Wed Aug 14, 2013 2:54 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Hofmeister wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Hofmeister wrote:Steve Borley says: “It’s crucial we all stick together, fans, directors, staff, players and everybody who loves our club."
Yeah right, by mocking supporters who don't agree with changing colours & crest, destroying the identity of our football club?
By supporting a man, whose actions cause a huge divide amongst our supporters?
By supporting an unnecessary rebrand that drove people out? People who're Cardiff City to the core, people who would give almost all for their beloved club?!?!
I once had a lot of respect for you, Mr. Borley...
I've read and re-read this post and I don't particularly want to fall out with the poster but this is a complete crock of shit.The only huge divide as you put it is on this forum which represents a storm in a teacup.
unf. not mate. I'd say over 70% of my Cardiff friends are completely against the rebrand. And that's realy life friends, not on here or on Facebook...
If you think my post my post in a crock of shit, fairplay its your opinion. You're entitled to have yours, just as I have mine.
I think its fair to say if it wasn't for Mr Borley we would be very probably would not be having this argument.
Your correct there, becaus eif the club had gone to the wall, those that brought it about would be in hiding from the shame of bringing and end to our famous well loved club, and all over a colour.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 2:54 pm
Hofmeister wrote:Mac wrote:Stef, you need to chill out.
haha it is you...how are you, mate?
Wed Aug 14, 2013 2:55 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Hofmeister wrote:BigGwynram wrote:
And i repeat there as been a few of them, i got two different ones tattooed on myself where the bluebird is the main feature, must be before you cam aboard.I would suggest you look back on recent records.
all the previous ones, with the Bluebird as the main feature. I cant make it any clearer, no matter if it was the last one or Sam's St.David's or the circle...all fine as long as the Bluebird is the centre of it
"mocking supporters who don't agree with changing colours & crest, destroying the identity of our football club? "
Those are the words you used,and you refer to changing the crest, so it's not change you mind, it's size then?
So you don't mind change. as long as it stays big.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 2:56 pm
corky wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:corky wrote:Trolls have won again but I will put the original thread else where
That's not clever Corky accusing the likes of Hofmestier being a troll. He has been consistent with his feelings over this.
Lets be honest now what did you expect from this thread, everyone to glorify Borley? Like it or not Steve has not done himself any favours over the rebrand with his comments decrementing the blue stand. If the article was on Bellamy then there would have not been such a divertion. Borley has put himself in the firing line so expect such a reaction.
Ian, a troll in my opinion is someone who changes the original thread or topic into something else...Steve has done huge work keeping this club alive and it would not have hurt to have a nice thread about that, even if you wan to drag his name through the mud in another thread because he does not support your opinion and he also knows how close this club was to folding.
Simply start your own threads if you want to attack Steve or talk about the re brand, that is all I am saying.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 2:56 pm
Wed Aug 14, 2013 2:57 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:corky wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:corky wrote:Trolls have won again but I will put the original thread else where
That's not clever Corky accusing the likes of Hofmestier being a troll. He has been consistent with his feelings over this.
Lets be honest now what did you expect from this thread, everyone to glorify Borley? Like it or not Steve has not done himself any favours over the rebrand with his comments decrementing the blue stand. If the article was on Bellamy then there would have not been such a divertion. Borley has put himself in the firing line so expect such a reaction.
Ian, a troll in my opinion is someone who changes the original thread or topic into something else...Steve has done huge work keeping this club alive and it would not have hurt to have a nice thread about that, even if you wan to drag his name through the mud in another thread because he does not support your opinion and he also knows how close this club was to folding.
Simply start your own threads if you want to attack Steve or talk about the re brand, that is all I am saying.
Paul, the mention of Borley or Tan is going to cause such a reaction.
There are lots of people who have done good but when they do something bad that annoys a lot of people that is what they are remembered for. Such is life.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 2:57 pm
Mac wrote:Hofmeister wrote:Mac wrote:Stef, you need to chill out.
haha it is you...how are you, mate?
All good. Hope you're well.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 2:58 pm
TheHangedMan wrote:Why does every f*cking thread get hijacked by rebrand posts?????
Can one of the mods, ideally Annis as he owns this board, but if not any mod, explain to me why there is not a separate section for rebrand talk on this board.
I looked at the title of the thread and thought that looks interesting so I'll have a read and within 2-3 posts it's back to the same old same old.
FFS, somebody please move rebrand talk into it's own asylum and let's get back to the football before this MB degenerates into a f*cking shambles!
Wed Aug 14, 2013 2:59 pm
Bluebird 37 wrote:Borley the red fan in it just for the money
Wed Aug 14, 2013 3:01 pm
Pontyclun Blue wrote:Bluebird 37 wrote:Borley the red fan in it just for the money
What have you done for the club with any money you gotBorley put his money where he said he was going to, into the club to keep it going. He didn't try to start up another club unlike some, whatever money Steve gets out of the club good on him. Steve Borley is what I would call a proper Cardiff City fan
Wed Aug 14, 2013 3:01 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:corky wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:corky wrote:Trolls have won again but I will put the original thread else where
That's not clever Corky accusing the likes of Hofmestier being a troll. He has been consistent with his feelings over this.
Lets be honest now what did you expect from this thread, everyone to glorify Borley? Like it or not Steve has not done himself any favours over the rebrand with his comments decrementing the blue stand. If the article was on Bellamy then there would have not been such a divertion. Borley has put himself in the firing line so expect such a reaction.
Ian, a troll in my opinion is someone who changes the original thread or topic into something else...Steve has done huge work keeping this club alive and it would not have hurt to have a nice thread about that, even if you wan to drag his name through the mud in another thread because he does not support your opinion and he also knows how close this club was to folding.
Simply start your own threads if you want to attack Steve or talk about the re brand, that is all I am saying.
Paul, the mention of Borley or Tan is going to cause such a reaction.
There are lots of people who have done good but when they do something bad that annoys a lot of people that is what they are remembered for. Such is life.
Bad, like saving the club and keeping us trading you mean.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 3:13 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:I hope Steve makes a fortune from CCFC. Not many of us used our kids future inheritance to pay bills to keep this club afloat when most of you ungrateful ***** werent about.
Steve is more CCFC than most of you put together.
The same people ruin another thread under the guise of freedom of speech.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 3:28 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:I hope Steve makes a fortune from CCFC. Not many of us used our kids future inheritance to pay bills to keep this club afloat when most of you ungrateful ***** werent about.
Steve is more CCFC than most of you put together.
The same people ruin another thread under the guise of freedom of speech.
I haven't always agreed with Steve Borley and some of the comments by other posters in this thread do have some substance, however, if you think back to the late Nineties when he was Chairman and was directing the profits made from CMB into CCFC to keep it afloat, then you have to tip the hat to the guy.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 3:40 pm
sleepers wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Hofmeister wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Hofmeister wrote:Steve Borley says: “It’s crucial we all stick together, fans, directors, staff, players and everybody who loves our club."
Yeah right, by mocking supporters who don't agree with changing colours & crest, destroying the identity of our football club?
By supporting a man, whose actions cause a huge divide amongst our supporters?
By supporting an unnecessary rebrand that drove people out? People who're Cardiff City to the core, people who would give almost all for their beloved club?!?!
I once had a lot of respect for you, Mr. Borley...
I've read and re-read this post and I don't particularly want to fall out with the poster but this is a complete crock of shit.The only huge divide as you put it is on this forum which represents a storm in a teacup.
unf. not mate. I'd say over 70% of my Cardiff friends are completely against the rebrand. And that's realy life friends, not on here or on Facebook...
If you think my post my post in a crock of shit, fairplay its your opinion. You're entitled to have yours, just as I have mine.
I think its fair to say if it wasn't for Mr Borley we would be very probably would not be having this argument.
Your correct there, becaus eif the club had gone to the wall, those that brought it about would be in hiding from the shame of bringing and end to our famous well loved club, and all over a colour.
does that include your mate sam,he nearly destroyed are club but you still associate with him,strange
Wed Aug 14, 2013 3:44 pm
Real_Blue_Really wrote:corky wrote:Real_Blue_Really wrote:corky wrote:Another great subject ruined. Shame
A real journey for Steve that seen many bad times, I was down the stadium last week and he was there with the builders, sleeves rolled up, helping out with extra seating around the stadium.
How is it ruined? Are City fans still allowed an opinion on the club hierachy corky?
I will tell you why its ruined...it is because this topic was not about the rebrand.
Gavin, don't delete the opinion, simply move it to another thread that is about the re brand.
It's about Borley's reaction to the rebrand, leave the comments here. The day fans are censored from speaking truth to power is the day this board becomes a lesser place.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 3:45 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:corky wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:corky wrote:Trolls have won again but I will put the original thread else where
That's not clever Corky accusing the likes of Hofmestier being a troll. He has been consistent with his feelings over this.
Lets be honest now what did you expect from this thread, everyone to glorify Borley? Like it or not Steve has not done himself any favours over the rebrand with his comments decrementing the blue stand. If the article was on Bellamy then there would have not been such a divertion. Borley has put himself in the firing line so expect such a reaction.
Ian, a troll in my opinion is someone who changes the original thread or topic into something else...Steve has done huge work keeping this club alive and it would not have hurt to have a nice thread about that, even if you wan to drag his name through the mud in another thread because he does not support your opinion and he also knows how close this club was to folding.
Simply start your own threads if you want to attack Steve or talk about the re brand, that is all I am saying.
Paul, the mention of Borley or Tan is going to cause such a reaction.
There are lots of people who have done good but when they do something bad that annoys a lot of people that is what they are remembered for. Such is life.
Bad, like saving the club and keeping us trading you mean.
I've been through this with you many times Gwyn. You have your opinion and I have mine. Yours is opposite to mine. You have your reasons and I have mine. Neither of us are going to change so we just have to beg to differ.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 3:48 pm
Hofmeister wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Hofmeister wrote:BigGwynram wrote:
And i repeat there as been a few of them, i got two different ones tattooed on myself where the bluebird is the main feature, must be before you cam aboard.I would suggest you look back on recent records.
all the previous ones, with the Bluebird as the main feature. I cant make it any clearer, no matter if it was the last one or Sam's St.David's or the circle...all fine as long as the Bluebird is the centre of it
"mocking supporters who don't agree with changing colours & crest, destroying the identity of our football club? "
Those are the words you used,and you refer to changing the crest, so it's not change you mind, it's size then?
So you don't mind change. as long as it stays big.
I lost u there, don't get it
Wed Aug 14, 2013 3:58 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:I hope Steve makes a fortune from CCFC. Not many of us used our kids future inheritance to pay bills to keep this club afloat when most of you ungrateful ***** werent about.
Steve is more CCFC than most of you put together.
The same people ruin another thread under the guise of freedom of speech.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:03 pm
Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:25 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Hofmeister wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Hofmeister wrote:BigGwynram wrote:
And i repeat there as been a few of them, i got two different ones tattooed on myself where the bluebird is the main feature, must be before you cam aboard.I would suggest you look back on recent records.
all the previous ones, with the Bluebird as the main feature. I cant make it any clearer, no matter if it was the last one or Sam's St.David's or the circle...all fine as long as the Bluebird is the centre of it
"mocking supporters who don't agree with changing colours & crest, destroying the identity of our football club? "
Those are the words you used,and you refer to changing the crest, so it's not change you mind, it's size then?
So you don't mind change. as long as it stays big.
I lost u there, don't get it
Well one minute you claim you are being mocked for opposing change, then in the next breath you are saying changing the badge is Ok as long as the Bluebird is the main feature, so it's the size of the Bluebird that matters to you, not the colour or shape or design off the badge, which we all agree as changed many times.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:34 pm
Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:50 pm
Bluebird 37 wrote:Watch Borley on twitter daily slags of BU and never sticks up for the blue
Wed Aug 14, 2013 5:02 pm
Bluebird 37 wrote:Watch Borley on twitter daily slags of BU and never sticks up for the blue
Wed Aug 14, 2013 5:08 pm
Bluebird 37 wrote:Watch Borley on twitter daily slags of BU and never sticks up for the blue
Wed Aug 14, 2013 5:11 pm
Bluebird 37 wrote:Watch Borley on twitter daily slags of BU and never sticks up for the blue
Wed Aug 14, 2013 5:19 pm
Hofmeister wrote:I oppose the change, as the new crest has the Dragon as the main feature, not the Bluebird. I got no problems with the Dragon itself, but not as the CCFC crest dominant symbol. When Sam changed the badge to the St.David's, I wasnt in favour but it was acceptable to me as it still contained the Bluebird as our main symbol...
I could have lived with a badge like Karl designed. That was real compromise, but unheard as we all know. Also a compromise concerning the colours would have been possible.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 5:23 pm
Bluebird 37 wrote:Watch Borley on twitter daily slags of BU and never sticks up for the blue
Wed Aug 14, 2013 5:35 pm
Wed Aug 14, 2013 6:11 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Bluebird 37 wrote:Watch Borley on twitter daily slags of BU and never sticks up for the blue
I think in Steve's position and knowing how close we came to getting wound up, whilst playing in blue would be his choice, keeping the club afloat and trading takes precedence over any personal choice to colour like the majority of real fans that put the club's needs first.
If there had been an alternative, and some mystery investors waiting in the wings to bail us out, then I'm sure Steve may have had a different outlook, but being in the position he is and knowing what he knows, I would put his view way ahead of others who simply had a feeling.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 6:12 pm
YES, I disagree massively with the rebrand & with Steve's opinion on it all, but to see some of the nonsense posted on here about him, is scandalous.