Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:12 am
Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:46 am
waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:53 am
Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:54 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
Still changing history are we? Do yourself a favour and f**k off and toll someone else as you have completely lost all credibility after this one.
What a tosser
Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:55 am
waddle wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
Still changing history are we? Do yourself a favour and f**k off and toll someone else as you have completely lost all credibility after this one.
What a tosser
oh i forgot about you - nobby , cityone and tony , 3 of the stupidest people to ever draw breath![]()
how am I changing history you dullard , a post was made saying that 15 pts from a possible 36 would be enough to get you promoted and it wasn't FACT
Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:58 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:waddle wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
Still changing history are we? Do yourself a favour and f**k off and toll someone else as you have completely lost all credibility after this one.
What a tosser
oh i forgot about you - nobby , cityone and tony , 3 of the stupidest people to ever draw breath![]()
how am I changing history you dullard , a post was made saying that 15 pts from a possible 36 would be enough to get you promoted and it wasn't FACT
In your mind and little world it is any wayWhat a prize prick
Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:04 am
Paxman wrote:Have I taught this board nothing?
Cardiff had the upper hand on this thread as soon as it was posted and it has now descended into so much nonsense it's swung very much back in Swansea's favour.
We will not be as big as man utd in Malaysia in 5 years, not in 50 years either or 500. We will probably be as big as QPR over there, in fact probably less as they have on of the most famous Asian footballers on their books... And QPR aren't very popular over there either may I add.
Waddle is correct. One of my pet hates is someone clearly making a point declaring a specific point in time and someone taking it to the future and applying it to a time frame in which the comment was not intended. Bakedalaskar fell foul of this when on a thread marked "as it stands" I posted how the table stood after Watford scored, yet because the other team equalised 15 minutes later my initial comment was deemed to be a mistake on my part. Needless to say I put him in his place and he deleted the thread
Waddle is correct.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:08 am
waddle wrote:Paxman wrote:Have I taught this board nothing?
Cardiff had the upper hand on this thread as soon as it was posted and it has now descended into so much nonsense it's swung very much back in Swansea's favour.
We will not be as big as man utd in Malaysia in 5 years, not in 50 years either or 500. We will probably be as big as QPR over there, in fact probably less as they have on of the most famous Asian footballers on their books... And QPR aren't very popular over there either may I add.
Waddle is correct. One of my pet hates is someone clearly making a point declaring a specific point in time and someone taking it to the future and applying it to a time frame in which the comment was not intended. Bakedalaskar fell foul of this when on a thread marked "as it stands" I posted how the table stood after Watford scored, yet because the other team equalised 15 minutes later my initial comment was deemed to be a mistake on my part. Needless to say I put him in his place and he deleted the thread
Waddle is correct.
TBF mate it's only 3 of them out of the whole board that are to thick to see it , the fact they keep going is quite amusing though
Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:48 am
Paxman wrote:waddle wrote:Paxman wrote:Have I taught this board nothing?
Cardiff had the upper hand on this thread as soon as it was posted and it has now descended into so much nonsense it's swung very much back in Swansea's favour.
We will not be as big as man utd in Malaysia in 5 years, not in 50 years either or 500. We will probably be as big as QPR over there, in fact probably less as they have on of the most famous Asian footballers on their books... And QPR aren't very popular over there either may I add.
Waddle is correct. One of my pet hates is someone clearly making a point declaring a specific point in time and someone taking it to the future and applying it to a time frame in which the comment was not intended. Bakedalaskar fell foul of this when on a thread marked "as it stands" I posted how the table stood after Watford scored, yet because the other team equalised 15 minutes later my initial comment was deemed to be a mistake on my part. Needless to say I put him in his place and he deleted the thread
Waddle is correct.
TBF mate it's only 3 of them out of the whole board that are to thick to see it , the fact they keep going is quite amusing though
I'm literally staggered each day by the stupidity of some people on this board, and they wonder why people keep returning
Carpe die, is my latest amusement, you won't believe the amount of unbelievably stupid stuff that guy comes out with, apparently Liverpool only changed to red in the 60's, arsenal are a better team without carzola and Chelsea are a better team without hazard - not to mention the championship being as strong as ever even though all the prem teams are in turmoil, none of the big names are firing, we haven't played well all year and are clear of 3rd by 8points and the top 4 consists of Cardiff, Watford, hull and crystal palace
These creatures are fascinating.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:55 am
Paxman wrote:waddle wrote:Paxman wrote:Have I taught this board nothing?
Cardiff had the upper hand on this thread as soon as it was posted and it has now descended into so much nonsense it's swung very much back in Swansea's favour.
We will not be as big as man utd in Malaysia in 5 years, not in 50 years either or 500. We will probably be as big as QPR over there, in fact probably less as they have on of the most famous Asian footballers on their books... And QPR aren't very popular over there either may I add.
Waddle is correct. One of my pet hates is someone clearly making a point declaring a specific point in time and someone taking it to the future and applying it to a time frame in which the comment was not intended. Bakedalaskar fell foul of this when on a thread marked "as it stands" I posted how the table stood after Watford scored, yet because the other team equalised 15 minutes later my initial comment was deemed to be a mistake on my part. Needless to say I put him in his place and he deleted the thread
Waddle is correct.
TBF mate it's only 3 of them out of the whole board that are to thick to see it , the fact they keep going is quite amusing though
I'm literally staggered each day by the stupidity of some people on this board, and they wonder why people keep returning
Carpe die, is my latest amusement, you won't believe the amount of unbelievably stupid stuff that guy comes out with, apparently Liverpool only changed to red in the 60's, arsenal are a better team without carzola and Chelsea are a better team without hazard - not to mention the championship being as strong as ever even though all the prem teams are in turmoil, none of the big names are firing, we haven't played well all year and are clear of 3rd by 8points and the top 4 consists of Cardiff, Watford, hull and crystal palace
These creatures are fascinating.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:02 am
Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:25 am
Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:27 am
Bakedalasker wrote:Paxman wrote:waddle wrote:Paxman wrote:Have I taught this board nothing?
Cardiff had the upper hand on this thread as soon as it was posted and it has now descended into so much nonsense it's swung very much back in Swansea's favour.
We will not be as big as man utd in Malaysia in 5 years, not in 50 years either or 500. We will probably be as big as QPR over there, in fact probably less as they have on of the most famous Asian footballers on their books... And QPR aren't very popular over there either may I add.
Waddle is correct. One of my pet hates is someone clearly making a point declaring a specific point in time and someone taking it to the future and applying it to a time frame in which the comment was not intended. Bakedalaskar fell foul of this when on a thread marked "as it stands" I posted how the table stood after Watford scored, yet because the other team equalised 15 minutes later my initial comment was deemed to be a mistake on my part. Needless to say I put him in his place and he deleted the thread
Waddle is correct.
TBF mate it's only 3 of them out of the whole board that are to thick to see it , the fact they keep going is quite amusing though
I'm literally staggered each day by the stupidity of some people on this board, and they wonder why people keep returning
Carpe die, is my latest amusement, you won't believe the amount of unbelievably stupid stuff that guy comes out with, apparently Liverpool only changed to red in the 60's, arsenal are a better team without carzola and Chelsea are a better team without hazard - not to mention the championship being as strong as ever even though all the prem teams are in turmoil, none of the big names are firing, we haven't played well all year and are clear of 3rd by 8points and the top 4 consists of Cardiff, Watford, hull and crystal palace
These creatures are fascinating.
ffs Paxman I did not fall foul at all. You just proved what an argumentive shit you are and will argue until the cows come home over the smallest of things.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:30 am
Cardiff Daft! wrote:Paxman wrote:waddle wrote:Paxman wrote:Have I taught this board nothing?
Cardiff had the upper hand on this thread as soon as it was posted and it has now descended into so much nonsense it's swung very much back in Swansea's favour.
We will not be as big as man utd in Malaysia in 5 years, not in 50 years either or 500. We will probably be as big as QPR over there, in fact probably less as they have on of the most famous Asian footballers on their books... And QPR aren't very popular over there either may I add.
Waddle is correct. One of my pet hates is someone clearly making a point declaring a specific point in time and someone taking it to the future and applying it to a time frame in which the comment was not intended. Bakedalaskar fell foul of this when on a thread marked "as it stands" I posted how the table stood after Watford scored, yet because the other team equalised 15 minutes later my initial comment was deemed to be a mistake on my part. Needless to say I put him in his place and he deleted the thread
Waddle is correct.
TBF mate it's only 3 of them out of the whole board that are to thick to see it , the fact they keep going is quite amusing though
I'm literally staggered each day by the stupidity of some people on this board, and they wonder why people keep returning
Carpe die, is my latest amusement, you won't believe the amount of unbelievably stupid stuff that guy comes out with, apparently Liverpool only changed to red in the 60's, arsenal are a better team without carzola and Chelsea are a better team without hazard - not to mention the championship being as strong as ever even though all the prem teams are in turmoil, none of the big names are firing, we haven't played well all year and are clear of 3rd by 8points and the top 4 consists of Cardiff, Watford, hull and crystal palace
These creatures are fascinating.
look at me waddle, im making cardiff fans look stupid. have i done well? does that mean im your friend now![]()
CRINGE!
Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:36 am
Paxman wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Paxman wrote:waddle wrote:Paxman wrote:Have I taught this board nothing?
Cardiff had the upper hand on this thread as soon as it was posted and it has now descended into so much nonsense it's swung very much back in Swansea's favour.
We will not be as big as man utd in Malaysia in 5 years, not in 50 years either or 500. We will probably be as big as QPR over there, in fact probably less as they have on of the most famous Asian footballers on their books... And QPR aren't very popular over there either may I add.
Waddle is correct. One of my pet hates is someone clearly making a point declaring a specific point in time and someone taking it to the future and applying it to a time frame in which the comment was not intended. Bakedalaskar fell foul of this when on a thread marked "as it stands" I posted how the table stood after Watford scored, yet because the other team equalised 15 minutes later my initial comment was deemed to be a mistake on my part. Needless to say I put him in his place and he deleted the thread
Waddle is correct.
TBF mate it's only 3 of them out of the whole board that are to thick to see it , the fact they keep going is quite amusing though
I'm literally staggered each day by the stupidity of some people on this board, and they wonder why people keep returning
Carpe die, is my latest amusement, you won't believe the amount of unbelievably stupid stuff that guy comes out with, apparently Liverpool only changed to red in the 60's, arsenal are a better team without carzola and Chelsea are a better team without hazard - not to mention the championship being as strong as ever even though all the prem teams are in turmoil, none of the big names are firing, we haven't played well all year and are clear of 3rd by 8points and the top 4 consists of Cardiff, Watford, hull and crystal palace
These creatures are fascinating.
ffs Paxman I did not fall foul at all. You just proved what an argumentive shit you are and will argue until the cows come home over the smallest of things.
So you admit you were wrong to start an argument regarding my comment as I was correct now then?
Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:36 am
Paxman wrote:Cardiff Daft! wrote:look at me waddle, im making cardiff fans look stupid. have i done well? does that mean im your friend now![]()
CRINGE!
In all honesty it's not me that has to make the ones on question look stupid, their comments do at for themselves surely?
Waddle is probably a very nice man but I don't make friends on the Internet.
And are you sure you have asked your dad to use the Internet? Surely a fully grown man wouldn't use the word "CRINGE!".... Like omg it's just sooooo no cool.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:40 am
Cardiff Daft! wrote:Paxman wrote:Cardiff Daft! wrote:look at me waddle, im making cardiff fans look stupid. have i done well? does that mean im your friend now![]()
CRINGE!
In all honesty it's not me that has to make the ones on question look stupid, their comments do at for themselves surely?
Waddle is probably a very nice man but I don't make friends on the Internet.
And are you sure you have asked your dad to use the Internet? Surely a fully grown man wouldn't use the word "CRINGE!".... Like omg it's just sooooo no cool.
i agree that some posters dont help themselves but you dont need to highlight it to waddle like some little dog that just fetched a ball.![]()
that made me cringe, hence why i put CRINGE! and if you can show me where it states that any persons over a certain age are not allowed to use the word cringe that would be great, theres a good dog!
Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:45 am
waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:49 am
AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
it might not "guarantee" promotion...but it WILL get us promotion, i think thats the point that was being made, f**k the mathematical shit as they will all drop points and make our final target smaller..
shouldnt you be planning an assault on the top 4?
Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:50 am
Paxman wrote:Cardiff Daft! wrote:i agree that some posters dont help themselves but you dont need to highlight it to waddle like some little dog that just fetched a ball.![]()
that made me cringe, hence why i put CRINGE! and if you can show me where it states that any persons over a certain age are not allowed to use the word cringe that would be great, theres a good dog!
Waddle engaged in conversation with me, it would be rude to not reply and the topic in question was stupid posters - you do the math.
As for grown men using the word "cringe" as a solo standing statement.... it's an unwritten rule surely?
Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:50 am
AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
it might not "guarantee" promotion...but it WILL get us promotion, i think thats the point that was being made, f**k the mathematical shit as they will all drop points and make our final target smaller..
shouldnt you be planning an assault on the top 4?
Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:52 am
Cardiff Daft! wrote:Paxman wrote:Cardiff Daft! wrote:i agree that some posters dont help themselves but you dont need to highlight it to waddle like some little dog that just fetched a ball.![]()
that made me cringe, hence why i put CRINGE! and if you can show me where it states that any persons over a certain age are not allowed to use the word cringe that would be great, theres a good dog!
Waddle engaged in conversation with me, it would be rude to not reply and the topic in question was stupid posters - you do the math.
As for grown men using the word "cringe" as a solo standing statement.... it's an unwritten rule surely?
you were sucking his d*ck man, plain and simple! and im cringing! paxman, officially waddles b*tch!
Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:57 am
mjw6150 wrote:AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
it might not "guarantee" promotion...but it WILL get us promotion, i think thats the point that was being made, f**k the mathematical shit as they will all drop points and make our final target smaller..
shouldnt you be planning an assault on the top 4?
Waddle has taken this out of context, he never said it would mathematically guarantee, he was simply epousing an opinion that it would surely be enough, an opinion you contradicted. Things can go both ways but it looks as if the 85 point prediction is going to be bang on so have a little humility and accept it was a good prediction...
You remind me of myself Waddle, back in my school days I used to log on forums and cause havoc. I did it because it helped me get away from the teenage angst many teenagers suffer in school. My advice is to enjoy the things you love and stay away from the things you hate, i.e. get on a Swansea board! Foster some positivity in your life because things these days, and always with youngsters, always seem to be negative.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:01 am
Paxman wrote:Cardiff Daft! wrote:Paxman wrote:Cardiff Daft! wrote:i agree that some posters dont help themselves but you dont need to highlight it to waddle like some little dog that just fetched a ball.![]()
that made me cringe, hence why i put CRINGE! and if you can show me where it states that any persons over a certain age are not allowed to use the word cringe that would be great, theres a good dog!
Waddle engaged in conversation with me, it would be rude to not reply and the topic in question was stupid posters - you do the math.
As for grown men using the word "cringe" as a solo standing statement.... it's an unwritten rule surely?
you were sucking his d*ck man, plain and simple! and im cringing! paxman, officially waddles b*tch!
You have a fabulous imagination fair play.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:01 am
AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
it might not "guarantee" promotion...but it WILL get us promotion, i think thats the point that was being made, f**k the mathematical shit as they will all drop points and make our final target smaller..
shouldnt you be planning an assault on the top 4?
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:02 am
Paxman wrote:waddle wrote:Paxman wrote:Have I taught this board nothing?
Cardiff had the upper hand on this thread as soon as it was posted and it has now descended into so much nonsense it's swung very much back in Swansea's favour.
We will not be as big as man utd in Malaysia in 5 years, not in 50 years either or 500. We will probably be as big as QPR over there, in fact probably less as they have on of the most famous Asian footballers on their books... And QPR aren't very popular over there either may I add.
Waddle is correct. One of my pet hates is someone clearly making a point declaring a specific point in time and someone taking it to the future and applying it to a time frame in which the comment was not intended. Bakedalaskar fell foul of this when on a thread marked "as it stands" I posted how the table stood after Watford scored, yet because the other team equalised 15 minutes later my initial comment was deemed to be a mistake on my part. Needless to say I put him in his place and he deleted the thread
Waddle is correct.
TBF mate it's only 3 of them out of the whole board that are to thick to see it , the fact they keep going is quite amusing though
I'm literally staggered each day by the stupidity of some people on this board, and they wonder why people keep returning
Carpe die, is my latest amusement, you won't believe the amount of unbelievably stupid stuff that guy comes out with, apparently Liverpool only changed to red in the 60's, arsenal are a better team without carzola and Chelsea are a better team without hazard - not to mention the championship being as strong as ever even though all the prem teams are in turmoil, none of the big names are firing, we haven't played well all year and are clear of 3rd by 8points and the top 4 consists of Cardiff, Watford, hull and crystal palace
These creatures are fascinating.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:07 am
Cardiff Daft! wrote:Paxman wrote:Cardiff Daft! wrote:Paxman wrote:Cardiff Daft! wrote:i agree that some posters dont help themselves but you dont need to highlight it to waddle like some little dog that just fetched a ball.![]()
that made me cringe, hence why i put CRINGE! and if you can show me where it states that any persons over a certain age are not allowed to use the word cringe that would be great, theres a good dog!
Waddle engaged in conversation with me, it would be rude to not reply and the topic in question was stupid posters - you do the math.
As for grown men using the word "cringe" as a solo standing statement.... it's an unwritten rule surely?
you were sucking his d*ck man, plain and simple! and im cringing! paxman, officially waddles b*tch!
You have a fabulous imagination fair play.
Fabulous?Cardiff City Forums resident Louie Spence
your killing me now! Better come up with a new username because this ones ruined now!
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:09 am
Nanny McPhail wrote:Paxman wrote:waddle wrote:Paxman wrote:Have I taught this board nothing?
Cardiff had the upper hand on this thread as soon as it was posted and it has now descended into so much nonsense it's swung very much back in Swansea's favour.
We will not be as big as man utd in Malaysia in 5 years, not in 50 years either or 500. We will probably be as big as QPR over there, in fact probably less as they have on of the most famous Asian footballers on their books... And QPR aren't very popular over there either may I add.
Waddle is correct. One of my pet hates is someone clearly making a point declaring a specific point in time and someone taking it to the future and applying it to a time frame in which the comment was not intended. Bakedalaskar fell foul of this when on a thread marked "as it stands" I posted how the table stood after Watford scored, yet because the other team equalised 15 minutes later my initial comment was deemed to be a mistake on my part. Needless to say I put him in his place and he deleted the thread
Waddle is correct.
TBF mate it's only 3 of them out of the whole board that are to thick to see it , the fact they keep going is quite amusing though
I'm literally staggered each day by the stupidity of some people on this board, and they wonder why people keep returning
Carpe die, is my latest amusement, you won't believe the amount of unbelievably stupid stuff that guy comes out with, apparently Liverpool only changed to red in the 60's, arsenal are a better team without carzola and Chelsea are a better team without hazard - not to mention the championship being as strong as ever even though all the prem teams are in turmoil, none of the big names are firing, we haven't played well all year and are clear of 3rd by 8points and the top 4 consists of Cardiff, Watford, hull and crystal palace
These creatures are fascinating.
And don't forget the biggest whopper of them all. Paxman pretending to be a Cardiff City supporter.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:11 am
waddle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
it might not "guarantee" promotion...but it WILL get us promotion, i think thats the point that was being made, f**k the mathematical shit as they will all drop points and make our final target smaller..
shouldnt you be planning an assault on the top 4?
Waddle has taken this out of context, he never said it would mathematically guarantee, he was simply epousing an opinion that it would surely be enough, an opinion you contradicted. Things can go both ways but it looks as if the 85 point prediction is going to be bang on so have a little humility and accept it was a good prediction...
You remind me of myself Waddle, back in my school days I used to log on forums and cause havoc. I did it because it helped me get away from the teenage angst many teenagers suffer in school. My advice is to enjoy the things you love and stay away from the things you hate, i.e. get on a Swansea board! Foster some positivity in your life because things these days, and always with youngsters, always seem to be negative.
I took nothing out of context , this was what the debate was all about in the original post I suggest you go back and read this properly then comment or we could always add you to the list of cretins
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:12 am
waddle wrote:AbsolutelyFearless wrote:waddle wrote:honestly you really can't be this stupid![]()
you keep dealing in hope and assumption and i'll stick with the facts , look at the SEVERAL threads on the matter , over a month after this topic was originally posted 85 pts will still not guarantee you promotion , so at the time it was a stupid comment , I didn't realise i bugged you so much that you went back over a month to bump a topic , but all you've done is make yourself look a bit of a lid![]()
and you talk about a bet , I made the bet yesterday ....... I million pound that 85 pts wasn't mathematically enough for you to be promoted at that time or certainly not when the topic was started , christ almighty I thought nobby was thick
it might not "guarantee" promotion...but it WILL get us promotion, i think thats the point that was being made, f**k the mathematical shit as they will all drop points and make our final target smaller..
shouldnt you be planning an assault on the top 4?
f**k the mathematical shit !!!!!! what a classic comment![]()
![]()
![]()
why would I be planning an assault on the top 4 ? do you think I am micheal laudrup or sir huw jenkins