Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 2:02 pm

Magicalempire wrote:
Bluedodo wrote:
Magicalempire wrote:
Bluedodo wrote:
Magicalempire wrote:
tylorstown18891 wrote:I think we should all follow rv 's way of responding to roathie,if he replies to anyone just send him faces he'll like that :lol: :wave: :wave:


It won’t bother me either way, I’m not going to be responding to smileys and lowering myself to that level. I have spoken with mods and assured them I will continue to give my views regardless. If there is a group of people that are determined to troll their own forum because they don’t like someone’s views then that’s their choice. You will be ruining the forum, not me. :thumbright:


Hey roathie hows life?? F##kwit


Excellent. Cheers :laughing6:


Sad sad sad sad sad sad


Don’t be upset, it’s a football forum. That’s all.



:kermit: :kermit: :kermit: :kermit:

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 2:50 pm

dogfound wrote:
Magicalempire wrote:
Bluedodo wrote:
Magicalempire wrote:
Bluedodo wrote:
Magicalempire wrote:
tylorstown18891 wrote:I think we should all follow rv 's way of responding to roathie,if he replies to anyone just send him faces he'll like that :lol: :wave: :wave:


It won’t bother me either way, I’m not going to be responding to smileys and lowering myself to that level. I have spoken with mods and assured them I will continue to give my views regardless. If there is a group of people that are determined to troll their own forum because they don’t like someone’s views then that’s their choice. You will be ruining the forum, not me. :thumbright:


Hey roathie hows life?? F##kwit


Excellent. Cheers :laughing6:


Sad sad sad sad sad sad


Don’t be upset, it’s a football forum. That’s all.



:kermit: :kermit: :kermit: :kermit:



Hes so deluded he actually thinks people get upset by him... :laughing5:

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 2:52 pm

pembroke allan wrote:He's so deluded he thinks people get upset by his perfection on any subject discussed? he makes brain of britain winner look dumb.. :mrgreen:


I’m just going with the evidence. The latest trend in responses is doing nothing to persuade me otherwise.

(Nice edit, glad I quoted before you changed it. Maybe you thought you had revealed too much and was too complimentary to your true thoughts. Hmmm.)

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 2:56 pm

Magicalempire wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:He's so deluded he thinks people get upset by his perfection on any subject discussed? he makes brain of britain winner look dumb.. :mrgreen:


I’m just going with the evidence. The latest trend in responses is doing nothing to persuade me otherwise.




Nothing will change you mind even if it was put in front of you by the queen that your wrong ! as you are always right regardless of the evidence presented to you and if that evidence is overwhelming you just side step
it like bamby on ice. :thumbup:

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 2:58 pm

pembroke allan wrote:Nothing will change you mind even if it was put in front of you by the queen that your wrong ! as you are always right regardless of the evidence presented to you and if that evidence is overwhelming you just side step
it like bamby on ice. :thumbup:


And this is based on what exactly?

If you are able to show me I am wrong I will happily say so. The problem you have is that you are never able to, hence why you turn to abuse.

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 3:01 pm

:bluescarf: :bluescarf: :bluescarf: :bluescarf: :bluebird:

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 3:14 pm

Magicalempire wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:Nothing will change you mind even if it was put in front of you by the queen that your wrong ! as you are always right regardless of the evidence presented to you and if that evidence is overwhelming you just side step
it like bamby on ice. :thumbup:


And this is based on what exactly?

If you are able to show me I am wrong I will happily say so. The problem you have is that you are never able to, hence why you turn to abuse.

. .
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 3:22 pm

Canton104 wrote:
Magicalempire wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:Nothing will change you mind even if it was put in front of you by the queen that your wrong ! as you are always right regardless of the evidence presented to you and if that evidence is overwhelming you just side step
it like bamby on ice. :thumbup:


And this is based on what exactly?

If you are able to show me I am wrong I will happily say so. The problem you have is that you are never able to, hence why you turn to abuse.

. .



Like said you never your wrong even if anyone present facts to you and many have so wouldn't waste my time on you in that respect....And why am I upsetting you by giving example of how you sidestep questions ? If what I said was abuse I cannot help it if you are so sensitive ... :mrgreen:

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 3:24 pm

pembroke allan wrote:
Like said you never your wrong even if anyone present facts to you and many have so wouldn't waste my time on you in that respect....And why am I upsetting you by giving example of how you sidestep questions ? If what I said was abuse I cannot help it if you are so sensitive ... :mrgreen:


Eh? I asked you if you could provide examples, you were unable to.

Why is this supposed to be upsetting? You being unable to back your claims is something I’m used to, I wasn’t expecting you to provide the examples. I was proving a point with the question... :laughing6:

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 3:25 pm

Magicalempire wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Like said you never your wrong even if anyone present facts to you and many have so wouldn't waste my time on you in that respect....And why am I upsetting you by giving example of how you sidestep questions ? If what I said was abuse I cannot help it if you are so sensitive ... :mrgreen:


Eh? I asked you if you could provide examples, you were unable to.

Why is this supposed to be upsetting? You being unable to back your claims is something I’m used to, I wasn’t expecting you to provide the examples. I was proving a point with the question... :laughing6:


. .
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 3:28 pm

Magicalempire wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Like said you never your wrong even if anyone present facts to you and many have so wouldn't waste my time on you in that respect....And why am I upsetting you by giving example of how you sidestep questions ? If what I said was abuse I cannot help it if you are so sensitive ... :mrgreen:


Eh? I asked you if you could provide examples, you were unable to.

Why is this supposed to be upsetting? You being unable to back your claims is something I’m used to, I wasn’t expecting you to provide the examples. I was proving a point with the question... :laughing6:



I explained why wont bother to give you example as in 8yrs you've been on this forum you haven't had the dignity or humility to admit your wrong to anyone so why should I pander to your ego?
It obviously is upsetting you because this is 2nd time you accused me of abuse by giving bamby example like said if thats abuse cannot help it if you are do sensitive

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 3:30 pm

pembroke allan wrote:
Magicalempire wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Like said you never your wrong even if anyone present facts to you and many have so wouldn't waste my time on you in that respect....And why am I upsetting you by giving example of how you sidestep questions ? If what I said was abuse I cannot help it if you are so sensitive ... :mrgreen:


Eh? I asked you if you could provide examples, you were unable to.

Why is this supposed to be upsetting? You being unable to back your claims is something I’m used to, I wasn’t expecting you to provide the examples. I was proving a point with the question... :laughing6:



I explained why wont bother to give you example as in 8yrs you've been on this forum you haven't had the dignity or humility to admit your wrong to anyone so why should I pander to your ego?
It obviously is upsetting you because this is 2nd time you accused me of abuse by giving bamby example like said if thats abuse cannot help it if you are do sensitive


f**k sake, every thread you give this tool a reason to post. You’re as bad as he is.

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 3:32 pm

pembroke allan wrote:
Magicalempire wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Like said you never your wrong even if anyone present facts to you and many have so wouldn't waste my time on you in that respect....And why am I upsetting you by giving example of how you sidestep questions ? If what I said was abuse I cannot help it if you are so sensitive ... :mrgreen:


Eh? I asked you if you could provide examples, you were unable to.

Why is this supposed to be upsetting? You being unable to back your claims is something I’m used to, I wasn’t expecting you to provide the examples. I was proving a point with the question... :laughing6:



I explained why wont bother to give you example as in 8yrs you've been on this forum you haven't had the dignity or humility to admit your wrong to anyone so why should I pander to your ego?
It obviously is upsetting you because this is 2nd time you accused me of abuse by giving bamby example like said if thats abuse cannot help it if you are do sensitive


So you want me to say I’m wrong when I am not in order to make you feel better then?

As I said, if you wish to take a point of mine and show me why I am wrong (not something trivial or unimportant like a typo or a guesstimate number that wasn’t to the exact number.. but an ACTUAL point I have made) and I will happily admit I am wrong.

The fact is you can’t. :thumbright:

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 3:43 pm

Magicalempire wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Magicalempire wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Like said you never your wrong even if anyone present facts to you and many have so wouldn't waste my time on you in that respect....And why am I upsetting you by giving example of how you sidestep questions ? If what I said was abuse I cannot help it if you are so sensitive ... :mrgreen:


Eh? I asked you if you could provide examples, you were unable to.

Why is this supposed to be upsetting? You being unable to back your claims is something I’m used to, I wasn’t expecting you to provide the examples. I was proving a point with the question... :laughing6:



I explained why wont bother to give you example as in 8yrs you've been on this forum you haven't had the dignity or humility to admit your wrong to anyone so why should I pander to your ego?
It obviously is upsetting you because this is 2nd time you accused me of abuse by giving bamby example like said if thats abuse cannot help it if you are do sensitive


So you want me to say I’m wrong when I am not in order to make you feel better then?

As I said, if you wish to take a point of mine and show me why I am wrong (not something trivial or unimportant like a typo or a guesstimate number that wasn’t to the exact number.. but an ACTUAL point I have made) and I will happily admit I am wrong.

The fact is you can’t. :thumbright:




Ahhhhh bamby sidestep in action again... you have never in 8yrs admitted your wrong to anyone so why would you start now? Anyway I've had enough fun with another roathy ego so time to make you disappear ! as my mother once said pointless having debate with someone who is never wrong as will you'll never win Just about sums you up.. :wav: :occasion9: :hello2: :hello2: :hello2: :hello2: :hello2:

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 3:46 pm

Canton104 wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Magicalempire wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Like said you never your wrong even if anyone present facts to you and many have so wouldn't waste my time on you in that respect....And why am I upsetting you by giving example of how you sidestep questions ? If what I said was abuse I cannot help it if you are so sensitive ... :mrgreen:


Eh? I asked you if you could provide examples, you were unable to.

Why is this supposed to be upsetting? You being unable to back your claims is something I’m used to, I wasn’t expecting you to provide the examples. I was proving a point with the question... :laughing6:



I explained why wont bother to give you example as in 8yrs you've been on this forum you haven't had the dignity or humility to admit your wrong to anyone so why should I pander to your ego?
It obviously is upsetting you because this is 2nd time you accused me of abuse by giving bamby example like said if thats abuse cannot help it if you are do sensitive


f**k sake, every thread you give this tool a reason to post. You’re as bad as he is.



Dont sweat hes back on ignore need to have bit fun now again beats reading the anti NH posts. :thumbup:

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 3:48 pm

pembroke allan wrote:
Ahhhhh bamby sidestep in action again... you have never in 8yrs admitted your wrong to anyone so why would you start now? Anyway I've had enough fun with another roathy ego so time to make you disappear ! as my mother once said pointless having debate with someone who is never wrong as will you'll never win Just about sums you up.. :wav: :occasion9: :hello2: :hello2: :hello2: :hello2: :hello2:


If I am never wrong then that is a positive not a negative. I have said if you can show me where my fundamental point is wrong then I will say so - so far you have not been able to. That only shows the quality of the points I make and is in no way a negative. You seem annoyed by people who are correct and see accuracy as a dirty word - I can’t help you with that.

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 3:49 pm

pembroke allan wrote:

Dont sweat hes back on ignore need to have bit fun now again beats reading the anti NH posts. :thumbup:


Course I am.

Last time you pretended I was on ignore because you couldn’t get the better of me you forgot one day and replied :laughing6:

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 4:06 pm

:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 5:19 pm

Magicalempire wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:

Dont sweat hes back on ignore need to have bit fun now again beats reading the anti NH posts. :thumbup:


Course I am.

Last time you pretended I was on ignore because you couldn’t get the better of me you forgot one day and replied :laughing6:




Mmmmm just this once will humour you!
You are just an idiot to say I forgot you were on ignore? as once on ignore like you are now I have to physically and deliberately unblock you to reply same as others on my ignore list! so you are WRONG to say I forgot... is this explanation simple enough for you to admit you were wrong ? I seriously doubt it is as sure you'll either ignore this post or waffle
away and sidestep me response like bamby
on ice..... right that is my last direct response
to you seeing as I have proved you were wrong... thumbup:
Try putting people on ignore and see if you can see their posts to you ? garauntee you won't as that's point of ignore...:lol: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave:

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 7:56 pm

pembroke allan wrote:
Magicalempire wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:

Dont sweat hes back on ignore need to have bit fun now again beats reading the anti NH posts. :thumbup:


Course I am.

Last time you pretended I was on ignore because you couldn’t get the better of me you forgot one day and replied :laughing6:




Mmmmm just this once will humour you!
You are just an idiot to say I forgot you were on ignore? as once on ignore like you are now I have to physically and deliberately unblock you to reply same as others on my ignore list! so you are WRONG to say I forgot... is this explanation simple enough for you to admit you were wrong ? I seriously doubt it is as sure you'll either ignore this post or waffle
away and sidestep me response like bamby
on ice..... right that is my last direct response
to you seeing as I have proved you were wrong... thumbup:
Try putting people on ignore and see if you can see their posts to you ? garauntee you won't as that's point of ignore...:lol: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave:


And just like magic you can apparently see my post again. Funny that.

I have no idea what you are babbling on about however. My point is that you pretend to put me on ignore as a safety net because if you pretend you cannot see a post then it gives you an excuse not to reply when no doubt the reply would make you look silly :thumbup:

Re: Updated: ‘ Jacks quite a shock ‘

Sun Jan 26, 2020 7:58 pm

:bluescarf: :bluescarf: :bluescarf: :bluescarf: :bluebird: