Spurs all over jacks

Still standing by your wildly innacurate percentages Roathie?

Absolutely.

Still standing by your wild lies regarding bony, canas and malky's side?

Talk me through the logic of how 9 games out of 22 is 48% ?

It was just a guess. Not bad considering i didnt look it up.

However the point we were discussing was that most of our injuries have been to our defence was it not? Or does that admission make you look a bit silly?

Where was the logic behind your statement canas was 4th choice captain, bony was never injured and malkys team scored 0.7 goals?

Some poor percentage working out on here, it must be said.

3 from 22 is 14%. I guessed 16%... Whoop di doo

The point is the most of our injuries have been to our wingers and defenders which was the discussion and which is what has been proved correct.

If Polo wants to get aroused over 1 or 2% as a way to channel his anger then let him be... I just bet he wishes he never lied so much in the past as he looks a bit silly when trying to make out that im lying

its not just 1 or 2% though its 6/7% in Rangel and Vorms case and considering you are making a fuss over me not going to the 2nd decimal point on another thread then you are looking your usual hypocritical self.

The point wasnt most injuries throughout the season the point was you claiming thats where you were "bare at the moment" as Williams, Chico and Davies had been sidelined in recent weeks which were both lies.

Unless of course "recent weeks" and "at the moment" was months ago

If so a poor grasp on the english language as well as mathmatics.

Still standing by your wildly innacurate percentages Roathie?

Absolutely.

Still standing by your wild lies regarding bony, canas and malky's side?

Talk me through the logic of how 9 games out of 22 is 48% ?

It was just a guess. Not bad considering i didnt look it up.

However the point we were discussing was that most of our injuries have been to our defence was it not? Or does that admission make you look a bit silly?

Where was the logic behind your statement canas was 4th choice captain, bony was never injured and malkys team scored 0.7 goals?

It was a lie to try and back your point up that Michu wasnt required as your current injury problems were to your defence. A lie as I proved all of your first choice outfield defence has been fit and available for some time.

Funny how none of these "guesses" never work the other way and you under estimate eh.

Some poor percentage working out on here, it must be said.

3 from 22 is 14%. I guessed 16%... Whoop di doo

The point is the most of our injuries have been to our wingers and defenders which was the discussion and which is what has been proved correct.

If Polo wants to get aroused over 1 or 2% as a way to channel his anger then let him be... I just bet he wishes he never lied so much in the past as he looks a bit silly when trying to make out that im lying

its not just 1 or 2% though its 6/7% in Rangel and Vorms case and considering you are making a fuss over me not going to the 2nd decimal point on another thread then you are looking your usual hypocritical self.

It was a guess polo, what is so difficult to understand? Does it alter my point? No.

I, not making a fuss at all. I wouldnt have mentioned it however you have developed a penchant for pointing out irrelevant stats being slightly incorrect and thus claiming it renders the point useless... Im merely pointing out your hypocrisy

The point wasnt most injuries throughout the season the point was you claiming thats where you were "bare at the moment" as Williams, Chico and Davies had been sidelined in recent weeks which were both lies.

incorrect. You asked me am i still happy to have michu sidelined. I said yes because most of our injury problems have been in defence or on the wings which i proved to be overwhelmingly accurate. Your recent weeks, and my recent weeks differ, does that make you a liar as a result?

Or does making up the stuff about canas, bony and malky make you one?



Unless of course "recent weeks" and "at the moment" was months ago

if i got marries 8 weeks ago i would say i got married in recent weeks.

If so a poor grasp on the english language as well as mathmatics.

which is better than being a liar with a poor grasp of mathematics like you then

Still waiting for your lie explanations

I can't get my hard around a Swansea fan moaning about injuries, but then saying they are happy to have Michu out.

Total contradiction.

It was a lie to try and back your point up that Michu wasnt required as your current injury problems were to your defence. A lie as I proved all of your first choice outfield defence has been fit and available for some time.

makes no difference, why would that be a lie? The only way in which that could possibly be a lie is if i was covering injuries to our attackers or attacking midfielders... To which of course we dont have any.

So either way it renders your michu point as pathetic as your other ones.

Funny how none of these "guesses" never work the other way and you under estimate eh.

like your malky one you mean?

As long as it backs up my point i couldnt give a damn. And it certainly did, it showed 7 defensive players have missed games through injury

I can't get my hard around a Swansea fan moaning about injuries, but then saying they are happy to have Michu out.

Total contradiction.

Where have I moaned?

Saying im happy that hes out is a bit over an over exaggeration. I see it as a chance for Bony to shine - which he has.

Put it this way, if he was available, i wouldnt want him in the starting 11.

It was a lie to try and back your point up that Michu wasnt required as your current injury problems were to your defence. A lie as I proved all of your first choice outfield defence has been fit and available for some time.

makes no difference, why would that be a lie? The only way in which that could possibly be a lie is if i was covering injuries to our attackers or attacking midfielders... To which of course we dont have any.

So either way it renders your michu point as pathetic as your other ones.

Funny how none of these "guesses" never work the other way and you under estimate eh.

like your malky one you mean?

As long as it backs up my point i couldnt give a damn. And it certainly did, it showed 7 defensive players have missed games through injury

So you dont have injuries to De Guzman and now Shelvey then

Saying im happy that hes out is a bit over an over exaggeration.

No it isn't.. You said it yourself.

You asked me am i still happy to have michu sidelined. I said yes because most of our injury problems have been in defence

It was a lie to try and back your point up that Michu wasnt required as your current injury problems were to your defence. A lie as I proved all of your first choice outfield defence has been fit and available for some time.

makes no difference, why would that be a lie? The only way in which that could possibly be a lie is if i was covering injuries to our attackers or attacking midfielders... To which of course we dont have any.

So either way it renders your michu point as pathetic as your other ones.

Funny how none of these "guesses" never work the other way and you under estimate eh.

like your malky one you mean?

As long as it backs up my point i couldnt give a damn. And it certainly did, it showed 7 defensive players have missed games through injury

So you dont have injuries to De Guzman and now Shelvey then

Hilarious

De Guzman is a holding midfield player and I have no idea regarding Shelvey, he limped off but could be fine.

So again you are talking rubbish.

No you didnt. You never said that.

You dont have problems in defence at the moment your first choice back 4 played yesterday and you also had Amat in midfield so its midfield you currently have problems.

Where does Michu play? Midfield. but hey, you would prefer Britton in there than Michu eh?

Saying im happy that hes out is a bit over an over exaggeration.

No it isn't.. You said it yourself.

You asked me am i still happy to have michu sidelined. I said yes because most of our injury problems have been in defence

Nope, it most certainly is. Let me take it away from Swansea.

Ole drops Theophile and puts Joe Lewis in as right back. Joe Lewis gets injured so you think the fact Ole has to choose Theophile as a result will lrobably work out better.

Then you get striker injury crisis and someone saying "bet you wish you had Lewis back"

No you didnt. You never said that.

You dont have problems in defence at the moment your first choice back 4 played yesterday and you also had Amat in midfield so its midfield you currently have problems.

Where does Michu play? Midfield. but hey, you would prefer Britton in there than Michu eh?

Vorm didnt play Christopher, neother did our defensive midfielder Canas. 2 of our defensive 6 unit were out, thats (33.3% of course)

Michu is an attacking midfielder that plays just behind the striker... Or up front if you are Laudrup... We are fine in that department assuming Voldemort is fine

Easy eh?

You've been quoted as saying you were happy he was out, so therefore me saying that is not an exaggeration, as you actually said it.

I've not exaggerated anything.

No you didnt. You never said that.

You dont have problems in defence at the moment your first choice back 4 played yesterday and you also had Amat in midfield so its midfield you currently have problems.

Where does Michu play? Midfield. but hey, you would prefer Britton in there than Michu eh?

Vorm didnt play Christopher, neother did our defensive midfielder Canas. 2 of our defensive 6 unit were out, thats (33.3% of course)

Michu is an attacking midfielder that plays just behind the striker... Or up front if you are Laudrup... We are fine in that department assuming Voldemort is fine

Easy eh?

De Guzman / Michu, Dyer and Harnandez out thats 60% of the front 5. So I would say your attacking options are down to the bare bones not your defence

So much so you had to use Britton in a role further forward

Still glad Michu is out?

You've been quoted as saying you were happy he was out, so therefore me saying that is not an exaggeration, as you actually said it.

I've not exaggerated anything.

Can you show me the thread to have a read? If you have taken it out of context then indeed you have exagerated.

Last edited by Castro on Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

What's your first name Roath, seeing as you like to use other people's.

De Guzman is a holding midfield player and I have no idea regarding Shelvey, he limped off but could be fine.

So again you are talking rubbish.

So JDG is a holding midfielder? Really.

Then why claim this a couple of pages back

In attacking midfield we have had 2 injuries

Michu
De Guzman
Shelvey if you want to count today?

Looks like its you talking the rubbish and lying / contradicting yourself. AGAIN!!!

No you didnt. You never said that.

You dont have problems in defence at the moment your first choice back 4 played yesterday and you also had Amat in midfield so its midfield you currently have problems.

Where does Michu play? Midfield. but hey, you would prefer Britton in there than Michu eh?

Vorm didnt play Christopher, neother did our defensive midfielder Canas. 2 of our defensive 6 unit were out, thats (33.3% of course)

Michu is an attacking midfielder that plays just behind the striker... Or up front if you are Laudrup... We are fine in that department assuming Voldemort is fine

Easy eh?

De Guzman / Michu, Dyer and Harnandez out thats 60% of the front 5. So I would say your attacking opt
ions are down to the bare bones not your defence

So much so you had to use Britton in a role further forward

Still glad Michu is out?

Then you would be incorrect. Pozuelo isnt even called upon to start yet and hes excellent.

If you are asking me would I like Michu on the wing instead of Routledge or Lamah then the answer is no. If you are asking me if id want him instead of Bony then the answer is no. If you are askin if i want him instead of shelvey the answer is no. If you are asking would i want him instead of britton the answer is no.

If I got guarantees than Laudrup wouldnt shove him up front instead of Bony then yes ill have him back. Hiwever i dont have thise guarantees so while we still have Pozuelo, Bony and Shelvey then its not the end of the world hes not abailable and probably to the teams advantage as we are still scoring

I've already quoted it Roathie.

You said it in this very thread.

incorrect. You asked me am i still happy to have michu sidelined. I said yes because most of our injury problems have been in defence or on the wings which i proved to be overwhelmingly accurate.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=133430&p=1381774&hilit=+Glad+to+have+Michu+out#p1381774

You also alluded to it here:

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=133430&hilit=Glad+to+have+Michu+out&start=300#p1381869

Yes he is a holding midfield player. He can play behind the striker but we dont play him there.

It was easier than creating a holding midfielder role for solely him and the on loan Ki

Seems you have made a pointless point AGAIN!!!!

Now then are we going to get to the bottom of your Bony, Canas and Malky lies or is your guilt compelling you to continue to ignore them?

probably to the teams advantage as we are still scoring

And still losing.

Looks like Trigger has been caught out again.

I've already quoted it Roathie.

You said it in this very thread.

incorrect. You asked me am i still happy to have michu sidelined. I said yes because most of our injury problems have been in defence or on the wings which i proved to be overwhelmingly accurate.

http://cardiffcityforum.co.uk/viewtopic ... t#p1381774

You also alluded to it here:

http://cardiffcityforum.co.uk/viewtopic ... 0#p1381869

I like Michu. However if given the choice of him or Bony up front then its Bony.

When he is available Laudrup sometimes plays him there which is annoying to everyone as the team is crap as a result. I also think Shelvey offers more to the team.

So do I want him back? Yes. Do I want him back if Laudrup plays him where he shouldnt? No.

However to say you think its contradictory to moan our wingers are injured and not want Michu back is incorrect, its nothing of the sort.

Looks like Trigger has been caught out again.

Really Martyn? Where?

Still on 100% Roathie posts I see

probably to the teams advantage as we are still scoring

And still losing.

But not enough to put us where we dont want to be

I like Michu. However if given the choice of him or Bony up front then its Bony.

When he is available Laudrup sometimes plays him there which is annoying to everyone as the team is crap as a result. I also think Shelvey offers more to the team.

So do I want him back? Yes. Do I want him back if Laudrup plays him where he shouldnt? No.

However to say you think its contradictory to moan our wingers are injured and not want Michu back is incorrect, its nothing of the sort.

So you admit that you were wrong? I wasn't exaggerating by saying you were happy about it, seeing as you posted it yourself twice in this thread?

Yes he is a holding midfield player. He can play behind the striker but we dont play him there.

It was easier than creating a holding midfielder role for solely him and the on loan Ki

Seems you have made a pointless point AGAIN!!!!

Now then are we going to get to the bottom of your Bony, Canas and Malky lies or is your guilt compelling you to continue to ignore them?

Holding midfielder is just the same as a defensive midfielder, certainly more defensive than attacking yet you choose to describe him as attacking rather than defensive

Seems like youve been caught out lying again

Besides, on the Bony thread you were claiming Michu was a central midfielder poured scourn on
all these different variances of a central midfielder.

Now you are trying to worm your way out you want to break it down into several different positions

There's a good few pages of you being caught out in this thread Trig. You've been tied up in knots by Mario Polotelli.

Yes he is a holding midfield player. He can play behind the striker but we dont play him there.

It was easier than creating a holding midfielder role for solely him and the on loan Ki

Seems you have made a pointless point AGAIN!!!!

Now then are we going to get to the bottom of your Bony, Canas and Malky lies or is your guilt compelling you to continue to ignore them?

Holding midfielder is just the same as a defensive midfielder, certainly more defensive than attacking yet you choose to describe him as attacking rather than defensive

no its not. We have 3 midfield players. A defensive one, a holding one and an attacking one. De Guzman plays the holding role. De Guzman cant defend for toffee to say hes more defensive is ridiculous

Seems like youve been caught out lying again

really? Where? The only person who has been caught out lying is you but continue to ignore it

Besides, on the Bony thread you were claiming Michu was a central midfielder poured scourn on
all these different variances of a central midfielder.

he is an attacking midfielder, i have no idea what you are talking about. The only bony thread you ahve ever shown me is one in which you claim he has never been injured for us... Which was a lie wasnt it

Now you are trying to worm your way out you want to break it down into several different positions

worm my way out of it?

Yeah good point i must made up these positions in my head. Roathie, the inventor of the defensive, holding and attacking midfielder

You are entering the realms of the ridiculous now