Where has Natman Blue gone

I think my PM have been infiltrated. You and everyone hasn't replied Carl ?

was I meant to have got something?

I think my PM have been infiltrated. You and everyone hasn't replied Carl ?

was I meant to have got something?

Only if you read carls PM

I think my PM have been infiltrated. You and everyone hasn't replied Carl ?

was I meant to have got something?

Only if you read carls PM

haha

I think my PM have been infiltrated. You and everyone hasn't replied Carl ?

was I meant to have got something?

Only if you read carls PM

haha

Steve is having a laugh Ian, I never got the pm.

Unless someone intercepted it

I think my PM have been infiltrated. You and everyone hasn't replied Carl ?

was I meant to have got something?

Only if you read carls PM

haha

Steve is having a laugh Ian, I never got the pm.

Unless someone intercepted it

I gathered Carl but I was a bit slow.

PM is as safe as a baby in a pram

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Some people are a bit sensitive lol.
My god even if I could which I can't why on earth would I want to read someone else's messages haha.

Id love to but shame I can't as I'm a rocker not a mod

Banned for saying or knowing to much

For shit stirring.

Claiming that someone told him us mods were reading users pms when they 100% cant.

Abuse of power.

Banned for saying or knowing to much

For shit stirring.

Claiming that someone told him us mods were reading users pms when they 100% cant.

Abuse of power.

In what way?

Bad decision.

Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.

Bad decision.

Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.

What about accusations that are wrong?

Bad decision.

Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.

What about accusations that are wrong?

sounds like you are taking your arse in your hand and abusing your "power" to me

Bad decision.

Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.

What about accusations that are wrong?

sounds like you are taking your arse in your hand and abusing your "power" to me

For a start I didn't ban him and I would suggest you find out the full story before gobbing off.

Bad decision.

Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.

What about accusations that are wrong?

I believe that reason is just being used as an excuse to ban him.. hardly crime of the century is it.

Banned for saying or knowing to much

For shit stirring.

Claiming that someone told him us mods were reading users pms when they 100% cant.

Abuse of power.

In what way?

I think there's been far worse on here than that without being banned. Just my opinion but if it was someone of a different viewpoint then he wouldn't be banned. Also was it a unanimous vote or even a majority vote to ban him.

Anyone who believes that the reason Natman Blue has been banned was for saying that someone told him mods could read everyone's PM's is extremely naive, and moderators pretending this is the reason for him being banned are treating all other board members as fools.

I personally don't like being accused of reading other peoples private messages. Would you?

I personally don't like being accused of being a tan lover a red lover etc so on that basis if someone calls me one will they get banned?

apologies to you baked.. just playing devil's advocate didn't realise it had gone as far as solicitors...

Things have got a bit silly.

However accusing someone of doing something that is morally wrong is a lot more serious than name calling don't you think.

Didnt you bizarrely accuse me of beating up my partner for no apparent reason not so long ago?

Sorry Ian but I thought the mods had stopped this nonsense long ago?

Bad decision.

Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.

What about accusations that are wrong?

I believe that reason is just being used as an excuse to ban him.. hardly crime of the century is it.

You believe wrong.

Bad decision.

Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.

What about accusations that are wrong?

I believe that reason is just being used as an excuse to ban him.. hardly crime of the century is it.

You believe wrong.

why is he banned then?

Bad decision.

Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.

What about accusations that are wrong?

Ive had many a million incorrect accusations thrown at me, far more vile than reading a pm too.

Nobody did anything about them.

It was a mod that decided to call me Roathie Watkins and calling me a nonce wasnt it? All because of my footballing opinion.

This stinks.

Anyone who believes that the reason Natman Blue has been banned was for saying that someone told him mods could read everyone's PM's is extremely naive, and moderators pretending this is the reason for him being banned are treating all other board members as fools.

I personally don't like being accused of reading other peoples private messages. Would you?

I personally don't like being accused of being a tan lover a red lover etc so on that basis if someone calls me one will they get banned?

apologies to you baked.. just playing devil's advocate didn't realise it had gone as far as solicitors...

Things have got a bit silly.

However accusing someone of doing something that is morally wrong is a lot more serious than name calling don't you think.

Didnt you bizarrely accuse me of beating up my partner for no apparent reason not so long ago?

Sorry Ian but I thought the mods had stopped this nonsense long ago?

Like you implied I ignored my kids.

You soon went crying over that but now you have a different attitude when the shoe is on the other foot.

Don't agree that anyone should be banned for their opinions, I disagreed big time with his, but he has a right to them.

I can tell you now though, that PMs on any forum software are only able to be read by the sender and recipient.

Why should we believe you this time Alex?

When you said that, I replied that you should take your anger from here and turn it into love for your kids. That wasnt an accusation or an insult or an implication that you ignored your children.

I was telling you that instead of making vile accusations on here you could be doing something with your children which would be far more rewarding.

Can you see the hypocrisy here though and why people think it is an abuse of power? You cant go around making accusations yourself of a much viler nature and then condemn people for making a trivial one.

And if i remember rightly it was you that went crying. I think all accusations are wrong. But you made your bed when you started it, you cant then decide you are against them.

Last edited by Roath_Magic_ on Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

Bad decision.

Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.

What about accusations that are wrong?

I believe that reason is just being used as an excuse to ban him.. hardly crime of the century is it.

You believe wrong.

why is he banned then?

Well Paul without getting personal the guy has been trolling Annis on other medias. I've seen the scripts and Annis has a good case for harassment.

Adding to this I have heard Natman has got a solicitor involved. That is more than a good enough reason to deny the guy access to anything.

banned for shit stirring haa how childish.

yeah life is harsh. I take exception of someone accusing me of reading other peoples mail. Specially from a God fearing apostle.

My mrs read my mail the other day, should I kick her out of the house?

Dont be such a berk man she is your wife, the Mother of your children.
Just sue her on a no win no fee basis.

Bad decision.

Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.

What about accusations that are wrong?

Trouble is if your accused of something or being someone and get banned. It's hard to put your point over that's not what you've said or who you are ,some are allowed back on here or change their name but w hen the person concerned has done nothing wrong and can't defend themselves

Bad decision.

Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.

What about accusations that are wrong?

Trouble is if your accused of something or being someone and get banned. It's hard to put your point over that's not what you've said or who you are ,some are allowed back on here or change their name but when the person concerned has done nothing wrong and can't defend themselves

The irony is baked would have been banned ten times over if he practiced what he preached. He made the ultimate of incorrect accusations and didnt as much as apologise, instead deleted the thread and evidence when others pointed out how vile and uncalled for it was

Id decided to leave it there and move on - but im always one to speak out when I see a wrong and this double standard hypocricy is embarrassingly ridiculous.

Bad decision.

Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.

What about accusations that are wrong?

Trouble is if your accused of something or being someone and get banned. It's hard to put your point over that's not what you've said or who you are ,some are allowed back on here or change their name but when the person concerned has done nothing wrong and can't defend themselves

The irony is baked would have been banned ten times over if he practiced what he preached. He made the ultimate of incorrect accusations and didnt as much as apologise, instead deleted the thread and evidence when others pointed out how vile and uncalled for it was

Id decided to leave it there and move on - but im always one to speak out when I see a wrong and this double standard hypocricy is embarrassingly ridiculous.

This is f**k all to do with you so why are you getting involved.

You wanted our episode to be brought to an end yet you have brought it up again. Your the one showing double standards here.

Bad decision.

Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.

What about accusations that are wrong?

Trouble is if your accused of something or being someone and get banned. It's hard to put your point over that's not what you've said or who you are ,some are allowed back on here or change their name but when the person concerned has done nothing wrong and can't defend themselves

The irony is baked would have been banned ten times over if he practiced what he preached. He made the ultimate of incorrect accusations and didnt as much as apologise, instead deleted the thread and evidence when others pointed out how vile and uncalled for it was

Id decided to leave it there and move on - but im always one to speak out when I see a wrong and this double standard hypocricy is embarrassingly ridiculous.

This is f**k all to do with you so why are you getting involved.

You wanted our episode to be brought to an end yet you have brought it up again. Your the one showing double standards here.

Im getting involved because I post on here and I feel someone is getting the same treatment that I stood up against for so long. Someone's opinions being hushed. I wouldnt be the man that I am if I ignored it just because "im ok".

I absolutely wanted to put an end to our episode and wouldnt have mentioned it again if you didnt just ban someone for exactly the same thing you did.

Lets not forget you didnt even apologise for yours so you cant think its that bad to accuse someone of something falsely.

Bad decision.

Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.

What about accusations that are wrong?

Trouble is if your accused of something or being someone and get banned. It's hard to put your point over that's not what you've said or who you are ,some are allowed back on here or change their name but when the person concerned has done nothing wrong and can't defend themselves

The irony is baked would have been banned ten times over if he practiced what he preached. He made the ultimate of incorrect accusations and didnt as much as apologise, instead deleted the thread and evidence when others pointed out how vile and uncalled for it was

Id decided to leave it there and move on - but im always one to speak out when I see a wrong and this double standard hypocricy is embarrassingly ridiculous.

This is f**k all to do with you so why are you getting involved.

You wanted our episode to be brought to an end yet you have brought it up again. Your the one showing double standards here.

You're