SICKENING

What is sickening is some of our fans abusing VT during the game rather than actually supporting the team!! By all means give him abuse before or after the game but for the 90 or 95 minutes or if your Chris Foy until Sunderland equalise then support the team ffs

Ill do what I want, thanks all the same.

Did I just read someone claim Tan was shouting WHO instead of booing?!

oh the Tan apologists are out in force today!

I don't see what's wrong with defending tan? He's invested millions in the club, he wants Cardiff to succeed also! you are so blinded by the rebrand but still continue to line tans pockets week in week out by attending games! Joker

I don't see what's wrong with defending tan? He's invested millions in the club, he wants Cardiff to succeed also! you are so blinded by the rebrand but still continue to line tans pockets week in week out by attending games! Joker

I see plenty wrong in defending that cancer of football. by the way, he's LOANED Cardiff City that money.

You are on here suggesting tan was shouting WHOOOOOOO & not BOOOOO - yet you think I'm the joker?

Wake up FFS.

I don't see what's wrong with defending tan? He's invested millions in the club, he wants Cardiff to succeed also! you are so blinded by the rebrand but still continue to line tans pockets week in week out by attending games! Joker

I see plenty wrong in defending that cancer of football.

You are on here suggesting tan was shouting WHOOOOOOO & not BOOOOO - yet you think I'm the joker?

Wake up FFS.

Yet again the anti red clutching at straws! Jog on and support the jacks... RED OR DEAD

WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

I don't see what's wrong with defending tan? He's invested millions in the club, he wants Cardiff to succeed also! you are so blinded by the rebrand but still continue to line tans pockets week in week out by attending games! Joker

I see plenty wrong in defending that cancer of football. by the way, he's LOANED Cardiff City that money.

You are on here suggesting tan was shouting WHOOOOOOO & not BOOOOO - yet you think I'm the joker?

Wake up FFS.

im still chuckling at him thinking he said "who"

Where did that Chris Hoy find 5 minutes of injury time from?

He played 5 mins in fairness but where did it come from in the first place, we made three second half substitutions and Sunderland made one at half time and one double substitution, at 30 secs per substitution I make that 2 mins of added on time but where did the other three minutes come from, I don't recall a physio coming on once and apart from Kimbo going down I can't see where the extra minutes come from.

.

5 subs = 2 mins 30
2 goals = 1 min
= 3 mins 30 secs is the time he HAD TO add on.

There was also a few small stoppages for injuries and he visibly pointed to his watch when Marshall was taking his time over restarts - meaning the clock had stopped and would be added on at the end.

There is nothing in the Laws of the Game that say this, sick of hearing this when refereeing. Time can be added on for excessive time lost but to suggest 5 subs must be 2 mins 30 seconds for subs HAD to be added on is wrong.

What is sickening is some of our fans abusing VT during the game rather than actually supporting the team!! By all means give him abuse before or after the game but for the 90 or 95 minutes or if your Chris Foy until Sunderland equalise then support the team ffs

Ill do what I want, thanks all the same.

Don't f*cking thank me

Oh hang on a minute... So we have Roathie the poster who has a million usernames LIKE A PARASITE, and Barry chuckles who presses the panic button more times than Jenson button presses his breaks ganging up.... Haha jog on guys let's get back to the thread..

Where did that Chris Hoy find 5 minutes of injury time from?

He played 5 mins in fairness but where did it come from in the first place, we made three second half substitutions and Sunderland made one at half time and one double substitution, at 30 secs per substitution I make that 2 mins of added on time but where did the other three minutes come from, I don't recall a physio coming on once and apart from Kimbo going down I can't see where the extra minutes come from.

.

5 subs = 2 mins 30
2 goals = 1 min
= 3 mins 30 secs is the time he HAD TO add on.

There was also a few small stoppages for injuries and he visibly pointed to his watch when Marshall was taking his time over restarts - meaning the clock had stopped and would be added on at the end.

There is nothing in the Laws of the Game that say this, sick of hearing this when refereeing. Time can be added on for excessive time lost but to suggest 5 subs must be 2 mins 30 seconds for subs HAD to be added on is wrong.

It isnt wrong. Its a rule of thumb and a method used worldwide.

Yes thenref can use his discretion but why should he have? You were wasting time all match.

Don't f*cking thank me

Don't tell people what to do then.

Oh hang on a minute... So we have Roathie the poster who has a million usernames LIKE A PARASITE, and Barry chuckles who presses the panic button more times than Jenson button presses his breaks ganging up.... Haha jog on guys let's get back to the thread..

WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Oh hang on a minute... So we have Roathie the poster who has a million usernames LIKE A PARASITE, and Barry chuckles who presses the panic button more times than Jenson button presses his breaks ganging up.... Haha jog on guys let's get back to the thread..

WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Where did that Chris Hoy find 5 minutes of injury time from?

He played 5 mins in fairness but where did it come from in the first place, we made three second half substitutions and Sunderland made one at half time and one double substitution, at 30 secs per substitution I make that 2 mins of added on time but where did the other three minutes come from, I don't recall a physio coming on once and apart from Kimbo going down I can't see where the extra minutes come from.

.

5 subs = 2 mins 30
2 goals = 1 min
= 3 mins 30 secs is the time he HAD TO add on.

There was also a few small stoppages for injuries and he visibly pointed to his watch when Marshall was taking his time over restarts - meaning the clock had stopped and would be added on at the end.

There is nothing in the Laws of the Game that say this, sick of hearing this when refereeing. Time can be added on for excessive time lost but to suggest 5 subs must be 2 mins 30 seconds for subs HAD to be added on is wrong.

It isnt wrong. Its a rule of thumb and a method used worldwide.

Yes thenref can use his discretion but why should he have? You were wasting time all match.

It is wrong! Referee's do not have to add 30 seconds per sub or 60 seconds for a double sub and that is fact. Every club runs down the clock when in a winning position. The alternative is to stop tje clock everytime the ball goes out of play?

Don't f*cking thank me

Don't tell people what to do then.

Go f**k yourself

Go f**k yourself

No.

Go f**k yourself

No.

ok then

Watch out Caerphilly, Chuckles fingers are all over the panic button..

BOOOOOOOOOOO!

Sorry, I mean... WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

It is wrong! Referee's do not have to add 30 seconds per sub or 60 seconds for a double sub and that is fact. Every club runs down the clock when in a winning position. The alternative is to stop tje clock everytime the ball goes out of play?

Nope, not wrong.

30 seconds added on for each of those is standard practice. Some refs differ as discretion can be used however as we have touched upon, the time wasting probably lead the ref to take the max for the 10 incidents.

You should have no complaints on that front.

Lol I must admit the who thing is funny, but it was meant to be...

Lol I must admit the who thing is funny, but it was meant to be...

Of course it was.... The old realise I've made a tit of myself, so say it was a joke all along thing...

Smooth.

Lol I must admit the who thing is funny, but it was meant to be...

Of course it was.... The old realise I've made a tit of myself, so say it was a joke all along thing...

Smooth.

oh dear... Put your teeth away! I've been laughing all the time... Get back on the planet!

I don't think anyone else will notice your tactic... You may well just get away with it.

It is wrong! Referee's do not have to add 30 seconds per sub or 60 seconds for a double sub and that is fact. Every club runs down the clock when in a winning position. The alternative is to stop tje clock everytime the ball goes out of play?

Nope, not wrong.

30 seconds added on for each of those is standard practice. Some refs differ as discretion can be used however as we have touched upon, the time wasting probably lead the ref to take the max for the 10 incidents.

You should have no complaints on that front.

It's not standard practice, each game is taken on it's merits. How many games have you watched with 2-3 mins added on at the end when there has been plenty incidents? I was truly stunned when the board went up for 5 minutes.

It is wrong! Referee's do not have to add 30 seconds per sub or 60 seconds for a double sub and that is fact. Every club runs down the clock when in a winning position. The alternative is to stop tje clock everytime the ball goes out of play?

Nope, not wrong.

30 seconds added on for each of those is standard practice. Some refs differ as discretion can be used however as we have touched upon, the time wasting probably lead the ref to take the max for the 10 incidents.

You should have no complaints on that front.

It's not standard practice, each game is taken on it's merits. How many games have you watched with 2-3 mins added on at the end when there has been plenty incidents? I was truly stunned when the board went up for 5 minutes.

It was about right IMO. And will continue to be so now the time wasting has been highlighted by Jose.

It is wrong! Referee's do not have to add 30 seconds per sub or 60 seconds for a double sub and that is fact. Every club runs down the clock when in a winning position. The alternative is to stop tje clock everytime the ball goes out of play?

Nope, not wrong.

30 seconds added on for each of those is standard practice. Some refs differ as discretion can be used however as we have touched upon, the time wasting probably lead the ref to take the max for the 10 incidents.

You should have no complaints on that front.

It's not standard practice, each game is taken on it's merits. How many games have you watched with 2-3 mins added on at the end when there has been plenty incidents? I was truly stunned when the board went up for 5 minutes.

It was about right IMO. And will continue to be so now the time wasting has been highlighted by Jose.

It sums the game up that a bit of Cardiff timewasting will now be looked for but Skrtel can continue to manhandle players and get away with it every week!

It is no good trying to make a valid point with Castro the closet boy. If you show he is not as accurate or clever as he evidently thinks he is, he will accuse you of being disabled, intoxicated or obsessed.
The self-proclaimed tracker of Solskjaer's career is a parasite feeding his ego of the passion and fervour of the fans of a much bigger club.
I'm intrigued by his new alias as Castro, is it a homage to the late Cuban leader or the notorious region of San Francisco? Perhaps the cigar in his avatar is a clue.

I don't think anyone else will notice your tactic... You may well just get away with it.

Arrogant Git

I don't see what's wrong with defending tan? He's invested millions in the club, he wants Cardiff to succeed also! you are so blinded by the rebrand but still continue to line tans pockets week in week out by attending games! Joker

I see plenty wrong in defending that cancer of football.

You are on here suggesting tan was shouting WHOOOOOOO & not BOOOOO - yet you think I'm the joker?

Wake up FFS.

Yet again the anti red clutching at straws! Jog on and support the jacks... RED OR DEAD

Does this not answer my thread earlier? Is the bluebird dead?

Red must be dead.

I got shot down by the same trolls who ruined this thread but the same trolls ignore statements like red or dead. .

Im Blue always have been and wont flinch.