Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:08 pm
taffyapple wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:taffyapple wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:taffyapple wrote:Here's a thought...
Tan DID NOT come to Cardiff City, he DID NOT save the Club from the HMRC
and the circling vultures. Cardiff City Football Club DID go bust...
League rules mean that Cardiff City Football Club CAN start again... but have
to do so as Cardiff Phoenix FC or Cardiff Borough, or Cardiff United. Would
anyone prefer red to something like that? Not a sarcastic question. Not looking
for a bite/argument/confrontation.
To be honest if we had to do a Rangers, meaning we would get back to playing in blue with the Bluebird as the main emblem on our badge, I would be all for it. I know that would mean our history of achievements, including the 1927 FA Cup win would be wiped away, but at least it would feel like I would be back to watching the "real" Cardiff City in blue again. I would find it a lot easier to get behind a new Cardiff City in blue than our current Cardiff City in red. Just my opinion of course and I imagine the majority will disagree with this.
No idea what people would think mate. But "Cardiff Athletic" to me or something
like that would feel AS wrong, if not MORE wrong than a different colour shirt.
My opinion anyway.
SHIT!!! I dont want to cause another 'split'![]()
![]()
To be fair everyone was going on about Rangers being called Rangers Newco, or Newco Rangers or whatever they were going to be called. But everyone has already got back to referring to them as Rangers and when they work their way back up to the SPL and battle it out with Celtic for the title again, most people will completely forget about them starting from scratch again. I believe the same would happen with us, we would restart as Cardiff City Bluebirds or something along them lines, but everyone will quickly refer to us as Cardiff City. I would honestly rather us restart as a blue Cardiff City than continue supporting a red Cardiff City for the rest of my life. But I appreciate many of you will disagree and feel completely different to me.
I hadnt even contemplated that. A new name would mean losing our 'Honours list'
Wiping away our FA Cup win, three appearances in the Final, Runners up in the league,
League Cup finalists, European Cup winners Cup semi-finalists?? Surely THAT would be
turning our backs on our history and tradition more than a change of shirt (something
we have done before) Hmmmm.. dont think I like that idea at all feller
Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:31 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:I bet they would take a different colour shirt right now
Funny u should say this Polo I am in Mallorca this moment and a about 25 Pompey are here on a stag do and I've asked them this and everyone one one of them except 2 of said f**k it it we would never change they are all lads from the 80S They said they are proud of being Pimpey colour and name no matter what division
Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:31 pm
Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:33 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:taffyapple wrote:Here's a thought...
Tan DID NOT come to Cardiff City, he DID NOT save the Club from the HMRC
and the circling vultures. Cardiff City Football Club DID go bust...
League rules mean that Cardiff City Football Club CAN start again... but have
to do so as Cardiff Phoenix FC or Cardiff Borough, or Cardiff United. Would
anyone prefer red to something like that? Not a sarcastic question. Not looking
for a bite/argument/confrontation.
To be honest if we had to do a Rangers, meaning we would get back to playing in blue with the Bluebird as the main emblem on our badge, I would be all for it. I know that would mean our history of achievements, including the 1927 FA Cup win would be wiped away, but at least it would feel like I would be back to watching the "real" Cardiff City in blue again. I would find it a lot easier to get behind a new Cardiff City in blue than our current Cardiff City in red. Just my opinion of course and I imagine the majority will disagree with this.
Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:36 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:The hypocrisy in this thread is ludicrous
The same peopke crying over a shirt as we have lost our identity are fine with having our name changed and being a totally new club.
You cant make this shit up
Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:38 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:The hypocrisy in this thread is ludicrous
The same peopke crying over a shirt as we have lost our identity are fine with having our name changed and being a totally new club.
You cant make this shit up
Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:41 pm
bleed_blue wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:The hypocrisy in this thread is ludicrous
The same peopke crying over a shirt as we have lost our identity are fine with having our name changed and being a totally new club.
You cant make this shit up
Its getting ridiculous. The fact that our fans wouldnt be for "doing a rangers" is absolutely unbelievable.
10 points clear at the top of the league ffs. Get a f*cking grip. The fact that some of our fans would be willing to see us in league 2 with a different name, f**k all fanbase, no income, shit football and the possibility of going under is an absolute disgrace.
Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:48 pm
Sven Ghali wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:taffyapple wrote:Here's a thought...
Tan DID NOT come to Cardiff City, he DID NOT save the Club from the HMRC
and the circling vultures. Cardiff City Football Club DID go bust...
League rules mean that Cardiff City Football Club CAN start again... but have
to do so as Cardiff Phoenix FC or Cardiff Borough, or Cardiff United. Would
anyone prefer red to something like that? Not a sarcastic question. Not looking
for a bite/argument/confrontation.
To be honest if we had to do a Rangers, meaning we would get back to playing in blue with the Bluebird as the main emblem on our badge, I would be all for it. I know that would mean our history of achievements, including the 1927 FA Cup win would be wiped away, but at least it would feel like I would be back to watching the "real" Cardiff City in blue again. I would find it a lot easier to get behind a new Cardiff City in blue than our current Cardiff City in red. Just my opinion of course and I imagine the majority will disagree with this.
WRONG, my friend. We wouldn't be Cardiff City FC anymore than Rebirth Renegers are the same Glasgow Rangers we all knew before. They (Rangers) are in all reality a NEW club with a NEW identity and THAT is a MILLION times worse than any team team that simply changed the colour of their shirts![]()
We can moan and whinge all we like. That is always easy to do (a) from afar, and (b) when we are never really going to be in a position (as Tan is) to OWN the club and spend £millions on keeping it both afloat and progressing![]()
Like it or not Vincent Tan has, erm, sort of earned the right to have a say in what goes on at Cardiff City FC![]()
![]()
Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:10 pm
Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:13 pm
Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:15 pm
aberdare-blue wrote:Some people are dull u actually think we would be thrown into division 3 like rangers????
we would be right at the bottom of the football pyramid so stop talking shit saying we'd be like rangers & be put into division 3, we would be like FC United who started a new club cause of the glazers take over.
Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:20 pm
DandoCCFC wrote:People chanted 'City Til I Die' and now boycotted.. hmmmm.
Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:22 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:aberdare-blue wrote:Some people are dull u actually think we would be thrown into division 3 like rangers????
we would be right at the bottom of the football pyramid so stop talking shit saying we'd be like rangers & be put into division 3, we would be like FC United who started a new club cause of the glazers take over.
I'm fully aware of that. Where did I say we would be thrown into division 3 like Rangers? The difference is as you have clearly shown in your post, you just want success at any cost. But I just want to be able to watch my team in their proper blue colours with their proper identity, whatever the level.
Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:25 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:DandoCCFC wrote:People chanted 'City Til I Die' and now boycotted.. hmmmm.
Evening Dando. To some fans our club has died when we got rebranded and these fans feel we are not City anymore. Not that I'm saying I feel like that, but I can completely understand how some fans feel and why they are boycotting. You know my feelings Dando and to be honest I do feel really "dirty" supporting us this season, although I don't think I could ever go as far as turning my back on my local club, no matter how unhappy and disgusted I am with what's gone on this season.
Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:36 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Sven Ghali wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:taffyapple wrote:Here's a thought...
Tan DID NOT come to Cardiff City, he DID NOT save the Club from the HMRC
and the circling vultures. Cardiff City Football Club DID go bust...
League rules mean that Cardiff City Football Club CAN start again... but have
to do so as Cardiff Phoenix FC or Cardiff Borough, or Cardiff United. Would
anyone prefer red to something like that? Not a sarcastic question. Not looking
for a bite/argument/confrontation.
To be honest if we had to do a Rangers, meaning we would get back to playing in blue with the Bluebird as the main emblem on our badge, I would be all for it. I know that would mean our history of achievements, including the 1927 FA Cup win would be wiped away, but at least it would feel like I would be back to watching the "real" Cardiff City in blue again. I would find it a lot easier to get behind a new Cardiff City in blue than our current Cardiff City in red. Just my opinion of course and I imagine the majority will disagree with this.
WRONG, my friend. We wouldn't be Cardiff City FC anymore than Rebirth Renegers are the same Glasgow Rangers we all knew before. They (Rangers) are in all reality a NEW club with a NEW identity and THAT is a MILLION times worse than any team team that simply changed the colour of their shirts![]()
We can moan and whinge all we like. That is always easy to do (a) from afar, and (b) when we are never really going to be in a position (as Tan is) to OWN the club and spend £millions on keeping it both afloat and progressing![]()
Like it or not Vincent Tan has, erm, sort of earned the right to have a say in what goes on at Cardiff City FC![]()
![]()
Oh come on!![]()
You're honestly saying Rangers are a completely different club now? Technically, they are a new team, but they play in the same colours, with the same emblem on their badge, in the same stadium, with the same players, manager, staff etc. Yes, some of their players wanted to leave, but it is pretty much the exact same football club except their history of achievements have been wiped away and they are a few divisions lower. I would take that in a heartbeat to see us back to playing in our proper blue colours with our Cardiff City identity still there, ahead of a lifetime of watching us as we currently are now. The current Rangers is closer to the old Rangers than our current red Cardiff is to our old blue Cardiff in my opinion.
Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:59 am
mr.angry wrote:bleed_blue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:bleed_blue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:I bet they would take a different colour shirt right now
Funny u should say this Polo I am in Mallorca this moment and a about 25 Pompey are here on a stag do and I've asked them this and everyone one one of them except 2 of said f**k it it we would never change they are all lads forms the 80S They said they are proud of being Pimpey colour and name no matter what division
Not being funny Annis but thats only 23 Pompey fans. They are obviously still living in the 80's, maybe they dont understand football has changed and its now a business.
Your prob right as I am as well and identity, pride, passion and tradition and love for the club I've known for 40 yrs means everything to me![]()
Dont get me wrong, I love the club. But im afraid the only way we're going to see Man utd,Arsenal,Chelsea,Man City at Cardiff is if we make a few sacrifices.
.
And the rebrand was a sacrifice we didn't need to make,it was never red or dead
Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:01 am
Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:24 am
Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:33 am
pembroke allan wrote:The question is would their fans accept £100m investment condition change shirt colour?
Given their position majority would accept it! Same for any club in same position.
We have been on breadline since at least 1978, if you know city in that year fans
Were asked to chip in to save club from going bust! cant have cake and eat it?
Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:17 am
Saint Mellon wrote:pembroke allan wrote:The question is would their fans accept £100m investment condition change shirt colour?
Given their position majority would accept it! Same for any club in same position.
We have been on breadline since at least 1978, if you know city in that year fans
Were asked to chip in to save club from going bust! cant have cake and eat it?
£100m (most of which is just changing debt from someone elses name into his).... In exchange for a change in shirt colour AND £107 million to pay back. You keep forgetting that last bit.
In essence, pay Tan £7m to change historic colours to his favourite colour and change badge to whatever he decides.
Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:16 am
Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:50 am
Sven Ghali wrote:Saint Mellon wrote:pembroke allan wrote:The question is would their fans accept £100m investment condition change shirt colour?
Given their position majority would accept it! Same for any club in same position.
We have been on breadline since at least 1978, if you know city in that year fans
Were asked to chip in to save club from going bust! cant have cake and eat it?
£100m (most of which is just changing debt from someone elses name into his).... In exchange for a change in shirt colour AND £107 million to pay back. You keep forgetting that last bit.
In essence, pay Tan £7m to change historic colours to his favourite colour and change badge to whatever he decides.
Sorry, but if you REALLY think Tan is doing anything (shirt colour change apart) that anyone else wouldn't do, then you are deluded. Others (including recent Chairmen) would 'do' us for a lot more than a 7% return
Cost versus Benefit? For him £millions on his investmentFor us? football and a new chapter in history for CARDIFF CITY FC
![]()
![]()
![]()
Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:06 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:aberdare-blue wrote:Some people are dull u actually think we would be thrown into division 3 like rangers????
we would be right at the bottom of the football pyramid so stop talking shit saying we'd be like rangers & be put into division 3, we would be like FC United who started a new club cause of the glazers take over.
I'm fully aware of that. Where did I say we would be thrown into division 3 like Rangers? The difference is as you have clearly shown in your post, you just want success at any cost. But I just want to be able to watch my team in their proper blue colours with their proper identity, whatever the level.
Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:33 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:I love people who use wikipedia as a reference.
Sun Feb 17, 2013 10:33 pm
hirwaunbluebird wrote:Mr angry where have I said I am for the rebrand,and as for bluebird in my name maybe everyone who has Blue or bird,should change their names.and has for your name you are just trying to live Upton it.ps shall I get my tattoo removed I have of a bluebird
Sun Feb 17, 2013 10:57 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:I bet they would take a different colour shirt right now
I bet their fan base would be split, just like ours.
the split in the fan base is minimal
Where did I give any opinion on the level of split?
Whatever side of the debate you are, you cannot deny that there is a split.
Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:05 pm
Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:11 pm
Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:40 pm
DandoCCFC wrote:People saying they spoke to fans another club and saying they wouldn't accept is just stupid.
They can't really say what they'd do as they haven't gone through it.