first place? Pure and simple, he lied.
Tan has progressed this club and moved it along? How exactly? Next season, we will be playing in exactly the same league as when he joined, yet we will be saddled with FAR more debt & playing in a totally alien colour with a feuding fan base that are split on the club's identity.
I can't see how that's progression.
![]()
![]()
Why would he convert debt to equity, that would mean he is involved for the long term in a place he is made to feel completely unwelcome.
Gavin, how about he honours his pledge to convert the debt to equity before any talk of compromise.
Secondly once he has converted ALL the debt to equity, I got a suggestion for compromise - turn us back to blue immediately and if we get back to the Premier League then and only then he can canvass all season ticket holders about allowing his values to become part of our heritage.
Gain our trust and then consult the fans on what we consider to be fair.
Not the first chairman to lie though Carl is he who could forget " it's my debt and when I leave the club the debt leaves with me" or " I guarantee all the early bird season ticket money will be given to dave jones to strengthen the squad and will not go toward the tax bill"
I look at this mess now and wonder where the club would be now if Sam turned his debt to equity a few years back.
Mon May 12, 2014 8:23 am
carlccfc wrote:Gavin wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Blue and red is just as alien to Cardiff City as red and black. Cardiff City should be wearing blue jerseys at home.
Tan has today shown himself to be backing out of his promise to change debt to equity - wasn't that the reason the majority "reluctantly accepted" the rebrand in the first place? Pure and simple, he lied.
Tan has progressed this club and moved it along? How exactly? Next season, we will be playing in exactly the same league as when he joined, yet we will be saddled with FAR more debt & playing in a totally alien colour with a feuding fan base that are split on the club's identity.
I can't see how that's progression.
![]()
![]()
Why would he convert debt to equity, that would mean he is involved for the long term in a place he is made to feel completely unwelcome.
Gavin, how about he honours his pledge to convert the debt to equity before any talk of compromise.
Secondly once he has converted ALL the debt to equity, I got a suggestion for compromise - turn us back to blue immediately and if we get back to the Premier League then and only then he can canvass all season ticket holders about allowing his values to become part of our heritage.
Gain our trust and then consult the fans on what we consider to be fair.
Mon May 12, 2014 8:23 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Cardiffcitymad wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:he doesn't want to be here... His family don't want him here... Best for all concerned.
So you have evidence to prove this?Barry Chuckle wrote:We hopefully realise that we can't spend the ridiculous money that we do and aim to be a self sufficient club... Now that would be progression.
You dream!!!
Baz speaking perfect sense there.
Mon May 12, 2014 8:43 am
Cardiffcitymad wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:he doesn't want to be here... His family don't want him here... Best for all concerned.
So you have evidence to prove this?Barry Chuckle wrote:We hopefully realise that we can't spend the ridiculous money that we do and aim to be a self sufficient club... Now that would be progression.
You dream!!!
Mon May 12, 2014 9:17 am
Mon May 12, 2014 9:28 am
Mon May 12, 2014 9:36 am
Buchanan's Exocet wrote:Tan said in the BBC interview on saturday that he wouldn't walk away and let it go bust, as HE would find another buyer as that would be the right thing to do.
People seem to have overlooked that point.
Mon May 12, 2014 9:42 am
Mon May 12, 2014 9:48 am
Mon May 12, 2014 9:51 am
Mon May 12, 2014 10:00 am
Green Arrow wrote:As bad as it sounds, won't be buying another season ticket unless we're back in blue with our badge or one the fans want and if that means a relegated Cardiff struggling with youth players free falling the divisions so be it. If that means a Cardiff City in the conference then so be it.
Loads will disagree with me but if Tan asset strips and goes (unlikely) and we start the season with a points deduction I'll then buy a season ticket. I just don't see how giving him any more money is opposing his ideology and views for his version of Cardiff City FC.
Mon May 12, 2014 10:11 am
CraigCCFC wrote:So hes a liar when it suits....got ya lol
Mon May 12, 2014 10:25 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:You just have to be the new moniker of soulofthesea.
Mon May 12, 2014 10:28 am
Cardiffcitymad wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:he doesn't want to be here... His family don't want him here... Best for all concerned.
So you have evidence to prove this?Barry Chuckle wrote:We hopefully realise that we can't spend the ridiculous money that we do and aim to be a self sufficient club... Now that would be progression.
You dream!!!
Mon May 12, 2014 10:40 am
carlccfc wrote:Oh and if there is to be fan representation on the board I nominate Annis![]()
Mon May 12, 2014 10:45 am
carlccfc wrote:Oh and if there is to be fan representation on the board I nominate Annis![]()
Mon May 12, 2014 10:46 am
AlwaysBBlue wrote:carlccfc wrote:Oh and if there is to be fan representation on the board I nominate Annis![]()
initially the words "please god no!" went through my mind...but a fan who can't be bought is not a bad idea lol