Angel Rangel shocked by Cardiff signing!

As for the rest regarding roathie, its pretty simple. If people want him to post off one account and one persona then they should not ban the others. Easy really innit

I suggest you set up a new account then, where it is clear that you are Roath & that you support Swansea.

As for the rest regarding roathie, its pretty simple. If people want him to post off one account and one persona then they should not ban the others. Easy really innit

I suggest you set up a new account then, where it is clear that you are Roath & that you support Swansea.

Reply to the content, not the poster.

Im sure that was your mantra at one point too funnily enough

Another roath acount with more than 100 posts
ptb mods

The day of their big European return & they print this?

obsession.

Exactly. Thats the shocking thing, not the fact Caulker has signed for us.

I watched their fall & rise programme last night, and apart from one or two glaring errors (no mention of shafting the local creditors, making out they had succesive promotions) it was a good watch, and you cannot deny it is a good story. If it was anyone but the Jacks I think we would be applauding if someone like Bradford, or Plymouth for example did something like that.

So theyve got a story as great as that, culminating in their finest hour tonight, and they are more interested in our new signing. Drop the chip off the shoulder ffs!!!

A bit like you lot sacking dave jones the day we got promoted

Absolutely nothing like the Jones sacking...

YOUR local paper is talking about a Cardiff signing on the day of your big European return... Says it all.

Absolutely nothing like the Jones sacking...

YOUR local paper is talking about a Cardiff signing on the day of your big European return... Says it all.

It is kind of a big deal, let's be fair. The South Wales Echo had a piece on Swansea City being in Europe, so don't be a little snide. Just as bad.

Absolutely nothing like the Jones sacking...

YOUR local paper is talking about a Cardiff signing on the day of your big European return... Says it all.

Whats the fact its a swansea paper got to do with anything? They arent swansea supporters hence the constant negative stories and conflict between paper and fans.

Come one mate you arent this thick usually.

A paper that normally dedicates news to Swansea City, should be covering Swansea's landmark game in their return to European Competiton.. Instead, it covers a story about its rivals record signing.

A paper that normally dedicates news to Swansea City, should be covering Swansea's landmark game in their return to European Competiton.. Instead, it covers a story about its rivals record signing.

Again, meaning what? The club has no control over the paper, the paper is detested by swans fans for this very point.

I dont seem to quite understand your angle.

Barry your not making sense here mate

Que

A paper that normally dedicates news to Swansea City, should be covering Swansea's landmark game in their return to European Competiton.. Instead, it covers a story about its rivals record signing.

South Wales Echo - devoted to Cardiff City - are banging on about Swansea City in Europe so you're points invalid kid. The fans don't own the papers, and to be honest, it is interesting reading about your rival clubs.

South Wales Echo - devoted to Cardiff City - are banging on about Swansea City in Europe so you're points invalid kid. The fans don't own the papers, and to be honest, it is interesting reading about your rival clubs.

Not on the day of a big game for Cardiff though, so it's YOUR points that are invalid, "kid".

South Wales Echo - devoted to Cardiff City - are banging on about Swansea City in Europe so you're points invalid kid. The fans don't own the papers, and to be honest, it is interesting reading about your rival clubs.

Not on the day of a big game for Cardiff though, so it's YOUR points that are invalid, "kid".

How so? Every newspaper which serves South Wales drills up it's pieces on Swansea City & Cardiff City. The newspapers always have a piece on Cardiff, and then Swansea. So don't play "one-up", because it's the same both ways. Even our paper the South Wales Argus has a huge piece devoted to Newport County, and then minor articles about Cardiff City and Swansea City.

You are getting my drift, plus personally I find it interesting to read about rivals clubs. Nice to have a clue, but then again, alot of Cardiff fans haven't been there during their League Two (Division Three) days. Explains those poor attendances you were getting back then.

You just arent getting it are you?

Do you even know what your point is?

Judge it equally on our first season in the top flight. We've already made far better signings than Brendan did and by the end of the transfer window will have several more top rated players like Caulker and Cornelius. After his loan spell you tried to sign Caulker. He can see the bigger picture now.

the option to sign caulker was never there when he finished with us he was going back to spurs from day one

A paper that normally dedicates news to Swansea City, should be covering Swansea's landmark game in their return to European Competiton.. Instead, it covers a story about its rivals record signing.

the evening post is a pile of shite and is the last place to go for balanced swansea news , they should be banned again for all the shit stirring about laudrup alone

Judge it equally on our first season in the top flight. We've already made far better signings than Brendan did and by the end of the transfer window will have several more top rated players like Caulker and Cornelius. After his loan spell you tried to sign Caulker. He can see the bigger picture now.

the option to sign caulker was never there when he finished with us he was going back to spurs from day one

Would you have him in your team now?

Judge it equally on our first season in the top flight. We've already made far better signings than Brendan did and by the end of the transfer window will have several more top rated players like Caulker and Cornelius. After his loan spell you tried to sign Caulker. He can see the bigger picture now.

the option to sign caulker was never there when he finished with us he was going back to spurs from day one

Would you have him in your team now?

no we have more than enough in that dept and he wouldn't get in before chico or ash we also have the spanish u-21 jordi amat and gary monk who has never let us down , do you think your fans have gone a bit OTT with the caulker signing

Judge it equally on our first season in the top flight. We've already made far better signings than Brendan did and by the end of the transfer window will have several more top rated players like Caulker and Cornelius. After his loan spell you tried to sign Caulker. He can see the bigger picture now.

the option to sign caulker was never there when he finished with us he was going back to spurs from day one

Would you have him in your team now?

no we have more than enough in that dept and he wouldn't get in before chico or ash we also have the spanish u-21 jordi amat and gary monk who has never let us down , do you think your fans have gone a bit OTT with the caulker signing

are you seriously trying to convince us you would rather Monk over Caulker?

Judge it equally on our first season in the top flight. We've already made far better signings than Brendan did and by the end of the transfer window will have several more top rated players like Caulker and Cornelius. After his loan spell you tried to sign Caulker. He can see the bigger picture now.

the option to sign caulker was never there when he finished with us he was going back to spurs from day one

Would you have him in your team now?

no we have more than enough in that dept and he wouldn't get in before chico or ash we also have the spanish u-21 jordi amat and gary monk who has never let us down , do you think your fans have gone a bit OTT with the caulker signing

Questionable Mate, think you would be in similar joy given same scenario when you went up! Don't forget lots of other people are surprised by move so it is brill signing however you look at it.
Should have said would you sign him if had chance?

Judge it equally on our first season in the top flight. We've already made far better signings than Brendan did and by the end of the transfer window will have several more top rated players like Caulker and Cornelius. After his loan spell you tried to sign Caulker. He can see the bigger picture now.

the option to sign caulker was never there when he finished with us he was going back to spurs from day one

Would you have him in your team now?

no we have more than enough in that dept and he wouldn't get in before chico or ash we also have the spanish u-21 jordi amat and gary monk who has never let us down , do you think your fans have gone a bit OTT with the caulker signing

are you seriously trying to convince us you would rather Monk over Caulker?

no you header , we don't need to spend 9 mill on caulker when we have chico , williams , amat and monk already

Judge it equally on our first season in the top flight. We've already made far better signings than Brendan did and by the end of the transfer window will have several more top rated players like Caulker and Cornelius. After his loan spell you tried to sign Caulker. He can see the bigger picture now.

the option to sign caulker was never there when he finished with us he was going back to spurs from day one

Would you have him in your team now?

no we have more than enough in that dept and he wouldn't get in before chico or ash we also have the spanish u-21 jordi amat and gary monk who has never let us down , do you think your fans have gone a bit OTT with the caulker signing

Questionable Mate, think you would be in similar joy given same scenario when you went up! Don't forget lots of other people are surprised by move so it is brill signing however you look at it.
Should have said would you sign him if had chance?

no question he's a good player but unlike you we don't need to strengthen in that position so really it would have been blowing 9 mill

Judge it equally on our first season in the top flight. We've already made far better signings than Brendan did and by the end of the transfer window will have several more top rated players like Caulker and Cornelius. After his loan spell you tried to sign Caulker. He can see the bigger picture now.

the option to sign caulker was never there when he finished with us he was going back to spurs from day one

Would you have him in your team now?

no we have more than enough in that dept and he wouldn't get in before chico or ash we also have the spanish u-21 jordi amat and gary monk who has never let us down , do you think your fans have gone a bit OTT with the caulker signing

Questionable Mate, think you would be in similar joy given same scenario when you went up! Don't forget lots of other people are surprised by move so it is brill signing however you look at it.
Should have said would you sign him if had chance?

no question he's a good player but unlike you we don't need to strengthen in that position so really it would have been blowing 9 mill

True but then you got 2yrs start on us! It looks like we are trying to miss out the 1st year consolidation type player and going slightly higher in quality, will be cheaper in long run provided it comes off, as they are younger so have longer life span.

no al your spending more money , that doesn't necessarily mean you're buying better players

You can't take seriously the opinion of someone with a name like that...

no al your spending more money , that doesn't necessarily mean you're buying better players

But prefer what we're doing compared to palace or hull, they look like buying to survive only! Looks like malky is buying to do more than that. Even though it is obviously main aim.
but one mans donkey is another's thoroughbred? Even man u made mistakes, So like yourselves up to now we've done ok in transfer market so happy with what's happening,

You can't take seriously the opinion of someone with a name like that...

Who gives a fck its called debate ok?

You can't take seriously the opinion of someone with a name like that...

google alan waddle , a swansea legend and my first hero as a kid

no al your spending more money , that doesn't necessarily mean you're buying better players

But prefer what we're doing compared to palace or hull, they look like buying to survive only! Looks like malky is buying to do more than that. Even though it is obviously main aim.
but one mans donkey is another's thoroughbred? Even man u made mistakes, So like yourselves up to now we've done ok in transfer market so happy with what's happening,

yes you're buying well by the look of it but i think your ability to pay over the odds puts you in a better place than hull and palace it's what you can afford i suppose , and he might have made you a laughung stock with the badge and playing in blue but he's as good as his word with the cash
all you have to worry about now is can you change your style of play to suit the prem because your direct approach will see you relegated IMO