' Deal virtually done on first City player to leave '

I'm not scum though am I?.

It is just the fact you can barely read which meant you misread me talking about Clifford.

it was quite clear what you said though to be honest.

Hopefully I don't get banned as I'm trying to explain myself.

I said, "Have you seen how 14 year old girls dress nowadays!?".

Now, take that comment as you want to, but I was criticizing how 14 year old girls dress. I then went on to say about how Katy Perry sexualizes a kids Birthday party in her new song.

It was not meant as "You can't blame clifford can you? Have you seen how 14 year old girls dress" as CF47bluebird seems to have read it.

I have a 2 nieces which are 8 and 10. Keep on calling me a paedo mate.

Keep digging. It was plainly obvious what you were getting at and trying to justify it now is making you look even worse.

Sell him before the world cup and we have more time to use the money, wait until after to get more money which we won't really have much time to get business done early.

He tried and just wasn't good enough, hope we get a decent sum back, same for Caulker. Started well and faded. Funny thing is all the jacks in the office are like "ho ho ho you hear your two best players got clauses in their contracts?" I was like "Yea, thank god for us!"

The best outfield player this season, superb holding midfeilder that protected a shocking defence , when he was absent City leaked goals by the bucket load, would thrive with better players around him.

Being even shitter than shit when he isnt playing isnt exactly a great endorsement.

We leaked goals by the bucket loads when he was playing ffs.

I know like, I think people just like to say stuff without anything to back it up.

he played against Liverpool (3-6), West Brom (3-3), Palace (0-3) and Sunderland (0-4)

but oh yeah, we are so f*cking solid with him in the team

Those heavy loses were more to do with OGS than Medel, one midfielder is never going to defend when the rest are in the opposition's 18 yard box. When Malky was in charge Medel was at his best & we were very often hard to break down, it was no coincidence he was less effective when Solskaer arrived, players were changed by the week & we never settled as a unit, he was a quality player in a appalling team.

The best outfield player this season, superb holding midfeilder that protected a shocking defence , when he was absent City leaked goals by the bucket load, would thrive with better players around him.

Being even shitter than shit when he isnt playing isnt exactly a great endorsement.

We leaked goals by the bucket loads when he was playing ffs.

I know like, I think people just like to say stuff without anything to back it up.

he played against Liverpool (3-6), West Brom (3-3), Palace (0-3) and Sunderland (0-4)

but oh yeah, we are so f*cking solid with him in the team

Those heavy loses were more to do with OGS than Medel, one midfielder is never going to defend when the rest are in the opposition's 18 yard box. When Malky was in charge Medel was at his best & we were very often hard to break down, it was no coincidence he was less effective when Solskaer arrived, players were changed by the week & we never settled as a unit, he was a quality player in a appalling team.

so hard to break down that we had the second worst defensive record in the league

Some on here have the same footballing mentality as Tan, if they ain't taking shots they're not doing it right & there seems to be a trend to build someone up then months later knock them down, no wonder we struggle to bring in the right players & manager.Medel even gets the blame for goals conceded, you could'nt make it up.