Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:03 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
smakerzthebluebird wrote:
Or maybe it's just because we happen to have different views? :roll:


If it was just your views Barry I'd agree to disagree but you constantly try and put words in posters mouths and disect every sentence of their replies it's just being pendantic no more, this bluegill rise character is clearly here for a wind up can't debate at all just says he's being bullied by pro reds lol

It's comical

I wrote a lengthy post asking him where and what he was doing two years ago when the rebrand hit as I suspected I got no reply


Funny that you accuse him of not being able to debate, because when I've debated you in this thread, you've just got abusive. I'd say that was being unable to debate too.

I don't put any words in posters mouths, I debate and put my point across. I'm passionate about my club & my views on what's going on at the club & will not stop that because some people happen to disagree with me.

It's simply a case of different views. :ayatollah:[/quote]

I was debating on the first page until you and Craig took it into madness and seeing as you were being pendantic again I decided I may as well join you!

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:04 pm

smakerzthebluebird wrote:I was debating on the first page until you and Craig took it into madness and seeing as you were being pendantic again I decided I may as well join you!


Craig took into into madness, I'm happy to debate. :thumbright:

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:07 pm

boxerbob wrote:I'll be happy to pay the expenses for chuckles to have his sex change operation....spoiled girl trapped in a mans body.Cant be good for him living a lie


What a preposterous and obnoxious thing to say about anyone. And for what? Having the audacity to have an opinion. I am absolutely flabbergasted how anyone can be so angry at a fellow Cardiff fan.

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:07 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
smakerzthebluebird wrote:I was debating on the first page until you and Craig took it into madness and seeing as you were being pendantic again I decided I may as well join you!


Craig took into into madness, I'm happy to debate. :thumbright:

Guilty as charged. Shouldnt poke your nose in when I ask a specific question to a specific person
Last edited by CraigCCFC on Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:08 pm

TheBlueWillRise wrote:Don't like rebrand threads? Don't post in them.

Don't like certain posters? Put them on ignore.

Instead it's:

Don't like Cardiff fans fighting for our heritage and identity? Bully and belittle them.

Don't like pro blues? Ban them.


Where have I said any of that? And when has any pro blue been banned on here?

Making stuff up to suit your agenda now aren't you!

And as I said in my first post on page 1 I admire those who have fought from the start cos they are truly passionate about it but those who are jumping on the bandwagon everyday lately are hypocrites simple as that!

Anyone that disagrees is trying to justify themselves jumping on the bandwagon and IMO there's no way of doing that history honour and pride can't surface two years after the colour change unless you've been asleep for two years straight

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:09 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:Guilty as charged. Shouldnt poke your nose in when I ask a specific question to a specific person


I think it's crazy that you can't understand that people didn't have to be a member on here 18 months ago to now be against the rebrand. I have many friends who are against the rebrand who probably aren't aware that this forum exists.

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:10 pm

TheBlueWillRise wrote:
boxerbob wrote:I'll be happy to pay the expenses for chuckles to have his sex change operation....spoiled girl trapped in a mans body.Cant be good for him living a lie


What a preposterous and obnoxious thing to say about anyone. And for what? Having the audacity to have an opinion. I am absolutely flabbergasted how anyone can be so angry at a fellow Cardiff fan.



He spoils nearly every thread he joins in,hes a virus to this site but that is my opinion

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:11 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:Guilty as charged. Shouldnt poke your nose in when I ask a specific question to a specific person


I think it's crazy that you can't understand that people didn't have to be a member on here 18 months ago to now be against the rebrand. I have many friends who are against the rebrand who probably aren't aware that this forum exists.

if he was a real person then id agree. Ita a fake account though :thumbup: you seem to be confusing the issue i have, its not what he is posting its the fact he is a fake.

Its kind of like you. It doesnt bother me what you post. Its your holier than thou, patronising and arrogant style that I dislike.
Last edited by CraigCCFC on Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:12 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:if he was a real person then id agree. Ita a fake account though :thumbup:


In your opinion, yet you have nothing to back this up & want him banned for your suspicion.. Crazy.

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:14 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:if he was a real person then id agree. Ita a fake account though :thumbup:


In your opinion, yet you have nothing to back this up & want him banned for your suspicion.. Crazy.


As someone on here always says "Its my opinion and im entitled to it" :thumbup:

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:15 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:Guilty as charged. Shouldnt poke your nose in when I ask a specific question to a specific person


I think it's crazy that you can't understand that people didn't have to be a member on here 18 months ago to now be against the rebrand. I have many friends who are against the rebrand who probably aren't aware that this forum exists.

if he was a real person then id agree. Ita a fake account though :thumbup: you seem to be confusing the issue i have, its not what he is posting its the fact he is a fake.


A real person? Any new pro blue poster is now a fake in the eyes of the red propaganda machine on here. Whatever suits your agenda I guess. Have you not taken into account that there may be a just a few other people with contrasting views to your own? I don't think you realise there are a silent majority of pro blues who read some of the abuse and bullying pro blues get on here and stay away.

Shame on you for attempting to deny us a voice, it won't work.

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:16 pm

Oh come on, its bloody obvious

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:18 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:As someone on here always says "Its my opinion and im entitled to it" :thumbup:


Totally.. But doesn't make it a fact, like you claim.. Does it? :thumbup:

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:20 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:As someone on here always says "Its my opinion and im entitled to it" :thumbup:


Totally.. But doesn't make it a fact, like you claim.. Does it? :thumbup:


when are opinions ever facts? where have I said its a fact to anyone else. In my own mind it is and thats all that matters :thumbup:

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:21 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:if he was a real person then id agree. Ita a fake account though :thumbup:


In your opinion, yet you have nothing to back this up & want him banned for your suspicion.. Crazy.


As someone on here always says "Its my opinion and im entitled to it" :thumbup:


Does that not extend to pro blue BU posters, no? In your world guess not. :roll:

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:21 pm

Too many big bens on here!!

There been a few over the seasons

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:23 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:
when are opinions ever facts? where have I said its a fact to anyone else. In my own mind it is and thats all that matters :thumbup:


It's a fact that you cannot say for sure that he is. :thumbup:

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:23 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
when are opinions ever facts? where have I said its a fact to anyone else. In my own mind it is and thats all that matters :thumbup:


It's a fact that you cannot say for sure that he is. :thumbup:


its also a fact that you cannot say for sure he isn't....ta ra :wave: :thumbup:
Last edited by CraigCCFC on Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:24 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:its also a fact that you cannot say for sure it isn't :thumbup:


I've never claimed otherwise, unlike you. :thumbup:

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:24 pm

TheBlueWillRise wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:if he was a real person then id agree. Ita a fake account though :thumbup:


In your opinion, yet you have nothing to back this up & want him banned for your suspicion.. Crazy.


As someone on here always says "Its my opinion and im entitled to it" :thumbup:


Does that not extend to pro blue BU posters, no? In your world guess not. :roll:


An opinion is formed by using judgement and logic and in my opinion you have neither of them u just like to provoke and your getting the responses you want so I'll leave it here now as your grating my arse crack!

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:25 pm

smakerzthebluebird wrote:An opinion is formed by using judgement and logic and in my opinion you have neither of them u just like to provoke and your getting the responses you want so I'll leave it here now as your grating my arse crack!


His has been formed on his judgement and logic then, no? :?

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:44 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
smakerzthebluebird wrote:An opinion is formed by using judgement and logic and in my opinion you have neither of them u just like to provoke and your getting the responses you want so I'll leave it here now as your grating my arse crack!


His has been formed on his judgement and logic then, no? :?


Well his opinion that pro blues are constantly abused is incorrect so obviously he isn't using logic that well is he!
Pro blues being banned was another one? Never happened on this forum to my knowledge! So that opinion again defies any logic and reason there are other quotes of his I could do the Barry chuckle pendantic disectment on but I can't be arsed time to go back to work

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:48 pm

smakerzthebluebird wrote:
Well his opinion that pro blues are constantly abused is incorrect so obviously he isn't using logic that well is he!
Pro blues being banned was another one? Never happened on this forum to my knowledge! So that opinion again defies any logic and reason there are other quotes of his I could do the Barry chuckle pendantic disectment on but I can't be arsed time to go back to work


Not constantly, no. But there have been several incidents of BOTH red and blue "camps" abusing each other - both are as bad as one another I say.

He hasn't said pro-blues get banned - he is questioning that every time a pro-blue poster shows up, people call for it to be banned (like Jinks and Craig have here) - which is rather bizarre.

:thumbup:

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:49 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
smakerzthebluebird wrote:
Well his opinion that pro blues are constantly abused is incorrect so obviously he isn't using logic that well is he!
Pro blues being banned was another one? Never happened on this forum to my knowledge! So that opinion again defies any logic and reason there are other quotes of his I could do the Barry chuckle pendantic disectment on but I can't be arsed time to go back to work


Not constantly, no. But there have been several incidents of BOTH red and blue "camps" abusing each other - both are as bad as one another I say.

He hasn't said pro-blues get banned - he is questioning that every time a pro-blue poster shows up, people call for it to be banned (like Jinks and Craig have here) - which is rather bizarre.

:thumbup:


Excuse me, i havent asked for him to be banned for being pro blue, so stop making things up :thumbup:

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:52 pm

This Thread is hilarious.... :thumbup:

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:54 pm

What you have done Craig is try and smear me and thus discredit my views as nothing more than the views of a fake, a duplicate a troll. You have a history of doing this to other pro blue posters such as the aforementioned Real_blue_really who you said dissapeared along with other pro blue posters.

Has it not crossed your narrow mind that maybe these posters felt threatened and intimidated by yourself and the rest of Tans mob? Did it not occur to you that what you may consider to be nothing more than a minor issue to others the rebrand is a topic that needs to be discussed.

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:55 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:
Excuse me, i havent asked for him to be banned for being pro blue, so stop making things up :thumbup:


I didn't say that was the reason, but you've asked for him to be banned, for no real reason. :thumbup:

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:57 pm

TheBlueWillRise wrote:What you have done Craig is try and smear me and thus discredit my views as nothing more than the views of a fake, a duplicate a troll. You have a history of doing this to other pro blue posters such as the aforementioned Real_blue_really who you said dissapeared along with other pro blue posters.

Has it not crossed your narrow mind that maybe these posters felt threatened and intimidated by yourself and the rest of Tans mob? Did it not occur to you that what you may consider to be nothing more than a minor issue to others the rebrand is a topic that needs to be discussed.


Discussed two years after it happened zzzzzzzzz

Make your own forum to talk about the rebrand best idea I've heard all season

We can then talk football and filth on here like it used to be!

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:20 pm

smakerzthebluebird wrote:
TheBlueWillRise wrote:What you have done Craig is try and smear me and thus discredit my views as nothing more than the views of a fake, a duplicate a troll. You have a history of doing this to other pro blue posters such as the aforementioned Real_blue_really who you said dissapeared along with other pro blue posters.

Has it not crossed your narrow mind that maybe these posters felt threatened and intimidated by yourself and the rest of Tans mob? Did it not occur to you that what you may consider to be nothing more than a minor issue to others the rebrand is a topic that needs to be discussed.


Discussed two years after it happened zzzzzzzzz

Make your own forum to talk about the rebrand best idea I've heard all season

We can then talk football and filth on here like it used to be!


If you don't like what I have to say then put me on ignore. The rebrand is the major topic at our club at the moment and it always will be until Tan stops being a dictatorial prat.

Re: FAO The Moderators

Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:56 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
True, on this occasion its Craig reporting u non stop Alex, but usually its u reporting others, true or not?


I'll report anyone that abuses me, yes. That's what it's for?

I won't report in the childish manner that Craig is doing though. Never have.


Ok fair enough Alex :thumbup: , but lets have some Civil debates, you and I are both for Our BLUE and want the same, but others dont see it our way, but we can respect their views, like they should ours :thumbup:

i bet it,s like a rave in your house pal with all the report buttons flashing :laughing6: