Wed May 22, 2013 7:04 am
Wed May 22, 2013 7:06 am
Wed May 22, 2013 8:03 am
Nuclearblue wrote:What I see is very sad is the OP having a go at a fellow City fan because he does not have the love for the red and black and a badge that is not in anyway connected to Cardiff City. I have the utmost respect for Simon and his views and he is one City fan I would like to see back. A fan who is not afraid to say what he feels.I have said before the best way to show your contempt at the rape of our identity is not by disappearing which is whished by the red lovers but to be a voice in the stadium.
Wed May 22, 2013 9:26 am
Fri May 24, 2013 9:50 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:banana wrote:A young girl posts on twitter how she loves her team and this frigging wally appears
kcb what the f...
shauny simkiss @shaunysimkiss 15 May
love my team! #ccfc @CCFCwomensteam pic.twitter.com/A2czVrZocZ
View photo
BluebirdForEver @damo1927 16 May
@shaunysimkiss @CCFCwomensteam in the right colour for playing Rugby But @CardiffCityFC NOT OUR BLUEBIRDS #TanOut pic.twitter.com/446cGFsVly
View photo
Yes, there are some wallies on twitter. Don't hit us all with the same bat, however.
I could point out pro-reds that have felt it necessary to intimidate/threaten others to get their point across too...
Fri May 24, 2013 9:56 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Are you saying that Tan wouldn't have any rich contacts?okay.
Neither of us knows what would happen, but to assume that we would close down, is wrong.
None of them have stepped forward so far, despite his desire to people to join with him in investing...
Given our history in the years before before June 2012, it is a extremely reasonable assumption.
He doesn't want any to invest now, as he is in sole control. He was going to IF we didn't agree to rebrand.
Fri May 24, 2013 10:01 am
Ramstein blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Are you saying that Tan wouldn't have any rich contacts?okay.
Neither of us knows what would happen, but to assume that we would close down, is wrong.
None of them have stepped forward so far, despite his desire to people to join with him in investing...
Given our history in the years before before June 2012, it is a extremely reasonable assumption.
He doesn't want any to invest now, as he is in sole control. He was going to IF we didn't agree to rebrand.
If he didnt want any investment, he wouldnt float the club. owning shares in the club no matter how small is investment.
Fri May 24, 2013 10:03 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Ramstein blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Are you saying that Tan wouldn't have any rich contacts?okay.
Neither of us knows what would happen, but to assume that we would close down, is wrong.
None of them have stepped forward so far, despite his desire to people to join with him in investing...
Given our history in the years before before June 2012, it is a extremely reasonable assumption.
He doesn't want any to invest now, as he is in sole control. He was going to IF we didn't agree to rebrand.
If he didnt want any investment, he wouldnt float the club. owning shares in the club no matter how small is investment.
Didn't realise he had already floated it..![]()
Easy to say that now there's rumours of a flotation.
Fri May 24, 2013 10:06 am
Ramstein blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Ramstein blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Are you saying that Tan wouldn't have any rich contacts?okay.
Neither of us knows what would happen, but to assume that we would close down, is wrong.
None of them have stepped forward so far, despite his desire to people to join with him in investing...
Given our history in the years before before June 2012, it is a extremely reasonable assumption.
He doesn't want any to invest now, as he is in sole control. He was going to IF we didn't agree to rebrand.
If he didnt want any investment, he wouldnt float the club. owning shares in the club no matter how small is investment.
Didn't realise he had already floated it..![]()
Easy to say that now there's rumours of a flotation.
Well even BBC are reporting that hes looking to float. And yes it easy to say now, as its happening, so what you have said looks to be in the process of being wrong, or has VT had a change of heart since you posted your comments and just thought about floating th club?
Fri May 24, 2013 10:16 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:
Yes, there are some wallies on twitter. Don't hit us all with the same bat, however.
I could point out pro-reds that have felt it necessary to intimidate/threaten others to get their point across too...
Fri May 24, 2013 10:20 am
Pontyclun Blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:
Yes, there are some wallies on twitter. Don't hit us all with the same bat, however.
I could point out pro-reds that have felt it necessary to intimidate/threaten others to get their point across too...
Who are they Chucks, or have you made them up, 3rd time of asking now
Fri May 24, 2013 10:28 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:
Yes, there are some wallies on twitter. Don't hit us all with the same bat, however.
I could point out pro-reds that have felt it necessary to intimidate/threaten others to get their point across too...
Who are they Chucks, or have you made them up, 3rd time of asking now
Events that are well documented on here and CCMB. If you're that interested, search yourself. At least it will stop you writing posts that make you look silly.
Fri May 24, 2013 10:37 am
Pontyclun Blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:
Yes, there are some wallies on twitter. Don't hit us all with the same bat, however.
I could point out pro-reds that have felt it necessary to intimidate/threaten others to get their point across too...
Who are they Chucks, or have you made them up, 3rd time of asking now
Events that are well documented on here and CCMB. If you're that interested, search yourself. At least it will stop you writing posts that make you look silly.
You are moving the goal posts Chucks, you said YOU could point out, I didn't say it you did Why would I waste my time looking it up when you said you could point it out![]()
I think it's the end of the thread for me as you will come back with something silly as norn , so
![]()
![]()
Fri May 24, 2013 11:04 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Are you saying that Tan wouldn't have any rich contacts?okay.
Neither of us knows what would happen, but to assume that we would close down, is wrong.
None of them have stepped forward so far, despite his desire to people to join with him in investing...
Given our history in the years before before June 2012, it is a extremely reasonable assumption.
He doesn't want any to invest now, as he is in sole control. He was going to IF we didn't agree to rebrand.
The whole point of the red is to attract major investment and support from the Asian area.
Do you actually believe that?!![]()
It's quite obvious that this rebrand was because of one man's favourite colour & his love of make believe dragons.
Fri May 24, 2013 11:16 am
JimmyJazz wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Are you saying that Tan wouldn't have any rich contacts?okay.
Neither of us knows what would happen, but to assume that we would close down, is wrong.
None of them have stepped forward so far, despite his desire to people to join with him in investing...
Given our history in the years before before June 2012, it is a extremely reasonable assumption.
He doesn't want any to invest now, as he is in sole control. He was going to IF we didn't agree to rebrand.
The whole point of the red is to attract major investment and support from the Asian area.
Do you actually believe that?!![]()
It's quite obvious that this rebrand was because of one man's favourite colour & his love of make believe dragons.
It's quite obvious that you appear to be an "argue-for-the-sake-of-it" attention seeking person.
Fri May 24, 2013 11:41 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:
Yes, there are some wallies on twitter. Don't hit us all with the same bat, however.
I could point out pro-reds that have felt it necessary to intimidate/threaten others to get their point across too...
Who are they Chucks, or have you made them up, 3rd time of asking now
Events that are well documented on here and CCMB. If you're that interested, search yourself. At least it will stop you writing posts that make you look silly.
You are moving the goal posts Chucks, you said YOU could point out, I didn't say it you did Why would I waste my time looking it up when you said you could point it out![]()
I think it's the end of the thread for me as you will come back with something silly as norn , so
![]()
![]()
Fri May 24, 2013 12:16 pm
Fri May 24, 2013 12:21 pm
mjw6150 wrote:Rubbish response Chuckles, both sides have been guilty of threats and disparaging actions and comments.
Fri May 24, 2013 12:57 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:Rubbish response Chuckles, both sides have been guilty of threats and disparaging actions and comments.
WHICH WAS EXACTLY MY POINT.![]()
Can't you read?
It was said that people absurd red shirt wearers, so I said it's not all one sided, pro rebranders have done some silly things too & pointed them out.
I even acknowledged this with my comment that BOTH sides are guilty of certain things.
Fri May 24, 2013 12:58 pm
Fri May 24, 2013 9:47 pm