Banning members

Quite a shocking poll this. Quite worrying for someone as opinionated as myself Can't see me lasting long here

Quite a shocking poll this. Quite worrying for someone as opinionated as myself Can't see me lasting long here

as long as your opinions match the mods you should be fine fella

well everyone moaning about been banned or censered are still here in one form or another.hardly north korea is it?

We seem to be attracting some right ones lately Jeff.

both of you missing the point entirely

not missing it, ducking it.

Give it a rest you two. Nobody is interested.

judging by the pole and the amount of responses this thread has had i'd say a few people are interested.

no one is saying it is north korea, but you shouldn't have to change usernames every time you have an opinion that doesnt match annis' or the mods. do you agree?

Now I don't know how long you have been on this forum but take it from me who has been here since it opened. There have been many discussions with differing opinions that have been allowed to go on. To say "every time" is just a pathetic statement and you are just being a drama queen so give it a rest.

about 4 years now until i got banned for saying annis should respect older managers and staff if he is insistant that everyone gives malky respect (first link in the OP)

fine. i'll change the question. do you think its ever ecceptable to be banned just for voicing an opinion if it doesnt violate the T&Cs?

...gone awfully quite after that question, should we read in to that?

well everyone moaning about been banned or censered are still here in one form or another.hardly north korea is it?

We seem to be attracting some right ones lately Jeff.

both of you missing the point entirely

not missing it, ducking it.

Give it a rest you two. Nobody is interested.

judging by the pole and the amount of responses this thread has had i'd say a few people are interested.

no one is saying it is north korea, but you shouldn't have to change usernames every time you have an opinion that doesnt match annis' or the mods. do you agree?

Now I don't know how long you have been on this forum but take it from me who has been here since it opened. There have been many discussions with differing opinions that have been allowed to go on. To say "every time" is just a pathetic statement and you are just being a drama queen so give it a rest.

about 4 years now until i got banned for saying annis should respect older managers and staff if he is insistant that everyone gives malky respect (first link in the OP)

fine. i'll change the question. do you think its ever ecceptable to be banned just for voicing an opinion if it doesnt violate the T&Cs?

...gone awfully quite after that question, should we read in to that?

Not gone quite at all but you are boring the tits off me.

well everyone moaning about been banned or censered are still here in one form or another.hardly north korea is it?

We seem to be attracting some right ones lately Jeff.

both of you missing the point entirely

not missing it, ducking it.

Give it a rest you two. Nobody is interested.

judging by the pole and the amount of responses this thread has had i'd say a few people are interested.

no one is saying it is north korea, but you shouldn't have to change usernames every time you have an opinion that doesnt match annis' or the mods. do you agree?

Now I don't know how long you have been on this forum but take it from me who has been here since it opened. There have been many discussions with differing opinions that have been allowed to go on. To say "every time" is just a pathetic statement and you are just being a drama queen so give it a rest.

about 4 years now until i got banned for saying annis should respect older managers and staff if he is insistant that everyone gives malky respect (first link in the OP)

fine. i'll change the question. do you think its ever ecceptable to be banned just for voicing an opinion if it doesnt violate the T&Cs?

...gone awfully quite after that question, should we read in to that?

Not gone quite at all but you are boring the tits off me.

ok, would be lovely if you answered that really simple question though....

the fact that you are dodging it gives a really clear message about you and the other mods on here. i'll repeat it really quickly for you: do you think its ever ecceptable to be banned just for voicing an opinion if it doesnt violate the T&Cs?

If you're going to bang on about whats acceptable and whats not then at least learn to spell the f*cking word.

Well at least we know where the mods stand;

They can abuse, threaten, alter posts and get away with it. So can anyone else who agrees with their agenda.

If you don't agree though then you'll get banned for any excuse they can find.

If my conscience wouldn't get the better of me then maybe I should stoop to some other peoples' levels. But that ain't me and I'd only get banned anyway lol

Stop making things up.

All you know regarding the mods is this mods option of you so stop exaggerating.

Why are you turning this on Natman Blue? He is not the one ousting you is he? I read through his post like you suggested, and he sure took some heavy abusive hits. My advice Natman, ignore it

NB has done nothing but criticise this board and the mods so yes he is ousting me. I've just given NB my opinion and he has reacted. TBH if he feels this way about how it is on here why does he continue to post?

But that's always the answer why continue to post on her after all views welcome no wonder were confused

I've answered the questions many times.

If you want an answer then pm me instead of flooding this forum.

If you're going to bang on about whats acceptable and whats not then at least learn to spell the f*cking word.

sorry, typo (which i copied and pasted)

oh and by the way...it's: WHAT'S....not whats

I've answered the questions many times.

If you want an answer then pm me instead of flooding this forum.

couldnt just answer it one more time for me could you? its just judging by this thread it really doesnt seem clear. If the answer is 'no' then no worries, its just me and the other people who have been banned without violating the Ts&Cs would like a bit of clarification on what they can be banned for

I've answered the questions many times.

If you want an answer then pm me instead of flooding this forum.

couldnt just answer it one more time for me could you? its just judging by this thread it really doesnt seem clear. If the answer is 'no' then no worries, its just me and the other people who have been banned without violating the Ts&Cs would like a bit of clarification on what they can be banned for

We welcome opinions on this forum but what we don't like is the use of abuse to express an opinion.

If people feel they have been abused then report it. If its not reported then it is highly likely nothing will happen there is no guarantee a mod will pick it up.

I've answered the questions many times.

If you want an answer then pm me instead of flooding this forum.

couldnt just answer it one more time for me could you? its just judging by this thread it really doesnt seem clear. If the answer is 'no' then no worries, its just me and the other people who have been banned without violating the Ts&Cs would like a bit of clarification on what they can be banned for

We welcome opinions on this forum but what we don't like is the use of abuse to express an opinion.

If people feel they have been abused then report it. If its not reported then it is highly likely nothing will happen there is no guarantee a mod will pick it up.

I would really like for this to be true, i really. But on page one there are pics quoted calling natman blue a red loving, god bothering wank bag. And this was reported. Dont you think by going arround calling natman a dramaqeen you are actually suporting abuse? And when no action is taken on this behavior you are also supporting it?

God bothering wank bag

I've answered the questions many times.

If you want an answer then pm me instead of flooding this forum.

couldnt just answer it one more time for me could you? its just judging by this thread it really doesnt seem clear. If the answer is 'no' then no worries, its just me and the other people who have been banned without violating the Ts&Cs would like a bit of clarification on what they can be banned for

We welcome opinions on this forum but what we don't like is the use of abuse to express an opinion.

If people feel they have been abused then report it. If its not reported then it is highly likely nothing will happen there is no guarantee a mod will pick it up.

I would really like for this to be true, i really. But on page one there are pics quoted calling natman blue a red loving, god bothering wank bag. And this was reported. Dont you think by going arround calling natman a dramaqeen you are actually suporting abuse? And when no action is taken on this behavior you are also supporting it?

You think calling someone a drama queen is abuse?

I've answered the questions many times.

If you want an answer then pm me instead of flooding this forum.

couldnt just answer it one more time for me could you? its just judging by this thread it really doesnt seem clear. If the answer is 'no' then no worries, its just me and the other people who have been banned without violating the Ts&Cs would like a bit of clarification on what they can be banned for

We welcome opinions on this forum but what we don't like is the use of abuse to express an opinion.

If people feel they have been abused then report it. If its not reported then it is highly likely nothing will happen there is no guarantee a mod will pick it up.

I would really like for this to be true, i really. But on page one there are pics quoted calling natman blue a red loving, god bothering wank bag. And this was reported. Dont you think by going arround calling natman a dramaqeen you are actually suporting abuse? And when no action is taken on this behavior you are also supporting it?

You think calling someone a drama queen is abuse?

i think guidlines as to what is and isnt abuse would be really helpful...just like liverpool did last yeah

I've answered the questions many times.

If you want an answer then pm me instead of flooding this forum.

couldnt just answer it one more time for me could you? its just judging by this thread it really doesnt seem clear. If the answer is 'no' then no worries, its just me and the other people who have been banned without violating the Ts&Cs would like a bit of clarification on what they can be banned for

We welcome opinions on this forum but what we don't like is the use of abuse to express an opinion.

If people feel they have been abused then report it. If its not reported then it is highly likely nothing will happen there is no guarantee a mod will pick it up.

I would really like for this to be true, i really. But on page one there are pics quoted calling natman blue a red loving, god bothering wank bag. And this was reported. Dont you think by going arround calling natman a dramaqeen you are actually suporting abuse? And when no action is taken on this behavior you are also supporting it?

You think calling someone a drama queen is abuse?

I am pretty sure that was not what i said, but there is no use is there? Like you said, many thing should be up for debate at the end of the season..

Since the overwhelming result i have conducted a little experiment. Only fair to see if the stats on this where actually true?
Natman Blue have received some pretty ugly abuse lately, well, mostly because he differ in opinion. After reading this i made a complaint to the mods, but was rejected since i was not the abused.

Non ban.png

I then tried to criticize some of the mods post, forward way, but not out of line i would say. Surely i got warned not using fowl language posting word like muppet, but clear as day i got banned posting this post actually being abused yet again.

Ban message.png

So i think the morale on the message board is. As long as you support the mods, you can do whatever you want to. But if you dare
stand up to them, your gone. Interesting hmmm

Yours sincerely
Dawyd

Mate, he's spot on. Just look at the thread about the aeroplane. some of that is disgusting and sickening. i've complained to all the mods and made them aware of the thread yet nothing.

I get called all sorts for having a different opinion - nothing

Somebody who supports a different viewpoint used the word muppet - threatened with a ban

I think banning you would be silly, I recommend you try and raise some money for charity or some other worthy cause, How about e4rm......................................f*cking right off

So tell, me though,a s you are proving my point ever so spectacularly. How are you allowed to still pot on this forum yet someone who used the word muppet yesterday is threatened with a ban?

Pot luck?

I guess patience is virtue.. 50% say they have been banned for their opinion. Hard evidence on abuse and political aganda. Lots of unanswered questions, that is boring mods and their faithfull followers. Not showing cardiff city fans much respect is it?

I guess patience is virtue.. 50% say they have been banned for their opinion. Hard evidence on abuse and political aganda. Lots of unanswered questions, that is boring mods and their faithfull followers. Not showing cardiff city fans much respect is it?

Probably because we're not classed as actual fans because we have a different opinion

Would be nice to see how big this problem really is, even though it is a blue forum. And why is Roathie still here?

roathie is contraversial and gets people riled up and gets them posting which means more hits...its the "quiet" ones with opinions that get banned

Although i do like roathie, when he's not arguing about the most pointless of things (which is a lot) he offers a perspective that a lot of blinkered city fans and a lot of bias jacks don't offer. Shame he's just such an arse about it all the time that no one takes his decent points seriously

I agree with this. Roath Magic isn't offensive or abusive. He is forthright and asks difficult questions. Sometimes the truth is difficult to take.

I totally disagree with most of what is said, but as you point out, he gets conversations going. We are living in a democracy and I value our right to certIn freedoms. This forum isn't a despotic regime. We all contribute even if some of the views are totally against my beliefs (BLUE!!!).

Even Crimson Canton makes me smile!

I guess patience is virtue.. 50% say they have been banned for their opinion. Hard evidence on abuse and political aganda. Lots of unanswered questions, that is boring mods and their faithfull followers. Not showing cardiff city fans much respect is it?

Probably because we're not classed as actual fans because we have a different opinion

:D why am I being brought into this?

I just offer a viewpoint from the sensible area of the mind often not tapped into by blinkered fans or indeed biased rivals. Im neither. My posts are always backed up by fact or detailed thoughts, dont name call (if i can resist) and am quite an innovative thinker.

Im an asset, no matter what others like to say or tell you

it,s quite simple mr roath.if people dont want to engage in debate or banter with you they should put you on ignore.personally i dont see the fuss about you if im honest.you just offer a view.no one has to agree or disagree and if they do disagree they certainly dont have to go in to meltdown

Quite right sir

This is exactly the point I made above. I don't need to agree with what you say as long as it is said without offensive language, etc.

I would hate to hear you had been banned even though I often find what you say uncomfortable to accept or just plain wrong in my eyes. This forum would be a mutual back-slapping club or even worse, turn us on ourselves without the likes of you.

Every football game needs an opponent. The best games I have seen have often been between arch rivals. Long may that continue.

Your insights are often very telling and if I'm honest, sometimes I wish I had made the same observations.

:D why am I being brought into this?

I just offer a viewpoint from the sensible area of the mind often not tapped into by blinkered fans or indeed biased rivals. Im neither. My posts are always backed up by fact or detailed thoughts, dont name call (if i can resist) and am quite an innovative thinker.

Im an asset, no matter what others like to say or tell you

I think what he is saying is that you generate the hits and hits equals more income for the boards owner.

I just point out the agendas and ill behaviour without necessarily generating the hits (although done some good work the last few days). Hence why we are more likely to get banned than you. After all, its all about the money!

:D why am I being brought into this?

I just offer a viewpoint from the sensible area of the mind often not tapped into by blinkered fans or indeed biased rivals. Im neither. My posts are always backed up by fact or detailed thoughts, dont name call (if i can resist) and am quite an innovative thinker.

Im an asset, no matter what others like to say or tell you

it,s quite simple mr roath.if people dont want to engage in debate or banter with you they should put you on ignore.personally i dont see the fuss about you if im honest.you just offer a view.no one has to agree or disagree and if they do disagree they certainly dont have to go in to meltdown

Quite right sir

This is exactly the point I made above. I don't need to agree with what you say as long as it is said without offensive language, etc.

I would hate to hear you had been banned even though I often find what you say uncomfortable to accept or just plain wrong in my eyes. This forum would be a mutual back-slapping club or even worse, turn us on ourselves without the likes of you.

Every football game needs an opponent. The best games I have seen have often been between arch rivals. Long may that continue.

Your insights are often very telling and if I'm honest, sometimes I wish I had made the same observations.

Very good of you to say

:D why am I being brought into this?

I just offer a viewpoint from the sensible area of the mind often not tapped into by blinkered fans or indeed biased rivals. Im neither. My posts are always backed up by fact or detailed thoughts, dont name call (if i can resist) and am quite an innovative thinker.

Im an asset, no matter what others like to say or tell you

I think what he is saying is that you generate the hits and hits equals more income for the boards owner.

I just point out the agendas and ill behaviour without necessarily generating the hits (although done some good work the last few days). Hence why we are more likely to get banned than you. After all, its all about the money!

Why is it all about the money when the owner of the board has earned more in his life than any of us on here?

Now here are two agendas with the same target but being executed in a different way. The agendas are too belittle this board but the executions are totally different:

1. I would say RM execution is a lot more clever than NB. RM takes an opportunity, draws out the facts that will support his argument but deliberately pushes aside those articles that go against his plan.

2. NB just basically goes on and on in the hope that he will convince others. Generally one or two will join in with him, usually the same one or two, resulting in them flooding the board and boring the rest of us.

:D why am I being brought into this?

I just offer a viewpoint from the sensible area of the mind often not tapped into by blinkered fans or indeed biased rivals. Im neither. My posts are always backed up by fact or detailed thoughts, dont name call (if i can resist) and am quite an innovative thinker.

Im an asset, no matter what others like to say or tell you

I think what he is saying is that you generate the hits and hits equals more income for the boards owner.

I just point out the agendas and ill behaviour without necessarily generating the hits (although done some good work the last few days). Hence why we are more likely to get banned than you. After all, its all about the money!

Why is it all about the money when the owner of the board has earned more in his life than any of us on here?

Now here are two agendas with the same target but being executed in a different way. The agendas are too belittle this board but the executions are totally different:

1. I would say RM execution is a lot more clever than NB. RM takes an opportunity, draws out the facts that will support his argument but deliberately pushes aside those articles that go against his plan.

2. NB just basically goes on and on in the hope that he will convince others. Generally one or two will join in with him, usually the same one or two, resulting in them flooding the board and boring the rest of us.

Every little helps as Tesco say!

An agenda is usually hidden. My aim is not to belittle this board. What i have done though is point out the hypocrisy of the owner and moderators who like to ban anyone who dare question them on their agendas.

The other thing I stand against is the belittling and abuse of any fan who dare go against that and the other more aggressive posters on this forum.

:D why am I being brought into this?

I just offer a viewpoint from the sensible area of the mind often not tapped into by blinkered fans or indeed biased rivals. Im neither. My posts are always backed up by fact or detailed thoughts, dont name call (if i can resist) and am quite an innovative thinker.

Im an asset, no matter what others like to say or tell you

I think what he is saying is that you generate the hits and hits equals more income for the boards owner.

I just point out the agendas and ill behaviour without necessarily generating the hits (although done some good work the last few days). Hence why we are more likely to get banned than you. After all, its all about the money!

Why is it all about the money when the owner of the board has earned more in his life than any of us on here?

Now here are two agendas with the same target but being executed in a different way. The agendas are too belittle this board but the executions are totally different:

1. I would say RM execution is a lot more clever than NB. RM takes an opportunity, draws out the facts that will support his argument but deliberately pushes aside those articles that go against his plan.

2. NB just basically goes on and on in the hope that he will convince others. Generally one or two will join in with him, usually the same one or two, resulting in them flooding the board and boring the rest of us.

For me there is one agenda. That is for people to have their right to an opinion and not be abused for it. But you are bringning this on your self with the lack of respect you have for cardiff fans. Following this thread makes me angry, and to see you have
no honor to owe up to the discrimination or actual numbers that do not support your behavior. I see several of the original poster do not post anymore, so i can only imagine where they have gone. You should be ashamed of your self calling this thread a flood. look at the numbers voting, saying, and watching. I would read this as a complaint, and you are showing no respect for fans

Last edited by CCFCBEST on Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

:D why am I being brought into this?

I just offer a viewpoint from the sensible area of the mind often not tapped into by blinkered fans or indeed biased rivals. Im neither. My posts are always backed up by fact or detailed thoughts, dont name call (if i can resist) and am quite an innovative thinker.

Im an asset, no matter what others like to say or tell you

I think what he is saying is that you generate the hits and hits equals more income for the boards owner.

I just point out the agendas and ill behaviour without necessarily generating the hits (although done some good work the last few days). Hence why we are more likely to get banned than you. After all, its all about the money!

Why is it all about the money when the owner of the board has earned more in his life than any of us on here?

wouldnt be too sure of that

Now here are two agendas with the same target but being executed in a different way. The agendas are too belittle this board but the executions are totally different:

why on earth would I want to belittle the board? This board is great and have often told those on planetswans that this board is excellent and Annis is a far better site owner than Phil Sumbler, truly mean it too

1. I would say RM execution is a lot more clever than NB. RM takes an opportunity, draws out the facts that will support his argument but deliberately pushes aside those articles that go against his plan.

like what? I give my opinion and back it up - if I dont take on a counter argument, it is generally because I dont agree with it, why would you ban me for that? as you know, i often end up being right anyway.

2. NB just basically goes on and on in the hope that he will convince others. Generally one or two will join in with him, usually the same one or two, resulting in them flooding the board and boring the rest of us.

cant comment on this, don't know enough about the situation, although i dont think anyone should be banned unless they are deliberately acting a plank which im not sure Natman does in fairness to him.

Last edited by Roath_Magic_ on Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

Can we give these boring cunts a section of their own where they can untwist each others knickers in their own space and not bore others please?

Natman shouldn't be banned for loving the red, but he's just a massive hypocrite.

Moans that nobody takes his red view seriously, yet the other day suggested anyone protesting is not real supporter of this club & he's a better one.