Fri May 09, 2014 8:38 pm
Fri May 09, 2014 8:42 pm
Fri May 09, 2014 8:46 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:He could have got another job regardless
Fri May 09, 2014 8:48 pm
Fri May 09, 2014 8:49 pm
ToungeFrazez wrote:thomasblue wrote:Looks like tan may be proved right after all
Tan is packing his bags and so is Ole. Bookmark it
Fri May 09, 2014 8:59 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Jinks wrote:No matter how much its twisted by some posters the bottom line is malky is the one whose apologised to mr Tan. if Tan had apologised to malky there would be no end of threads saying tan lost was in the wrong because he would not have apologised otherwise...
Spot on Jinx
Todays statement raises more questions than answers thats for sure
Fri May 09, 2014 10:41 pm
smakerzthebluebird wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:He could have got another job regardless
I know Craig but I firmly believ as said on another thread that Norwich have been holding out for him the deal is done but they wouldn't touch him whilst the case was goin to court so e had to give the olive branch trixie a settlement issue a statement then he gets another job
Plus of they touched him and he's theoretically still under contract by city which he might well have been prior to this settlement then Norwich could be in the shit
Just my two pennies worth expect him named by Thursday next week
Fri May 09, 2014 11:01 pm
castleblue wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:castleblue wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:castleblue wrote:Google "Settlement Agreement" Carl and then put this Dail Mail claim in the bullshit box.
I'm not saying MM was perfect but the club has negotiated a "Settlement Agreement" with both MM and IM and as the terms will be covered by a confidentiality clause we will never get to know the full details.
But I would bet my bottom dollar that both MM & IM have, as a minimum, been paid thier contractual notice periods plus an "Ex Gratia" payment to make this stuff go away.
![]()
![]()
Ive been involved in numerous settlement agreement through my work and they can contain anything as long as both sides agree. Money isnt an issue.
Are you saying that money doesn't form part of the agreement.
![]()
![]()
Im saying it doesnt have to. Settlement agreements are legally binding but entered voluntarily. If either side doesnt agree with any term proposed by the other then the SA doesnt go ahead and normal ET procedures take place.
That's it exactly Craig there has to be agreement by both parties for an agreement to be reached and therefore it follows that both parties accept the terms of the agreement which when signed by ALL parties becomes legally binding.
It's all about opinions and mine is that MM has had to give something in order to get a financial settlement and that has been to include in his statement thanks to VT for his financial support in getting to the PL. No surprise there as we ALL know without that money we would not have got promoted but in terms of any apology ALL he has said is that "If" he caused any offence during time at the club. That is a very very long way from saying that he did cause offence, a very long way indeed.
Ask yourself why the club would have to agree to MM deciding to withdraw all his claims against the club. Surely if he decided to do this then the club would have just said good we can move on now. But they haven't and the club hasn't said that it hasn't reached agreement with MM to settle the dispute.
Trust me MM has received a payment and that may only be for his notice period and that should not be confused with compensation. They are two very seperate things.
![]()
![]()
Fri May 09, 2014 11:15 pm
llan bluebird wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:llan bluebird wrote:Two issues for me
1- Dodgy doesn't have to illegal- Contractually entitled "commissions" signed off by a poor CFO may not be illegal but if some of the cuts talked about loosely on here were true on a player who was so lamentable then it would destroy all the good will Malky has acquired over the last three years both with our fans and the media (who he played both to a tee)
2- He could have walked away and said he was fed up with the crap and for the benefit of the fans who I love, i wanted to end this saga in such a bad season for them. This would have gave him even more kudos with the fans above.
IMO - He has had some form of pay off
maybe..time will tell......but as its being reported,which is all we have to go on........its shite
IMO.???????..based on what exactly....bare in mind he probably had a top legal team recomended by the LMA used to doing these settlements........an apology..in fact two because Moody did likewise.......new to me,have you seen this before?
Based on the facts that malky was taking Tan to court..... It was Malky who was the plaintiff, he could have stopped it anytime, without an apology. It is the apology which is damming.....and bloody confusing.
I also have never seen this before, but we are Cardiff City Fruit Case !!!!!
Hopefully this is stage 1 of a multi staged plan to sort out our mess![]()
Fri May 09, 2014 11:17 pm
Blueboys1927 wrote:Malky is clearing the way to go back to the club he loves ........Norwich City![]()
![]()
Sat May 10, 2014 5:23 am
Sat May 10, 2014 7:12 am
Sat May 10, 2014 7:21 am
Forever Blue wrote:ToungeFrazez wrote:I am shocked that people who have backed Malky now seem to desert him! No evidence on him doing anything wrong, other than move on with his life. Shame on you! And just show how you can't trust anyone
I'm not deserting him, just for the first time worried by the way this court has ended or shall we say settled.
But I still believe if there was major evidence Tan would have Malky arrested.
Sat May 10, 2014 7:52 am
Igovernor wrote:So you reckon VT did not pay Malkey off
Sat May 10, 2014 7:56 am
simon.wiesenthal wrote:Igovernor wrote:So you reckon VT did not pay Malkey off
if you have eyes to read , and a bit of a thought process going on thats how it sounds.....
but of course you can always do what your doing..
Sat May 10, 2014 9:47 am
Sat May 10, 2014 10:57 am
Bakedalasker wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:Igovernor wrote:So you reckon VT did not pay Malkey off
if you have eyes to read , and a bit of a thought process going on thats how it sounds.....
but of course you can always do what your doing..
There is absolutely no evidence that he did or not from the statement yesterday. It has been left to everyones imagination.
Sat May 10, 2014 10:59 am
simon.wiesenthal wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:Igovernor wrote:So you reckon VT did not pay Malkey off
if you have eyes to read , and a bit of a thought process going on thats how it sounds.....
but of course you can always do what your doing..
There is absolutely no evidence that he did or not from the statement yesterday. It has been left to everyones imagination.
who drops a law suit thats worth up to 4million pounds......
Malky........im not imagining it ....or have i imagined his and Moodys apology.......or his tongue up Tans bum statement.
or do you also believe those words.........
if he did no wrong.............the alternative is he is prepared to lie , lose dignity and say absolutley anything { nice chap }
Sat May 10, 2014 11:02 am
Bakedalasker wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:Igovernor wrote:So you reckon VT did not pay Malkey off
if you have eyes to read , and a bit of a thought process going on thats how it sounds.....
but of course you can always do what your doing..
There is absolutely no evidence that he did or not from the statement yesterday. It has been left to everyones imagination.
who drops a law suit thats worth up to 4million pounds......
Malky........im not imagining it ....or have i imagined his and Moodys apology.......or his tongue up Tans bum statement.
or do you also believe those words.........
if he did no wrong.............the alternative is he is prepared to lie , lose dignity and say absolutley anything { nice chap }
Have you ever thought he just might have been paid up?
Sat May 10, 2014 1:07 pm
simon.wiesenthal wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:Igovernor wrote:So you reckon VT did not pay Malkey off
if you have eyes to read , and a bit of a thought process going on thats how it sounds.....
but of course you can always do what your doing..
There is absolutely no evidence that he did or not from the statement yesterday. It has been left to everyones imagination.
who drops a law suit thats worth up to 4million pounds......
Malky........im not imagining it ....or have i imagined his and Moodys apology.......or his tongue up Tans bum statement.
or do you also believe those words.........
if he did no wrong.............the alternative is he is prepared to lie , lose dignity and say absolutley anything { nice chap }
Have you ever thought he just might have been paid up?
so its option B......an undignified liar
Sat May 10, 2014 1:32 pm
Sat May 10, 2014 7:41 pm
2blue2handle wrote:So your saying Malky is a money grabber with no self respect? Either way malky cannot come out of this well.
In fairness the mail have been spot on for a long time.