Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:50 pm
Paxman wrote:Lots of name calling, jack accusations and assumptions regarding alter egos - that's the classic sign that the thread is spot on and others don't wish to think about it or even entertain it. They know it's true.
It's simple, if you are in a competition yet it has cost you far more than what the actual prize it then winning it isn't a success. It will only become a success when the club achieved what most would consider a fair trade off for everything we have had to give away. To many no achievements will be worth it, to others then champions league... But surely no real fan in their right mind would have done this to their club for one promotion from the championship?
It's not a success, it's a vessel to enable the stupid to sweep whats really going in under the premier league rug for a season. Success? Not on your nelly.
Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:57 pm
Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:03 pm
Paxman wrote:It isn't my goal to get people to agree with me. My posts are obvious and have a lot of basis of fact to them. There isn't a lot to agree or disagree with,
To disagree with this one for example is to actually think one promotion from the championship is worth everything that we have had to give away and rip out of the club, and if that is the opinion held then it says more about that person as a fan than my opinion in the first place.
Many people disagree with others, many are called WUM's - yet the only persons opinion people can't handle to the point they get incredibly angry or want be banned - is mine... Its because they know its true. Otherwise it would be easy to combat or easy to ignore. You can't ignore the truth, if you do then you are denying yourself a fundamental want from humans. It's far easier to banish it (ptb calls etc etc)
I don't need back up to know my opinion is correct. My opinion alone tells me I'm correct. It stands for itself.
Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:05 pm
SBF1 wrote:Paxman wrote:It isn't my goal to get people to agree with me. My posts are obvious and have a lot of basis of fact to them. There isn't a lot to agree or disagree with,
To disagree with this one for example is to actually think one promotion from the championship is worth everything that we have had to give away and rip out of the club, and if that is the opinion held then it says more about that person as a fan than my opinion in the first place.
Many people disagree with others, many are called WUM's - yet the only persons opinion people can't handle to the point they get incredibly angry or want be banned - is mine... Its because they know its true. Otherwise it would be easy to combat or easy to ignore. You can't ignore the truth, if you do then you are denying yourself a fundamental want from humans. It's far easier to banish it (ptb calls etc etc)
I don't need back up to know my opinion is correct. My opinion alone tells me I'm correct. It stands for itself.
Fill ya boots posting then.
It's your time.![]()
Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:06 pm
Paxman wrote:SBF1 wrote:Paxman wrote:It isn't my goal to get people to agree with me. My posts are obvious and have a lot of basis of fact to them. There isn't a lot to agree or disagree with,
To disagree with this one for example is to actually think one promotion from the championship is worth everything that we have had to give away and rip out of the club, and if that is the opinion held then it says more about that person as a fan than my opinion in the first place.
Many people disagree with others, many are called WUM's - yet the only persons opinion people can't handle to the point they get incredibly angry or want be banned - is mine... Its because they know its true. Otherwise it would be easy to combat or easy to ignore. You can't ignore the truth, if you do then you are denying yourself a fundamental want from humans. It's far easier to banish it (ptb calls etc etc)
I don't need back up to know my opinion is correct. My opinion alone tells me I'm correct. It stands for itself.
Fill ya boots posting then.
It's your time.![]()
And yours, you're reading it.
Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:07 pm
Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:09 pm
Paxman wrote:If you say so.
Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:18 pm
Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:33 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:Paxman does have some good points its just people would rather walk about with there heads in the sand untill such things are upon us then worry
Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:50 pm
Paxman wrote:It isn't my goal to get people to agree with me. My posts are obvious and have a lot of basis of fact to them. There isn't a lot to agree or disagree with,
To disagree with this one for example is to actually think one promotion from the championship is worth everything that we have had to give away and rip out of the club, and if that is the opinion held then it says more about that person as a fan than my opinion in the first place.
Many people disagree with others, many are called WUM's - yet the only persons opinion people can't handle to the point they get incredibly angry or want be banned - is mine... Its because they know its true. Otherwise it would be easy to combat or easy to ignore. You can't ignore the truth, if you do then you are denying yourself a fundamental want from humans. It's far easier to banish it (ptb calls etc etc)
I don't need back up to know my opinion is correct. My opinion alone tells me I'm correct. It stands for itself.
Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:06 pm
Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:24 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:Roathy is a troll. Brining up threads about the rebrand and our debts suits him as he knows it will cause arguments. He will always win as its a topic that no one is ever going to agree on at the end of the day, the best thing to do is just ignore the sad f**k.
As for chuckles and his incessant ramblings at others if they dont agree with his point of view on the rebrand, we get that you care we really do and so do alot of us whether you dont realise it or not. Your not going to win everyone over if you keep badgering them and trying to make them feel inferior to yourself because they are happy with watching city play. Your better off coming up with ideas to get fans to be more united then alienating them (I'm not saying you havent as you did the petition). The problem is with this messageboard nowdays is that fans can't celebrate the fact we are looking to get promoted without someone bringing up the rebrand to put a downer on it all and causing arguments.
Quick edit: I have nothing against you chuckles and your passion for the city and our blue traditions but you can't blame others for getting annoyed at you
Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:30 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:Roathy is a troll. Brining up threads about the rebrand and our debts suits him as he knows it will cause arguments. He will always win as its a topic that no one is ever going to agree on at the end of the day, the best thing to do is just ignore the sad f**k.
As for chuckles and his incessant ramblings at others if they dont agree with his point of view on the rebrand, we get that you care we really do and so do alot of us whether you dont realise it or not. Your not going to win everyone over if you keep badgering them and trying to make them feel inferior to yourself because they are happy with watching city play. Your better off coming up with ideas to get fans to be more united then alienating them (I'm not saying you havent as you did the petition). The problem is with this messageboard nowdays is that fans can't celebrate the fact we are looking to get promoted without someone bringing up the rebrand to put a downer on it all and causing arguments.
Quick edit: I have nothing against you chuckles and your passion for the city and our blue traditions but you can't blame others for getting annoyed at you
I simply agreed to certain points from the opening post.. I don't care who wrote it tbh, I agree with it.
Well it isn't the same, to me - the promotion is tainted. That's my viewpoint and I will exercise my right to air it.. If people are really getting annoyed about other people's views, maybe they shouldn't go on forums.
Mon Mar 18, 2013 11:25 pm
Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:37 am
Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:52 am
Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:23 am
RICK+CCFC wrote:Of course promotion would be a success, & a total one at that. It's what all league clubs set out for in August, & its their ultimate objective to deliver & to achieve.
On the financial front, we are where we are, historically & now. There's nothing us fans can do about that, apart from support our club & go with the flow. Other clubs have taken other financial options in the past, whether sought or unsought, & in some cases on more than one occasion,,, that's their business.
Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:33 am
Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:36 am
RICK+CCFC wrote:Then i guess the success your talking about is long term, & we shall have to wait & see won't we?
Who knows whats going to happen this time next week, let alone in five years time.
However, in answer to your original question, Yes, promotion would be deemed a success.
Regarding the re brand, What exactly would you have done yourself to stop it happening in the first place?
Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:53 am
Paxman wrote:RICK+CCFC wrote:Then i guess the success your talking about is long term, & we shall have to wait & see won't we?
Who knows whats going to happen this time next week, let alone in five years time.
However, in answer to your original question, Yes, promotion would be deemed a success.
Regarding the re brand, What exactly would you have done yourself to stop it happening in the first place?
Of course I'm talking long term. This promotion cannot be deemed a success until what we have outweighs the destruction. And the promotion alone clearly doesn't. So it isn't a success, just one objective reached of a long line of objectives that if achieved will contribute toward it being classed as a success.
As for what I would have done? Not much as I'm the other side of the world although if I was there then a protest would have been a good place to start.
Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:02 am
RICK+CCFC wrote:Paxman wrote:RICK+CCFC wrote:Then i guess the success your talking about is long term, & we shall have to wait & see won't we?
Who knows whats going to happen this time next week, let alone in five years time.
However, in answer to your original question, Yes, promotion would be deemed a success.
Regarding the re brand, What exactly would you have done yourself to stop it happening in the first place?
Of course I'm talking long term. This promotion cannot be deemed a success until what we have outweighs the destruction. And the promotion alone clearly doesn't. So it isn't a success, just one objective reached of a long line of objectives that if achieved will contribute toward it being classed as a success.
As for what I would have done? Not much as I'm the other side of the world although if I was there then a protest would have been a good place to start.
Like i said, we shall have to wait & see,,,,,& time will ultimately tell.
With regards to the word "destruction" that you use, i think that's a matter of personal opinion, & of perception.
Personally, i'm no fan of the re brand myself, ive been following our club long enough to know that.
However, i am open minded enough to see how thing go, its not like we currently have any real choice not to do so anyway?
It's a global market, & economy,, & i'm pretty sure you, of all people, know that!
Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:07 am
Paxman wrote:RICK+CCFC wrote:Of course promotion would be a success, & a total one at that. It's what all league clubs set out for in August, & its their ultimate objective to deliver & to achieve.
On the financial front, we are where we are, historically & now. There's nothing us fans can do about that, apart from support our club & go with the flow. Other clubs have taken other financial options in the past, whether sought or unsought, & in some cases on more than one occasion,,, that's their business.
Youre confusing an objective with success. Of course the objective of this whole thing has been for promotion, but that doesn't mean it has brought success.
This whole saga can only be deemed a success if what we get outweighs what the club has had to pay which in the eyes of the overwhelming majority of fans is OK. Promotion from the championship alone, to most football fans, is worth what the club has had to pay for it.
You mention other clubs, yes they are vying for promotion but they all play in their colours, have their identity and pride intact. Promotion will always be a success for clubs like that except if your Portsmouth or Rangers
For us, surely the reward will be something far far greater than achieving what the likes of burnley did a few seasons ago to be worth all this reconstruction?
Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:14 am
Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:15 am
Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:20 am
RICK+CCFC wrote:All very interesting Paxman, & im sure you'll agree that a "Brand" has to start some where.
Im not counting my chickens at all, there's a long long way to go.
We all had a little bit of VT's mind set while he was being interviewed last month. Its a pity you were not asking the questions!
Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:25 am
Fixed again.Paxman wrote:The fact you see the banishing of Cardiffs blue and bluebird plus getting saddled with £100m debt as "reconstruction" frankly arouses me.
Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:32 am
Sneggyblubird wrote:Fixed again.Paxman wrote:The fact you see the banishing of Cardiffs blue and bluebird plus getting saddled with £100m debt as "reconstruction" frankly arouses me.
Ah now the flaw in your argument is exposed for all to see.So by your silly logic if the blue colour came back tommorow the £100m debt would dissappear like a puff of smoke.Oh and we've still got the bluebird.
Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:39 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Of course Roathy your relative argument is a rebrand of your original argument.Though you may find comfort with the support of that silly bugger chuckles your arguments are actually as baseless as when you started out as Canton Magic.
It's true. Possible Promotion is tarnished by the loss of our club identity and traditions.
What should be the best season in our lifetimes so far, is being dogged by in-fighting from fans and an unrecognisable Cardiff a city on the pitch.
If you wish to debate maturely, instead of pathetic name calling, go right ahead.
Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:45 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:I'm merely expressing my opinion that I agree that this title will be tainted. Why you resort to petty name calling, ill never know.
Its because hes more blatant and you use that very antogonising passive aggressive crap. You talk down to people as if they are shit. Its no coincidence that many feel the same toward you.
The bloke is a grade A arsehole unfortunately Craig. Beaten him in many arguments in the past, ripped through his flawed logic and tripped him up left, right and center. It is best to mock those who cannot debate maturely I find.
Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:53 pm