FAO Milky Joe

Monk to save us !? Save us from what exactly , a tad melodramatic don't you think

Your mate reckons he's the answer when you are tired after Europa games, he seems to think you have a squad like Manu and Chelsea and can field completely different teams for different games

He's not my mate he's a mentalcase , we have a decent squad at the moment and will not need monk to "save" us in fact monk in my opinion will only play in cup games as fourth choice CB if then

He is pretty mental, to be fair. He should get a good hobby.

Roathie making a c**t of himself again. Only a jack can take so many positives from getting battered at home in their first game. In the last two seasons they were close affairs. Some of you lot think you'll get top 8

36 posts a day on your rivals forum....

Milky is spot on to be fair.

Milky is spot on to be fair.

realised youve made a fool of yourself on your last one so on to your new one. Wont take long and you'll be on to the next.

How many usernames is that now btw? Plus an email address for each one.

I assume you are talking about usernames? Ive had one, this one. Good name too innit.

Check the stats from your last visit to West Ham. You had the majority of possession with eleven attempts but only one of any note. Exactly the same as us Saturday

No matter how many hundreds of usernames you have, it's always the same inaccurate drivel isn't it

I assume you are talking about usernames? Ive had one, this one. Good name too innit.

It's what a 5 year old Swansea fan would choose. It explains everything

You still lost you bellend

meaning what?

You saying your game with West Ham was winnable but you still lost , so have we I don't see the point your trying to make, your obviously a Jack trying to wind people up but your seriously poor at it , why don't you go back into your caravan and have a rethink or better yet do some colouring in you might be able to do that

You had no shots, how was it winnable? you were never in it.

We lost a very close encounter and created more than enough to win it. its was winnable.

We had 12 shots and 51% possession

Check the stats from your last visit to West Ham. You had the majority of possession with eleven attempts but only one of any note. Exactly the same as us Saturday

No matter how many hundreds of usernames you have, it's always the same inaccurate drivel isn't it

Not sure what game you were looking at sunshine.

Shots on target

West ham 9-7 Swansea

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/21209165


That was a narrow 1-0 defeat before we thumped them 3-0 at home

You had 1 shot on target, but none that troubled the keeper.

We had 12 shots and 51% possession

Pricey, who you trying to kid?

You had 1 (one) shot on target. None (0) that troubled the keeper

You did watch the game right?

We had 12 shots and 51% possession

Pricey, who you trying to kid?

You had 1 (one) shot on target. None (0) that troubled the keeper

You did watch the game right?

Yeah I watched it and I looked at the table which shows me that Swansea Town are below the CAPITAL

We had 12 shots and 51% possession

Pricey, who you trying to kid?

You had 1 (one) shot on target. None (0) that troubled the keeper

You did watch the game right?

Yeah I watched it and I looked at the table which shows me that Swansea Town are below the CAPITAL

Glad you have seen the error of your ways then, and of course we are, we played Manchester United you plum

You also lost at West Ham last season with your "vastly better team", Roathie.

You also lost at West Ham last season with your "vastly better team", Roathie.

And?

You also lost at West Ham last season with your "vastly better team", Roathie.

And?

And you're now going to say you are better than us, which is standard farye for rivals

You also lost at West Ham last season with your "vastly better team", Roathie.

And?

Well, you claim that we will struggle because we lost at West Ham, whereas your team did so too & finished 9th. In fact, very few teams won at The Boleyn Ground...

You also lost at West Ham last season with your "vastly better team", Roathie.

And?

Well, you claim that we will struggle because we lost at West Ham, whereas your team did so too & finished 9th. In fact, very few teams won at The Boleyn Ground...

I claim you will struggle due to HOW you lost at west ham, not because.

I claim you will struggle due to HOW you lost at west ham, not because.

Wrong Roathie, you claimed BEFORE the game that we would struggle if we didn't get a result at the Boleyn Ground. Seeing as your team and many others did the same last season, your theory has been blown to pieces.

As for the performance, it's one game. I recall Swansea getting some bad results in their first season & they did okay.

I claim you will struggle due to HOW you lost at west ham, not because.

Wrong Roathie, you claimed BEFORE the game that we would struggle if we didn't get a result at the Boleyn Ground. Seeing as your team and many others did the same last season, your theory has been blown to pieces.

As for the performance, it's one game. I recall Swansea getting some bad results in their first season & they did okay.

RIGHT barnett. I claimed you would struggle if you didnt pick up points in winnable fixtures as your team isnt good enough to pick up results against the better teams (which the oerformance showed). We lost winnable games, but always gave a good account of ourselves and were good enough to beat the likes of Man City, Arsenal, Liverpool and get draws against Chelsea and Tottenham, withiut that ability we would have got 36 points 4 short of the magic 40.

you lost at West Ham, probably forgot that.

Blows your theory to bits Roath.

What an odd response. I guess ill just have to post it again

I claimed you would struggle if you didnt pick up points in winnable fixtures as your team isnt good enough to pick up results against the better teams (which the oerformance showed). We lost winnable games, but always gave a good account of ourselves and were good enough to beat the likes of Man City, Arsenal, Liverpool and get draws against Chelsea and Tottenham, withiut that ability we would have got 36 points 4 short of the magic 40.

I've also blown your theory to bits. You must have missed that when you got banned as Milky Joe

I've also blown your theory to bits. You must have missed that when you got banned as Milky Joe

You have posted the same sentence which does neither.

You lost to west ham, we lost to west ham.

We put up a great fight and could have won. You barely shot on target and had no chance of winning.

We had the ability to get results against better sides (like beating man city 1-0 at home), i dont believe you do and it showed against west ham which means if you fail to take advantage of winnible games you will struggle.

.... Yet you say you have "blown the theory to bits" by simoy saying, "you lost to west ham too"

:lol: you lost at West Ham, probably forgot that.

Blows your theory to bits Roath.

He just doesnt know what he's talking about.

He thought a football team had 10 players!
Mcmanaman played for Everton!
He didnt even know the correct score for swansea against qpr last season! I hate swansea but even I know!

D'uh

"If you don't get something at West Ham, you will struggle."

& that was posted before the game, so stop babbling on about performances, because you said this before you could see performance...

Well, you lost to West Ham & so did others...

Blown to bits.

Last edited by Barry Chuckle on Tue Aug 20, 2013 11:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

:lol: you lost at West Ham, probably forgot that.

Blows your theory to bits Roath.

He just doesnt know what he's talking about.

He thought a football team had 10 players!
Mcmanaman played for Everton!
He didnt even know the correct score for swansea against qpr last season! I hate swansea but even I know!

D'uh

I thought none of the above. And we won 5-0 and 4-1 and loved all 9 goals.

"If you don't get something at West Ham, you will struggle."

Well, you lost to West Ham & so did others...

Blown to bits.

Yes, now we seem to have gone back 5 or 6 posts.

I said you would struggle if you couldnt beat west ham because you dont have the quality to beat the better sides. We lost to west ham but managed to beat the likes of arsenal, liverpool and your next opponants man city. If we didnt we would have gone down.

Itll sink in soon im sure

Funny how the Jacks after 1 game last year, going on about top of the league etc & yet this time, it's only after one game, so it doesn't count.



"Winnable" game, that's why Swansea haven't done it yet.

Games against the top 4 are largely irrelevant. its the games against the other clubs that count. Man Utd are top 4 (champions actually) hence the result doesn't matter, QPR was a winnable game so it was very important and we ran out 4-0 winners.

We have played West Ham twice in the Premier League and won 3-0 and lost 1-0, both games were very winnable. judging from your game yesterday you didn't look capable of a draw even. that's the concern.

what was that you were saying?

All from one game?

You were torn to shreds in your first game too & survived.

Your agenda is showing through all too clearly.