Spurs all over jacks

There's a good few pages of you being caught out in this thread Trig. You've been tied up in knots by Mario Polotelli.

So you keep saying Greeny

Still waiting to see it

Open your eyes Trigger.

Open your eyes Trigger.

Ok, done.

I see 94 out of 94 of your posts about me, and thats just on one of your accounts Greeny

Glad to see you've corrected your earlier mathematical error. I see over 1000 on a Cardiff City website, going by your theory, you're obsessed. That's just on one of your multi accounts too. You've tied yourself up there Trigger.

Glad to see you've corrected your earlier mathematical error. I see over 1000 on a Cardiff City website, going by your theory, you're obsessed. That's just on one of your multi accounts too. You've tied yourself up there Trigger.

Corrected? You do realise with every post you make it changes right?

Absolutely obsessed with football Martyn, never hide that. Being obsessed with a man on the internet however, thats just weird

95 from 95

You claimed that I had hundreds of posts, which is wrong. My name isn't Martyn either. Obsessed with football, yet supposedly has all this wealth.... Yet doesn't ever come over to watch Swansea. You're not a Swansea fan. Not a real one anyway. An embarrassment to real jacks.

You claimed that I had hundreds of posts, which is wrong. My name isn't Martyn either. Obsessed with football, yet supposedly has all this wealth.... Yet doesn't ever come over to watch Swansea. You're not a Swansea fan. Not a real one anyway. An embarrassment to real jacks.

You do have hundreds of posts

Where have I said i never come and watch Swansea? Proof or youre a liar

Where have I said im not a Swansea fan? Proof or youre a liar

Cheers Martyn

You claimed that I had hundreds of posts, which is wrong. My name isn't Martyn either. Obsessed with football, yet supposedly has all this wealth.... Yet doesn't ever come over to watch Swansea. You're not a Swansea fan. Not a real one anyway. An embarrassment to real jacks.

You do have hundreds of posts

Where have I said i never come and watch Swansea? Proof or your a liar

Where have I said i, not a Swansea fan? Proof or your a liar

Cheers Martyn

I don't, this is my 95th. Maths really must have been a struggle for you in school.

You never say that you watch them live, always online. By the way, I noticed you pick on some spelling earlier, so it's you're and not your for this sentence. Proof that I'm Martyn or you're a liar.

You claimed that I had hundreds of posts, which is wrong. My name isn't Martyn either. Obsessed with football, yet supposedly has all this wealth.... Yet doesn't ever come over to watch Swansea. You're not a Swansea fan. Not a real one anyway. An embarrassment to real jacks.

You do have hundreds of posts

Where have I said i never come and watch Swansea? Proof or your a liar

Where have I said i, not a Swansea fan? Proof or your a liar

Cheers Martyn

I don't, this is my 95th. Maths really must have been a struggle for you in school.

97th you mean? So ironic

You have 4 usernames Martyn as we all know

You never say that you watch them live, always online. By the way, I noticed you pick on some spelling earlier, so it's you're and not your for this sentence. Proof that I'm Martyn or you're a liar.

read those sentences again Martyn? Maybe reading as well as maths may be needed for you

So no proof I dont come back and watch the Swans then? So LIAR

no its not. We have 3 midfield players. A defensive one, a holding one and an attacking one. De Guzman plays the holding role. De Guzman cant defend for toffee to say hes more defensive is ridiculous


So my point stands then that 60% of your attacking unit is not available, and thats exlcuding Michu, whereas only 33% of your defensive unit are unavailale.

yet you claim its the defence thats down to the bare bones (Even though 50% of your outfield players yesterday were defenders, all first choice except Amat)

You also call De Guzman and Attacking CM here so caught lying and contradicting yourself again.

RoathMagic » Thu Oct 24, 2013 11:59 pm

Here is a spot analysis of what our positions are when in posession of the football. Its laudrups system, it hasnt changed and doent change - so change Graham for Bony obviously.

It shows Michu clearly a midfield role, with even the likes of Dyer and Routledge playing ahead. Its like attempting to call Paul Scholes a striker, even worse than that as Michu is far more defensive than Scholes was.Attachments
image.jpg (22.15 KiB) Viewed 57 times

Last edited by Mario Polotelli on Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:37 am, edited 2 times in total.

Nicely edited RoathMagic, please look at my original quote, where it shows you wrote them incorrectly.

Ironic to see you make assumptions, then lambast someone as a liar for doing similar. Proof that you are a massive contradiction.

Nicely edited RoathMagic, please look at my original quote, where it shows you wrote them incorrectly.

Ironic to see you make assumptions, then lambast someone as a liar for doing similar. Proof that you are a massive contradiction.

Do you see any edits? No me neither.

nicely twisted for the second sentence. You do realise it is you that calls me a liar for guessing something pretty accurately, yet you completely make something up and its fine?v

You are a card Martyn

no its not. We have 3 midfield players. A defensive one, a holding one and an attacking one. De Guzman plays the holding role. De Guzman cant defend for toffee to say hes more defensive is ridiculous


So my point stands then that 60% of your attacking unit is not available, and thats exlcuding Michu, whereas only 33% of your defensive unit are unavailale.

yet you claim its the defence thats down to the bare bones (Even though 50% of your outfield players yesterday were defenders, all first choice except Amat)

You also call De Guzman and Attacking CM here so caught lying and contradicting yourself again.

RoathMagic » Thu Oct 24, 2013 11:59 pm

Here is a spot analysis of what our positions are when in posession of the football. Its laudrups system, it hasnt changed and doent change - so change Graham for Bony obviously.

It shows Michu clearly a midfield role, with even the likes of Dyer and Routledge playing ahead. Its like attempting to call Paul Scholes a striker, even worse than that as Michu is far more defensive than Scholes was.Attachments
image.jpg (22.15 KiB) Viewed 57 times

Your point?

Roathie, just admit you spelt it wrong - I saw it and if you look at the post where he's quoted you, it's spelt wrong too when he quoted you.

Do you ever go to Swansea games then? You never mention it.

Roathie, just admit you spelt it wrong - I saw it and if you look at the post where he's quoted you, it's spelt wrong too when he quoted you.

Do you ever go to Swansea games then? You never mention it.

I'm not admitting anything. Prove it or you are a liar is the party line right?

I very rarely mention myself unless im quizzed, much prefer to talk football as the questions are often disingenuous or loaded questions so only give what answers I want to as a result.


Since being here ive seen at least a match every season and it costs me more than it would if I bought a home and away season ticket... Much more

Last edited by Castro on Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:49 am, edited 1 time in total.

no its not. We have 3 midfield players. A defensive one, a holding one and an attacking one. De Guzman plays the holding role. De Guzman cant defend for toffee to say hes more defensive is ridiculous


So my point stands then that 60% of your attacking unit is not available, and thats exlcuding Michu, whereas only 33% of your defensive unit are unavailale.

yet you claim its the defence thats down to the bare bones (Even though 50% of your outfield players yesterday were defenders, all first choice except Amat)

You also call De Guzman and Attacking CM here so caught lying and contradicting yourself again.

RoathMagic » Thu Oct 24, 2013 11:59 pm

Here is a spot analysis of what our positions are when in posession of the football. Its laudrups system, it hasnt changed and doent change - so change Graham for Bony obviously.

It shows Michu clearly a midfield role, with even the likes of Dyer and Routledge playing ahead. Its like attempting to call Paul Scholes a striker, even worse than that as Michu is far more defensive than Scholes was.Attachments
image.jpg (22.15 KiB) Viewed 57 times

Your point?

That your attacking unit is down to the bare bones not your defensive unit as you claim.

You tried to discredit this by insinuating De Guzman wasnt part of the attacking unit by claiming "hes an holding midfielder".

yet i find two posts calling him an attacking midfielder.

Contradictions galore Roathie.

When did you last go? I'm sure it does, but you've got all those winnings from betting.

no its not. We have 3 midfield players. A defensive one, a holding one and an attacking one. De Guzman plays the holding role. De Guzman cant defend for toffee to say hes more defensive is ridiculous


So my point stands then that 60% of your attacking unit is not available, and thats exlcuding Michu, whereas only 33% of your defensive unit are unavailale.

yet you claim its the defence thats down to the bare bones (Even though 50% of your outfield players yesterday were defenders, all first choice except Amat)

You also call De Guzman and Attacking CM here so caught lying and contradicting yourself again.

RoathMagic » Thu Oct 24, 2013 11:59 pm

Here is a spot analysis of what our positions are when in posession of the football. Its laudrups system, it hasnt changed and doent change - so change Graham for Bony obviously.

It shows Michu clearly a midfield role, with even the likes of Dyer and Routledge playing ahead. Its like attempting to call Paul Scholes a striker, even worse than that as Michu is far more defensive than Scholes was.Attachments
image.jpg (22.15 KiB) Viewed 57 times

Your point?

That your attacking unit is down to the bare bones not your defensive unit as you claim.

You tried to discredit this by insinuating De Guzman wasnt part of the attacking unit by claiming "hes an holding midfielder".

yet i find two posts calling him an attacking midfielder.

Contradictions galore Roathie.

He is more attacking than defensive, but he isnt an attacking midfielder per se. He and Michu are not the same positions... Which is the point isnt it.

You are getting a bit desperate now Polo.

Last edited by Castro on Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

All these injuries yet Michu wouldnt make a difference.

Interesting that considering this is waht you claim on the Bony thread.

Michu is an excellent footballer, he could probably fill a gap on the wing too.

We play 4-5-1 hes an attacking midfielder.

Although is often found in defensive positions acting as a second defensive midfielder. Not sure what you have been

With all that skill and ability to play the "2nd defensive position" its such a surprise you would prefer a CB in the DM and Leon in between Amat and Shelvey

Didn't Roath say he wouldn't want Michu on the wing in this thread. More lies from Pinocchio. As for the spelling errors - I'm glad another poster is able to verify that you were caught lying again.

All these injuries yet Michu wouldnt make a difference.

Interesting that considering this is waht you claim on the Bony thread.

Michu is an excellent footballer, he could probably fill a gap on the wing too.

We play 4-5-1 hes an attacking midfielder.

Although is often found in defensive positions acting as a second defensive midfielder. Not sure what you have been

With all that skill and ability to play the "2nd defensive position" its such a surprise you would prefer a CB in the DM and Leon in between Amat and Shelvey

We dont have "gaps to fill". We have Lamah and Routledge on the wing, Bony up front and Shelvey and Pozuelo as attacking midfield. Unless you are suggesting Michu would be better on the wing than our wingers? Or better up front than our striker?

Are you feeling ok Chris? Your arguments are getting ridiculous, you aren't doing yourself any favours

no its not. We have 3 midfield players. A defensive one, a holding one and an attacking one. De Guzman plays the holding role. De Guzman cant defend for toffee to say hes more defensive is ridiculous


So my point stands then that 60% of your attacking unit is not available, and thats exlcuding Michu, whereas only 33% of your defensive unit are unavailale.

yet you claim its the defence thats down to the bare bones (Even though 50% of your outfield players yesterday were defenders, all first choice except Amat)

You also call De Guzman and Attacking CM here so caught lying and contradicting yourself again.

RoathMagic » Thu Oct 24, 2013 11:59 pm

Here is a spot analysis of what our positions are when in posession of the football. Its laudrups system, it hasnt changed and doent change - so change Graham for Bony obviously.

It shows Michu clearly a midfield role, with even the likes of Dyer and Routledge playing ahead. Its like attempting to call Paul Scholes a striker, even worse than that as Michu is far more defensive than Scholes was.Attachments
image.jpg (22.15 KiB) Viewed 57 times

Your point?

That your attacking unit is down to the bare bones not your defensive unit as you claim.

You tried to discredit this by insinuating De Guzman wasnt part of the attacking unit by claiming "hes an holding midfielder".

yet i find two posts calling him an attacking midfielder.

Contradictions galore Roathie.

He is more attacking than defensive, but he isnt an attacking midfielder per se. He and Michu are not the same positions... Which is the point isnt it.

I dont know what the point is, you keep changing it when i catch you out. ]
He isnt an attacking midfielder yet I find two posts where you call him an attacking midfielder You are getting a bit desperate now Polo.

Didn't Roath say he wouldn't want Michu on the wing in this thread. More lies from Pinocchio. As for the spelling errors - I'm glad another poster is able to verify that you were caught lying again.

Yes he did - he stands by it too

He was mistaken. Prove it or you are a liar

Now where did I say I didnt come back to watch any games? Or are you lying?

There is proof, in my post where I quoted it, it's written there. You are a liar and even worse is the libellous crap you are posting in the betting area about match fixing. I've got a mind to phone the authorities about you.

no its not. We have 3 midfield players. A defensive one, a holding one and an attacking one. De Guzman plays the holding role. De Guzman cant defend for toffee to say hes more defensive is ridiculous


So my point stands then that 60% of your attacking unit is not available, and thats exlcuding Michu, whereas only 33% of your defensive unit are unavailale.

yet you claim its the defence thats down to the bare bones (Even though 50% of your outfield players yesterday were defenders, all first choice except Amat)

You also call De Guzman and Attacking CM here so caught lying and contradicting yourself again.

RoathMagic » Thu Oct 24, 2013 11:59 pm

Here is a spot analysis of what our positions are when in posession of the football. Its laudrups system, it hasnt changed and doent change - so change Graham for Bony obviously.

It shows Michu clearly a midfield role, with even the likes of Dyer and Routledge playing ahead. Its like attempting to call Paul Scholes a striker, even worse than that as Michu is far more defensive than Scholes was.Attachments
image.jpg (22.15 KiB) Viewed 57 times

Your point?

That your attacking unit is down to the bare bones not your defensive unit as you claim.

You tried to discredit this by insinuating De Guzman wasnt part of the attacking unit by claiming "hes an holding midfielder".

yet i find two posts calling him an attacking midfielder.

Contradictions galore Roathie.

He is more attacking than defensive, but he isnt an attacking midfielder per se. He and Michu are not the same positions... Which is the point isnt it.

I dont know what the point is, you keep changing it when i catch you out. ]
He isnt an attacking midfielder yet I find two posts where you call him an attacking midfielder You are getting a bit desperate now Polo.

There is no catching out, its you being pedantic and then claiming victory like a child irrelevant of the point being discussed or context. It is the only way you can debate.

De Guzman is a holding midfield player. If i were to pigeon hole him as attacking midfielder or defensive then it would be attacking, but he isnt an attacking midfielder per se.

Your point is that there is a gap for Michu remember, for all your dancing around like a clown... Yet the fact remains there isnt one

All these injuries yet Michu wouldnt make a difference.

Interesting that considering this is waht you claim on the Bony thread.

Michu is an excellent footballer, he could probably fill a gap on the wing too.

We play 4-5-1 hes an attacking midfielder.

Although is often found in defensive positions acting as a second defensive midfielder. Not sure what you have been

With all that skill and ability to play the "2nd defensive position" its such a surprise you would prefer a CB in the DM and Leon in between Amat and Shelvey

We dont have "gaps to fill". We have Lamah and Routledge on the wing, Bony up front and Shelvey and Pozuelo as attacking midfield. Unless you are suggesting Michu would be better on the wing than our wingers? Or better up front than our striker?

Are you feeling ok Chris? Your arguments are getting ridiculous, you aren't doing yourself any favours

Lamah didnt play yesterday, he wasnt fit according to NJ. Pozuelo had to "fill the gap"

Im pretty sure Michu in AM, Shelvey just behind and then Leon as DM would have been a better fit and less of a "gap fill" than Amat at DM and Britton between Shelvey and Amat.

Your point is that there is a gap for Michu remember, for all your dancing around like a clown... Yet the fact remains there isnt one

So you would rather 2 players playing slightly out of position instead of none then.

All these injuries yet Michu wouldnt make a difference.

Interesting that considering this is waht you claim on the Bony thread.

Michu is an excellent footballer, he could probably fill a gap on the wing too.

We play 4-5-1 hes an attacking midfielder.

Although is often found in defensive positions acting as a second defensive midfielder. Not sure what you have been

With all that skill and ability to play the "2nd defensive position" its such a surprise you would prefer a CB in the DM and Leon in between Amat and Shelvey

We dont have "gaps to fill". We have Lamah and Routledge on the wing, Bony up front and Shelvey and Pozuelo as attacking midfield. Unless you are suggesting Michu would be better on the wing than our wingers? Or better up front than our striker?

Are you feeling ok Chris? Your arguments are getting ridiculous, you aren't doing yourself any favours

Lamah didnt play yesterday, he wasnt fit according to NJ. Pozuelo had to "fill the gap"

Im pretty sure Michu in AM, Shelvey just behind and then Leon as DM would have been a better fit and less of a "gap fill" than Amat at DM and Britton between Shelvey and Amat.

Well hes wrong isnt he. He did.

Pozuelo can play in all attacking midfield positions, including the wings.

If you were the manager Chrissy then maybe, however You dont have say in the team and i doubt very much Michu would be used for that purpose.

This isnt championship manager where we can use these players in their positions

What is your first name RoathMagic? You like to use others first names in a condescending manner, yet are too scared to provide your own.

All these injuries yet Michu wouldnt make a difference.

Interesting that considering this is waht you claim on the Bony thread.

Michu is an excellent footballer, he could probably fill a gap on the wing too.

We play 4-5-1 hes an attacking midfielder.

Although is often found in defensive positions acting as a second defensive midfielder. Not sure what you have been

With all that skill and ability to play the "2nd defensive position" its such a surprise you would prefer a CB in the DM and Leon in between Amat and Shelvey

We dont have "gaps to fill". We have Lamah and Routledge on the wing, Bony up front and Shelvey and Pozuelo as attacking midfield. Unless you are suggesting Michu would be better on the wing than our wingers? Or better up front than our striker?

Are you feeling ok Chris? Your arguments are getting ridiculous, you aren't doing yourself any favours

Lamah didnt play yesterday, he wasnt fit according to NJ. Pozuelo had to "fill the gap"

Im pretty sure Michu in AM, Shelvey just behind and then Leon as DM would have been a better fit and less of a "gap fill" than Amat at DM and Britton between Shelvey and Amat.

Well hes wrong isnt he. He did.

Pozuelo can play in all attacking midfield positions, including the wings.

If you were the manager Chrissy then maybe, however You dont have say in the team and i doubt very much Michu would be used for that purpose.

This isnt championship manager where we can use these players in their positions

So can michu play on the wing you said so yourself

So to summarise you would rather a midfield 3 of Shelvey / Britton / Amat then Michu / Shelvey / Britton ?