DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

Well it obviously wasnt clear as Wanyama initially turned down Southampton.

For what was said to be a £1 million payment to the agent.

Now then wouldn't it be better for Celtic to pay the £1 million on behalf of Southampton to push the deal through and get a £11 million net transfer fee, rather than accept what is essentially £2 million less than the full amount?

Arsenal and Liverpool were also sniffing around, there is no way on earth they would accept such a low bid days after a bid of £12 million was lodged. that much is obvious.

Thats all conjecture and hear say. The only FACT is Wanyama initially turned down Southampton so unless they come back in with another bid (which eventually they did) then Celtic had to mull over our 10 million offer.

At 83% of the initial 12 million accepted there was more chance of a negotiation than if we offered 4 million which is what your silly Jordan Mutch ratio works out as.

Well we aren't going to agree, clearly.

Go into TESCO and ask if you can have a £2 ready meal for £1.60, then go and ask them if you can have one for 60p. They will say no to both, customers more than willing to pay £2 so the price is... £2.

There was a dispute with Wanyamas agent with regards to fees, as pointed out, Celtic could have covered that and still made more than the £10m which is claimed to have been accepted here. its nonsense, complete and utter nonsense. Cltic have also stated a bid was never accepted.

The people complaining this is a sticky are the same ones who always dig at Carl and calling him a liar.

I would do the same with the amount of s**t people give Carl.

It is hilarious, great idiots on this board.

The people complaining this is a sticky are the same ones who always dig at Carl and calling him a liar.

I would do the same with the amount of s**t people give Carl.

It is hilarious, great idiots on this board.

Ive questioned why a topic of this nature is a sticky and have never called Carl a liar.

Never cared for the ITK updates tbh, Carls or anyonelses. What will be will be, if we sign a player it gets announced before he can play for us obviously, I never understood why people have to hang off other peoples words. Be your own person.

The people complaining this is a sticky are the same ones who always dig at Carl and calling him a liar.

I would do the same with the amount of s**t people give Carl.

It is hilarious, great idiots on this board.

Ive questioned why a topic of this nature is a sticky and have never called Carl a liar.

Never cared for the ITK updates tbh, Carls or anyonelses. What will be will be, if we sign a player it gets announced before he can play for us obviously, I never understood why people have to hang off other peoples words. Be your own person.

I was on about people more like Chuckles who always digs at Carl.

It's up to people to believe what he say's, I always take it with a pinch of salt.

Chuckles just disagrees with people on here because he has a personal dislike for them.

Oh dear Roathie. Comparing negotiating a transfer to buying something from a supermarket. More ridiculous examples.

There is no way they would accept 10. hes right.

I was on about people more like Chuckles who always digs at Carl.

It's up to people to believe what he say's, I always take it with a pinch of salt.

Chuckles just disagrees with people on here because he has a personal dislike for them.

What a surprise. Singling me out again.

I "dig" at Carl & anyone else who claims to be ITK, because nobody is ITK anymore, as all the nonsense posted on here recently has proved.

No personal dislike for anyone, just think this board can do without any ITK updates and posts like this which are just crying for attention. Let people believe what they want, I know I'm not the only one who feels this way either.

I'd say you'd get more members if you did away with all the ITK & Hammam agendas.

I was on about people more like Chuckles who always digs at Carl.

It's up to people to believe what he say's, I always take it with a pinch of salt.

Chuckles just disagrees with people on here because he has a personal dislike for them.

What a surprise. Singling me out again.

I "dig" at Carl & anyone else who claims to be ITK, because nobody is ITK anymore, as all the nonsense posted on here recently has proved.

No personal dislike for anyone, just think this board can do without any ITK updates and posts like this which are just crying for attention. Let people believe what they want, I know I'm not the only one who feels this way either.

I'd say you'd get more members if you did away with all the ITK & Hammam agendas.

You disagree with anyone you don't like.

Well Carl got this spot on.

How can nobody be ITK? Some people will know some things going and some won't.

I was on about people more like Chuckles who always digs at Carl.

It's up to people to believe what he say's, I always take it with a pinch of salt.

Chuckles just disagrees with people on here because he has a personal dislike for them.

What a surprise. Singling me out again.

I "dig" at Carl & anyone else who claims to be ITK, because nobody is ITK anymore, as all the nonsense posted on here recently has proved.

No personal dislike for anyone, just think this board can do without any ITK updates and posts like this which are just crying for attention. Let people believe what they want, I know I'm not the only one who feels this way either.

I'd say you'd get more members if you did away with all the ITK & Hammam agendas.

You disagree with anyone you don't like.

Well Carl got this spot on.

How can nobody be ITK? Some people will know some things going and some won't.

Its all guesswork and repeating what has been said in the papers

You disagree with anyone you don't like.

Well Carl got this spot on.

How can nobody be ITK? Some people will know some things going and some won't.

Are you claiming to know me better than I know myself? You silly little boy.

No he didn't, he's been corrected (again!) by Steve Davies, who has sadly decided not to post anymore, after the farcical posts from the other night.

Nobody who is an active member on this forum is ITK in my mind & the forum would be a better place without all the bullshit that it creates. That's my opinion.

You disagree with anyone you don't like.

Well Carl got this spot on.

How can nobody be ITK? Some people will know some things going and some won't.

Are you claiming to know me better than I know myself? You silly little boy.

No he didn't, he's been corrected (again!) by Steve Davies, who has sadly decided not to post anymore, after the farcical posts from the other night.

Nobody who is an active member on this forum is ITK in my mind & the forum would be a better place without all the bullshit that it creates. That's my opinion.

If somebody does get some actual information then what is wrong with that? People like you kick a fuss up over it, it's rumours, speculation.. that's the beauty and fun of the Transfer Window but we have moaning killjoys who have no sense of humour like you.

The people complaining this is a sticky are the same ones who always dig at Carl and calling him a liar.

I would do the same with the amount of s**t people give Carl.

It is hilarious, great idiots on this board.

If Carl stops giving people shit then people will stop giving Carl shit!! He asks for everything he gets with his bullshit,just to build up his ego. Don't worry about Carl he's got skin like a rhino!!!

this forum is getting like a "i was right you where wrong cause i know someone you dont" ........

Don't understand why people think Malky was the one that pulled out the deal

From Tan's comments, you can clearly see he was the one that pulled the plug

Don't understand why people think Malky was the one that pulled out the deal

From Tan's comments, you can clearly see he was the one that pulled the plug

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... nyama.html

Read this report Celtic never accepted any offers from cardiff

Don't understand why people think Malky was the one that pulled out the deal

From Tan's comments, you can clearly see he was the one that pulled the plug

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... nyama.html

Read this report Celtic never accepted any offers from cardiff

Yeah because Tan didn't want to pay the extra 2 million

Don't understand why people think Malky was the one that pulled out the deal

From Tan's comments, you can clearly see he was the one that pulled the plug

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... nyama.html

Read this report Celtic never accepted any offers from cardiff

Yeah because Tan didn't want to pay the extra 2 million

Regardless the op claimed that he was right and that a bid had been accepted by Celtic the report proves that wasent the case

Don't understand why people think Malky was the one that pulled out the deal

From Tan's comments, you can clearly see he was the one that pulled the plug

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... nyama.html

Read this report Celtic never accepted any offers from cardiff

Yeah because Tan didn't want to pay the extra 2 million

Regardless the op claimed that he was right and that a bid had been accepted by Celtic the report proves that wasent the case

I never said it was the case?
Don't get why you quoted me

Don't understand why people think Malky was the one that pulled out the deal

From Tan's comments, you can clearly see he was the one that pulled the plug

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... nyama.html

Read this report Celtic never accepted any offers from cardiff

Yeah because Tan didn't want to pay the extra 2 million

Regardless the op claimed that he was right and that a bid had been accepted by Celtic the report proves that wasent the case

I never said it was the case?
Don't get why you quoted me

Sorry mate wasent having a dip I was just pointing out that regardless of tan pulling the plug his offer had never been accepted in the first place contrary to what mr Curtis stated in his original post

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

Yes, Neil Lennon can...

"There was never a deal agreed with Cardiff, and there was never a price set for Victor.

"Southampton's was the only confirmed offer we had, and it was considerably more than the figure Cardiff were talking about."

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

Yes, Neil Lennon can...

"There was never a deal agreed with Cardiff, and there was never a price set for Victor.

"Southampton's was the only confirmed offer we had, and it was considerably more than the figure Cardiff were talking about."

Steve davies was right then no wonder this thread disappeared down the board pronto from a sticky

This threads like a story line fromn eastenders, let's hope steve comes back to defend himself and it flairs up again, I can profit on the popcorn and 3d glasses I'm selling to viewers then, the last time borley and his merry men joined in I made a killing

This threads like a story line fromn eastenders, let's hope steve comes back to defend himself and it flairs up again, I can profit on the popcorn and 3d glasses I'm selling to viewers then, the last time borley and his merry men joined in I made a killing

I don't see that steve davies has anything to defend as it seems to me he was on the money unless Lennon is lying to make Carl look a tw*t

So who do you believe Lennon or Carl? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

This threads like a story line fromn eastenders, let's hope steve comes back to defend himself and it flairs up again, I can profit on the popcorn and 3d glasses I'm selling to viewers then, the last time borley and his merry men joined in I made a killing

I don't see that steve davies has anything to defend as it seems to me he was on the money unless Lennon is lying to make Carl look a tw*t

As long as it flairs up and i make money fromt he popcorn and 3d glasses i dont care who gets it going again or whos ITK either, i do like steves posts and always have good debate with him in truth

official statement from city that carl was talking bollox and knows fook all ... give it up son

http://www.cardiffcityfc.co.uk/news/article/wanyama-correction-932691.aspx?

"In relation to quotes from a press conference held on Thursday July 18, Cardiff City Football Club and Tan Sri Vincent Tan would like to clarify that while negotiations with Celtic FC were ongoing for the proposed transfer of Victor Wanyama, no formal bid was officially accepted by the Scottish Premier League Champions.



Having been unable to reach an agreement, we thanked Celtic for their cooperation and have since directed our attention to other targets."

I wouldn't know Carl (or Annis) if I saw them in the stadium. I'm not defending them either but I do feel sorry for them when anyone can post a "We're signing so-and-so for 5 million" thread and yet they get attacked for Carl's posts of the same nature.
Why single Carl out ?
Factual responses please Baz !

This thread is comedy gold!!