Fri Apr 19, 2013 9:59 pm
Paxman wrote:spanishbluebird wrote:Paxman wrote:Another woeful match of a terrible standard. Anyone with any delusions that this isn't the weakest league in years and years will hopefully have awoken and had a great whiff of coffee tonight.
the championship is the most competitive league in Europe...fact
paxman the most boring b*stard ...fact
Well it isn't a fact, you just made it up.
However why do people confuse competitiveness with quality. As we have seen, everyone seems just as bad as each other. That's not the sign of a quality league is it.
Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:00 pm
spanishbluebird wrote:Paxman wrote:bluearmy1990 wrote:No they are clear because man city ain't been the same team as last season neither are arsenal, chelsea, liverpool, newcastle and so on.. not because they signed van persieyou clown!
Arsenal aren't the same team as they were the ones who lost van Persie.
Chelsea are higher than they were last year, as are Liverpool, Newcastle are weaker but spurs are stronger.
Not a difficult concept.
paxman look how shit all the prem clubs did in Europe ,good players don't make great teams
Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:00 pm
spanishbluebird wrote:Paxman wrote:spanishbluebird wrote:Paxman wrote:Another woeful match of a terrible standard. Anyone with any delusions that this isn't the weakest league in years and years will hopefully have awoken and had a great whiff of coffee tonight.
the championship is the most competitive league in Europe...fact
paxman the most boring b*stard ...fact
Well it isn't a fact, you just made it up.
However why do people confuse competitiveness with quality. As we have seen, everyone seems just as bad as each other. That's not the sign of a quality league is it.
I didn't make it up ,you are a boring b*stard and another fact for you Cardiff city NPower championship2012/13 champions..brilliant isn't it
Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:01 pm
Paxman wrote:pembroke allan wrote:funny how premier is quality! when man u are so far ahead of everyone else and yet every expert says its not one of their best teams? doesn't sound like quality league does it? but the stupid part is you are still bestowing the virtues of them down m4 and belittling citys achievement! not once have you praised city on promotion all you spout about is how dross champ is! your opinion of course, and judgeing by peoples opinion of you on here tonight its not worth much.![]()
If you think man united were good last year then it's basically the same team with Kagawa and van Persie added.
Simple as that.
Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:02 pm
Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:03 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Paxman wrote:pembroke allan wrote:funny how premier is quality! when man u are so far ahead of everyone else and yet every expert says its not one of their best teams? doesn't sound like quality league does it? but the stupid part is you are still bestowing the virtues of them down m4 and belittling citys achievement! not once have you praised city on promotion all you spout about is how dross champ is! your opinion of course, and judgeing by peoples opinion of you on here tonight its not worth much.![]()
If you think man united were good last year then it's basically the same team with Kagawa and van Persie added.
Simple as that.
mmm where did I say man u were good? not having good night are you?
Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:05 pm
what so the champions league is not a group stage followed by a 2 leg affair,Paxman wrote:spanishbluebird wrote:Paxman wrote:bluearmy1990 wrote:No they are clear because man city ain't been the same team as last season neither are arsenal, chelsea, liverpool, newcastle and so on.. not because they signed van persieyou clown!
Arsenal aren't the same team as they were the ones who lost van Persie.
Chelsea are higher than they were last year, as are Liverpool, Newcastle are weaker but spurs are stronger.
Not a difficult concept.
paxman look how shit all the prem clubs did in Europe ,good players don't make great teams
If anyone bases the quality if a nations league on a knockout competition then their logic is flawed from the off. Look how we did in the FA and league cup.
The quality of football on show in the premier league has been superb.
Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:06 pm
spanishbluebird wrote:what so the champions league is not a group stage followed by a 2 leg affair,Paxman wrote:spanishbluebird wrote:Paxman wrote:bluearmy1990 wrote:No they are clear because man city ain't been the same team as last season neither are arsenal, chelsea, liverpool, newcastle and so on.. not because they signed van persieyou clown!
Arsenal aren't the same team as they were the ones who lost van Persie.
Chelsea are higher than they were last year, as are Liverpool, Newcastle are weaker but spurs are stronger.
Not a difficult concept.
paxman look how shit all the prem clubs did in Europe ,good players don't make great teams
If anyone bases the quality if a nations league on a knockout competition then their logic is flawed from the off. Look how we did in the FA and league cup.
The quality of football on show in the premier league has been superb.
Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:10 pm
Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:11 pm
nobby wrote:Paxman. Your an obsessed and one sad jack right or wrong.
Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:12 pm
nobby wrote:Paxman. Your an obsessed and one sad jack right or wrong.
Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:15 pm
Paxman wrote:nobby wrote:Paxman. Your an obsessed and one sad jack right or wrong.
That makes absolutely no sense at all. You aren't swansealad69 are you?
Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:16 pm
Paxman wrote:spanishbluebird wrote:what so the champions league is not a group stage followed by a 2 leg affair,Paxman wrote:spanishbluebird wrote:Paxman wrote:bluearmy1990 wrote:No they are clear because man city ain't been the same team as last season neither are arsenal, chelsea, liverpool, newcastle and so on.. not because they signed van persieyou clown!
Arsenal aren't the same team as they were the ones who lost van Persie.
Chelsea are higher than they were last year, as are Liverpool, Newcastle are weaker but spurs are stronger.
Not a difficult concept.
paxman look how shit all the prem clubs did in Europe ,good players don't make great teams
If anyone bases the quality if a nations league on a knockout competition then their logic is flawed from the off. Look how we did in the FA and league cup.
The quality of football on show in the premier league has been superb.
Yes it is. And the loser is KNOCKED OUT.
Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:22 pm
spanishbluebird wrote:
so man city played 6 games and finished bottom of their group ,why ? because they were unlucky or because they were the worst team in the group, that my point, not as strong as it use to be like a few years back when the quarter finals and semi's were full of prem teams ,and thats the last I'll say on the matter because your boring me now with your dross
Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:24 pm
nobby wrote:Paxman wrote:nobby wrote:Paxman. Your an obsessed and one sad jack right or wrong.
That makes absolutely no sense at all. You aren't swansealad69 are you?
Are you a jack and are you obsessed with us. Is that simple enough smart arse.
Sat Apr 20, 2013 2:12 am
Paxman wrote:brewer918 wrote:Paxman wrote:Another woeful match of a terrible standard. Anyone with any delusions that this isn't the weakest league in years and years will hopefully have awoken and had a great whiff of coffee tonight.
To be honest who really cares!! We are going up as champions!! Let's be honest the premiership hasnt been up to standard either!! The mind really boggles at some of your comments on here!! Underhand digs at our achievements. Just let it go for god sake.
It just goes to show how close the championship is and that to me is a very exciting league. Anyone can beat anyone!!
The premiership has been an excellent league. Look at the players that have come into it since last year and the only one to leave is Balotelli.
Nothing to do with having a dig, I'm Cardiff too. I'm just being honest and realistic.
Sat Apr 20, 2013 4:27 am
McPhailS wrote:Paxman wrote:brewer918 wrote:Paxman wrote:Another woeful match of a terrible standard. Anyone with any delusions that this isn't the weakest league in years and years will hopefully have awoken and had a great whiff of coffee tonight.
To be honest who really cares!! We are going up as champions!! Let's be honest the premiership hasnt been up to standard either!! The mind really boggles at some of your comments on here!! Underhand digs at our achievements. Just let it go for god sake.
It just goes to show how close the championship is and that to me is a very exciting league. Anyone can beat anyone!!
The premiership has been an excellent league. Look at the players that have come into it since last year and the only one to leave is Balotelli.
Nothing to do with having a dig, I'm Cardiff too. I'm just being honest and realistic.
Honest and realistic?
FFS your username says it all......delusions of grandeur.
Your a spoofer.
Sat Apr 20, 2013 4:47 am
Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:20 am
aj1927 wrote:I don't think the league is a strong as it has been, but it has been worse in the past. If that makes us the best of a bad bunch then so be it. It's has been a very poor showing from the relegated sides this season but Bolton Blackburn and Wolves were never the biggest names in the premiership despite Wolves rich history and Blackburn being previous winners,whilst Recent times have seen marquee names like Newcastle and WestHam add to the attraction of the league.
I don't see Pax's angle on this thread, but we rarely agree on topics anyway.
Either way, I'm sitting on M17 heading towards Preston looking very much forward to seeing the Champions and Newest Addition to the Premier League.
Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:51 am
Paxman wrote:aj1927 wrote:I don't think the league is a strong as it has been, but it has been worse in the past. If that makes us the best of a bad bunch then so be it. It's has been a very poor showing from the relegated sides this season but Bolton Blackburn and Wolves were never the biggest names in the premiership despite Wolves rich history and Blackburn being previous winners,whilst Recent times have seen marquee names like Newcastle and WestHam add to the attraction of the league.
I don't see Pax's angle on this thread, but we rarely agree on topics anyway.
Either way, I'm sitting on M17 heading towards Preston looking very much forward to seeing the Champions and Newest Addition to the Premier League.
You have said you don't see my angle yet have agreed with me, people tend to do that a lot.
Sat Apr 20, 2013 8:05 am
Paxman wrote:bluearmy1990 wrote:No they are clear because man city ain't been the same team as last season neither are arsenal, chelsea, liverpool, newcastle and so on.. not because they signed van persieyou clown!
Arsenal aren't the same team as they were the ones who lost van Persie.
Chelsea are higher than they were last year, as are Liverpool, Newcastle are weaker but spurs are stronger.
Not a difficult concept.
Sat Apr 20, 2013 8:38 am
castleblue wrote:Paxman wrote:bluearmy1990 wrote:No they are clear because man city ain't been the same team as last season neither are arsenal, chelsea, liverpool, newcastle and so on.. not because they signed van persieyou clown!
Arsenal aren't the same team as they were the ones who lost van Persie.
Chelsea are higher than they were last year, as are Liverpool, Newcastle are weaker but spurs are stronger.
Not a difficult concept.
So Chelsea lost Drogba, Essien, Malouda, Kalou and Bowsinga and are "Higher"How does that work paxoman as this time last year they were in a Champions League semi final, an FA Cup Final, I could go on.
By the way are you sure only Ballotelli left the Premier League or is that just more nonsense from a brain muddled by eating to much monkey meat.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sat Apr 20, 2013 8:46 am
Sat Apr 20, 2013 10:21 am
Sat Apr 20, 2013 10:24 am
Carpe Diem wrote:It's not about individual players its about how they gel as a team. The talk of many tv and radio pundits is that Man U have not been as convincing as previous seasons in terms of perfomances, yet find themselves romping the league. All about opinions but merely pointing to players coming in ignores form, injuries, team dynamics etc. You could sign whoever, but if the current players get injured or don't perform then the team doesn't necessarily get better.
Life is rarely so simple as to narrow your argument to one variable and just makes it very naive and unconvincing.
That's me done!
Sat Apr 20, 2013 10:43 am
Paxman wrote: I couldn't give a toss what pundits say, I have my own eyes and half those pundits don't know their arse from their elbow.
Sat Apr 20, 2013 10:46 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Paxman wrote: I couldn't give a toss what pundits say, I have my own eyes and half those pundits don't know their arse from their elbow.
Yet you use pundits in other posts as examples to back up your stories/ramblings.
Sat Apr 20, 2013 10:47 am
Paxman wrote:Sorry to add to your woes but I didnt see you claimed Chelsea lost Essien too.
You really didnt think about your post did you?
Sat Apr 20, 2013 10:48 am
Sat Apr 20, 2013 10:53 am
castleblue wrote:Paxman wrote:Sorry to add to your woes but I didnt see you claimed Chelsea lost Essien too.
You really didnt think about your post did you?
Does he play for Chelsea paxoman![]()
No on loan at Real Madrid which means he has left the Premier League doesn't it.
Maybe not when you have a muddled brain from eating to much monkey meat.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()