WHY MALKY HAD TO GO

So you lied about me doubling the points. Not like you, Roathie.

Like how you state we would have gone down if Malky stayed. All fictional and pointless.

Regardless, both had/have the clubs interests at heart.

Guess results are more important.... ..........

Its an opinion, in resonse to other opinion, and presented with statistic and logic.

Its anything but pointless.

Ye like me saying Mackay shouldnt have been sacked.

But couldnt back it up with any logic

Cheers you f*cking spastic.

I've said why plenty of times.

Oooo look a post that some people agree with, what logic, revolutionary

Put that on the top of your CV.

Last edited by Willy-Wonka on Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Cheers you f*cking spastic.

I've said why plenty of times.

So you lied about me doubling the points. Not like you, Roathie.

Im just going to repost that because you are either really simple or just to pig headed to read my post.

No one mentioned doubling points - but if you are stating Malky should have been sacked because of his league record in the first half of the season then you are disregarding any possibility that we would have improved as a team and the ratios & results would be the same throughout the season under Malky... in a nutshell doubling the points

So no lies there.

And you cannot label everyone who can give an articulate opinion/argument as Roathie...

So you lied about me doubling the points. Not like you, Roathie.

Im just going to repost that because you are either really simple or just to pig headed to read my post.

No one mentioned doubling points - but if you are stating Malky should have been sacked because of his league record in the first half of the season then you are disregarding any possibility that we would have improved as a team and the ratios & results would be the same throughout the season under Malky... in a nutshell doubling the points

So no lies there.

And you cannot label everyone who can give an articulate opinion/argument as Roathie...

You mentioned it in your first response so you lied. There is no "in a nutshell", there was no suggestion we would double our points by me, I didnt know where our next meaningful goal was coming from let alone 3 points,

I believe he had to go by what I seen my own eyes and the stats back it up. We were getting progessively worse, and showing no sign of improvement.

We couldnt score, didnt look like scoring, and couldnt keep them out the other end. Simple mathmatics really,

So you lied about me doubling the points. Not like you, Roathie.

Im just going to repost that because you are either really simple or just to pig headed to read my post.

No one mentioned doubling points - but if you are stating Malky should have been sacked because of his league record in the first half of the season then you are disregarding any possibility that we would have improved as a team and the ratios & results would be the same throughout the season under Malky... in a nutshell doubling the points

So no lies there.

And you cannot label everyone who can give an articulate opinion/argument as Roathie...

You mentioned it in your first response so you lied. There is no "in a nutshell", there was no suggestion we would double our points by me, I didnt know where our next meaningful goal was coming from let alone 3 points,

I believe he had to go by what I seen my own eyes and the stats back it up. We were getting progessively worse, and showing no sign of improvement.

We couldnt score, didnt look like scoring, and couldnt keep them out the other end. Simple mathmatics really,

Again you failed to actually read the post...

"you're stats are for the first half of the season leading up to the January transfer window - its not as simple as just doubling the points"

At what point did I quote you on that? Using stats for first half of the season with no consideration to the fact that the second half of the season might be different.. You might as well just double the points

Although I'm glad you have stopped with personal insults now. You come across much better

Quoted me and started the post " Youre" indicating you were addressing me.

"Its not as simple as doubling the points" suggesting thats what I was doing.

"Doubling the points in a nutshell" again suggesting thats what I was doing.

Both incorrect as qualified in my previous post

So not only a liar but also jumping in and making incorrect judgements.

Both terrible traits.

Give it 3-4 months, you'll all be saying Polo was right again and the circus will go full circle. Laughable the fans on here.

Polo: Malky's football is too negative. The stats prove it and Cornelius is rubbish.

Bluebird1977: I agree, as a customer I should expect more than this I want to be entertained FFS.

Malky's Online Army: OMFG HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT??? OMG THAT IS A DISGRACE HE GOT US PROMOTED. CORNELIUS WILL COME GOOD AFTER 2 MORE GAMES.

2 months later

Polo: Told you the stats don't lie. The football is too negative. Malky needs to go.

Bluebird1977 at half time: This is ridiculous. More hoof ball up to Campbell again. I want to be entertained.

Malky's Online Army: OMG WE JUST BEAT LIKE MAN CITY 3-2 AND YOU SAY THIS YOU PLASTIC TAN APOLOGIST!!!

4 months later

Vincent Tan has sacked manager Malky Mackay. Solskjaer has been appointed manager.

Polo: He deserved the sack and now maybe we'll attack more.

Bluebird1977: Cant be any worse than the hoof ball we've already soon. Wheres the bum and boobs thread?

Malky's Online Army: You're right we're playing better football under Solskjaer now. I can already see the changes and Polo you were right. Cornelius was a waste of money and you were right it was a terrible transfer deal.....BUT HOW CAN YOU SAY BRAYFORD WAS A BAD DEAL AND MALKY WAS TERRIBLE IN THE TRANSFER MARKET? OMG YOU MUST BE TAN IN DISGUISE OR SOMETHING.

-----

Thats basically whats happened. Polo always gets proved right in the end.

It's a bit rich for you to criticise those who support Malky, James - you had an account dedicated to him!

It's a bit rich for you to criticise those who support Malky, James - you had an account dedicated to him!

I also had an account dedicated to Wiz Khalifa. Doesn't mean I like his music.

It's a bit rich for you to criticise those who support Malky, James - you had an account dedicated to him!

Theres supporting Malky and there is burying your head in the sand.

To claim Brayford was not a disaster of a signing is just laughable.

Between 2/3m wasted on fee and wages and he was bombed out before a ball was kicked.

It's a bit rich for you to criticise those who support Malky, James - you had an account dedicated to him!

I also had an account dedicated to Wiz Khalifa. Doesn't mean I like his music.

"Malky is my God"

It's a bit rich for you to criticise those who support Malky, James - you had an account dedicated to him!

Theres supporting Malky and there is burying your head in the sand.

To claim Brayford was not a disaster of a signing is just laughable.

Between 2/3m wasted on fee and wages and he was bombed out before a ball was kicked.

Not a disaster, no. It was a gamble & a justified gamble. Sadly, it didn't pay off. His only "disasterous" signing was Cornelius, in my eyes.

Big difference between a bad signing and a disasterous signing.

It's a bit rich for you to criticise those who support Malky, James - you had an account dedicated to him!

Theres supporting Malky and there is burying your head in the sand.

To claim Brayford was not a disaster of a signing is just laughable.

Between 2/3m wasted on fee and wages and he was bombed out before a ball was kicked.

Not a disaster, no. It was a gamble & a justified gamble. Sadly, it didn't pay off. His only "disasterous" signing was Cornelius, in my eyes.

Big difference between a bad signing and a disasterous signing.

How can it be a justified gamble when he didnt kick a ball in the premier league?

There was no gamble, they knew what they were getting, its not like he was an unknown quantity.

A "bad" signing does not do it justice.

Give it 3-4 months, you'll all be saying Polo was right again and the circus will go full circle. Laughable the fans on here.

Polo: Malky's football is too negative. The stats prove it and Cornelius is rubbish.

Bluebird1977: I agree, as a customer I should expect more than this I want to be entertained FFS.

Malky's Online Army: OMFG HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT??? OMG THAT IS A DISGRACE HE GOT US PROMOTED. CORNELIUS WILL COME GOOD AFTER 2 MORE GAMES.

2 months later

Polo: Told you the stats don't lie. The football is too negative. Malky needs to go.

Bluebird1977 at half time: This is ridiculous. More hoof ball up to Campbell again. I want to be entertained.

Malky's Online Army: OMG WE JUST BEAT LIKE MAN CITY 3-2 AND YOU SAY THIS YOU PLASTIC TAN APOLOGIST!!!

4 months later

Vincent Tan has sacked manager Malky Mackay. Solskjaer has been appointed manager.

Polo: He deserved the sack and now maybe we'll attack more.

Bluebird1977: Cant be any worse than the hoof ball we've already soon. Wheres the bum and boobs thread?

Malky's Online Army: You're right we're playing better football under Solskjaer now. I can already see the changes and Polo you were right. Cornelius was a waste of money and you were right it was a terrible transfer deal.....BUT HOW CAN YOU SAY BRAYFORD WAS A BAD DEAL AND MALKY WAS TERRIBLE IN THE TRANSFER MARKET? OMG YOU MUST BE TAN IN DISGUISE OR SOMETHING.

-----

Thats basically whats happened. Polo always gets proved right in the end.

You don't seem to understand that you are the only people that appear fickle and plastic. We are defending a manager that got us promoted for the first time in Cardiff's history to the premier league, you are defending a guy who has been in charge for a month.

As I said earlier, both are trying to do what is best for the club.

The only reason you bring up Mackay is to defend Ole, when he doesn't need defending as he is only 3 games in.

The dragging of malkys legacy through the dirt is so unnecessary, that is the reason why there is a 'malky army'.

Call him defensive or whatever, say he wasted some of our money but I can't believe some are completely dismissing his achievements for the club.

The Malky era has moments that won't be beaten ever, like Charlton at home. How long ago does that feel?.

Last edited by Willy-Wonka on Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

"Malky is my God"

Just proved you're an absolute liar as well Chuckles. You said in a thread before you wouldn't bring up things that have already gone in future debates yet you have done. Nothing but a liar Mr Clarke.

Also, I have many accounts on here so I wouldn't take the names of them to heart. Laughable that you have. I couldn't care less really. Theres appreciating what Malky has done and then there's blindly defending every single thing he does regardless of what he's done. Sorry, but you have to be subjective.

How can it be a justified gamble when he didnt kick a ball in the premier league?

There was no gamble, they knew what they were getting, its not like he was an unknown quantity.

A "bad" signing does not do it justice.

Quite clearly a justified gamble, seeing as he was highly rated for his play in the Championship for the past two seasons & the fact that in terms of premiership transfers, it hardly broke the bank.

Bad signing covers it perfectly for me. Certainly, no disaster in my opinion.

How can it be a justified gamble when he didnt kick a ball in the premier league?

There was no gamble, they knew what they were getting, its not like he was an unknown quantity.

A "bad" signing does not do it justice.

Quite clearly a justified gamble, seeing as he was highly rated for his play in the Championship for the past two seasons & the fact that in terms of premiership transfers, it hardly broke the bank.

Bad signing covers it perfectly for me. Certainly, no disaster in my opinion.

Hardly broke the bank

Easy to say when its not your money.

Im not sure Tan would agree, might as well set light to 3m quid.

Cost more per game than Cornelius did.

How can it be a justified gamble when he didnt kick a ball in the premier league?

There was no gamble, they knew what they were getting, its not like he was an unknown quantity.

A "bad" signing does not do it justice.

Quite clearly a justified gamble, seeing as he was highly rated for his play in the Championship for the past two seasons & the fact that in terms of premiership transfers, it hardly broke the bank.

Bad signing covers it perfectly for me. Certainly, no disaster in my opinion.

Hardly broke the bank

Easy to say when its not your money.

Im not sure Tan would agree, might as well set light to 3m quid.

Cost more per game than Cornelius did.

Of course it's a vast sum of money to ordinary folk, but for a gamble, comparing to the vast sums of money spent in the premier league, it didn't break the bank. There are plenty of managers who have wasted much more money on much bigger transfers in the premier league.

Bad transfer, not a disaster in my opinion.

You don't seem to understand that you are the only people that appear fickle and plastic. We are defending a manager that got us promoted for the first time in Cardiff's history to the premier league, you are defending a guy who has been in charge for a month.

Wrong Willy Plonka. You're defending Malky. Im giving the opinion of what is best of the club. Managers mean next to nothing to me. Disposable staff who get a wage. If they perform and do right by the club and meet the required objectives they stay. If they don't then adios amigo.

As I said earlier, both are trying to do what is best for the club.

No. You're bringing it up to defend Malky even though he's gone Willy Plonka.

The only reason you bring up Mackay is to defend Ole, when he doesn't need defending as he is only 3 games in.

No. The reason I bring up Malky is because his disciples like you keep running around the forum saying 'under Malky we would have stayed up'. Malky's gone. Get over it. Its the club that matters. I have no attachment to managers. I care for and support the club. Malky's gone. Its done and dusted... Well it would be if his merry men didn't keep running around the forum 24/7 claiming he's the next prophet.

The dragging of malkys legacy through the dirt is so unnecessary, that is the reason why there is a 'malky army'.

Nonsense. You started the moment he was on the verge of being sacked so cut the shit. You still haven't rioted or caused a fuss and I'm glad because I don't condone such behaviour but you're all full of shit. You claim you're going to do this and that then Tan does it, calls your bluff and you all look like lost sheep. WHAT HAVE YOU DONE? Nothing. Keep singing but no one cares. The club is all that matters. Not managers. Do we still sing about Lennie Lawrence? No. He took us up to the Championship from the depths of English football. Why not chant about Lennie? Why not chant about DJ who stabilised our club in times of hardship on the brink of many financial issues? Because none of them provided you with a fist pump.

Call him defensive or whatever, say he wasted some of our money but I can't believe some are completely dismiss his achievements for the club.

Its annoying Malky apologists and disciples like yourself that run around the forum and won't let go that are doing him dishonour. The more you keep talking about him the more we have to refute and argue with you about the bad parts of Malky's era in retort to your constant bullshit. If you let it drop and stopped your Malky agenda then we wouldnt have nothing to respond to. We would just keep supporting the club.

The Malky era has moments that won't be beaten ever, like Charlton at home. How long ago does that feel?.

Agreed so do us a favour Willy Plonka and give it a rest. Let us remember Malky for the good that he did and just because we mention the bad doesn't mean we don't appreciate him taking us up. We're just realists who don't feel the need to put tongue to arse every breathing second.

Don't see where 3 million comes from either. Transfer fee was reported as 1.5 million.

Quoted me and started the post " Youre" indicating you were addressing me.

"Its not as simple as doubling the points" suggesting thats what I was doing.

"Doubling the points in a nutshell" again suggesting thats what I was doing.

Both incorrect as qualified in my previous post

So not only a liar but also jumping in and making incorrect judgements.

Both terrible traits.

"You're" as in the stats you provided and "in a nutshell" is correct your page of stats indicates that based on previous averages goals scored, goals against, points gained that we are mathematically likely to repeat the same next season therefore... Double the point

You need to learn the definition of liar and as for jumping in and making incorrect judgements... This is a open forum so there is no "jumping in" I can post when and where I want

Incorrect conclusions? I have made my opinions and commented on your posts - it's the viewers perceptions - not the artists intentions which are usually correct and my perception of your stats post is simples down to "doubling the points" that's all your arguments worth to me and seemingly others on the forum

If you want to make a point argue it - rather than resort to name calling and an offensive attitude

How can it be a justified gamble when he didnt kick a ball in the premier league?

There was no gamble, they knew what they were getting, its not like he was an unknown quantity.

A "bad" signing does not do it justice.

Quite clearly a justified gamble, seeing as he was highly rated for his play in the Championship for the past two seasons & the fact that in terms of premiership transfers, it hardly broke the bank.

Bad signing covers it perfectly for me. Certainly, no disaster in my opinion.

Hardly broke the bank

Easy to say when its not your money.

Im not sure Tan would agree, might as well set light to 3m quid.

Cost more per game than Cornelius did.

Of course it's a vast sum of money to ordinary folk, but for a gamble, comparing to the vast sums of money spent in the premier league, it didn't break the bank. There are plenty of managers who have wasted much more money on much bigger transfers in the premier league.

Bad transfer, not a disaster in my opinion.

Theres not many who blew what he did in their first season as a promoted club on such awful, inept signings.

Polo, Alex is just being pedantic.

Polo, Alex is just being pedantic.

No he isn't, he's just giving his opinion. That is allowed on here.

"You're" as in the stats you provided and "in a nutshell" is correct your page of stats indicates that based on previous averages goals scored, goals against, points gained that we are mathematically likely to repeat the same next season therefore... Double the
points next season.
.

Incorrect conclusions? I have made my opinions and commented on your posts - it's the viewers perceptions - not the artists intentions which are usually correct and my perception of your stats post is simples down to "doubling the points" that's all your arguments worth to me and seemingly others on the forum

Next season? If we repeat the same next season we will have the same points not double What the f**k next season got to do with it I dont know

Your arrogance knows no boundaries, you have incorrectly assumed my reason for wanting him gone, which I have already qualified my reasoning with logic,

So that's what the riot never happened then ? You were all turn coats.

Don't sack Mackay ... Malky Mackay !!!

Lol .... No wonder u all sold out to the red shirt you turn coats.

Best laugh is ...... Not one comment regards the pressure MM was under in relation to working under Tan with fractured relationship , meanwhile your decent ever director Borley stating " best ever cardiff manager "

Personally I think your all a bunch of double headed key board cunts

So that's what the riot never happened then ? You were all turn coats.

Don't sack Mackay ... Malky Mackay !!!

Lol .... No wonder u all sold out to the red shirt you turn coats.

Best laugh is ...... Not one comment regards the pressure MM was under in relation to working under Tan with fractured relationship , meanwhile your decent ever director Borley stating " best ever cardiff manager "

Personally I think your all a bunch of double headed key board cunts

Never once sang that song thank you very much.

No turning here either his footbalk was always zzzzzz and my feelings on it are well documented

In fairness to Mario, he has been against Mackay for a long time - it's not a recent change of opinion.