Tan's business masterstroke?

Check your own spelling genius!

Check your own spelling genius!

284 out of 290

Getting desperate! What if we catch you next week?
Edit when you can please!

Getting desperate! What if we catch you next week?
Edit when you can please!

You certainly are, ive never witnessed such madness over the internet and ive had conversations with Swansealad

What if we win the league this year?

The fact you are even attrmpting to compare a perennial substitute Ole Gunnar Solskjaer to Michael Laudrup is terrifying

Castro while OGS can't be compared to M. Laudrup in terms of playing ability etc. in terms of how well known both of them are then OGS can be compared. The EPL is broadcast in 220 territories, by 80 broadcasters to 643m households every week, whereas La Liga only reached a cumulative audience for the 2011/12 season of 235m for the whole season. The EPL has a global audience which raises the profile of players, whereas La Liga is mainly a Spanish audience plus a bit of interest from a few Spanish speaking countries.

It really doesn't matter. Its like comparing Michael Laudrup with Jimmy Ffloyd Hasselbaink. One had more TV exposure however the other is much better known. Hes up there with Zidane - who also didnt play in the premier league remember.

It does matter as the post is about Marketing the club and as OGS has had more media exposure through the far greater audience of the EPL, then he is more well known and is a positive business masterstroke by VT. Your initial argument about M. Laudrup's playing ability was irrelevant as it is media exposure which is the key to marketing. This is why people who are NOBODY'S with no talent can become famous on reality TV and hence make a lot of money.

It wasnt my argument. It was my reply to his argument that Solskjaer was more successful so would get more fans. That os nonsense.

Pele got less exposure than Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink. Ask the world who they know more. Same goes with Laudrup. Solskjaer wasnt even a star ayer for United let aline the Premier League.

Do you think Ipswich has hoardes of fans and world wide exposure because Roy Keane was their manager (5 times the player of Solskjaer).

Ipswich are not in the EPL and while Keane was arguably a better player it is doubtful that he had as much media exposure, as OGS scored almost 200 more goals than him in his career (260 as opposed to 66) and goals get headlines.

You dont think Roy Keane had as much media exposure as OGS?!

Roy Keane is one if the most talked about and written about football players the Premier League has ever seen.

Thismis pie imnthe sky stuff, it really is.

unbelievable isnt?the same roy keane ogs made captain of his best 1-11 he played with and the same roy keane who had more exposure for quitting a world cup than most players will recieve in a lifetime x20.never mind all his achievements .
i,like yrself think ogs is a great appointment for ccfc.the potential for him and ccfc to grow/do well is massive.one thing iv noticed tonight is the ccfc fans getting excited because ogs has good contacts/history /media image.if tan messes this one up and shafts ogs someway or another then surely this will result in bad publicity for the club?i dont get this any publitity is good publitity-ask gerrard ratner.

It wasnt my argument. It was my reply to his argument that Solskjaer was more successful so would get more fans. That os
unbelievable isnt?the same roy keane ogs made captain of his best 1-11 he played with and the same roy keane who had more exposure for quitting a world cup than most players will recieve in a lifetime x20.never mind all his achievements .
i,like yrself think ogs is a great appointment for ccfc.the potential for him and ccfc to grow/do well is massive.one thing iv noticed tonight is the ccfc fans getting excited because ogs has good contacts/history /media image.if tan messes this one up and shafts ogs someway or another then surely this will result in bad publicity for the club?i dont get this any publitity is good publitity-ask gerrard ratner.

This thread continues to stagger me mate. Next they will be saying Ian Wright would be a great manager addition because hes famous and scored a fair few in the Prem.

Solskjaer was a substitute for most of his career, was very rarely in the papers or news on a regular basis. Its like overnight they have turned him into a Premier League and world wide superstar that people cant get enough of

It wasnt my argument. It was my reply to his argument that Solskjaer was more successful so would get more fans. That os
unbelievable isnt?the same roy keane ogs made captain of his best 1-11 he played with and the same roy keane who had more exposure for quitting a world cup than most players will recieve in a lifetime x20.never mind all his achievements .
i,like yrself think ogs is a great appointment for ccfc.the potential for him and ccfc to grow/do well is massive.one thing iv noticed tonight is the ccfc fans getting excited because ogs has good contacts/history /media image.if tan messes this one up and shafts ogs someway or another then surely this will result in bad publicity for the club?i dont get this any publitity is good publitity-ask gerrard ratner.

This thread continues to stagger me mate. Next they will be saying Ian Wright would be a great manager addition because hes famous and scored a fair few in the Prem.

Solskjaer was a substitute for most of his career, was very rarely in the papers or news on a regular basis. Its like overnight they have turned him into a Premier League and world wide superstar that people cant get enough of

This is what I've been on about all along, look at the amount of support he still gets....

http://www.redcafe.net/threads/ole-gunnar-solskjærs-managing-career-now-cardiff-manager.342713/page-9

Man united are like that.nthey still sing "keano". But Ipswich and Sunderland arent their second teams and gained worldwide support as a result and Roy Keane as has been mentioned was five times the player, 10 times the more popular and 100 times more famous.

Your spelling is atrocious!

Your spelling is atrocious!

thats like Dawn French calling Lenny Henry fat

You would probably know as you don't move out of your closet!

You would probably know as you don't move out of your closet!

I wouldnt know what?

What it is like to be a benthic organism!

What it is like to be a benthic organism!

christ you are strange!

Genuine question! Do you not understand it?
Or are you going to squeal?

Genuine question! Do you not understand it?
Or are you going to squeal?

So you are asking me what its like to live at the bottom of the seas living off dead organisms?

Je-sus

Isnt it like 1.30am there ffs

The fact you are even attrmpting to compare a perennial substitute Ole Gunnar Solskjaer to Michael Laudrup is terrifying

Castro while OGS can't be compared to M. Laudrup in terms of playing ability etc. in terms of how well known both of them are then OGS can be compared. The EPL is broadcast in 220 territories, by 80 broadcasters to 643m households every week, whereas La Liga only reached a cumulative audience for the 2011/12 season of 235m for the whole season. The EPL has a global audience which raises the profile of players, whereas La Liga is mainly a Spanish audience plus a bit of interest from a few Spanish speaking countries.

It really doesn't matter. Its like comparing Michael Laudrup with Jimmy Ffloyd Hasselbaink. One had more TV exposure however the other is much better known. Hes up there with Zidane - who also didnt play in the premier league remember.

It does matter as the post is about Marketing the club and as OGS has had more media exposure through the far greater audience of the EPL, then he is more well known and is a positive business masterstroke by VT. Your initial argument about M. Laudrup's playing ability was irrelevant as it is media exposure which is the key to marketing. This is why people who are NOBODY'S with no talent can become famous on reality TV and hence make a lot of money.

It wasnt my argument. It was my reply to his argument that Solskjaer was more successful so would get more fans. That os nonsense.

Pele got less exposure than Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink. Ask the world who they know more. Same goes with Laudrup. Solskjaer wasnt even a star ayer for United let aline the Premier League.

Do you think Ipswich has hoardes of fans and world wide exposure because Roy Keane was their manager (5 times the player of Solskjaer).

Ipswich are not in the EPL and while Keane was arguably a better player it is doubtful that he had as much media exposure, as OGS scored almost 200 more goals than him in his career (260 as opposed to 66) and goals get headlines.

You dont think Roy Keane had as much media exposure as OGS?!

Roy Keane is one if the most talked about and written about football players the Premier League has ever seen.

Thismis pie imnthe sky stuff, it really is.

If Keane is more talked about, how do you explain that when you google both names there are 7,990,000 results for Keane and 27,900,000 results for OGS, or to put it another way about 1,000,000 more results for every extra 10 goals that OGS scored. You keep to your subjective comments and I'll keep to the statistical facts!

The fact you are even attrmpting to compare a perennial substitute Ole Gunnar Solskjaer to Michael Laudrup is terrifying

Castro while OGS can't be compared to M. Laudrup in terms of playing ability etc. in terms of how well known both of them are then OGS can be compared. The EPL is broadcast in 220 territories, by 80 broadcasters to 643m households every week, whereas La Liga only reached a cumulative audience for the 2011/12 season of 235m for the whole season. The EPL has a global audience which raises the profile of players, whereas La Liga is mainly a Spanish audience plus a bit of interest from a few Spanish speaking countries.

It really doesn't matter. Its like comparing Michael Laudrup with Jimmy Ffloyd Hasselbaink. One had more TV exposure however the other is much better known. Hes up there with Zidane - who also didnt play in the premier league remember.

It does matter as the post is about Marketing the club and as OGS has had more media exposure through the far greater audience of the EPL, then he is more well known and is a positive business masterstroke by VT. Your initial argument about M. Laudrup's playing ability was irrelevant as it is media exposure which is the key to marketing. This is why people who are NOBODY'S with no talent can become famous on reality TV and hence make a lot of money.

It wasnt my argument. It was my reply to his argument that Solskjaer was more successful so would get more fans. That os nonsense.

Pele got less exposure than Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink. Ask the world who they know more. Same goes with Laudrup. Solskjaer wasnt even a star ayer for United let aline the Premier League.

Do you think Ipswich has hoardes of fans and world wide exposure because Roy Keane was their manager (5 times the player of Solskjaer).

Ipswich are not in the EPL and while Keane was arguably a better player it is doubtful that he had as much media exposure, as OGS scored almost 200 more goals than him in his career (260 as opposed to 66) and goals get headlines.

You dont think Roy Keane had as much media exposure as OGS?!

Roy Keane is one if the most talked about and written about football players the Premier League has ever seen.

Thismis pie imnthe sky stuff, it really is.

If Keane is more talked about, how do you explain that when you google both names there are 7,990,000 results for Keane and 27,900,000 results for OGS, or to put it another way about 1,000,000 more results for every extra 10 goals that OGS scored. You keep to your subjective comments and I'll keep to the statistical facts!

Quote from united forum.....

"Bruce, Hughes, Keane and the rest never really looked like future United managers. I think United fans want to see Ole do well because there's a very big possibility of him ending up here, and the better he does the more likely that becomes. He's also such a likable bloke that it's impossible to want anything other than the very best for him, which is more than I can say about Keane and Hughes, for example."

The fact you are even attrmpting to compare a perennial substitute Ole Gunnar Solskjaer to Michael Laudrup is terrifying

Castro while OGS can't be compared to M. Laudrup in terms of playing ability etc. in terms of how well known both of them are then OGS can be compared. The EPL is broadcast in 220 territories, by 80 broadcasters to 643m households every week, whereas La Liga only reached a cumulative audience for the 2011/12 season of 235m for the whole season. The EPL has a global audience which raises the profile of players, whereas La Liga is mainly a Spanish audience plus a bit of interest from a few Spanish speaking countries.

It really doesn't matter. Its like comparing Michael Laudrup with Jimmy Ffloyd Hasselbaink. One had more TV exposure however the other is much better known. Hes up there with Zidane - who also didnt play in the premier league remember.

It does matter as the post is about Marketing the club and as OGS has had more media exposure through the far greater audience of the EPL, then he is more well known and is a positive business masterstroke by VT. Your initial argument about M. Laudrup's playing ability was irrelevant as it is media exposure which is the key to marketing. This is why people who are NOBODY'S with no talent can become famous on reality TV and hence make a lot of money.

It wasnt my argument. It was my reply to his argument that Solskjaer was more successful so would get more fans. That os nonsense.

Pele got less exposure than Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink. Ask the world who they know more. Same goes with Laudrup. Solskjaer wasnt even a star ayer for United let aline the Premier League.

Do you think Ipswich has hoardes of fans and world wide exposure because Roy Keane was their manager (5 times the player of Solskjaer).

Ipswich are not in the EPL and while Keane was arguably a better player it is doubtful that he had as much media exposure, as OGS scored almost 200 more goals than him in his career (260 as opposed to 66) and goals get headlines.

You dont think Roy Keane had as much media exposure as OGS?!

Roy Keane is one if the most talked about and written about football players the Premier League has ever seen.

Thismis pie imnthe sky stuff, it really is.

If Keane is more talked about, how do you explain that when you google both names there are 7,990,000 results for Keane and 27,900,000 results for OGS, or to put it another way about 1,000,000 more results for every extra 10 goals that OGS scored. You keep to your subjective comments and I'll keep to the statistical facts!

No idea. Maybe his name is mentioned more times in match reports. However match reports are not about Solskjaer just as your match report against newcastle wasnt about Hudson.

In terms of publicity and in terms of actual personal column inches - if you think solskjaer has had more than Keane then you are bonkers. I dont even know why you are trying to argue the case.

Here we go.

Actual world wide interest in both Roy Keane and Ole Solskjaer in terms of google searches.

Roy Keane on average holds more than twice as much interest worldwide and that includes this recent week where Solskjaer has had the headlines for taking over you guys.

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Ole beat him on the line i see.

Ole beat him on the line i see.

Beat him to being more talked about this month, yes.

The average interest is the graph on the left which includes this month and the furore regarding Tan and the managerial situation.

Roy Keane hasnt even been in management for ages and still more interest in him than a managerial active Ole.

Ole beat him on the line i see.

Beat him to being more talked about this month, yes.

The average interest is the graph on the left which includes this month and the furore regarding Tan and the managerial situation.

Roy Keane hasnt even been in management for ages and still more interest in him than a managerial active Ole.

no2 to O'Neil for Ireland don't forget.
ole was manager of little molde ,not on everyone's lips but going forward he'll leave kean for dead in your next graph.

Ole beat him on the line i see.

Beat him to being more talked about this month, yes.

The average interest is the graph on the left which includes this month and the furore regarding Tan and the managerial situation.

Roy Keane hasnt even been in management for ages and still more interest in him than a managerial active Ole.

no2 to O'Neil for Ireland don't forget.
ole was manager of little molde ,not on everyone's lips but going forward he'll leave kean for dead in your next graph.

Yep, im sure the world are clamouring to see what Ireland are doing with Keane as number 2

The fact is, he merely mentioned Alex Ferguson last month and his google searches went up almost to the level of Solskjaer taking over a basket case of a situation.

I have a google search result from 2004 aswell if you would like to see it, its not pretty reading for your man.

Ole beat him on the line i see.

Beat him to being more talked about this month, yes.

The average interest is the graph on the left which includes this month and the furore regarding Tan and the managerial situation.

Roy Keane hasnt even been in management for ages and still more interest in him than a managerial active Ole.

no2 to O'Neil for Ireland don't forget.
ole was manager of little molde ,not on everyone's lips but going forward he'll leave kean for dead in your next graph.

When he sends you down and uncle vinny gives him the boot.

Ole beat him on the line i see.

Beat him to being more talked about this month, yes.

The average interest is the graph on the left which includes this month and the furore regarding Tan and the managerial situation.

Roy Keane hasnt even been in management for ages and still more interest in him than a managerial active Ole.

no2 to O'Neil for Ireland don't forget.
ole was manager of little molde ,not on everyone's lips but going forward he'll leave kean for dead in your next graph.

Yep, im sure the world are clamouring to see what Ireland are doing with Keane as number 2

The fact is, he merely mentioned Alex Ferguson last month and his google searches went up almost to the level of Solskjaer taking over a basket case of a situation.

I have a google search result from 2004 aswell if you would like to see it, its not pretty reading for your man.

Can you upload a graph comparing Solksjaer and Laudrup?

No agenda, I just can't remember how to do it and it'll be an interesting comparison.

I'd expect Laudrup to win because he won a cup with you last year and has obviously been managing in a higher profile league.

Ole beat him on the line i see.

Beat him to being more talked about this month, yes.

The average interest is the graph on the left which includes this month and the furore regarding Tan and the managerial situation.

Roy Keane hasnt even been in management for ages and still more interest in him than a managerial active Ole.

no2 to O'Neil for Ireland don't forget.
ole was manager of little molde ,not on everyone's lips but going forward he'll leave kean for dead in your next graph.

Yep, im sure the world are clamouring to see what Ireland are doing with Keane as number 2

The fact is, he merely mentioned Alex Ferguson last month and his google searches went up almost to the level of Solskjaer taking over a basket case of a situation.

I have a google search result from 2004 aswell if you would like to see it, its not pretty reading for your man.

you didn't even know Roy Keane was back in management i can't take you seriously goodbye.

you didn't even know Roy Keane was back in management i can't take you seriously goodbye.

He isnt, he is an assistant manager to a team that competes about 6 times a year - they are completely different jobs. Unless you think Morten Weighirst is the manager of Swansea too

You are leaving the discussion because you are bang to rights. So yes, goodbye.

Can you upload a graph comparing Solksjaer and Laudrup?

No agenda, I just can't remember how to do it and it'll be an interesting comparison.

I'd expect Laudrup to win because he won a cup with you last year and has obviously been managing in a higher profile league.

Laurdrup in red

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Thanks