TLG on Bluebirds Unite

RICK+CCFC , I must admit mate, when I first seen your pic, I thought you was George Michael senior from arrested development mate, (no offence intended there btw)

Thanks.

That's me alright. No multi accounts, & nothing to hide.

RICK+CCFC , I must admit mate, when I first seen your pic, I thought you was George Michael senior from arrested development mate, (no offence intended there btw)

Thanks.

That's me alright. No multi accounts, & nothing to hide.

Agreed rick some of us dont need to troll about in shitty made up names that get on here somehow, you will find its always the ones taking the piss out of a pic or whatever on here who are the ones in hide mode 99% of the time its the same ones who have a problem with themself but mock others to make there own life feel better

When the rebrand first happened TLG thought he was going to be the saviour of our identity and everyone would follow him and protest against Vincent Tan and they didn't so he's thrown his toys out of the pram and quit following the club he's followed for 37 years

TLG is just like other abstainers.

Those who give up smoking, drinking and the like.

A pain in the arse.

TLG is just like other abstainers.

Those who give up smoking, drinking and the like.

A pain in the arse.

Well i suppose that's one way of looking at it.

Did you know that in 1969 George Best gave up women & booze?

He later said it was the longest 20 minutes of his life.

RICK+CCFC , I must admit mate, when I first seen your pic, I thought you was George Michael senior from arrested development mate, (no offence intended there btw)

Thanks.

That's me alright. No multi accounts, & nothing to hide.

Agreed rick some of us dont need to troll about in shitty made up names that get on here somehow, you will find its always the ones taking the piss out of a pic or whatever on here who are the ones in hide mode 99% of the time its the same ones who have a problem with themself but mock others to make there own life feel better

wow now, who's trolling on here mate? i was reading these posts, and i seen the pic, as i stated it wasn't my intention to offend, again if i did offend i do apologise, as for multi accounts, i don't get that bit, I've been a member on here for a while, same account everything.

RICK+CCFC , I must admit mate, when I first seen your pic, I thought you was George Michael senior from arrested development mate, (no offence intended there btw)

Thanks.

That's me alright. No multi accounts, & nothing to hide.

Agreed rick some of us dont need to troll about in shitty made up names that get on here somehow, you will find its always the ones taking the piss out of a pic or whatever on here who are the ones in hide mode 99% of the time its the same ones who have a problem with themself but mock others to make there own life feel better

wow now, who's trolling on here mate? i was reading these posts, and i seen the pic, as i stated it wasn't my intention to offend, again if i did offend i do apologise, as for multi accounts, i don't get that bit, I've been a member on here for a while, same account everything.

No offense taken fella,,, but at first i thought you meant George Michael the singer

Ive goggled the other GMJ, & i suppose there are certain similarities, on picture anyway.

When the rebrand first happened TLG thought he was going to be the saviour of our identity and everyone would follow him and protest against Vincent Tan and they didn't so he's thrown his toys out of the pram and quit following the club he's followed for 37 years

There speaks an Old School Blue who supports the Reds.

Tan's not a dictator he owns the club effectively he can do what he wants with it without some know it alls on the internet calling him a dictator. He came in an saved us whether you like it or not, I don't like the rebrand, I never will but Tan has put his hard earned cash into the club so he can what he likes.

This Who can argue with this?

Tan's not a dictator he owns the club effectively he can do what he wants with it without some know it alls on the internet calling him a dictator. He came in an saved us whether you like it or not, I don't like the rebrand, I never will but Tan has put his hard earned cash into the club so he can what he likes.

This Who can argue with this?

I can. For a start, Tan doesn't own the club.

Tan's not a dictator he owns the club effectively he can do what he wants with it without some know it alls on the internet calling him a dictator. He came in an saved us whether you like it or not, I don't like the rebrand, I never will but Tan has put his hard earned cash into the club so he can what he likes.

This Who can argue with this?

I can. For a start, Tan doesn't own the club.

This is the relevant point i was making earlier. If VT's share holding is 49%, then surely the other 51% shareholders could have vetoed the whole re-branding? Or at the very least have some form of an input or compromise into it??

Unless, of course,,the other 51% want to cash in their shares in the near future???

Tan's not a dictator he owns the club effectively he can do what he wants with it without some know it alls on the internet calling him a dictator. He came in an saved us whether you like it or not, I don't like the rebrand, I never will but Tan has put his hard earned cash into the club so he can what he likes.

This Who can argue with this?

I can. For a start, Tan doesn't own the club.

OK. You should complain to wikipedia as they disagree with you. It states Tan is the owner of Cardiff City FC!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardiff_City_F.C.

This is the relevant point i was making earlier. If VT's share holding is 49%, then surely the other 51% shareholders could have vetoed the whole re-branding? Or at the very least have some form of an input or compromise into it??

Tan's shareholding was approximately 35% the last time the relevant documents were filed at Companies House.

The shareholders had no say in the re-branding. That was passed by the board, which is largely made of up of Tan's yes-men.

Last edited by The Lone Gunman on Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

OK. You should complain to wikipedia as they disagree with you. It states Tan is the owner of Cardiff City FC!

I could edit Wikipedia today and state that Gwyn Davies owns the club. That wouldn't make it true.

OK. You should complain to wikipedia as they disagree with you. It states Tan is the owner of Cardiff City FC!

I could edit Wikipedia today and state that Gwyn Davies owns the club. That wouldn't make it true.

Move on with life mate.
Stop attention seeking on Cardiff city message boards.

OK. You should complain to wikipedia as they disagree with you. It states Tan is the owner of Cardiff City FC!

I could edit Wikipedia today and state that Gwyn Davies owns the club. That wouldn't make it true.

Move on with life mate.
Stop attention seeking on Cardiff city message boards.

If we said that to everyone who posted there be nobody left

OK. You should complain to wikipedia as they disagree with you. It states Tan is the owner of Cardiff City FC!

I could edit Wikipedia today and state that Gwyn Davies owns the club. That wouldn't make it true.

Move on with life mate.
Stop attention seeking on Cardiff city message boards.

If we said that to everyone who posted there be nobody left

I don't agree with the description of Tan as a "dictator". I would describe Tan as a very shrewd, & success driven business man,,,very objective,,& a person who wont accept failure in any of his business ventures, of which Cardiff City FC is one.

For him our re-brand was very, very simple.

Apart from that, i agree with what Dave said. There's a "point of readiness" in every one's life,,,regarding anything personal.

I respect DS's decision, & i hope that time does heal for him,,, & the others that have taken the same stance.

I absolutely agree Rick. @ the end of the day CCFC is a business not an institution which has to make it's own way in the world.

However VT is providing the funds he is still responsible for millions of £'s worth of investment so obviously he calls the shots. Frankly anyone who thinks he should hold a vote on his every decision is deluding themselves.

Tan's not a dictator he owns the club effectively he can do what he wants with it without some know it alls on the internet calling him a dictator. He came in an saved us whether you like it or not, I don't like the rebrand, I never will but Tan has put his hard earned cash into the club so he can what he likes.

This Who can argue with this?

I can. For a start, Tan doesn't own the club.

This is the relevant point i was making earlier. If VT's share holding is 49%, then surely the other 51% shareholders could have vetoed the whole re-branding? Or at the very least have some form of an input or compromise into it??

Unless, of course,,the other 51% want to cash in their shares in the near future???

The Board are the day to day representatives of the shareholders. If the shareholders are against what the board are doing i.e. the rebrand then the Shareholders could call an EGM and sack them for a new board who can then reverse their actions.

In the case of CCFC I would imagine that was next to impossible because the vast majority of shareholders (% held not individually) would be in favour of the rebrand.

One mans accurate assessment of what's gone on down the city.
sad to see a man turn his back on city after 37 years especially now we've finally reached the premier league.

I'm Spartacus only been on here a couple of days and look forward to debating all things city.

Couldnt stay away for long then

That's not me either. Roathie by the looks of things is doing you a good'un. This is my only account and I post on Reddit now in the bluebirds subreddit.

I don't agree with the description of Tan as a "dictator". I would describe Tan as a very shrewd, & success driven business man,,,very objective,,& a person who wont accept failure in any of his business ventures, of which Cardiff City FC is one.

For him our re-brand was very, very simple.

Apart from that, i agree with what Dave said. There's a "point of readiness" in every one's life,,,regarding anything personal.

I respect DS's decision, & i hope that time does heal for him,,, & the others that have taken the same stance.

I absolutely agree Rick. @ the end of the day CCFC is a business not an institution which has to make it's own way in the world.

However VT is providing the funds he is still responsible for millions of £'s worth of investment so obviously he calls the shots. Frankly anyone who thinks he should hold a vote on his every decision is deluding themselves.

To my knowledge Nobody has ever suggested that VT govern by consensus on EVERY issue, this is certainly not the view of BU in the meetings i attended, where did you get that idea from?

Tesco is a business
Starbucks are a business
Apple is a business
Is your affinity with CCFC on a par with your favourite business?

Move on with life mate.
Stop attention seeking on Cardiff city message boards.

I have 492 posts on this board. You have 1,493.

Move on with life, mate. Stop attention-seeking on Cardiff City message boards.

TLG is just like other abstainers.

Those who give up smoking, drinking and the like.

A pain in the arse.

Well i suppose that's one way of looking at it.

Did you know that in 1969 George Best gave up women & booze?

He later said it was the longest 20 minutes of his life.

A mate of mine gave up smoking, beer, sex & football.

You could not meet a more miserable sod. Complains about everything. His name is Dave too.

Awww you have an imaginary friend May i ask his view on the rebrand?

RICK+CCFC , I must admit mate, when I first seen your pic, I thought you was George Michael senior from arrested development mate, (no offence intended there btw)

Thanks.

That's me alright. No multi accounts, & nothing to hide.

Agreed rick some of us dont need to troll about in shitty made up names that get on here somehow, you will find its always the ones taking the piss out of a pic or whatever on here who are the ones in hide mode 99% of the time its the same ones who have a problem with themself but mock others to make there own life feel better

wow now, who's trolling on here mate? i was reading these posts, and i seen the pic, as i stated it wasn't my intention to offend, again if i did offend i do apologise, as for multi accounts, i don't get that bit, I've been a member on here for a while, same account everything.

No offense taken fella,,, but at first i thought you meant George Michael the singer

Ive goggled the other GMJ, & i suppose there are certain similarities, on picture anyway.

good, no mate didn't mean the singer, George Michael senior from the show arrested development, i only quickly glanced at your pic and then i thought ooh he looks like him hah.

Awww you have an imaginary friend May i ask his view on the rebrand?

Maybe he is not imaginary but anonymous just like 15% of your petition signatures.

OK. You should complain to wikipedia as they disagree with you. It states Tan is the owner of Cardiff City FC!

I could edit Wikipedia today and state that Gwyn Davies owns the club. That wouldn't make it true.

I don't think you can edit that part. I'd love to see you try it though

Move on with life mate.
Stop attention seeking on Cardiff city message boards.

I have 492 posts on this board. You have 1,493.

Move on with life, mate. Stop attention-seeking on Cardiff City message boards.

TLG I think you should post more on here! This Forum is much better than the one you normally post stuff. that forum has too much random stuff going on!

Move on with life mate.
Stop attention seeking on Cardiff city message boards.

I have 492 posts on this board. You have 1,493.

Move on with life, mate. Stop attention-seeking on Cardiff City message boards.

I am a Cardiff city fan.
Your not.
There lies the difference.

Awww you have an imaginary friend May i ask his view on the rebrand?

Maybe he is not imaginary but anonymous just like 15% of your petition signatures.

Your word 'maybe' denotes a fair degree of self-doubt as to whether your friend exists at all.


New balls.