Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:17 pm

Not me sad boy! Try banning Townhill Magic! It is not me! Work it out bright boy!

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:20 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:Not me sad boy! Try banning Townhill Magic! It is not me! Work it out bright boy!


Spoken like a true intellectual :lol:

Now then, do you have anything of value to discuss regarding football Martyn? :laughing6:

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:32 pm

I have lots to discuss about football, I have been watching and lying the game before you were a gamete in the testes of a man who looked for a mate in an arrow gene pool.
You don't want to debate, you wan to hector people. So eager to impress you are superior! However, recently you have shown you are not an intellectual! Hence, so desperate to ridicule people who are simply more clever. Your French is inferior, your attempt to use gluons to justify your science almost pitiful! It is still making me laugh! Have you found a compound of Helium yet? Your mathematical skills inaccurate and painfully embarrassing.
Let's talk football! Why are Swansea so poor? Dembele and Bentaleb did not boreal sweat against the Jack midfield, Bony was a isolated threat! He does not have the pace to threaten beyond the the back four, not Spurs best asset. Your back four is disorganised and your cheap Spanish imports have no courage for the scrap!
Discuss!

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:42 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:I have lots to discuss about football, I have been watching and lying the game before you were a gamete in the testes of a man who looked for a mate in an arrow gene pool.

how true :lol: so now you are claiming to know how old I am? By working out you were watching football before i was born, woudnt have to be accurate considering its mathematics? How ironic. :lol:

You don't want to debate, you wan to hector people. So eager to impress you are superior! However, recently you have shown you are not an intellectual! Hence, so desperate to ridicule people who are simply more clever.

"more clever" :lol: its like talking to Rio Ferdinand ffs.

Listen im here to talk football, if you want to as well then we will get on fine. However when you turn every post i make to a post about my private life or me in general then you arent really showing the traits of a man here to discuss football.


Your French is inferior, your attempt to use gluons to justify your science almost pitiful! It is still making me laugh! Have you found a compound of Helium yet? Your mathematical skills inaccurate and painfully embarrassing.

your football knowledge is terrible, your grammar is awful, your inability to talk football so pick on other things irrelevant to the point is painfully embarrassing. Have you made a post not about me yet?

Let's talk football! Why are Swansea so poor? Dembele and Bentaleb did not boreal sweat against the Jack midfield, Bony was a isolated threat! He does not have the pace to threaten beyond the the back four, not Spurs best asset. Your back four is disorganised and your cheap Spanish imports have no courage for the scrap!

with pleasure. I dont think Swansea are poor. I dont know who Bemtaleb is or what boreal sweat is? The rest id just hurling insults at the swansea back 4.now to you have something genuinely discussion-able?


Discuss!

would love to :thumbup:

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:47 pm

Bentaleb is the Spurs midfield player, only 20, who did not break sweat against your midfield yesterday! He strolled through the game, no pressure of him.
Top ten premier league Jacks? I don't think so!

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:49 pm

How old are you then anonymous, match fixing, super Swans supporter? Ever played the game I love? I doubt it!

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:53 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:Bentaleb is the Spurs midfield player, only 20, who did not break sweat against your midfield yesterday! He strolled through the game, no pressure of him.
Top ten premier league Jacks? I don't think so!


Ah excellent, probably why he plays for Spurs then? :D

Yes the jacks are a top 10 side. :thumbup:

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:54 pm

The table does not lie! Your mathematics is really poor!

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:54 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:How old are you then anonymous, match fixing, super Swans supporter? Ever played the game I love? I doubt it!


Are you saying I fix matches :shock:

Surely you know how old I am for your sum to be correct no? Or have you proven to be a contradictive obsessor?

Yes ive played, you? :lol:

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:55 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:The table does not lie! Your mathematics is really poor!


your mathematics is really poor :lol: Okay Rio :lol:

The table doesnt lie you are correct. And after the last set of 38 games Swansea were 9th :thumbup:

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:56 pm

I bet you are crap! Most sad boys are!
The fun is thus will make you bite! I'm off to bed weirdo!

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:00 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:I bet you are crap! Most sad boys are!
The fun is thus will make you bite! I'm off to bed weirdo!


Not a successful betting man the Martyn? :lol:

Thus or this? Come on thats too easy :lol:

Enjoy your single bed next to your Roathie poster :laughing6:

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:03 pm

Jacks a top ten side... Never heard of anything so ridiculous. :laughing6:

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:04 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:Jacks a top ten side... Never heard of anything so ridiculous. :laughing6:


Yep they are. Just as Man United are champions.

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:08 pm

Yes, champions of the previous season. They aren't the champions of this season.

Just like Swansea are a top 10 side of last season & not currently a top 10 side this season.

Going by your ridiculous theory, you would describe Wigan, Reading & QPR still as premiership sides.

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:10 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:Yes, champions of the previous season. They aren't the champions of this season.

exactly because this season hasnt been decided yet, they ,ay well retain it.

Just like Swansea are a top 10 side of last season & not currently a top 10 side this season.

we are not currently in the top 10 no. But we are a top 10 side. That wont change until we finish outside the top 10.

Going by your ridiculous theory, you would describe Wigan, Reading & QPR still as premiership sides.

nope because they got relegated. They are the relegated premiership sides. :thumbup:

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:11 pm

You aren't currently a top 10 side. To claim otherwise would be ludicrous.

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:12 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:You aren't currently a top 10 side. To claim otherwise would be ludicrous.


We are not currently in the top 10.

But we are a top 10 side.

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:13 pm

Stats say otherwise.

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:14 pm

This is pitiful! Someone ease his misery! There is no accolade for finishing 9th. Champions is a title, earned by finishing first, it is a historical feat that has been accomplished
. Swansea are not a current top ten team! End of story! Another bit of mathematics you don't understand?

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:15 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:Stats say otherwise.


No they dont. The stats say the last finishing positions saw us 9th.

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:16 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:This is pitiful! Someone ease his misery! There is no accolade for finishing 9th. Champions is a title, earned by finishing first, it is a historical feat that has been accomplished
. Swansea are not a current top ten team! End of story! Another bit of mathematics you don't understand?


:thumbup:

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:17 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:This is pitiful! Someone ease his misery! There is no accolade for finishing 9th. Champions is a title, earned by finishing first, it is a historical feat that has been accomplished
. Swansea are not a current top ten team! End of story! Another bit of mathematics you don't understand?


Is there no end to your obsession :lol:

You dont need an accolade. Do you get an accolade for being top 4? No.... Yet Man City are a top 4 side.

It has nothing to do with mathematics or guesstimates Martyn. We finished 9th so we are a top 10 side.

Simple really. :thumbup:

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:17 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
beddaubluebird wrote:This is pitiful! Someone ease his misery! There is no accolade for finishing 9th. Champions is a title, earned by finishing first, it is a historical feat that has been accomplished
. Swansea are not a current top ten team! End of story! Another bit of mathematics you don't understand?


:thumbup:


:thumbup:

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:18 pm

Castro wrote:You dont need an accolade. Do you get an accolade for being top 4? No.... Yet Man City are a top 4 side.

It has nothing to do with mathematics or guesstimates Martyn. We finished 9th so we are a top 10 side.

Simple really. :thumbup:


Because Man City are currently in the top 4.

Manchester Utd are not currently a top 4 side.

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:20 pm

It is simple only to the simple! Most of us clever people simply look at the table! Manchester United might be champions but they are not a top,four team. It is quite logical,except to the desperate! :lol:

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:23 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:It is simple only to the simple! Most of us clever people simply look at the table! Manchester United might be champions but they are not a top,four team. It is quite logical,except to the desperate! :lol:


Nope im afraid you are wrong. Its a simple concept to those who have the ability to grasp it. You have a history of not being able grasp simple concepts? Remember your food?

The table is at its most accurate after each set of 38 games. Thats when you accolades are handed out and that when clubs receive their final rankings.

The last set of 38 games saw us 9th which makes us a top 10 side.

If you wish to disagree then be my guest :lol:

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:26 pm

Are you insulating that I am disabled again? Please make that insidious sneer absolutely clear please!

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:26 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
Castro wrote:You dont need an accolade. Do you get an accolade for being top 4? No.... Yet Man City are a top 4 side.

It has nothing to do with mathematics or guesstimates Martyn. We finished 9th so we are a top 10 side.

Simple really. :thumbup:


Because Man City are currently in the top 4.

Manchester Utd are not currently a top 4 side.


Nothing to do with current positions.

Man united are a top 4 side too... Until they finish outside the top 4 that is :thumbup:

Re: Malky Lovers

Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:28 pm

beddaubluebird wrote:Are you insulating that I am disabled again? Please make that insidious sneer absolutely clear please!


Again? :lol:

Im insinuating you cant grasp simple concepts... Ironically like this one :lol:

Why are you not in bed? Or are you obsessing over me while you are in bed, thats an uncomfortable thought. Do you have a wife? Do you talk to her about me? Is it affecting your home life? It must be :shock: