Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:35 am
Nuclearblue wrote:Hate to say it and im going to get a lot of abuse but im going to look at the bigger picture here.
To me it has always been Blue before the Prem and if we are to get our identity back then I feel we will have to go down and maybe even stay down to achieve this. The worst thing to happen is we stay up and Tan and his cronies will bring even further re branding.
I think more of our club to put success before the greater good of our club. Its the way i feel that i just cant enjoy this campaign whilst not having our correct colours and badge.
Right rip fook into me
Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:29 am
Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:31 am
mugsy wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Hate to say it and im going to get a lot of abuse but im going to look at the bigger picture here.
To me it has always been Blue before the Prem and if we are to get our identity back then I feel we will have to go down and maybe even stay down to achieve this. The worst thing to happen is we stay up and Tan and his cronies will bring even further re branding.
I think more of our club to put success before the greater good of our club. Its the way i feel that i just cant enjoy this campaign whilst not having our correct colours and badge.
Right rip fook into me
Can't see a big queue of buyers lining up for us as a Championship team!
Mon Mar 10, 2014 12:53 pm
Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:17 pm
Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:28 pm
Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:45 pm
Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:42 pm
crywolf wrote:No point trying to end up like a new Portsmouth. Stay up, enjoy the ride if it goes well, give the mustache guy a toast, and start rioting if results are too poor.
Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:31 pm
soulofthesea wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Not putting you down just pointing out that I did not make it up and that it is a 100% fact unlike the ones that you always seem to put out.
Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:21 pm
Arrow wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:But we could have still been saved until the very last day of the stay of execution.
now I am dealing in facts and you are being hypothetical.
There was nobody else, it was only TG and Tan, as confirmed by Steve Borley.
There were others Craig. Just the likes of Steve Borley did not like the look of it.
Why didn't they step forward then, if you are that sure there were others it wont hurt to name then
Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:14 am
pembroke allan wrote:Arrow wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:But we could have still been saved until the very last day of the stay of execution.
now I am dealing in facts and you are being hypothetical.
There was nobody else, it was only TG and Tan, as confirmed by Steve Borley.
There were others Craig. Just the likes of Steve Borley did not like the look of it.
Why didn't they step forward then, if you are that sure there were others it wont hurt to name then
has far as i have seen not one person even those (ITK) have named any one who wanted to invest at the time of tan &tg, thats why people can say there was others because no one can disprove what they say, so they have an arguement they cannot lose on that basis!!![]()
if they say who it was other people can disprove what they say. simples!!
Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:17 am
Bluebird64 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Arrow wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:But we could have still been saved until the very last day of the stay of execution.
now I am dealing in facts and you are being hypothetical.
There was nobody else, it was only TG and Tan, as confirmed by Steve Borley.
There were others Craig. Just the likes of Steve Borley did not like the look of it.
Why didn't they step forward then, if you are that sure there were others it wont hurt to name then
has far as i have seen not one person even those (ITK) have named any one who wanted to invest at the time of tan &tg, thats why people can say there was others because no one can disprove what they say, so they have an arguement they cannot lose on that basis!!![]()
if they say who it was other people can disprove what they say. simples!!
Or alternatively based on your logic those who are saying there were no investors cannot prove there was absolutely nobody prepared to invest. The club chose Tan and his investment and we cannot change that but by uniting for a return to blue we may be able to change the future.
Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:25 am
Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:30 am
Bluebird64 wrote:I actually discussed this issue at length with TG and can tell you that what you say in not 100% correct so again using your logic how much proof do you need? It's all irrelevant anyway because we accepted Tans investment. We cannot change this but we should now be focused on getting behind the return of our colours and perhaps we may change our future.
Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:48 am
CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:I actually discussed this issue at length with TG and can tell you that what you say in not 100% correct so again using your logic how much proof do you need? It's all irrelevant anyway because we accepted Tans investment. We cannot change this but we should now be focused on getting behind the return of our colours and perhaps we may change our future.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
you just lost what little credibility you had left
I think you just hit the bottom of the barrel saying that
Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:54 am
CraigCCFC wrote:A club director stated there was no other offers. What more proof can you ask for?
Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:55 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:A club director stated there was no other offers. What more proof can you ask for?
A club director also said it was never red or dead.
You didn't need any investors after tan stuck in the £6m. You had enough assets to service the debt into a manageable sum - yet you all decided it was no fun doing that, so took the cash. Not sure how those who did nothing can now complain TWO years down the line just because the team isnt very good.
Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:59 am
CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:I actually discussed this issue at length with TG and can tell you that what you say in not 100% correct so again using your logic how much proof do you need? It's all irrelevant anyway because we accepted Tans investment. We cannot change this but we should now be focused on getting behind the return of our colours and perhaps we may change our future.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
you just lost what little credibility you had left
Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:01 am
CraigCCFC wrote:
Red or dead is a whole year after what we are discussing.
Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:03 am
Pontyclun Blue wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:I actually discussed this issue at length with TG and can tell you that what you say in not 100% correct so again using your logic how much proof do you need? It's all irrelevant anyway because we accepted Tans investment. We cannot change this but we should now be focused on getting behind the return of our colours and perhaps we may change our future.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
you just lost what little credibility you had left
I got to agree with Craig on this![]()
I think you just hit the bottom of the barrel saying that
Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:06 am
Bluebird64 wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:I actually discussed this issue at length with TG and can tell you that what you say in not 100% correct so again using your logic how much proof do you need? It's all irrelevant anyway because we accepted Tans investment. We cannot change this but we should now be focused on getting behind the return of our colours and perhaps we may change our future.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
you just lost what little credibility you had left
I got to agree with Craig on this![]()
I think you just hit the bottom of the barrel saying that
Say what you want but it is true. Actually I found that TG was a very open person who would always answer a straight question when asked.
Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:08 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:A club director stated there was no other offers. What more proof can you ask for?
A club director also said it was never red or dead.
You didn't need any investors after tan stuck in the £6m. You had enough assets to service the debt into a manageable sum - yet you all decided it was no fun doing that, so took the cash. Not sure how those who did nothing can now complain TWO years down the line just because the team isnt very good.
Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:13 am
Bluebird64 wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:I actually discussed this issue at length with TG and can tell you that what you say in not 100% correct so again using your logic how much proof do you need? It's all irrelevant anyway because we accepted Tans investment. We cannot change this but we should now be focused on getting behind the return of our colours and perhaps we may change our future.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
you just lost what little credibility you had left
I got to agree with Craig on this![]()
I think you just hit the bottom of the barrel saying that
Say what you want but it is true. Actually I found that TG was a very open person who would always answer a straight question when asked.
,
Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:17 am
CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:I actually discussed this issue at length with TG and can tell you that what you say in not 100% correct so again using your logic how much proof do you need? It's all irrelevant anyway because we accepted Tans investment. We cannot change this but we should now be focused on getting behind the return of our colours and perhaps we may change our future.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
you just lost what little credibility you had left
I got to agree with Craig on this![]()
I think you just hit the bottom of the barrel saying that
Say what you want but it is true. Actually I found that TG was a very open person who would always answer a straight question when asked.
Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:20 am
Bluebird64 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:I actually discussed this issue at length with TG and can tell you that what you say in not 100% correct so again using your logic how much proof do you need? It's all irrelevant anyway because we accepted Tans investment. We cannot change this but we should now be focused on getting behind the return of our colours and perhaps we may change our future.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
you just lost what little credibility you had left
I got to agree with Craig on this![]()
I think you just hit the bottom of the barrel saying that
Say what you want but it is true. Actually I found that TG was a very open person who would always answer a straight question when asked.
No need to keep digging at all what I have stated is true. If you send me a PM I will inform you and your disbelieving friend Craig of the event that I attended and even who was sitting next to me and photographs of the event if needed. It may come as a shock but some fans do actually get to speak to owners and directors and sometimes they even answer questions as well.
Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:21 am
Bluebird64 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:I actually discussed this issue at length with TG and can tell you that what you say in not 100% correct so again using your logic how much proof do you need? It's all irrelevant anyway because we accepted Tans investment. We cannot change this but we should now be focused on getting behind the return of our colours and perhaps we may change our future.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
you just lost what little credibility you had left
I got to agree with Craig on this![]()
I think you just hit the bottom of the barrel saying that
Say what you want but it is true. Actually I found that TG was a very open person who would always answer a straight question when asked.
No need to keep digging at all what I have stated is true. If you send me a PM I will inform you and your disbelieving friend Craig of the event that I attended and even who was sitting next to me and photographs of the event if needed. It may come as a shock but some fans do actually get to speak to owners and directors and sometimes they even answer questions as well.
Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:22 am
Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:23 am
Pontyclun Blue wrote:
You keep harping on about just because your team isn't very good, at this present moment in time the jacks are only 4pts ahead of us okay you got a game in hand but you still got to win that, as we all know strange things happen at this time of the season you lot are not quite safe yet
come off it, you cant even compare. Since Monk has taken over he has the best points pr game ratio of any previous Swans manager in the Premier League. To play the amount of games we have played, participate in a successful European campaign and be 2 points from 10th is remarkable. With WBA next im sure we will be there or there abouts.Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:27 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:
You keep harping on about just because your team isn't very good, at this present moment in time the jacks are only 4pts ahead of us okay you got a game in hand but you still got to win that, as we all know strange things happen at this time of the season you lot are not quite safe yet
come off it, you cant even compare. Since Monk has taken over he has the best points pr game ratio of any previous Swans manager in the Premier League. To play the amount of games we have played and be 2 points from 10th is remarkable. With WBA next im sure we will be there or there abouts.
But back to the point, the quality of our side doesnt come into it. We have nothing to complain about, we own a large % of the club.
Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:36 am
Bluebird64 wrote:No not the players awards but if you PM me then I will furnish you with further details.