Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: " Society of Black Lawyers at it again " ' RACISM '

Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:39 pm

Wow. No response to that.

Re: " Society of Black Lawyers at it again " ' RACISM '

Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:55 pm

DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
in setting up a white society purely because im proud to be white.

Also. white people who have been overlooked for promotion
or jobs because of "ethnic quotas" can come to me


Right. There are already groups like that though. They burn crosses and wear pillow cases on their heads. You must have heard of them.

Don't let me stop you though.


What an absolutely ridiculous response.

Why can Black people be proud of their colour yet White people are automatically
racist for being proud of their colour



THE SOCIETY OF BLACK LAWYERS ISN'T A GROUP BASED JUST ON THEM BEING PROUD OF BEING BLACK.
Christ.

Also, black history is a story of fighting back over centuries to rise up and achieve equality despite always being oppressed at every turn.
White history is a story of slave drivers and imperialism.


Your argument is PATHETIC.

And based on some need to 'feel the pain' of Black people the World over, because your a liberal
and are brainwashed by Big Brother.

White history is a story of slave drivers and imperialism

Long long before the White slave traders hit Africa, 1500 years before in fact, there were a
race of nasty warmongering slave trading predominantly BLACK buggers called The Moors.

Am I wrong to say "Whoopeeee to the White man" for driving the Moors back!!!!

There's a point to my historical lesson to you.

History proves only one thing. Everything always turns full circle. Eventually.

So do you want Black people in Britain to be treated better than whites, or equal?

Because if its equality you 'crave' for Black people in Britain, they have it. And a good
thing too.

But basing ANY groups/associations/clubs on COLOUR flies in the face of EVERY argument the
black/asian have ever had. And is technically illegal. And if it is legal.

Why not White Clubs?

Re: " Society of Black Lawyers at it again " ' RACISM '

Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:00 pm

Its not illegal to have this society as long as they dont refuse entry to others based on their race. You could also form a Society of White people if you wanted the difference is theres no need. The reason this society exists is because they feel they have to form this society to help fight against racism as they dont feel correctly represented.

I dont agree with it as its counter productive but they have their reasons

Re: " Society of Black Lawyers at it again " ' RACISM '

Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:10 pm

taffyapple wrote:
DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
in setting up a white society purely because im proud to be white.

Also. white people who have been overlooked for promotion
or jobs because of "ethnic quotas" can come to me


Right. There are already groups like that though. They burn crosses and wear pillow cases on their heads. You must have heard of them.

Don't let me stop you though.


What an absolutely ridiculous response.

Why can Black people be proud of their colour yet White people are automatically
racist for being proud of their colour



THE SOCIETY OF BLACK LAWYERS ISN'T A GROUP BASED JUST ON THEM BEING PROUD OF BEING BLACK.
Christ.

Also, black history is a story of fighting back over centuries to rise up and achieve equality despite always being oppressed at every turn.
White history is a story of slave drivers and imperialism.


Your argument is PATHETIC.

And based on some need to 'feel the pain' of Black people the World over, because your a liberal
and are brainwashed by Big Brother.

White history is a story of slave drivers and imperialism

Long long before the White slave traders hit Africa, 1500 years before in fact, there were a
race of nasty warmongering slave trading predominantly BLACK buggers called The Moors.

Am I wrong to say "Whoopeeee to the White man" for driving the Moors back!!!!

There's a point to my historical lesson to you.

History proves only one thing. Everything always turns full circle. Eventually.

So do you want Black people in Britain to be treated better than whites, or equal?

Because if its equality you 'crave' for Black people in Britain, they have it. And a good
thing too.

But basing ANY groups/associations/clubs on COLOUR flies in the face of EVERY argument the
black/asian have ever had. And is technically illegal. And if it is legal.

Why not White Clubs?


This has nothing to do with the SBL any more.
The point was you wanted to set up a whites only club because you are proud to be white (or to celebrate some white guys driving back some black guys over 1500 years ago), which as far as I'm aware, you still haven't done. Why not?

I know black people have official equality, but its obviously not working out in real life like on paper. We all like football, right? So, John Terry says some racist things, he gets banned for 4 games and fined somewhere between 1 and 2 weeks wages. Now, I'm sure even the most racist among us can't deny that that case wasn't dealt with very well. So some black players feel that racism isn't being taken very seriously in the game, so they talk about setting up a union, or getting help off the SBL to help them achieve what they, and most of us, fell they deserve.

THIS DOES NOT MAKE THEM RACIST.

THIS IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TO SETTING UP A WHITES ONLY GROUP BECAUSE YOU ARE PROUD OF BEING WHITE.

Re: " Society of Black Lawyers at it again " ' RACISM '

Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:49 pm

DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
in setting up a white society purely because im proud to be white.

Also. white people who have been overlooked for promotion
or jobs because of "ethnic quotas" can come to me


Right. There are already groups like that though. They burn crosses and wear pillow cases on their heads. You must have heard of them.

Don't let me stop you though.


What an absolutely ridiculous response.

Why can Black people be proud of their colour yet White people are automatically
racist for being proud of their colour



THE SOCIETY OF BLACK LAWYERS ISN'T A GROUP BASED JUST ON THEM BEING PROUD OF BEING BLACK.
Christ.

Also, black history is a story of fighting back over centuries to rise up and achieve equality despite always being oppressed at every turn.
White history is a story of slave drivers and imperialism.


Your argument is PATHETIC.

And based on some need to 'feel the pain' of Black people the World over, because your a liberal
and are brainwashed by Big Brother.

White history is a story of slave drivers and imperialism

Long long before the White slave traders hit Africa, 1500 years before in fact, there were a
race of nasty warmongering slave trading predominantly BLACK buggers called The Moors.

Am I wrong to say "Whoopeeee to the White man" for driving the Moors back!!!!

There's a point to my historical lesson to you.

History proves only one thing. Everything always turns full circle. Eventually.

So do you want Black people in Britain to be treated better than whites, or equal?

Because if its equality you 'crave' for Black people in Britain, they have it. And a good
thing too.

But basing ANY groups/associations/clubs on COLOUR flies in the face of EVERY argument the
black/asian have ever had. And is technically illegal. And if it is legal.

Why not White Clubs?


This has nothing to do with the SBL any more.
The point was you wanted to set up a whites only club because you are proud to be white (or to celebrate some white guys driving back some black guys over 1500 years ago), which as far as I'm aware, you still haven't done. Why not?

I know black people have official equality, but its obviously not working out in real life like on paper. We all like football, right? So, John Terry says some racist things, he gets banned for 4 games and fined somewhere between 1 and 2 weeks wages. Now, I'm sure even the most racist among us can't deny that that case wasn't dealt with very well. So some black players feel that racism isn't being taken very seriously in the game, so they talk about setting up a union, or getting help off the SBL to help them achieve what they, and most of us, fell they deserve.

THIS DOES NOT MAKE THEM RACIST.

THIS IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TO SETTING UP A WHITES ONLY GROUP BECAUSE YOU ARE PROUD OF BEING WHITE.


f**k me. So your saying calling themselves the Black Lawyers Association has nothing to
do with "yeh right, this is us... fighting the fight and proud" Do behave. Why use the
word black? Why? Whats wrong with 'Afro-Lawyers are us' or 'Caribbean Law Society'???

John Terry says some racist things (not proven in court) and is banned for four games and
fined thousands of pounds. That sounds fair enough to me. The prick was in a football match,
banter, words were exchanged and he 'allegedly' resorted to racist comments. its DONE WITH

What do you think should have happened? Ban him from Football, execution???

Re: " Society of Black Lawyers at it again " ' RACISM '

Tue Nov 20, 2012 9:33 am

taffyapple wrote:f**k me. So your saying calling themselves the Black Lawyers Association has nothing to
do with "yeh right, this is us... fighting the fight and proud" Do behave. Why use the
word black? Why? Whats wrong with 'Afro-Lawyers are us' or 'Caribbean Law Society'???

John Terry says some racist things (not proven in court) and is banned for four games and
fined thousands of pounds. That sounds fair enough to me. The prick was in a football match,
banter, words were exchanged and he 'allegedly' resorted to racist comments. its DONE WITH

What do you think should have happened? Ban him from Football, execution???


Jesus wept.

a) They might not be Carribean
2) Why can't they use the word black? What's wrong with the word black?
c) It was proven that there was no criminal intent in court, he clearly said racist things, there's video evidence
4) Racism isn't banter
e) I think what would have happened to anyone else in the world should have happened to him. One or two weeks wages, seriously?

Re: " Society of Black Lawyers at it again " ' RACISM '

Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:21 am

DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
taffyapple wrote:f**k me. So your saying calling themselves the Black Lawyers Association has nothing to
do with "yeh right, this is us... fighting the fight and proud" Do behave. Why use the
word black? Why? Whats wrong with 'Afro-Lawyers are us' or 'Caribbean Law Society'???

John Terry says some racist things (not proven in court) and is banned for four games and
fined thousands of pounds. That sounds fair enough to me. The prick was in a football match,
banter, words were exchanged and he 'allegedly' resorted to racist comments. its DONE WITH

What do you think should have happened? Ban him from Football, execution???


Jesus wept.

a) They might not be Carribean
2) Why can't they use the word black? What's wrong with the word black?
c) It was proven that there was no criminal intent in court, he clearly said racist things, there's video evidence
4) Racism isn't banter
e) I think what would have happened to anyone else in the world should have happened to him. One or two weeks wages, seriously?

Left wing bull shit sheriff. Your boring this racism shit is boring. You lot are looking for it at every quarter. Leeds Diof or however you spell it had to publicly state there was no racist abuse because some got on there high horse as having a black player and Millwall fans , there must of been racist abuse. It's boring and raising racial tension just so you can can shout all whites are racist except yourself. :roll:
I will reply for you now " Jesus wept" You are Fooking boring fella

Re: " Society of Black Lawyers at it again " ' RACISM '

Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:49 am

Nuclearblue wrote:
DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
taffyapple wrote:f**k me. So your saying calling themselves the Black Lawyers Association has nothing to
do with "yeh right, this is us... fighting the fight and proud" Do behave. Why use the
word black? Why? Whats wrong with 'Afro-Lawyers are us' or 'Caribbean Law Society'???

John Terry says some racist things (not proven in court) and is banned for four games and
fined thousands of pounds. That sounds fair enough to me. The prick was in a football match,
banter, words were exchanged and he 'allegedly' resorted to racist comments. its DONE WITH

What do you think should have happened? Ban him from Football, execution???


Jesus wept.

a) They might not be Carribean
2) Why can't they use the word black? What's wrong with the word black?
c) It was proven that there was no criminal intent in court, he clearly said racist things, there's video evidence
4) Racism isn't banter
e) I think what would have happened to anyone else in the world should have happened to him. One or two weeks wages, seriously?

Left wing bull shit sheriff. Your boring this racism shit is boring. You lot are looking for it at every quarter. Leeds Diof or however you spell it had to publicly state there was no racist abuse because some got on there high horse as having a black player and Millwall fans , there must of been racist abuse. It's boring and raising racial tension just so you can can shout all whites are racist except yourself. :roll:
I will reply for you now " Jesus wept" You are Fooking boring fella

nukes ,i,m loosing the will to live reading this fellows stuff.if all the residents of canton lined up ,held hands and sang i want to teach the world the sing followed by a john lennon medlay blokes like the poster would still moan at some of the white fellows for singing it in the wrong key and therefore upsetting the somalians hearing.

Re: " Society of Black Lawyers at it again " ' RACISM '

Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:50 am

Nuclearblue wrote:Left wing bull shit sheriff. Your boring this racism shit is boring. You lot are looking for it at every quarter. Leeds Diof or however you spell it had to publicly state there was no racist abuse because some got on there high horse as having a black player and Millwall fans , there must of been racist abuse. It's boring and raising racial tension just so you can can shout all whites are racist except yourself. :roll:
I will reply for you now " Jesus wept" You are Fooking boring fella


All I was saying is that the SBL are not racist, which I stand by. That John Terry used racist language, which I stand by.
I never, ever, ever said all white people except for me are racist, thats ridiculous. I just said that if you wanted to set up a whites only society based purely on the fact of all its members being proud to be white then that could be seen as racist.

My politics are not far left, there is a gulf in difference between far left ideology and realising when something is racist.

Also I never mentioned anything about Leeds v Milwall.

Re: " Society of Black Lawyers at it again " ' RACISM '

Tue Nov 20, 2012 12:23 pm

DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
Nuclearblue wrote:Left wing bull shit sheriff. Your boring this racism shit is boring. You lot are looking for it at every quarter. Leeds Diof or however you spell it had to publicly state there was no racist abuse because some got on there high horse as having a black player and Millwall fans , there must of been racist abuse. It's boring and raising racial tension just so you can can shout all whites are racist except yourself. :roll:
I will reply for you now " Jesus wept" You are Fooking boring fella


All I was saying is that the SBL are not racist, which I stand by. That John Terry used racist language, which I stand by.
I never, ever, ever said all white people except for me are racist, thats ridiculous. I just said that if you wanted to set up a whites only society based purely on the fact of all its members being proud to be white then that could be seen as racist.

My politics are not far left, there is a gulf in difference between far left ideology and realising when something is racist.

Also I never mentioned anything about Leeds v Milwall.

if all you are saying is a white society based purely on race would been seen as racist then you,ll understand that a black society based purely on race will be seen as racist

Re: " Society of Black Lawyers at it again " ' RACISM '

Tue Nov 20, 2012 12:30 pm

jtc wrote:
DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
Nuclearblue wrote:Left wing bull shit sheriff. Your boring this racism shit is boring. You lot are looking for it at every quarter. Leeds Diof or however you spell it had to publicly state there was no racist abuse because some got on there high horse as having a black player and Millwall fans , there must of been racist abuse. It's boring and raising racial tension just so you can can shout all whites are racist except yourself. :roll:
I will reply for you now " Jesus wept" You are Fooking boring fella


All I was saying is that the SBL are not racist, which I stand by. That John Terry used racist language, which I stand by.
I never, ever, ever said all white people except for me are racist, thats ridiculous. I just said that if you wanted to set up a whites only society based purely on the fact of all its members being proud to be white then that could be seen as racist.

My politics are not far left, there is a gulf in difference between far left ideology and realising when something is racist.

Also I never mentioned anything about Leeds v Milwall.

if all you are saying is a white society based purely on race would been seen as racist then you,ll understand that a black society based purely on race will be seen as racist


I'll accept that you see it as racist.

Re: " Society of Black Lawyers at it again " ' RACISM '

Tue Nov 20, 2012 12:46 pm

DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
jtc wrote:
DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
Nuclearblue wrote:Left wing bull shit sheriff. Your boring this racism shit is boring. You lot are looking for it at every quarter. Leeds Diof or however you spell it had to publicly state there was no racist abuse because some got on there high horse as having a black player and Millwall fans , there must of been racist abuse. It's boring and raising racial tension just so you can can shout all whites are racist except yourself. :roll:
I will reply for you now " Jesus wept" You are Fooking boring fella


All I was saying is that the SBL are not racist, which I stand by. That John Terry used racist language, which I stand by.
I never, ever, ever said all white people except for me are racist, thats ridiculous. I just said that if you wanted to set up a whites only society based purely on the fact of all its members being proud to be white then that could be seen as racist.

My politics are not far left, there is a gulf in difference between far left ideology and realising when something is racist.

Also I never mentioned anything about Leeds v Milwall.

if all you are saying is a white society based purely on race would been seen as racist then you,ll understand that a black society based purely on race will be seen as racist


I'll accept that you see it as racist.

so this sbl is a society for black lawyers which doesn,t even have the majority of black lawyers as members..........mmmmmmmmmmm.wonder why?nothing to do with the fact if they studied law they may well know it,s either racist or could be viewed as racist and would /could alienate them from their white contempries who have fought hard and long alongside them for equality?

Re: " Society of Black Lawyers at it again " ' RACISM '

Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:24 pm

This has gone from a debate about racism to an exercise in stubbornness.
If you want to know my thoughts, read my previous posts.
I'm not going to post in this thread any more.

Re: " Society of Black Lawyers at it again " ' RACISM '

Tue Nov 20, 2012 3:17 pm

DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
taffyapple wrote:f**k me. So your saying calling themselves the Black Lawyers Association has nothing to
do with "yeh right, this is us... fighting the fight and proud" Do behave. Why use the
word black? Why? Whats wrong with 'Afro-Lawyers are us' or 'Caribbean Law Society'???

John Terry says some racist things (not proven in court) and is banned for four games and
fined thousands of pounds. That sounds fair enough to me. The prick was in a football match,
banter, words were exchanged and he 'allegedly' resorted to racist comments. its DONE WITH

What do you think should have happened? Ban him from Football, execution???


Jesus wept.

a) They might not be Carribean
2) Why can't they use the word black? What's wrong with the word black?
c) It was proven that there was no criminal intent in court, he clearly said racist things, there's video evidence
4) Racism isn't banter
e) I think what would have happened to anyone else in the world should have happened to him. One or two weeks wages, seriously?


God help us all.

Just answer one question:

If Black people are allowed to mention their colour in the name of an Association or Club.

Why aren't white people?

Remember, we've already ascertained that one of History's most violent, racist, slave trading
murderous fuckers were the Moors, who tried to take over the whole world. So drop the victim
bollocks

Re: " Society of Black Lawyers at it again " ' RACISM '

Tue Nov 20, 2012 4:03 pm

taffyapple wrote:
DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
taffyapple wrote:f**k me. So your saying calling themselves the Black Lawyers Association has nothing to
do with "yeh right, this is us... fighting the fight and proud" Do behave. Why use the
word black? Why? Whats wrong with 'Afro-Lawyers are us' or 'Caribbean Law Society'???

John Terry says some racist things (not proven in court) and is banned for four games and
fined thousands of pounds. That sounds fair enough to me. The prick was in a football match,
banter, words were exchanged and he 'allegedly' resorted to racist comments. its DONE WITH

What do you think should have happened? Ban him from Football, execution???


Jesus wept.

a) They might not be Carribean
2) Why can't they use the word black? What's wrong with the word black?
c) It was proven that there was no criminal intent in court, he clearly said racist things, there's video evidence
4) Racism isn't banter
e) I think what would have happened to anyone else in the world should have happened to him. One or two weeks wages, seriously?


God help us all.

Just answer one question:

If Black people are allowed to mention their colour in the name of an Association or Club.

Why aren't white people?

Remember, we've already ascertained that one of History's most violent, racist, slave trading
murderous fuckers were the Moors, who tried to take over the whole world. So drop the victim
bollocks


Okay, I'll post ONCE more, just for you, and thats it.

The SBL (or the MOBOs or Black Panthers) have NOTHING to do with the "Moors", that couldn't be more irrelevant. What are you even on about that for?

Right now in the world right now at this point in time right now 2012 (thats now), there is a group of people that feel the need to address a situation in which black individuals are not getting the support that they deserve. They have created this group and named it the Society of Black Lawyers.

White people are more than welcome to set up any society they choose, however, if the sole purpose of this group is because they are proud of being white, then they run the risk of people assuming they are racist (remember, this club isn't fighting for anything or bringing people together for any moral cause of justice like others, rather just because they like being caucasian.)
The second reason you could choose to set up this club could be for equality and justice as mentioned above. The only problem there is that this clearly isn't a major problem facing the white majority of this white-run country, so there is nothing to fight against. Setting up this club would be seen as pedantic.

No need to hold hands in the Canton (although singing is encouraged) or call me a lefty hippy, the above points are all I was trying to get across.

Re: " Society of Black Lawyers at it again " ' RACISM '

Tue Nov 20, 2012 4:32 pm

DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
taffyapple wrote:
DamnRightIveGotTheBlues wrote:
taffyapple wrote:f**k me. So your saying calling themselves the Black Lawyers Association has nothing to
do with "yeh right, this is us... fighting the fight and proud" Do behave. Why use the
word black? Why? Whats wrong with 'Afro-Lawyers are us' or 'Caribbean Law Society'???

John Terry says some racist things (not proven in court) and is banned for four games and
fined thousands of pounds. That sounds fair enough to me. The prick was in a football match,
banter, words were exchanged and he 'allegedly' resorted to racist comments. its DONE WITH

What do you think should have happened? Ban him from Football, execution???


Jesus wept.

a) They might not be Carribean
2) Why can't they use the word black? What's wrong with the word black?
c) It was proven that there was no criminal intent in court, he clearly said racist things, there's video evidence
4) Racism isn't banter
e) I think what would have happened to anyone else in the world should have happened to him. One or two weeks wages, seriously?


God help us all.

Just answer one question:

If Black people are allowed to mention their colour in the name of an Association or Club.

Why aren't white people?

Remember, we've already ascertained that one of History's most violent, racist, slave trading
murderous fuckers were the Moors, who tried to take over the whole world. So drop the victim
bollocks


Okay, I'll post ONCE more, just for you, and thats it.

The SBL (or the MOBOs or Black Panthers) have NOTHING to do with the "Moors", that couldn't be more irrelevant. What are you even on about that for?

Right now in the world right now at this point in time right now 2012 (thats now), there is a group of people that feel the need to address a situation in which black individuals are not getting the support that they deserve. They have created this group and named it the Society of Black Lawyers.

White people are more than welcome to set up any society they choose, however, if the sole purpose of this group is because they are proud of being white, then they run the risk of people assuming they are racist (remember, this club isn't fighting for anything or bringing people together for any moral cause of justice like others, rather just because they like being caucasian.)
The second reason you could choose to set up this club could be for equality and justice as mentioned above. The only problem there is that this clearly isn't a major problem facing the white majority of this white-run country, so there is nothing to fight against. Setting up this club would be seen as pedantic.

No need to hold hands in the Canton (although singing is encouraged) or call me a lefty hippy, the above points are all I was trying to get across.


Pedantic?

There are very real grievances in Britain today that the white indigenous population
are being overlooked for jobs/homes/advancement because of a barely hidden agenda
on being seen to be being fair to the ethnic population. Its called 'quota filling'

So My "Society of White Lawyers" would be fighting any such injustice as and when called
upon to do so

ok?

Or Racist?