Malky Mackay

Malky is a bigger crook than Tan.

No he isn't.

How naive, I think you better prepare to have your perceptions of your hero battered this coming summer.

Malky failed to sign a proven goalscorer for the Premiership which in my opinion has cost us dearly ...... and so did OGS looking back over the season since January !

OGS....had a month to get one, and the january window is never great...........Malky had two years to get a goal scorer in at championship level,failed...........and then failed again last summer....promoted with 2 joint scorers on 8, one of which was retiring the other who you have no intention of playing anywhere near the opposition goals......a proven striker would and should have been 1st,2nd,3rd and 4th priority..........

Malky failed to sign a proven goalscorer for the Premiership which in my opinion has cost us dearly ...... and so did OGS looking back over the season since January !

What proven goalscorer signs for a club in January?
Sturridge is the only example

I have no doubt if Dave Jones got us promoted vs Blackpool, his PL team would smash the Malky made 40m team

I hope youre proud of yourself this morning you f*cking clown.

40m on this little lot:
Caulker
Medel
Cornelius
KTC
A.N.other 3 who were signed and have been nowhere to be seen


Hang your head in shame you f*cking waster.

YOU are the reason we are going down.

How clueless are you? We were doing fine at the start of the season, then Tan starts interfering to undo Malky's good work. Still, we wasn't in the relegation zone, we beat West Brom at home 1-0, but then Tan decides to send Malky that email, which was incredible timing considering we had just won a game! But when the damage was done by Tan and he sacked Malky, we were still above the relegation zone. All the big teams were already played at home apart from Liverpool and Chelsea, giving us a great opportunity to pick up the results required to stay in this division.

Unfortunately, Malky was sacked and Ole was brought in. Ole tried to drastically change our playing style, which wasn't his fault, he has his own style and methods. But Tan appointing Ole to play his open, expansive, attacking style against superior teams with superior players was absolutely suicidal and is the reason we fell into the relegation zone under Ole and are going down.

But yeah, despite us not being in the relegation zone and beating the teams around us in the bottom half at home under Malky, it's still all Malky's fault we are going down! Incredible!

I hope youre proud of yourself this morning you f*cking clown.

40m on this little lot:
Caulker
Medel
Cornelius
KTC
A.N.other 3 who were signed and have been nowhere to be seen


Hang your head in shame you f*cking waster.

YOU are the reason we are going down.

How clueless are you? We were doing fine at the start of the season, then Tan starts interfering to undo Malky's good work. Still, we wasn't in the relegation zone, we beat West Brom at home 1-0, but then Tan decides to send Malky that email, which was incredible timing considering we had just won a game! But when the damage was done by Tan and he sacked Malky, we were still above the relegation zone. All the big teams were already played at home apart from Liverpool and Chelsea, giving us a great opportunity to pick up the results required to stay in this division.

Unfortunately, Malky was sacked and Ole was brought in. Ole tried to drastically change our playing style, which wasn't his fault, he has his own style and methods. But Tan appointing Ole to play his open, expansive, attacking style against superior teams with superior players was absolutely suicidal and is the reason we fell into the relegation zone under Ole and are going down.

But yeah, despite us not being in the relegation zone and beating the teams around us in the bottom half at home under Malky, it's still all Malky's fault we are going down! Incredible!

We were 1 pt off relegation when Malky was sacked, above an improving Palace, teams below us picking up points. With our January fixtures being our most toughest ever. Stop using that stupid excuse

When you look at the money we have spent and then the state of the squad its almost impossible not to point the finger at Malky. All that money spent and mostly on defensive players, yet still conceeded the second most goals, no decent left or right back, we have nothing that resembled a premiership striker in the squad, its a shambles.

Ole will also have to take part of the blame, he had enough time to turn it around and has struggled, maybe due to the state of the squad admitadly but we havent done enough.

When you look at the money we have spent and then the state of the squad its almost impossible not to point the finger at Malky. All that money spent and mostly on defensive players, yet still conceeded the second most goals, no decent left or right back, we have nothing that resembled a premiership striker in the squad, its a shambles.

Ole will also have to take part of the blame, he had enough time to turn it around and has struggled, maybe due to the state of the squad admitadly but we havent done enough.

I wouldn't say a month in what is hard to do business is enough time IMO. He has failed to keep us up, his only failure but his biggest.

When you look at the money we have spent and then the state of the squad its almost impossible not to point the finger at Malky. All that money spent and mostly on defensive players, yet still conceeded the second most goals, no decent left or right back, we have nothing that resembled a premiership striker in the squad, its a shambles.

Ole will also have to take part of the blame, he had enough time to turn it around and has struggled, maybe due to the state of the squad admitadly but we havent done enough.

we got promoted and pretty much everyone i spoke to was of the opinion we needed a whole new team.............unreal, the useless champions?????............but its Tans fault..it was clear as day MM wasnt up to it and he kept faith and gave him a war chest.........

When you look at the money we have spent and then the state of the squad its almost impossible not to point the finger at Malky. All that money spent and mostly on defensive players, yet still conceeded the second most goals, no decent left or right back, we have nothing that resembled a premiership striker in the squad, its a shambles.

Ole will also have to take part of the blame, he had enough time to turn it around and has struggled, maybe due to the state of the squad admitadly but we havent done enough.

I wouldn't say a month in what is hard to do business is enough time IMO. He has failed to keep us up, his only failure but his biggest.

Oh no I didnt mean in January, we all know how impossible January is, Malky has told us enough times. Ole failure was not getting that bit extra from the players to turn it arounf, it was a hard job.

I hope youre proud of yourself this morning you f*cking clown.

40m on this little lot:
Caulker
Medel
Cornelius
KTC
A.N.other 3 who were signed and have been nowhere to be seen


Hang your head in shame you f*cking waster.

YOU are the reason we are going down.

How clueless are you? We were doing fine at the start of the season, then Tan starts interfering to undo Malky's good work. Still, we wasn't in the relegation zone, we beat West Brom at home 1-0, but then Tan decides to send Malky that email, which was incredible timing considering we had just won a game! But when the damage was done by Tan and he sacked Malky, we were still above the relegation zone. All the big teams were already played at home apart from Liverpool and Chelsea, giving us a great opportunity to pick up the results required to stay in this division.

Unfortunately, Malky was sacked and Ole was brought in. Ole tried to drastically change our playing style, which wasn't his fault, he has his own style and methods. But Tan appointing Ole to play his open, expansive, attacking style against superior teams with superior players was absolutely suicidal and is the reason we fell into the relegation zone under Ole and are going down.

But yeah, despite us not being in the relegation zone and beating the teams around us in the bottom half at home under Malky, it's still all Malky's fault we are going down! Incredible!

We were 1 pt off relegation when Malky was sacked, above an improving Palace, teams below us picking up points. With our January fixtures being our most toughest ever. Stop using that stupid excuse

But it's not an excuse is it. We were doing fine until Tan started interfering and undermining Malky. Everyone knows the damage Tan has done off the pitch. Like I said, we beat West Brom at home and then Tan sends Malky that email, impeccable timing that! I don't believe we would have only picked up 1 point at home against Sunderland and West Ham, so I don't think we would have fallen into the relegation zone in January. I also don't think we would have lost home to Hull 4-0, home to Palace 3-0, or failed to win so many games at home to teams in 10th position or below in this league if Malky was still here, considering the only 2 team we played at home under Malky in the bottom half, Swansea and West Brom, we both won!

We have thrown away so many points at home under Ole that we wouldn't have under Malky. Nobody was complaining about Malky's spending when we beat Man City. You can complain all you like but the fact is, we wasn't in the relegation zone when Malky got sacked and our form has drastically declined since Ole replaced him. It's all Malky's fault though!

I hope youre proud of yourself this morning you f*cking clown.

40m on this little lot:
Caulker
Medel
Cornelius
KTC
A.N.other 3 who were signed and have been nowhere to be seen


Hang your head in shame you f*cking waster.

YOU are the reason we are going down.

How clueless are you? We were doing fine at the start of the season, then Tan starts interfering to undo Malky's good work. Still, we wasn't in the relegation zone, we beat West Brom at home 1-0, but then Tan decides to send Malky that email, which was incredible timing considering we had just won a game! But when the damage was done by Tan and he sacked Malky, we were still above the relegation zone. All the big teams were already played at home apart from Liverpool and Chelsea, giving us a great opportunity to pick up the results required to stay in this division.

Unfortunately, Malky was sacked and Ole was brought in. Ole tried to drastically change our playing style, which wasn't his fault, he has his own style and methods. But Tan appointing Ole to play his open, expansive, attacking style against superior teams with superior players was absolutely suicidal and is the reason we fell into the relegation zone under Ole and are going down.

But yeah, despite us not being in the relegation zone and beating the teams around us in the bottom half at home under Malky, it's still all Malky's fault we are going down! Incredible!

f*cking hell ross you spout the same shit so often i could type it our myself.


So Malky didnt waste 40m then?

I hope youre proud of yourself this morning you f*cking clown.

40m on this little lot:
Caulker
Medel
Cornelius
KTC
A.N.other 3 who were signed and have been nowhere to be seen


Hang your head in shame you f*cking waster.

YOU are the reason we are going down.

How clueless are you? We were doing fine at the start of the season, then Tan starts interfering to undo Malky's good work. Still, we wasn't in the relegation zone, we beat West Brom at home 1-0, but then Tan decides to send Malky that email, which was incredible timing considering we had just won a game! But when the damage was done by Tan and he sacked Malky, we were still above the relegation zone. All the big teams were already played at home apart from Liverpool and Chelsea, giving us a great opportunity to pick up the results required to stay in this division.

Unfortunately, Malky was sacked and Ole was brought in. Ole tried to drastically change our playing style, which wasn't his fault, he has his own style and methods. But Tan appointing Ole to play his open, expansive, attacking style against superior teams with superior players was absolutely suicidal and is the reason we fell into the relegation zone under Ole and are going down.

But yeah, despite us not being in the relegation zone and beating the teams around us in the bottom half at home under Malky, it's still all Malky's fault we are going down! Incredible!

We were 1 pt off relegation when Malky was sacked, above an improving Palace, teams below us picking up points. With our January fixtures being our most toughest ever. Stop using that stupid excuse

But it's not an excuse is it. We were doing fine until Tan started interfering and undermining Malky. Everyone knows the damage Tan has done off the pitch. Like I said, we beat West Brom at home and then Tan sends Malky that email, impeccable timing that! I don't believe we would have only picked up 1 point at home against Sunderland and West Ham, so I don't think we would have fallen into the relegation zone in January. I also don't think we would have lost home to Hull 4-0, home to Palace 3-0, or failed to win so many games at home to teams in 10th position or below in this league if Malky was still here, considering the only 2 team we played at home under Malky in the bottom half, Swansea and West Brom, we both won!

We have thrown away so many points at home under Ole that we wouldn't have under Malky. Nobody was complaining about Malky's spending when we beat Man City. You can complain all you like but the fact is, we wasn't in the relegation zone when Malky got sacked and our form has drastically declined since Ole replaced him. It's all Malky's fault though!

i totally agree.................... with your last five words

I hope youre proud of yourself this morning you f*cking clown.

40m on this little lot:
Caulker
Medel
Cornelius
KTC
A.N.other 3 who were signed and have been nowhere to be seen


Hang your head in shame you f*cking waster.

YOU are the reason we are going down.

How clueless are you? We were doing fine at the start of the season, then Tan starts interfering to undo Malky's good work. Still, we wasn't in the relegation zone, we beat West Brom at home 1-0, but then Tan decides to send Malky that email, which was incredible timing considering we had just won a game! But when the damage was done by Tan and he sacked Malky, we were still above the relegation zone. All the big teams were already played at home apart from Liverpool and Chelsea, giving us a great opportunity to pick up the results required to stay in this division.

Unfortunately, Malky was sacked and Ole was brought in. Ole tried to drastically change our playing style, which wasn't his fault, he has his own style and methods. But Tan appointing Ole to play his open, expansive, attacking style against superior teams with superior players was absolutely suicidal and is the reason we fell into the relegation zone under Ole and are going down.

But yeah, despite us not being in the relegation zone and beating the teams around us in the bottom half at home under Malky, it's still all Malky's fault we are going down! Incredible!

We were 1 pt off relegation when Malky was sacked, above an improving Palace, teams below us picking up points. With our January fixtures being our most toughest ever. Stop using that stupid excuse

But it's not an excuse is it. We were doing fine until Tan started interfering and undermining Malky. Everyone knows the damage Tan has done off the pitch. Like I said, we beat West Brom at home and then Tan sends Malky that email, impeccable timing that! I don't believe we would have only picked up 1 point at home against Sunderland and West Ham, so I don't think we would have fallen into the relegation zone in January. I also don't think we would have lost home to Hull 4-0, home to Palace 3-0, or failed to win so many games at home to teams in 10th position or below in this league if Malky was still here, considering the only 2 team we played at home under Malky in the bottom half, Swansea and West Brom, we both won!

We have thrown away so many points at home under Ole that we wouldn't have under Malky. Nobody was complaining about Malky's spending when we beat Man City. You can complain all you like but the fact is, we wasn't in the relegation zone when Malky got sacked and our form has drastically declined since Ole replaced him. It's all Malky's fault though!

We beat a Man City side with Lescott and Javi Garcia at CB and an out-of-form Joe Hart, with 2 of the 3 goals being set pieces, wow we were really setting the world alight

I hope youre proud of yourself this morning you f*cking clown.

40m on this little lot:
Caulker
Medel
Cornelius
KTC
A.N.other 3 who were signed and have been nowhere to be seen


Hang your head in shame you f*cking waster.

YOU are the reason we are going down.

How clueless are you? We were doing fine at the start of the season, then Tan starts interfering to undo Malky's good work. Still, we wasn't in the relegation zone, we beat West Brom at home 1-0, but then Tan decides to send Malky that email, which was incredible timing considering we had just won a game! But when the damage was done by Tan and he sacked Malky, we were still above the relegation zone. All the big teams were already played at home apart from Liverpool and Chelsea, giving us a great opportunity to pick up the results required to stay in this division.

Unfortunately, Malky was sacked and Ole was brought in. Ole tried to drastically change our playing style, which wasn't his fault, he has his own style and methods. But Tan appointing Ole to play his open, expansive, attacking style against superior teams with superior players was absolutely suicidal and is the reason we fell into the relegation zone under Ole and are going down.

But yeah, despite us not being in the relegation zone and beating the teams around us in the bottom half at home under Malky, it's still all Malky's fault we are going down! Incredible!

f*cking hell ross you spout the same shit so often i could type it our myself.


So Malky didnt waste 40m then?

The players Malky brought in kept us above the relegation zone.

I hope youre proud of yourself this morning you f*cking clown.

40m on this little lot:
Caulker
Medel
Cornelius
KTC
A.N.other 3 who were signed and have been nowhere to be seen


Hang your head in shame you f*cking waster.

YOU are the reason we are going down.

How clueless are you? We were doing fine at the start of the season, then Tan starts interfering to undo Malky's good work. Still, we wasn't in the relegation zone, we beat West Brom at home 1-0, but then Tan decides to send Malky that email, which was incredible timing considering we had just won a game! But when the damage was done by Tan and he sacked Malky, we were still above the relegation zone. All the big teams were already played at home apart from Liverpool and Chelsea, giving us a great opportunity to pick up the results required to stay in this division.

Unfortunately, Malky was sacked and Ole was brought in. Ole tried to drastically change our playing style, which wasn't his fault, he has his own style and methods. But Tan appointing Ole to play his open, expansive, attacking style against superior teams with superior players was absolutely suicidal and is the reason we fell into the relegation zone under Ole and are going down.

But yeah, despite us not being in the relegation zone and beating the teams around us in the bottom half at home under Malky, it's still all Malky's fault we are going down! Incredible!

f*cking hell ross you spout the same shit so often i could type it our myself.


So Malky didnt waste 40m then?

The players Malky brought in kept us above the relegation zone.

so in your opinion he spent the money he was given wisely then?

Think some people are a little bit embarrassed that their calls to sack Malky have backfired with the new regime looking like getting less points from 18 games than Malky did, with a far easier fixture list (i.e. most of our rivals at home rather than away in 1st half of season).

Malky wasted the Cornelius money but built a squad that is close to staying up in the PL despite the off field turmoil (last season we only had the rebrand which was barely opposed during the season, this season we've had the bonuses row, Moody's sacking, Malky's ultimatum followed by sacking, Tan's public outbursts, the leak and all the protests about the reband on top of it).


Malky also won us at least £60m in TV money by delivering promotion in the first place, yes he had money to do so but spent it largely wisely hence the league position. He also had less money than a number of teams in the Championship were spending on fees and wages.

Malky would have kept us up this season because we would have beaten West Ham, Hull, Palace at home with him in charge and we would also have beaten Sunderland with him in charge. The TV money from staying up would have made up for the loss.

Sad thing is the Sunderland game showed that he was beginning to get the players playing good football (he was sacked only one day before, no way it was just the Kerslake effect and it is certain Kerslake implemented Malky's tactics but with Malky on the sideline we wouldn't have blew it like that, we rarely blew leads like that with him in charge).

Everyone who wanted Malky out, you've had a mare!

Last edited by mjw6150 on Mon Apr 28, 2014 2:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Funny thing is everyone on here thinks Malky is a terrible man for buying badly. Are they going to criticise Pochettino as well and call him a crook? (£15m on a striker who punched a team mate and was loaned out after three goals and is likely to leave for far less in summer)?

What about Martinez for spending £8m on Kone?

Last season Bruce spent £3m on Proschwitz but everyone says what a great wheeler and dealer he is.

All managers make mistakes.

Malky would have kept us up this season because we would have beaten West Ham, Hull, Palace with him in charge and we would also have beaten Sunderland with him in charge. The TV money from staying up would have made up for the loss.

That is magnificent fair play!

Think some people are a little bit embarrassed that their calls to sack Malky have backfired with the new regime looking like getting less points from 18 games than Malky did, with a far easier fixture list (i.e. most of our rivals at home rather than away in 1st half of season).

Malky wasted the Cornelius money but built a squad that is close to staying up in the PL despite the off field turmoil (last season we only had the rebrand which was barely opposed during the season, this season we've had the bonuses row, Moody's sacking, Malky's ultimatum followed by sacking, Tan's public outbursts, the leak and all the protests about the reband on top of it).


Malky also won us at least £60m in TV money by delivering promotion in the first place, yes he had money to do so but spent it largely wisely hence the league position. He also had less money than a number of teams in the Championship were spending on fees and wages.

Malky would have kept us up this season because we would have beaten West Ham, Hull, Palace at home with him in charge and we would also have beaten Sunderland with him in charge. The TV money from staying up would have made up for the loss.

Sad thing is the Sunderland game showed that he was beginning to get the players playing good football (he was sacked only one day before, no way it was just the Kerslake effect and it is certain Kerslake implemented Malky's tactics but with Malky on the sideline we wouldn't have blew it like that, we rarely blew leads like that with him in charge).

Everyone who wanted Malky out, you've had a mare!

It's nice to see there are still people on this forum who can see things for what they are. Excellent post.

Malky would have kept us up this season because we would have beaten West Ham, Hull, Palace with him in charge and we would also have beaten Sunderland with him in charge. The TV money from staying up would have made up for the loss.

That is magnificent fair play!

Under Malky our results against bottom half rivals at home were:-

West Brom - W 1-0
Swansea - W 1-0

We also beat Fulham away 2-1, a vital result if we do end up staying up.

Of course another £60m TV money from staying up will outweigh the bad deals as opposed to staying down and only getting £3m TV money plus £12m parachute money.

Malky would have kept us up this season because we would have beaten West Ham, Hull, Palace with him in charge and we would also have beaten Sunderland with him in charge. The TV money from staying up would have made up for the loss.

That is magnificent fair play!

Under Malky our results against bottom half rivals at home were:-

West Brom - W 1-0
Swansea - W 1-0

We also beat Fulham away 2-1, a vital result if we do end up staying up.

Of course another £60m TV money from staying up will outweigh the bad deals as opposed to staying down and only getting £3m TV money plus £12m parachute money.

ok, so we got 2 wins against two sides in the bottom 10.

Why does that mean we would definately have beaten Sunderland, Hull, Palace and West Ham?

the mark of Malkys' tactics were plain for all to see against sunderland anyway, even though he wasnt there.

Funny thing is everyone on here thinks Malky is a terrible man for buying badly. Are they going to criticise Pochettino as well and call him a crook? (£15m on a striker who punched a team mate and was loaned out after three goals and is likely to leave for far less in summer)?

What about Martinez for spending £8m on Kone?

Last season Bruce spent £3m on Proschwitz but everyone says what a great wheeler and dealer he is.

All managers make mistakes.

It's just just cornflop milky fukt up with, he basically threw the whole 40+ mil away, with only caulker worth the money IMO, just about.

Malky would have kept us up this season because we would have beaten West Ham, Hull, Palace with him in charge and we would also have beaten Sunderland with him in charge. The TV money from staying up would have made up for the loss.

That is magnificent fair play!

Under Malky our results against bottom half rivals at home were:-

West Brom - W 1-0
Swansea - W 1-0

We also beat Fulham away 2-1, a vital result if we do end up staying up.

Of course another £60m TV money from staying up will outweigh the bad deals as opposed to staying down and only getting £3m TV money plus £12m parachute money.

ok, so we got 2 wins against two sides in the bottom 10.

Why does that mean we would definately have beaten Sunderland, Hull, Palace and West Ham?

the mark of Malkys' tactics were plain for all to see against sunderland anyway, even though he wasnt there.

So Mackay was tactically at fault for us losing 4 nil to sunderland 5 months after he was sacked.

Malky would have kept us up this season because we would have beaten West Ham, Hull, Palace with him in charge and we would also have beaten Sunderland with him in charge. The TV money from staying up would have made up for the loss.

That is magnificent fair play!

Under Malky our results against bottom half rivals at home were:-

West Brom - W 1-0
Swansea - W 1-0

We also beat Fulham away 2-1, a vital result if we do end up staying up.

Of course another £60m TV money from staying up will outweigh the bad deals as opposed to staying down and only getting £3m TV money plus £12m parachute money.

ok, so we got 2 wins against two sides in the bottom 10.

Why does that mean we would definately have beaten Sunderland, Hull, Palace and West Ham?

the mark of Malkys' tactics were plain for all to see against sunderland anyway, even though he wasnt there.

So Mackay was tactically at fault for us losing 4 nil to sunderland 5 months after he was sacked.

the OTHER sunderland game you melt!

Malky would have kept us up this season because we would have beaten West Ham, Hull, Palace with him in charge and we would also have beaten Sunderland with him in charge. The TV money from staying up would have made up for the loss.

That is magnificent fair play!

Under Malky our results against bottom half rivals at home were:-

West Brom - W 1-0
Swansea - W 1-0

We also beat Fulham away 2-1, a vital result if we do end up staying up.

Of course another £60m TV money from staying up will outweigh the bad deals as opposed to staying down and only getting £3m TV money plus £12m parachute money.

ok, so we got 2 wins against two sides in the bottom 10.

Why does that mean we would definately have beaten Sunderland, Hull, Palace and West Ham?

the mark of Malkys' tactics were plain for all to see against sunderland anyway, even though he wasnt there.

So Mackay was tactically at fault for us losing 4 nil to sunderland 5 months after he was sacked.

Fair play, Paul is having an absolute nightmare here!

Ah right, I was going to say.

People like Kenfig on here would blame Mackay if they burnt their toast, so I wasn't sure.

Mackay wasn't in charge for the home game anyway.

Last edited by Mario on Mon Apr 28, 2014 2:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Malky would have kept us up this season because we would have beaten West Ham, Hull, Palace with him in charge and we would also have beaten Sunderland with him in charge. The TV money from staying up would have made up for the loss.

That is magnificent fair play!

Under Malky our results against bottom half rivals at home were:-

West Brom - W 1-0
Swansea - W 1-0

We also beat Fulham away 2-1, a vital result if we do end up staying up.

Of course another £60m TV money from staying up will outweigh the bad deals as opposed to staying down and only getting £3m TV money plus £12m parachute money.

ok, so we got 2 wins against two sides in the bottom 10.

Why does that mean we would definately have beaten Sunderland, Hull, Palace and West Ham?

the mark of Malkys' tactics were plain for all to see against sunderland anyway, even though he wasnt there.

So Mackay was tactically at fault for us losing 4 nil to sunderland 5 months after he was sacked.

Fair play, Paul is having an absolute nightmare here!

read it again Ross

Ah right, I was going to say.

Pole like Kenfig on here would blame Mackay if they burnt their toast, so I wasn't sure.

It was Malkys fault I burnt my toast this morning as I was still pissed about us getting thumped yesterday due to our shit squad.

Malky would have kept us up this season because we would have beaten West Ham, Hull, Palace with him in charge and we would also have beaten Sunderland with him in charge. The TV money from staying up would have made up for the loss.

That is magnificent fair play!

Under Malky our results against bottom half rivals at home were:-

West Brom - W 1-0
Swansea - W 1-0

We also beat Fulham away 2-1, a vital result if we do end up staying up.

Of course another £60m TV money from staying up will outweigh the bad deals as opposed to staying down and only getting £3m TV money plus £12m parachute money.

ok, so we got 2 wins against two sides in the bottom 10.

Why does that mean we would definately have beaten Sunderland, Hull, Palace and West Ham?

the mark of Malkys' tactics were plain for all to see against sunderland anyway, even though he wasnt there.

They were the only two we played at home under Malky.

Not definitely but chances are we would have.

Yes and we were superb and well on top of them for 75 mins until Kerslake crushed our momentum with poor substitutions (Never should have took Nooney off and definitely not brought Cornelius on for Campbell).