Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:47 pm
Eric_from_Ely wrote:no amount of last words will make you any less wrong
I am still waiting for you to work out a way to invoke double zero into your 3/1 hat example![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
1 in 3 you berk!
Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:50 pm
Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:51 pm
Paxman wrote:Eric_from_Ely wrote:no amount of last words will make you any less wrong
I am still waiting for you to work out a way to invoke double zero into your 3/1 hat example![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
1 in 3 you berk!
What?
European tables have 37 numbers. The probability of it landing on a specific number is 1/37. If its an American table they have an extra number a "00" meaning it is then written as 1/38.
As the link shows you.
No amount of smileys changes that.
Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:54 pm
Eric_from_Ely wrote:Paxman wrote:Eric_from_Ely wrote:no amount of last words will make you any less wrong
I am still waiting for you to work out a way to invoke double zero into your 3/1 hat example![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
1 in 3 you berk!
What?
European tables have 37 numbers. The probability of it landing on a specific number is 1/37. If its an American table they have an extra number a "00" meaning it is then written as 1/38.
As the link shows you.
No amount of smileys changes that.
right, so I see you have finally reversed the figures and accepted that you were wrong to say 37/1, which you now understand (having been educated by me) is totally different from 1/37.
I thank you
I thank you
I thank you
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Case closed.
Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:56 pm
Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:00 pm
Eric_from_Ely wrote:The forum has spoken, and declared you wrong.
Nothing else you can type will change this factual information